Skip to content

Efficiency, and Emergency Department Nurse Preference Between 2 Methods of Visualization: A Pilot Study

Comparative Effectiveness, Efficiency, and Emergency Department Nurse Preference Between 2 Methods of Visualization for Midline Catheter Insertion: A Pilot Study

Status
Completed
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Observational
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT04811430
Enrollment
49
Registered
2021-03-23
Start date
2019-10-14
Completion date
2019-10-15
Last updated
2021-03-23

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Catheter Related Complication

Keywords

Visualization, Needle Guidance, Midline Catheter, Emergency Department Nurse

Brief summary

The purpose of this study was to assess the impact of a continuous needle tracking system on the accuracy, speed, and quality of ultrasound-guided peripheral venous catheter insertion.

Detailed description

A pilot study using simulated tissue was conducted with 49 US-based emergency department nurses to compare insertion of a midline catheter using traditional ultrasound guidance versus an advanced needle-tracking technology along with traditional ultrasound guidance.

Interventions

DEVICERandomized Traditional

Traditional ultrasound guidance was utilized to insert Midlines on simulated veins blocks not live patients

DEVICECue(TM) Needle Tracking Technology

Cue(TM) Needle Tracking Technology with real time needle tip tracking is used to assist ultrasound guided midline insertions on simulated veins blocks not live patients

Sponsors

Becton, Dickinson and Company
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Observational model
COHORT
Time perspective
CROSS_SECTIONAL

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL

Inclusion criteria

* US-based emergency department nurse who have placed 10 peripheral intravenous catheters in the past 60 days * have placed less than or equal to 15 ultrasound-assisted vascular access devices in the past 60 days and have been practicing ultrasound-assisted vascular access no more than 18 months

Exclusion criteria

* Nurses that don't meet that predetermined inclusion criteria

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Insertion Success1 hourNumber of attempts required to properly place a needle tip in the simulated vessel
Insertion Time1 hourTime required to successfully insert a needle tip into a simulated vessel
Backwalling Events1 hourEvents where the needle fully transects the simulated blood vessel during the inserting of the needle tip into a simulated vessel
Needle redirects1 hourLateral movement and deflection of the needle tip during insertion into a simulated vessel
Accuracy of Needle Placement1 hourAccuracy of needle placement as indicated by the lateral distance from a target

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Self-reported subjective measurements1 hourPost-study questions were used to assess confidence during insertion with Cue needle tracking system (likert), confidence when insertion with traditional ultrasound techniques (likert), preference between the cue needle tracking system and the standard of care

Countries

United States

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026