Skip to content

Efficacy and Safety of One-Stage Hybrid Coronary Revascularization

Efficacy and Safety of One-Step Hybrid Coronary Revascularization Versus Percutaneous Coronary Intervention for Patients With Multivessel Disease

Status
UNKNOWN
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT04811586
Acronym
HCR-EAST
Enrollment
200
Registered
2021-03-23
Start date
2020-12-30
Completion date
2023-12-01
Last updated
2021-03-23

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Multivessel Coronary Artery Disease

Keywords

hybrid coronary revascularization (HCR), percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI), coronary artery bypass graft (CABG), multivessel coronary artery disease

Brief summary

Coronary revascularization could be accomplished either by percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) or coronary artery bypass graft (CABG). PCI with drug-eluting stent (DES) implantation is featured by minimal invasive, low complication and rapid rehabilitation. CABG is characterized by improved long-term, event-free survival attributable to the use of left internal mammary artery (LIMA) graft. Hybrid coronary revascularization (HCR) consists of LIMA bypass to left anterior coronary descending artery (LAD) by minimal invasive direct coronary artery bypass (MIDCAB) and PCI of other stenosed coronary arteries with DES implantation. One-step HCR entails LIMA-LAD anastomosis performed through MIDCAB, immediately followed by PCI for non-LAD lesions, sometimes for diagonal branch, in the hybrid operating room. Limited data are available in comparing one-step HCR to PCI alone for the treatment of multivessel coronary artery disease(MVD). The current EAST-HCR study will investigate the efficacy and safety of one-step HCR for patients with MVD, as comparing to PCI alone.

Interventions

to improve the blood supply for coronary arteries by using either percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) or coronary artery bypass graft (CABG)

Sponsors

Shanghai East Hospital
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

1. 18 Years and older 2. signed the informed consent 3. indicated for revascularization, with possible bypass segment in LAD and amendable lesions by PCI in other vessels 4. anatomy requiring as following: (1) Multivessel CAD involving the LAD (proximal or mid) and/or LM (ostial, mid-shaft or distal) with at least 1 other epicardial coronary artery requiring treatment in LCX or RCA, including: (2) LAD disease, and a major diagonal lesion, either bifurcation or independent in location, with both requiring revascularization (determined by QFR or FFR) (3) LM distal bifurcation lesion (Medina 1,1,1), intended for 2-stent approach if randomized to PCI 5. Heart team discussion after angiogram, with conclusion of suitable candidate for either PCI or HCR 6. Able to tolerate and no plans to interrupt dual anti-platelet therapy for 3\ 12 months 7. Willing to comply with 2-year clinical follow-up

Exclusion criteria

1. Previous cardiac or thoracic surgery 2. Previous PCI of the LM and/or LAD within 12 months 3. Totally occluded left main vessel 4. Cardiogenic shock or LVEF \<30% 5. Previous STEMI within 30-day prior to randomization 6. Concomitant vascular or other cardiac disease with plan of surgical treatment 7. Indication for chronic oral anticoagulation therapy 8. Previous stroke history within 6-month prior to randomization 9. Survival expectation less than 3 years due to non-cardiac illness 10. Allergy or hypersensitivity to any of the study drugs or devices used in the trial 11. Enrolled in additional clinical study 12. Informed consent not available or noncompliance with follow-up 13. Pregnant

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Major Adverse Cardiac and Cerebrovascular Events (MACCE)2 yearsthe occurrence of MACCE at 2 years' clinical follow-up, including all-cause death, myocardial infarction, stroke, and repeated revascularization

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Bleeding events2 yearsindividual component of MACCE
Hospital duration (day)up yo 2 years
Rate of complete revascularization at index hospitalization2 yearsrate of complete revascularization at index hospitalization (defined by Quantitative flow ration\[QFR\] or Fraction flow reserve\[FFR\])
Stent thrombosis event2 yearsstent thrombosis defined by Academic Research Consortium (ARC)

Countries

China

Contacts

Primary ContactQi Zhang, MD, PhD
zhangqnh@hotmail.com+86-21-38804518

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026