Skip to content

EXPRESON-IN : Intracerebral Recordings of P3a Responses to Expressive Own-names

EXPRESON-INTRA : Intracerebral Recordings of P3a Responses to Own-names Uttered by Expressive and Neutral Voices in Pharmacoresistant Epilepsy Adult Patients

Status
UNKNOWN
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT04810832
Acronym
EXPRESON-IN
Enrollment
20
Registered
2021-03-23
Start date
2020-09-09
Completion date
2023-09-09
Last updated
2021-07-09

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Intractable Epilepsy

Keywords

Event-related Potentials (ERP), Intracerebral recordings, Presurgical evaluation

Brief summary

Neurophysiologic evaluation of disorders of consciousness (DOC) patients in intensive care unit include late auditory evoked potentials. It allows the physicians to record cerebral responses of patients to auditory stimuli and in particularly to their own name (as the P3a response). Numerous studies try to improve the relevance of the auditory stimuli used in this paradigm and notably using more expressive stimuli. Here the investigators investigate the intracerebral correlates of the P3a responses recorded on the scalp with neutral and more expressive stimuli.

Detailed description

Late auditory evoked potentials (as P3 wave) are used in neurophysiology to assess the level of consciousness in DOC (disorder of consciousness) patients. The P3 wave, elicited by listening standard and deviant stimuli, corresponds to the activation of a frontoparietal network and is considered to reflect a cognitive attention task. Using the own name of the patient as deviant stimuli improve the ability to detect the P3 wave because of the particularly relevance of this stimulus for the patient. In human cognition, to identify the expressivity valence of a voice is essential. Neural processing of expressive voices should involves more widespread brain areas than neutral voices processing. Here the investigators investigate the intracerebral correlates of the P3a responses recorded on the scalp to own-name stimuli uttered by neutral and more expressive voices (positive : smiling voice or negative : rough voice) in adult pharmacoresistant epilepsy patients.

Interventions

Evoked related potentials are performed for each patient during each paradigm (neutral voice and expressive voices): * with scalp electrodes in the department of neurophysiology * with intracranial electrodes in the department of neurosurgery.

Sponsors

Centre Hospitalier St Anne
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
NA
Intervention model
SEQUENTIAL
Primary purpose
BASIC_SCIENCE
Masking
NONE

Intervention model description

Open and prospective study. Evoked related potentials are recorded on the scalp and with intracranial electrodes for each participant while they listen 3 paradigms successively and in a random order: i) their own name uttered by a smiling voice ii) their own name uttered by a neutral voice iii) their own name uttered by a rough voice

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Intractable focal epilepsy with undergoing pre-surgical evaluation * intracerebral electrodes implantation in auditory cortices, temporal lobe, superior temporal gyrus, limbic areas, frontal lobe * Given Consent to inclusion

Exclusion criteria

* Deafness * Pregnancy

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Latencies cartography of intracranial responses to own-name uttered by neutral voice1 yearAnalyse of latencies of intracranial responses recorded to own-name uttered by neutral voice to build a map of the brain process of this responses
Latencies cartography of intracranial responses to own-name uttered by expressive voices1 yearAnalyse of latencies of intracranial responses recorded to own-name uttered by expressive voices to build a map of the brain process of this responses

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Comparison between brain responses to own-name uttered by expressive voices recorded with intracerebral electrodes versus scalp electrodes1 yearQualitative comparison between scalp and intracranial recordings with the expressive voices paradigms (comparison of the latencies of the recorded responses)
Comparison between brain responses to own-name uttered by neutral voices recorded with intracerebral electrodes versus scalp electrodes1 yearQualitative comparison between scalp and intracranial recordings with the neutral voices paradigms (comparison of the latencies of the recorded responses)

Countries

France

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026