Skip to content

A Study to Assess the Safety and Efficacy Of Tafamidis In Chinese Participants With Transthyretin Amyloid Cardiomyopathy (ATTR-CM)

A Study to Characterize the Safety and Efficacy of Tafamidis Once Daily in the Treatment of Transthyretin Amyloid Cardiomyopathy in Chinese Participants

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 4
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT04814186
Enrollment
53
Registered
2021-03-24
Start date
2021-07-22
Completion date
2023-10-16
Last updated
2024-12-18

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Transthyretin Amyloid Cardiomyopathy

Keywords

Tafamidis

Brief summary

This is a national, multi-center, single-arm study, open-label to patients with symptomatic Transthyretin amyloid cardiomyopathy (ATTR-CM) who are tafamidis naïve. This study is to obtain safety, descriptive efficacy, Pharmacokinetics (PK) and Pharmacodynamics (PD) data for tafamidis orally once daily. Subject eligibility for participation in the study will receive tafamidis once daily or 12 months following the assessment as the screening and baseline, month 1, 3, 6, 9 and 12 visits (or Early Study Discontinuation).

Interventions

DRUGTafamidis

61 mg, once daily, oral administration, for 12 months.

Sponsors

Pfizer
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Allocation
NA
Intervention model
SINGLE_GROUP
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

1. Subject has documented ATTR-CM. 2. For the reproductive criteria for male and female participants, please refer to relevant protocol sections.

Exclusion criteria

1. Other acute or chronic medical or psychiatric condition including recent or active suicidal ideation or behavior or laboratory abnormality, in the judgment of the investigator, would make the participant inappropriate for entry into this study. 2. Participants who have prior liver and/or heart transplant. 3. Participants with primary (light chain) or secondary amyloidosis. 4. Previous administration with an investigational drug within 30 days or 5 half lives preceding the first dose of study intervention used in this study (whichever is longer).

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Number of Participants With All-Causality Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs)From first dose of study intervention on Day 1 (baseline) up to 28 days post the last dose of study intervention (up to a maximum of 393 days)An adverse event (AE) was any untoward medical occurrence in a patient or clinical study participant, temporally associated with the use of study intervention, whether or not considered related to the study intervention. All AEs that started after the first dosing but before the last dose plus the lag time (28 days) were TEAEs. A serious adverse event (SAE) was an AE resulting in any of the following outcomes or deemed significant for any other reason: death; initial or prolonged inpatient hospitalization; life-threatening experience; persistent disability/incapacity; congenital anomaly/birth defect. A severe TEAE was an event that prevented normal everyday activities. Severe TEAEs were assessed by the investigator.
Number of Participants With Treatment-Related TEAEsFrom first dose of study intervention on Day 1 (baseline) up to 28 days post the last dose of study intervention (up to a maximum of 393 days)An AE was any untoward medical occurrence in a patient or clinical study participant, temporally associated with the use of study intervention, whether or not considered related to the study intervention. All AEs that started after the first dosing but before the last dose plus the lag time (28 days) were TEAEs. An SAE was an AE resulting in any of the following outcomes or deemed significant for any other reason: death; initial or prolonged inpatient hospitalization; life-threatening experience; persistent disability/incapacity; congenital anomaly/birth defect. A severe TEAE was an event that prevented normal everyday activities. Severe TEAEs and treatment-related TEAEs were assessed by the investigator.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Percentage of Responders in Transthyretin (TTR) Stabilization Post Dose at Months 1, 6, and 12Predose on Day 1 (baseline), predose and 3 hours post dose at Month 1 visit, 7 hours post dose at Month 6 visit, and 1 hour post dose at Month 12 visitBlood sample of approximate 10 mL was collected at baseline, Months 1, 6, and 12 visits for measurement of TTR and TTR tetramer concentrations. TTR concentration was obtained prior to urea denaturation and TTR tetramer concentration was obtained after urea denaturation. Month 1 visit occurred 1 month post Day 1 +/- 1 week, Month 6 visit occurred 6 months post Day 1 +/- 2 weeks, and Month 12 visit occurred 12 months post Day 1 +/- 2 weeks or within 2 weeks after end of treatment. Responder was the participant who achieved TTR stabilization (ie, who had been TTR stabilized). Declaring a participant to have been (TTR) 'stabilized' was defined as the participant whose percent stabilization was equal to or greater than 32%. Percent stabilization (%) was calculated as (\[fraction of initial {FOI} dosed - FOI baseline\] / FOI baseline)×100, and FOI was calculated as average TTR tetramer concentration (post-denaturation) / average TTR concentration (pre-denaturation).
TTR Concentration at Baseline, Months 1, 6, and 12Predose on Day 1 (baseline), predose and 3 hours post dose at Month 1 visit, 7 hours post dose at Month 6 visit, and 1 hour post dose at Month 12 visitOne K2EDTA blood sample of approximate 10 mL was collected on Day 1 (baseline), and at Months 1, 6, and 12 visits for measurement of TTR concentration. Month 1 visit occurred 1 month post Day 1 +/- 1 week, Month 6 visit occurred 6 months post Day 1 +/- 2 weeks, and Month 12 visit occurred 12 months post Day 1 +/- 2 weeks or within 2 weeks after end of treatment.
Change From Baseline for Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire Overall Summary (KCCQ-OS) Scores at Months 6 and 12Day 1 (baseline), Months 6, and 12The KCCQ is a self-administered, 23-item questionnaire. KCCQ-OS scores are transformed to a 0 to 100 range, with lower scores denoting poorer quality of life.
Change From Baseline for EuroQol 5 Dimensions 5 Levels (EQ-5D-5L) Index Values at Months 6 and 12Day 1 (baseline), Months 6, and 12The EQ-5D-5L is a brief, self-administered generic health status instrument. The instrument consists of 2 parts. In the first part, respondents are asked to rate their current health state on 5 dimensions (mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain or discomfort, and anxiety or depression) with each dimension having 5 levels of function (no problems, slight problems, moderate problems, severe problems, and extreme problems). The second part is a participant's self-rating of current health state on a Visual Analog Scale (EQ-5D VAS) with endpoints labeled 'best imaginable health state' (score of 100) and 'worst imaginable health state' (score of 0). The index values were calculated using the scoring algorithm based on preferences solicited from the Chinese population with 0 representing death and 1 representing full health. Higher EQ-5D-5L index value indicated a better quality of life. Change from baseline for EQ-5D-5L index values are reported for this outcome measure.
Change From Baseline (CFB) for Distance Walked During 6 Minute Walk Test (6MWT) at Months 6 and 12Baseline, months 6 and 12As a measure of functional capacity, the 6MWT measured the distance a participant could walk on a straight course in 6 minutes. 6MWT was conducted in accordance with guidelines established by the American Thoracic Society at Month 6 and Month 12 visits. Baseline was defined as the last measurement prior to first dose of study intervention.
Change From Baseline for Physical Component Summary (PCS) for Short-Form Survey 12 (SF-12) at Months 6 and 12Day 1 (baseline), Months 6, and 12SF-12 is developed as a shorter alternative to the SF-36 for use in large-scale studies. It is an instrument with different weights for scoring physical and mental health, and measures health-related quality of life with 12 items categorized in eight areas: physical functioning, role physical, bodily pain, general health, vitality, social functioning, role emotional, and mental health. This questionnaire was completed by the participant after the KCCQ and EQ-5D-5L, and prior to other required visit assessments. PCS score ranges from 0 to 100, and higher PCS score indicates a better quality of life. Change from baseline for PCS for SF-12 is reported for this outcome measure.
Change From Baseline for Mental Component Summary (MCS) for SF-12 at Months 6 and 12Day 1 (baseline), Months 6, and 12SF-12 is developed as a shorter alternative to the SF-36 for use in large-scale studies. It is an instrument with different weights for scoring physical and mental health, and measures health-related quality of life with 12 items categorized in eight areas: physical functioning, role physical, bodily pain, general health, vitality, social functioning, role emotional, and mental health. This questionnaire was completed by the participant after the KCCQ and EQ-5D-5L, and prior to other required visit assessments. MCS score ranges from 0 to 100, and higher MCS score indicates a better quality of life. Change from baseline for MCS for SF-12 is reported for this outcome measure.
Plasma Concentrations of Tafamidis at Months 1, 6, and 12Predose and 3 hours post dose at Month 1 visit, 7 hours post dose at Month 6 visit, and 1 hour post at Month 12 visitBlood samples of approximately 3 mL, to provide an approximately 1 mL plasma, were collected for measurement of plasma concentrations of tafamidis at Months 1, 6, and 12 visits. Month 1 visit occurred 1 month post Day 1 +/- 1 week, Month 6 visit occurred 6 months post Day 1 +/- 2 weeks, and Month 12 visit occurred 12 months post Day 1 +/- 2 weeks or within 2 weeks after end of treatment.
Change From Baseline for EuroQol VAS at Months 6 and 12Day 1 (baseline), Months 6, and 12The EQ-5D-5L (5 levels version) is a brief, self-administered generic health status instrument. The instrument consists of 2 parts. In the first part, respondents are asked to rate their current health state on 5 dimensions (mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain or discomfort, and anxiety or depression) with each dimension having 3 levels of function (no problems, slight problems, moderate problems, severe problems and extreme problems). The second part is a participant's self-rating of current health state on a EQ-5D VAS with endpoints labeled 'best imaginable health state' (score of 100) and 'worst imaginable health state' (score of 0). The scores from the 5 dimensions may be used to calculate a single index value, also known as a utility score. EQ-5D VAS scores are reported for this outcome measure.
Change From Baseline for N Terminal Prohormone B Type Natriuretic Peptide (NT-proBNP) at Months 6 and 12Baseline, months 6 and 12Plasma NT-proBNP is a guideline-mandated biomarker in heart failure. Baseline was defined as the last measurement prior to the first dose of study treatment.

Countries

China

Participant flow

Recruitment details

A total of 53 participants were enrolled in this study.

Participants by arm

ArmCount
All Participants
Participants received tafamidis free acid 61 milligrams (mg) once daily (QD). Participants were instructed to take the study intervention on a daily basis (up to a maximum of 1 year).
53
Total53

Withdrawals & dropouts

PeriodReasonFG000
Follow-Up PhaseAdverse Event1
Follow-Up PhaseDeath6
Follow-Up PhaseOther1
Follow-Up PhaseWithdrawal by Subject1
Treatment PhaseAdverse Event1
Treatment PhaseDeath6
Treatment PhaseOther1
Treatment PhaseWithdrawal by Subject2

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicAll Participants
Age, Categorical
<=18 years
0 Participants
Age, Categorical
>=65 years
17 Participants
Age, Categorical
Between 18 and 65 years
36 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Asian
53 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
6 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
47 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
6 / 53
other
Total, other adverse events
35 / 53
serious
Total, serious adverse events
21 / 53

Outcome results

Primary

Number of Participants With All-Causality Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs)

An adverse event (AE) was any untoward medical occurrence in a patient or clinical study participant, temporally associated with the use of study intervention, whether or not considered related to the study intervention. All AEs that started after the first dosing but before the last dose plus the lag time (28 days) were TEAEs. A serious adverse event (SAE) was an AE resulting in any of the following outcomes or deemed significant for any other reason: death; initial or prolonged inpatient hospitalization; life-threatening experience; persistent disability/incapacity; congenital anomaly/birth defect. A severe TEAE was an event that prevented normal everyday activities. Severe TEAEs were assessed by the investigator.

Time frame: From first dose of study intervention on Day 1 (baseline) up to 28 days post the last dose of study intervention (up to a maximum of 393 days)

Population: Safety analysis set included all enrolled participants who took at least 1 dose of tafamidis free acid 61 mg soft capsule.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
All ParticipantsNumber of Participants With All-Causality Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs)TEAEs45 Participants
All ParticipantsNumber of Participants With All-Causality Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs)Treatment-Emergent SAEs21 Participants
All ParticipantsNumber of Participants With All-Causality Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs)Severe TEAEs17 Participants
All ParticipantsNumber of Participants With All-Causality Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs)TEAEs Leading to Death6 Participants
All ParticipantsNumber of Participants With All-Causality Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs)Discontinuations From Study Due to TEAEs1 Participants
All ParticipantsNumber of Participants With All-Causality Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs)Permanent Discontinuations From Study Intervention Due to TEAEs1 Participants
All ParticipantsNumber of Participants With All-Causality Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs)Dosing Interruptions of the Study Intervention due to TEAEs3 Participants
Primary

Number of Participants With Treatment-Related TEAEs

An AE was any untoward medical occurrence in a patient or clinical study participant, temporally associated with the use of study intervention, whether or not considered related to the study intervention. All AEs that started after the first dosing but before the last dose plus the lag time (28 days) were TEAEs. An SAE was an AE resulting in any of the following outcomes or deemed significant for any other reason: death; initial or prolonged inpatient hospitalization; life-threatening experience; persistent disability/incapacity; congenital anomaly/birth defect. A severe TEAE was an event that prevented normal everyday activities. Severe TEAEs and treatment-related TEAEs were assessed by the investigator.

Time frame: From first dose of study intervention on Day 1 (baseline) up to 28 days post the last dose of study intervention (up to a maximum of 393 days)

Population: Safety analysis set included all enrolled participants who took at least 1 dose of tafamidis free acid 61 mg soft capsule.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
All ParticipantsNumber of Participants With Treatment-Related TEAEsTEAEs3 Participants
All ParticipantsNumber of Participants With Treatment-Related TEAEsTreatment-Emergent SAEs0 Participants
All ParticipantsNumber of Participants With Treatment-Related TEAEsSevere TEAEs0 Participants
All ParticipantsNumber of Participants With Treatment-Related TEAEsTEAEs Leading to Death0 Participants
All ParticipantsNumber of Participants With Treatment-Related TEAEsDiscontinuations From Study Due to TEAEs0 Participants
All ParticipantsNumber of Participants With Treatment-Related TEAEsPermanent Discontinuations From Study Intervention Due to TEAEs0 Participants
All ParticipantsNumber of Participants With Treatment-Related TEAEsDosing Interruptions of the Study Intervention due to TEAEs1 Participants
Secondary

Change From Baseline (CFB) for Distance Walked During 6 Minute Walk Test (6MWT) at Months 6 and 12

As a measure of functional capacity, the 6MWT measured the distance a participant could walk on a straight course in 6 minutes. 6MWT was conducted in accordance with guidelines established by the American Thoracic Society at Month 6 and Month 12 visits. Baseline was defined as the last measurement prior to first dose of study intervention.

Time frame: Baseline, months 6 and 12

Population: Efficacy analysis set included all enrolled participants who took at least 1 dose of tafamidis free acid 61 mg soft capsule. Number of Participants Analyzed represents the total number of participants in the efficacy analysis set regardless of the type of outcome measures. Number Analyzed for each row represents the number of participants who had a reportable measurement of 6MWT at baseline, at Months 6 (for reporting CFB at Month 6) and 12 (for reporting CFB at Month 12).

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
All ParticipantsChange From Baseline (CFB) for Distance Walked During 6 Minute Walk Test (6MWT) at Months 6 and 12Month 6-19.3 MetersStandard Deviation 73.36
All ParticipantsChange From Baseline (CFB) for Distance Walked During 6 Minute Walk Test (6MWT) at Months 6 and 12Month 121.5 MetersStandard Deviation 91.29
Secondary

Change From Baseline for EuroQol 5 Dimensions 5 Levels (EQ-5D-5L) Index Values at Months 6 and 12

The EQ-5D-5L is a brief, self-administered generic health status instrument. The instrument consists of 2 parts. In the first part, respondents are asked to rate their current health state on 5 dimensions (mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain or discomfort, and anxiety or depression) with each dimension having 5 levels of function (no problems, slight problems, moderate problems, severe problems, and extreme problems). The second part is a participant's self-rating of current health state on a Visual Analog Scale (EQ-5D VAS) with endpoints labeled 'best imaginable health state' (score of 100) and 'worst imaginable health state' (score of 0). The index values were calculated using the scoring algorithm based on preferences solicited from the Chinese population with 0 representing death and 1 representing full health. Higher EQ-5D-5L index value indicated a better quality of life. Change from baseline for EQ-5D-5L index values are reported for this outcome measure.

Time frame: Day 1 (baseline), Months 6, and 12

Population: Efficacy analysis set included all enrolled participants who took at least 1 dose of tafamidis free acid 61 mg soft capsule. Number of Participants Analyzed represents the total number of participants in the efficacy analysis set regardless of the type of outcome measures. Number Analyzed for each row represents the number of evaluable participants who had reportable EQ-5D-5L scores at baseline, Months 6 (for reporting CFB at Month 6) and 12 (for reporting CFB at Month 12).

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
All ParticipantsChange From Baseline for EuroQol 5 Dimensions 5 Levels (EQ-5D-5L) Index Values at Months 6 and 12Month 60.0 Index value on a scale of 0-1Standard Deviation 0.24
All ParticipantsChange From Baseline for EuroQol 5 Dimensions 5 Levels (EQ-5D-5L) Index Values at Months 6 and 12Month 120.0 Index value on a scale of 0-1Standard Deviation 0.21
Secondary

Change From Baseline for EuroQol VAS at Months 6 and 12

The EQ-5D-5L (5 levels version) is a brief, self-administered generic health status instrument. The instrument consists of 2 parts. In the first part, respondents are asked to rate their current health state on 5 dimensions (mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain or discomfort, and anxiety or depression) with each dimension having 3 levels of function (no problems, slight problems, moderate problems, severe problems and extreme problems). The second part is a participant's self-rating of current health state on a EQ-5D VAS with endpoints labeled 'best imaginable health state' (score of 100) and 'worst imaginable health state' (score of 0). The scores from the 5 dimensions may be used to calculate a single index value, also known as a utility score. EQ-5D VAS scores are reported for this outcome measure.

Time frame: Day 1 (baseline), Months 6, and 12

Population: Efficacy analysis set included all enrolled participants who took at least 1 dose of tafamidis free acid 61 mg soft capsule . Number of Participants Analyzed represents the total number of participants in the efficacy analysis set regardless of the type of outcome measures. Number Analyzed for each row represents the number of evaluable participants who had reportable EuroQol VAS scores at baseline, Months 6 (for reporting CFB at Month 6) and 12 (for reporting CFB at Month 12).

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
All ParticipantsChange From Baseline for EuroQol VAS at Months 6 and 12Month 6-0.6 Score on a scale of 100Standard Deviation 20.23
All ParticipantsChange From Baseline for EuroQol VAS at Months 6 and 12Month 123.4 Score on a scale of 100Standard Deviation 15.65
Secondary

Change From Baseline for Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire Overall Summary (KCCQ-OS) Scores at Months 6 and 12

The KCCQ is a self-administered, 23-item questionnaire. KCCQ-OS scores are transformed to a 0 to 100 range, with lower scores denoting poorer quality of life.

Time frame: Day 1 (baseline), Months 6, and 12

Population: Efficacy analysis set included all enrolled participants who took at least 1 dose of tafamidis free acid 61 mg soft capsule. Number of Participants Analyzed represents the total number of participants in the efficacy analysis set regardless of the type of outcome measures. Number Analyzed for each row represents the number of evaluable participants who had reportable KCCQ-OS scores at baseline, at Months 6 (for reporting CFB at Month 6) and 12 (for reporting CFB at Month 12).

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
All ParticipantsChange From Baseline for Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire Overall Summary (KCCQ-OS) Scores at Months 6 and 12Month 12-0.3 Score on a scale of 100Standard Deviation 19.89
All ParticipantsChange From Baseline for Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire Overall Summary (KCCQ-OS) Scores at Months 6 and 12Month 6-0.4 Score on a scale of 100Standard Deviation 18.97
Secondary

Change From Baseline for Mental Component Summary (MCS) for SF-12 at Months 6 and 12

SF-12 is developed as a shorter alternative to the SF-36 for use in large-scale studies. It is an instrument with different weights for scoring physical and mental health, and measures health-related quality of life with 12 items categorized in eight areas: physical functioning, role physical, bodily pain, general health, vitality, social functioning, role emotional, and mental health. This questionnaire was completed by the participant after the KCCQ and EQ-5D-5L, and prior to other required visit assessments. MCS score ranges from 0 to 100, and higher MCS score indicates a better quality of life. Change from baseline for MCS for SF-12 is reported for this outcome measure.

Time frame: Day 1 (baseline), Months 6, and 12

Population: Efficacy analysis set included all enrolled participants who took at least 1 dose of tafamidis free acid 61 mg soft capsule. Number of Participants Analyzed represents the total number of participants in the efficacy analysis set regardless of the type of outcome measures. Number Analyzed for each row represents the number of evaluable participants who had reportable MCS scores at baseline, Months 6 (for reporting CFB at Month 6) and 12 (for reporting CFB at Month 12).

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
All ParticipantsChange From Baseline for Mental Component Summary (MCS) for SF-12 at Months 6 and 12Month 61.4 Score on a scale of 100Standard Deviation 10.6
All ParticipantsChange From Baseline for Mental Component Summary (MCS) for SF-12 at Months 6 and 12Month 121.5 Score on a scale of 100Standard Deviation 12.54
Secondary

Change From Baseline for N Terminal Prohormone B Type Natriuretic Peptide (NT-proBNP) at Months 6 and 12

Plasma NT-proBNP is a guideline-mandated biomarker in heart failure. Baseline was defined as the last measurement prior to the first dose of study treatment.

Time frame: Baseline, months 6 and 12

Population: Efficacy analysis set included all enrolled participants who took at least 1 dose of tafamidis free acid 61 mg soft capsule. Number of Participants Analyzed represents the total number of participants in the efficacy analysis set regardless of the type of outcome measures. Number Analyzed for each row represents the number of participants who had a reportable measurement of NT-proBNP at baseline, at Months 6 (for reporting CFB at Month 6) and 12 (for reporting CFB at Month 12).

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
All ParticipantsChange From Baseline for N Terminal Prohormone B Type Natriuretic Peptide (NT-proBNP) at Months 6 and 12Month 6452.9 Nanograms per liter (ng/L)Standard Deviation 2625.04
All ParticipantsChange From Baseline for N Terminal Prohormone B Type Natriuretic Peptide (NT-proBNP) at Months 6 and 12Month 12-422.2 Nanograms per liter (ng/L)Standard Deviation 1581.82
Secondary

Change From Baseline for Physical Component Summary (PCS) for Short-Form Survey 12 (SF-12) at Months 6 and 12

SF-12 is developed as a shorter alternative to the SF-36 for use in large-scale studies. It is an instrument with different weights for scoring physical and mental health, and measures health-related quality of life with 12 items categorized in eight areas: physical functioning, role physical, bodily pain, general health, vitality, social functioning, role emotional, and mental health. This questionnaire was completed by the participant after the KCCQ and EQ-5D-5L, and prior to other required visit assessments. PCS score ranges from 0 to 100, and higher PCS score indicates a better quality of life. Change from baseline for PCS for SF-12 is reported for this outcome measure.

Time frame: Day 1 (baseline), Months 6, and 12

Population: Efficacy analysis set included all enrolled participants who took at least 1 dose of tafamidis free acid 61 mg soft capsule. Number of Participants Analyzed represents the total number of participants in the efficacy analysis set regardless of the type of outcome measures. Number Analyzed for each row represents the number of evaluable participants who had reportable PCS scores at baseline, Months 6 (for reporting CFB at Month 6) and 12 (for reporting CFB at Month 12).

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
All ParticipantsChange From Baseline for Physical Component Summary (PCS) for Short-Form Survey 12 (SF-12) at Months 6 and 12Month 60.1 Score on a scale of 100Standard Deviation 8.24
All ParticipantsChange From Baseline for Physical Component Summary (PCS) for Short-Form Survey 12 (SF-12) at Months 6 and 12Month 12-0.0 Score on a scale of 100Standard Deviation 9.14
Secondary

Percentage of Responders in Transthyretin (TTR) Stabilization Post Dose at Months 1, 6, and 12

Blood sample of approximate 10 mL was collected at baseline, Months 1, 6, and 12 visits for measurement of TTR and TTR tetramer concentrations. TTR concentration was obtained prior to urea denaturation and TTR tetramer concentration was obtained after urea denaturation. Month 1 visit occurred 1 month post Day 1 +/- 1 week, Month 6 visit occurred 6 months post Day 1 +/- 2 weeks, and Month 12 visit occurred 12 months post Day 1 +/- 2 weeks or within 2 weeks after end of treatment. Responder was the participant who achieved TTR stabilization (ie, who had been TTR stabilized). Declaring a participant to have been (TTR) 'stabilized' was defined as the participant whose percent stabilization was equal to or greater than 32%. Percent stabilization (%) was calculated as (\[fraction of initial {FOI} dosed - FOI baseline\] / FOI baseline)×100, and FOI was calculated as average TTR tetramer concentration (post-denaturation) / average TTR concentration (pre-denaturation).

Time frame: Predose on Day 1 (baseline), predose and 3 hours post dose at Month 1 visit, 7 hours post dose at Month 6 visit, and 1 hour post dose at Month 12 visit

Population: Pharmacodynamic (PD) analysis set included all enrolled participants who took at least 1 dose of tafamidis free acid 61 mg soft capsule and who had at least 1 TTR stabilization value. Number of Participants Analyzed represents the number of participants who had PD samples collected, and both the baseline and post dose TTR and TTR tetramer concentrations \>= the lower limit of quantification (LLOQ). Number Analyzed for each row represents the number of evaluable participants at each timepoint.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
All ParticipantsPercentage of Responders in Transthyretin (TTR) Stabilization Post Dose at Months 1, 6, and 12Predose at Month 196.4 Percentages of participants
All ParticipantsPercentage of Responders in Transthyretin (TTR) Stabilization Post Dose at Months 1, 6, and 123 hours post dose at Month 196.4 Percentages of participants
All ParticipantsPercentage of Responders in Transthyretin (TTR) Stabilization Post Dose at Months 1, 6, and 127 hours post dose at Month 696.2 Percentages of participants
All ParticipantsPercentage of Responders in Transthyretin (TTR) Stabilization Post Dose at Months 1, 6, and 121 hour post dose at Month 1294.7 Percentages of participants
Secondary

Plasma Concentrations of Tafamidis at Months 1, 6, and 12

Blood samples of approximately 3 mL, to provide an approximately 1 mL plasma, were collected for measurement of plasma concentrations of tafamidis at Months 1, 6, and 12 visits. Month 1 visit occurred 1 month post Day 1 +/- 1 week, Month 6 visit occurred 6 months post Day 1 +/- 2 weeks, and Month 12 visit occurred 12 months post Day 1 +/- 2 weeks or within 2 weeks after end of treatment.

Time frame: Predose and 3 hours post dose at Month 1 visit, 7 hours post dose at Month 6 visit, and 1 hour post at Month 12 visit

Population: Pharmacokinetic (PK) analysis set included all enrolled participants who took at least 1 dose of tafamidis free acid 61 mg soft capsule and who had at least 1 quantifiable plasma tafamidis concentration. Number of Participants Analyzed represents the number of participants who had at least 1 tafamidis concentration \>=LLOQ. Number Analyzed for each row represents the number of participants with non-missing concentrations at each timepoint.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
All ParticipantsPlasma Concentrations of Tafamidis at Months 1, 6, and 123 hours post dose at Month 112040 nanograms per milliliter (ng/mL)Standard Deviation 4950.1
All ParticipantsPlasma Concentrations of Tafamidis at Months 1, 6, and 12Predose at Month 110410 nanograms per milliliter (ng/mL)Standard Deviation 5521.1
All ParticipantsPlasma Concentrations of Tafamidis at Months 1, 6, and 127 hours post dose at Month 614100 nanograms per milliliter (ng/mL)Standard Deviation 5950.5
All ParticipantsPlasma Concentrations of Tafamidis at Months 1, 6, and 121 hour post dose at Month 1211950 nanograms per milliliter (ng/mL)Standard Deviation 5475.8
Secondary

TTR Concentration at Baseline, Months 1, 6, and 12

One K2EDTA blood sample of approximate 10 mL was collected on Day 1 (baseline), and at Months 1, 6, and 12 visits for measurement of TTR concentration. Month 1 visit occurred 1 month post Day 1 +/- 1 week, Month 6 visit occurred 6 months post Day 1 +/- 2 weeks, and Month 12 visit occurred 12 months post Day 1 +/- 2 weeks or within 2 weeks after end of treatment.

Time frame: Predose on Day 1 (baseline), predose and 3 hours post dose at Month 1 visit, 7 hours post dose at Month 6 visit, and 1 hour post dose at Month 12 visit

Population: PD analysis set included all enrolled participants who took at least 1 dose of tafamidis free acid 61 mg soft capsule and who had at least 1 TTR concentration value. Number of Participants Analyzed represents the total number of participants in the PD analysis set. Number Analyzed for each row represents the number of participants with evaluable values at the specific timepoints.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
All ParticipantsTTR Concentration at Baseline, Months 1, 6, and 12Predose on Day 1 (baseline)12.70 Milligrams per deciliter (mg/dL)Standard Deviation 5.67
All ParticipantsTTR Concentration at Baseline, Months 1, 6, and 12Predose at Month 119.73 Milligrams per deciliter (mg/dL)Standard Deviation 7.019
All ParticipantsTTR Concentration at Baseline, Months 1, 6, and 123 hours post dose at Month 119.58 Milligrams per deciliter (mg/dL)Standard Deviation 6.547
All ParticipantsTTR Concentration at Baseline, Months 1, 6, and 127 hours post dose at Month 621.48 Milligrams per deciliter (mg/dL)Standard Deviation 7.717
All ParticipantsTTR Concentration at Baseline, Months 1, 6, and 121 hour post dose at Month 1221.79 Milligrams per deciliter (mg/dL)Standard Deviation 7.003

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026