Skip to content

Early neo2 Registry of the Acurate neo2 TAVI Prosthesis

Early neo2 Registry of the Acurate neo2 TAVI Prosthesis

Status
Completed
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Observational
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT04810195
Enrollment
554
Registered
2021-03-22
Start date
2020-09-01
Completion date
2022-03-15
Last updated
2022-10-05

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Aortic Valve Stenosis

Keywords

TAVR

Brief summary

The Early neo2 registry will study up to 500 patients treated with the updated Boston Acurate neo2 TAVI prosthesis at various European hospitals. The data is gathered from routine healthcare and there are no study-mandated additional procedures. The main endpoint is a combined efficiency and safety endpoint after 30 days. Imaging data (echocardiography, computed tomography and aortography) will be analysed centrally by a core lab.

Detailed description

Background and rationale The Boston Scientific Acurate neo2 TAVI prosthesis was launched commercially in Europe in September 2020 as a successor to the original Acurate neo prosthesis. Modifications include an added sealing skirt. The original Acurate neo failed to reach non-inferiority to other TAVI prostheses in two randomized trials. There is a need to gather initial safety and efficacy data from this next generation prosthesis, as there is no larger dataset presented after the CE-mark study of the Acurate neo2. Project objectives To gather initial safety and efficacy data in the initial up to 500 consecutive patients treated with the Acurate neo2 in various European sites. Karolinska will be the coordinating center for data collection. Methods Data will be collected in an anonymous form and sent to Karolinska for compilation and statistics. Data collection will continue until 500 patients are reached (April, 2021). Statistics Standard descriptive statistics will be used for the main results. For the comparison to SCOPE data (with the original Acurate neo prosthesis) on postoperative aortic insufficiency, standard statistical methods will used (Fishers exact test for categorical variables, and t-test for continuous measurements such as amount of regurgitation by videodensitometry). Core lab studies The core lab analyses will be performed at CORRIB in Galway (Prof. Serruys et al).

Interventions

DEVICEBoston Scientific Acurate neo2 TAVR device

The newest generation of the Acurate neo2 TAVR device, launched in Europe in 2020.

Sponsors

Boston Scientific Corporation
CollaboratorINDUSTRY
Andreas Rück
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Observational model
COHORT
Time perspective
PROSPECTIVE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* that a Acurate neo2 prosthesis has been inserted into the sheath (i.e. a procedure has been started).

Exclusion criteria

* None

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
MACE30 daysany of * Postoperative aortic insuffiency moderate or higher (in hospital echo, site reported) * Postoperative new permanent pacemaker (in hospital) * 30 days mortality * 30 days stroke * Acute Kidney Injury (AKIN grade 3) (in hospital)

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Rate of Postoperative aortic insufficiency more than mild by transthoracic echoWithin 7 days of procedureCore-lab analysis of the postoperative transthoracic echo for aortic insufficiency: percentage of patients with more than mild insufficiency
Rate of Postoperative aortic insufficiency more than mild by aortographySame day as procedureCore-lab analysis of the aortogram in the end of the procedure for quantification of aortic insufficiency (videodensitometry): rate of patients with more than mild insuffiency
Postoperative aortic valve gradientsWithin 7 days of procedureAortic prosthesis mean gradient (mmHg) on postoperative transthoracic echocardiogram
Rate of major acute procedural complicationsSame day as procedureIntraprocedural complications such as valve embolization, need for second valve, anular rupture
Procedural contrast useSame day as procedureThe average amount of contrast in ml per procedure

Countries

Denmark, Germany, Sweden

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026