Diabetes
Conditions
Keywords
pharmaceutical consultations, adherence
Brief summary
Investigators hypothesize that the implementation of a hospital pharmacy consultation and the transmission of its report to pharmacies may improve knowledge, adherence and encourage the development of pharmacist medication reviews. A before-and-after study of the implementation of pharmaceutical consultations will allow the investigators to evaluate the validity of the hypothesis.
Interventions
BEHAVIORALPharmaceutical consultation
Selection of patients for a pharmaceutical consultation with collection of non-opposition and scheduling of telephone interviews or by teleconsultations at one week after hospitalization. Data collection through interviews using a telephone questionnaire (or by teleconsultation) one week after consultation. Elements on knowledge and adherence of treatment will be collected.
Sponsors
Hospices Civils de Lyon
Study design
Observational model
COHORT
Time perspective
PROSPECTIVE
Eligibility
Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No
Inclusion criteria
* Adult patient admitted in the endocrinology service for a type 2 Diabetes who has more than 5 concomitant treatments * Adult patient that is being discharged for a return home * Good comprehension of French
Exclusion criteria
* Bad comprehension of French
Design outcomes
Primary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Evolution in the knowledge about the patient's condition | One week | Treatment knowledge, knowledge about the pathology and knowledge of hygienic and dietary measures will be assessed with a questionnaire giving a score from 0 to 2 -the higher the score, the better the outcome-. Comparison of the knowledge of the treatment between the first questionnaire conducted during the pharmaceutical consultation and the second questionnaire one week after the consultation. Statistical evaluation by comparative tests between the two questionnaires. |
| Evolution in the adherence | One week | Evaluation of the patient's adherence to his treatment through a questionnaire giving a score between 0 to 6 -the higher the score, the better the outcome-. Comparison of the scores between the first questionnaire conducted during the pharmaceutical consultation and the second questionnaire one week after the consultation. Statistical evaluation by comparative tests between the two questionnaires. |
Countries
France
Outcome results
None listed