Skip to content

A Dose-ranging Study to Evaluate the Safety and Efficacy of UNR844 in Subjects With Presbyopia.

A Randomized, Placebo-controlled, Double-masked, Multi-center, Dose-ranging Study to Evaluate the Safety, and Efficacy of UNR844 in Subjects With Presbyopia

Status
Terminated
Phases
Phase 2
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT04806503
Acronym
READER
Enrollment
234
Registered
2021-03-19
Start date
2021-06-30
Completion date
2022-10-14
Last updated
2024-06-20

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Presbyopia

Keywords

loss of elasticity in lens, lens, lens disorder, loss of near vision, Presbyopia, UNR844, farsightedness

Brief summary

Study of safety and efficacy of UNR844 in subjects with presbyopia.

Detailed description

This was a randomized, placebo-controlled, double-masked,multi-arm, parallel-group, multi-center 13-month study which consisted of: * A 1 week run-in period * A 3-month treatment course with UNR844 and/or Placebo * A 9-month treatment holiday period Participants were randomized equally to one of five treatment arms: UNR844 5 mg/mL,UNR844 13.3 mg/mL, UNR844 23 mg/mL, UNR844 30 mg/mL, or Placebo eye drops twice-a-day for three months. Participants underwent a 1 week run-in period where they were assessed for entry criteria during the Screening visit. During the run-in period, participants self-administered 1 drop of artificial tears twice-a-day (1 drop in the morning and 1 drop in the evening) in each eye at home. This run-in period was designed to help minimize any potential variability in distance corrected near visual acuity (DCNVA) caused due to initial ocular surface issues and help to establish an accurate baseline prior to randomization. The run-in period was to help exclude participants with a change in DCNVA of 0.10 logMAR difference between Screening and Baseline. This study was conducted to determine the optimum dose of UNR844 treatment and the duration of effect of UNR844 treatment for further development.

Interventions

DRUGUNR844

Ophthalmic solution for topical ocular administration

DRUGPlacebo

Placebo

Sponsors

Novartis Pharmaceuticals
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
TRIPLE (Subject, Caregiver, Investigator)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
45 Years to 55 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Written informed consent must be obtained before any assessment is performed * Impaired near vision in each eye and when using both eyes, without any near correction * Need a certain level of near correction

Exclusion criteria

* Impaired distance vision in either eye, with distance correction (if any) * Severe short- or long-sightedness * Any significant medical or clinical conditions affecting vision, the eyes or general health

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Characterize Dose-response of UNR844 for Change From Baseline in Binocular Distance-corrected Near Visual Acuity (DCNVA) at Month 3Baseline, Month 3Characterize dose response of UNR844 as measured by change from baseline at Month 3 in binocular DCNVA (without near correction) in Logarithm of Minimum Angle of Resolution (logMAR), at 40cm. A low logMAR score represents good vision while a high logMAR score represents bad vision.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Characterize Dose Response of UNR844 as Measured by Change From Baseline in Monocular (Worse-seeing Eye) Distance-corrected Near Visual Acuity (DCNVA) at Month 3Baseline, Month 3Characterize dose response of UNR844 as measured by change from baseline at Month 3 in monocular (worse-seeing eye) DCNVA in Logarithm of Minimum Angle of Resolution (logMAR), at 40 cm. A low logMAR score represents good vision while a high logMAR score represents bad vision.
Characterize Dose Response of UNR844 as Measured by Change From Baseline in Monocular (Better-seeing Eye) Distance-corrected Near Visual Acuity (DCNVA) at Month 3Baseline, Month 3Characterize dose response of UNR844 as measured by change from baseline at Month 3 in monocular (better-seeing eye) DCNVA in Logarithm of Minimum Angle of Resolution (logMAR), at 40cm. A low logMAR score represents good vision while a high logMAR score represents bad vision.
Percentage of Participants Gaining at Least 0.30 logMAR in Binocular Distance-corrected Near Visual Acuity (DCNVA) (Without Near Correction) From Baseline at Month 3Baseline, Month 3Percentage of participants gaining at least 0.3 logMAR in binocular DCNVA compared to baseline at Month 3. DCNVA is measured in Logarithm of Minimum Angle of Resolution (logMAR) at 40 cm, with subjects corrected for any distance refraction error. A low logMAR score represents good vision while a high logMAR score represents bad vision. Percentages were derived from Rubin's rule by integrating all results from multiple imputations. For subjects with missing DCNVA at Month 3, the value of DCNVA was imputed and dichotomized to derive the endpoint of gaining of 3 lines.
Percentage of Participants Gaining at Least 0.30 logMAR in Monocular (Worse-seeing Eye) Distance-corrected Near Visual Acuity (DCNVA) (Without Near Correction) From Baseline at Month 3Baseline, Month 3Percentage of participants gaining at least 0.3 logMAR in monocular (worse-seeing eye) DCNVA compared to baseline at Month 3. DCNVA is measured in Logarithm of Minimum Angle of Resolution (logMAR) at 40 cm, with subjects corrected for any distance refraction error. A low logMAR score represents good vision while a high logMAR score represents bad vision. Percentages were derived from Rubin's rule by integrating all results from multiple imputations. For subjects with missing DCNVA at Month 3, the value of DCNVA was imputed and dichotomized to derive the endpoint of gaining of 3 lines.
Percentage of Participants Gaining at Least 0.30 logMAR in Monocular (Better-seeing Eye) Distance-corrected Near Visual Acuity (DCNVA) (Without Near Correction) From Baseline at Month 3Baseline, Month 3Percentage of participants gaining at least 0.3 logMAR in monocular (better-seeing eye) DCNVA compared to baseline at Month 3. DCNVA is measured in Logarithm of Minimum Angle of Resolution (logMAR) at 40 cm, with subjects corrected for any distance refraction error. A low logMAR score represents good vision while a high logMAR score represents bad vision. Percentages were derived from Rubin's rule by integrating all results from multiple imputations. For subjects with missing DCNVA at Month 3, the value of DCNVA was imputed and dichotomized to derive the endpoint of gaining of 3 lines.

Countries

Australia, Canada, Japan, United States

Participant flow

Participants by arm

ArmCount
UNR844 5 mg/mL
UNR844 5 mg/mL ophthalmic solution; one drop twice-a-day for three months
48
UNR844 13.3 mg/mL
UNR844 13.3 mg/mL ophthalmic solution; one drop twice-a-day for three months
48
UNR844 23 mg/mL
UNR844 23 mg/mL ophthalmic solution; one drop twice-a-day for three months
44
UNR844 30 mg/mL
UNR844 30 mg/mL ophthalmic solution; one drop twice-a-day for three months
48
Placebo Ophthalmic Solution
placebo ophthalmic solution; one drop twice-a-day for three months
46
Total234

Withdrawals & dropouts

PeriodReasonFG000FG001FG002FG003FG004
Overall StudyAdverse Event11010
Overall StudyLost to Follow-up00100
Overall StudyWithdrawal by Subject10111

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicPlacebo Ophthalmic SolutionTotalUNR844 5 mg/mLUNR844 13.3 mg/mLUNR844 23 mg/mLUNR844 30 mg/mL
Age, Continuous51.2 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 2.8
50.9 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 2.75
50.8 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 2.61
50.9 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 2.8
51.0 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 2.94
50.5 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 2.66
Race (NIH/OMB)
American Indian or Alaska Native
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Asian
11 Participants52 Participants11 Participants9 Participants10 Participants11 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Black or African American
1 Participants14 Participants4 Participants5 Participants2 Participants2 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
More than one race
0 Participants2 Participants1 Participants0 Participants0 Participants1 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
White
34 Participants166 Participants32 Participants34 Participants32 Participants34 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
23 Participants135 Participants28 Participants28 Participants27 Participants29 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
23 Participants99 Participants20 Participants20 Participants17 Participants19 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
EG002
affected / at risk
EG003
affected / at risk
EG004
affected / at risk
EG005
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
0 / 480 / 480 / 440 / 481 / 461 / 234
other
Total, other adverse events
26 / 4822 / 4816 / 4423 / 4821 / 46108 / 234
serious
Total, serious adverse events
0 / 481 / 480 / 441 / 483 / 465 / 234

Outcome results

Primary

Characterize Dose-response of UNR844 for Change From Baseline in Binocular Distance-corrected Near Visual Acuity (DCNVA) at Month 3

Characterize dose response of UNR844 as measured by change from baseline at Month 3 in binocular DCNVA (without near correction) in Logarithm of Minimum Angle of Resolution (logMAR), at 40cm. A low logMAR score represents good vision while a high logMAR score represents bad vision.

Time frame: Baseline, Month 3

Population: Full Analysis Set

ArmMeasureValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)Dispersion
UNR844 5 mg/mLCharacterize Dose-response of UNR844 for Change From Baseline in Binocular Distance-corrected Near Visual Acuity (DCNVA) at Month 3-0.106 logMARStandard Error 0.0186
UNR844 13.3 mg/mLCharacterize Dose-response of UNR844 for Change From Baseline in Binocular Distance-corrected Near Visual Acuity (DCNVA) at Month 3-0.110 logMARStandard Error 0.0188
UNR844 23 mg/mLCharacterize Dose-response of UNR844 for Change From Baseline in Binocular Distance-corrected Near Visual Acuity (DCNVA) at Month 3-0.136 logMARStandard Error 0.0203
UNR844 30 mg/mLCharacterize Dose-response of UNR844 for Change From Baseline in Binocular Distance-corrected Near Visual Acuity (DCNVA) at Month 3-0.101 logMARStandard Error 0.0185
Placebo Ophthalmic SolutionCharacterize Dose-response of UNR844 for Change From Baseline in Binocular Distance-corrected Near Visual Acuity (DCNVA) at Month 3-0.112 logMARStandard Error 0.0194
p-value: 0.81795% CI: [-0.045, 0.056]Mixed-effect Model for Repeated Measures
p-value: 0.94695% CI: [-0.05, 0.053]Mixed-effect Model for Repeated Measures
p-value: 0.3895% CI: [-0.077, 0.029]Mixed-effect Model for Repeated Measures
p-value: 0.66795% CI: [-0.039, 0.062]Mixed-effect Model for Repeated Measures
Secondary

Characterize Dose Response of UNR844 as Measured by Change From Baseline in Monocular (Better-seeing Eye) Distance-corrected Near Visual Acuity (DCNVA) at Month 3

Characterize dose response of UNR844 as measured by change from baseline at Month 3 in monocular (better-seeing eye) DCNVA in Logarithm of Minimum Angle of Resolution (logMAR), at 40cm. A low logMAR score represents good vision while a high logMAR score represents bad vision.

Time frame: Baseline, Month 3

Population: Full Analysis Set

ArmMeasureValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)Dispersion
UNR844 5 mg/mLCharacterize Dose Response of UNR844 as Measured by Change From Baseline in Monocular (Better-seeing Eye) Distance-corrected Near Visual Acuity (DCNVA) at Month 3-0.056 logMARStandard Error 0.0194
UNR844 13.3 mg/mLCharacterize Dose Response of UNR844 as Measured by Change From Baseline in Monocular (Better-seeing Eye) Distance-corrected Near Visual Acuity (DCNVA) at Month 3-0.075 logMARStandard Error 0.0198
UNR844 23 mg/mLCharacterize Dose Response of UNR844 as Measured by Change From Baseline in Monocular (Better-seeing Eye) Distance-corrected Near Visual Acuity (DCNVA) at Month 3-0.081 logMARStandard Error 0.021
UNR844 30 mg/mLCharacterize Dose Response of UNR844 as Measured by Change From Baseline in Monocular (Better-seeing Eye) Distance-corrected Near Visual Acuity (DCNVA) at Month 3-0.059 logMARStandard Error 0.0194
Placebo Ophthalmic SolutionCharacterize Dose Response of UNR844 as Measured by Change From Baseline in Monocular (Better-seeing Eye) Distance-corrected Near Visual Acuity (DCNVA) at Month 3-0.085 logMARStandard Error 0.0206
p-value: 0.28495% CI: [-0.024, 0.083]Mixed-effect Model for Repeated Measures
p-value: 0.71195% CI: [-0.044, 0.065]Mixed-effect Model for Repeated Measures
p-value: 0.87195% CI: [-0.051, 0.06]Mixed-effect Model for Repeated Measures
p-value: 0.32995% CI: [-0.027, 0.08]Mixed-effect Model for Repeated Measures
Secondary

Characterize Dose Response of UNR844 as Measured by Change From Baseline in Monocular (Worse-seeing Eye) Distance-corrected Near Visual Acuity (DCNVA) at Month 3

Characterize dose response of UNR844 as measured by change from baseline at Month 3 in monocular (worse-seeing eye) DCNVA in Logarithm of Minimum Angle of Resolution (logMAR), at 40 cm. A low logMAR score represents good vision while a high logMAR score represents bad vision.

Time frame: Baseline, Month 3

Population: Full Analysis Set

ArmMeasureValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)Dispersion
UNR844 5 mg/mLCharacterize Dose Response of UNR844 as Measured by Change From Baseline in Monocular (Worse-seeing Eye) Distance-corrected Near Visual Acuity (DCNVA) at Month 3-0.125 logMARStandard Error 0.0217
UNR844 13.3 mg/mLCharacterize Dose Response of UNR844 as Measured by Change From Baseline in Monocular (Worse-seeing Eye) Distance-corrected Near Visual Acuity (DCNVA) at Month 3-0.121 logMARStandard Error 0.022
UNR844 23 mg/mLCharacterize Dose Response of UNR844 as Measured by Change From Baseline in Monocular (Worse-seeing Eye) Distance-corrected Near Visual Acuity (DCNVA) at Month 3-0.143 logMARStandard Error 0.0241
UNR844 30 mg/mLCharacterize Dose Response of UNR844 as Measured by Change From Baseline in Monocular (Worse-seeing Eye) Distance-corrected Near Visual Acuity (DCNVA) at Month 3-0.112 logMARStandard Error 0.0216
Placebo Ophthalmic SolutionCharacterize Dose Response of UNR844 as Measured by Change From Baseline in Monocular (Worse-seeing Eye) Distance-corrected Near Visual Acuity (DCNVA) at Month 3-0.146 logMARStandard Error 0.0228
p-value: 0.47495% CI: [-0.038, 0.081]Mixed-effect Model for Repeated Measures
p-value: 0.41995% CI: [-0.036, 0.086]Mixed-effect Model for Repeated Measures
p-value: 0.91495% CI: [-0.06, 0.067]Mixed-effect Model for Repeated Measures
p-value: 0.26395% CI: [-0.026, 0.094]Mixed-effect Model for Repeated Measures
Secondary

Percentage of Participants Gaining at Least 0.30 logMAR in Binocular Distance-corrected Near Visual Acuity (DCNVA) (Without Near Correction) From Baseline at Month 3

Percentage of participants gaining at least 0.3 logMAR in binocular DCNVA compared to baseline at Month 3. DCNVA is measured in Logarithm of Minimum Angle of Resolution (logMAR) at 40 cm, with subjects corrected for any distance refraction error. A low logMAR score represents good vision while a high logMAR score represents bad vision. Percentages were derived from Rubin's rule by integrating all results from multiple imputations. For subjects with missing DCNVA at Month 3, the value of DCNVA was imputed and dichotomized to derive the endpoint of gaining of 3 lines.

Time frame: Baseline, Month 3

Population: Full Analysis Set

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
UNR844 5 mg/mLPercentage of Participants Gaining at Least 0.30 logMAR in Binocular Distance-corrected Near Visual Acuity (DCNVA) (Without Near Correction) From Baseline at Month 34.4 Percentage of participants
UNR844 13.3 mg/mLPercentage of Participants Gaining at Least 0.30 logMAR in Binocular Distance-corrected Near Visual Acuity (DCNVA) (Without Near Correction) From Baseline at Month 39.3 Percentage of participants
UNR844 23 mg/mLPercentage of Participants Gaining at Least 0.30 logMAR in Binocular Distance-corrected Near Visual Acuity (DCNVA) (Without Near Correction) From Baseline at Month 314.9 Percentage of participants
UNR844 30 mg/mLPercentage of Participants Gaining at Least 0.30 logMAR in Binocular Distance-corrected Near Visual Acuity (DCNVA) (Without Near Correction) From Baseline at Month 35.1 Percentage of participants
Placebo Ophthalmic SolutionPercentage of Participants Gaining at Least 0.30 logMAR in Binocular Distance-corrected Near Visual Acuity (DCNVA) (Without Near Correction) From Baseline at Month 34.6 Percentage of participants
p-value: 0.51695% CI: [0.083, 10.847]Multiple Imputation, Logistic Regression
p-value: 0.17795% CI: [0.367, 16.398]Multiple Imputation, Logistic Regression
p-value: 0.07995% CI: [0.604, 22.094]Multiple Imputation, Logistic Regression
p-value: 0.47695% CI: [0.136, 8.381]Multiple Imputation, Logistic Regression
Secondary

Percentage of Participants Gaining at Least 0.30 logMAR in Monocular (Better-seeing Eye) Distance-corrected Near Visual Acuity (DCNVA) (Without Near Correction) From Baseline at Month 3

Percentage of participants gaining at least 0.3 logMAR in monocular (better-seeing eye) DCNVA compared to baseline at Month 3. DCNVA is measured in Logarithm of Minimum Angle of Resolution (logMAR) at 40 cm, with subjects corrected for any distance refraction error. A low logMAR score represents good vision while a high logMAR score represents bad vision. Percentages were derived from Rubin's rule by integrating all results from multiple imputations. For subjects with missing DCNVA at Month 3, the value of DCNVA was imputed and dichotomized to derive the endpoint of gaining of 3 lines.

Time frame: Baseline, Month 3

Population: Full Analysis Set

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
UNR844 5 mg/mLPercentage of Participants Gaining at Least 0.30 logMAR in Monocular (Better-seeing Eye) Distance-corrected Near Visual Acuity (DCNVA) (Without Near Correction) From Baseline at Month 36.3 Percentage of participants
UNR844 13.3 mg/mLPercentage of Participants Gaining at Least 0.30 logMAR in Monocular (Better-seeing Eye) Distance-corrected Near Visual Acuity (DCNVA) (Without Near Correction) From Baseline at Month 39.4 Percentage of participants
UNR844 23 mg/mLPercentage of Participants Gaining at Least 0.30 logMAR in Monocular (Better-seeing Eye) Distance-corrected Near Visual Acuity (DCNVA) (Without Near Correction) From Baseline at Month 30.3 Percentage of participants
UNR844 30 mg/mLPercentage of Participants Gaining at Least 0.30 logMAR in Monocular (Better-seeing Eye) Distance-corrected Near Visual Acuity (DCNVA) (Without Near Correction) From Baseline at Month 32.8 Percentage of participants
Placebo Ophthalmic SolutionPercentage of Participants Gaining at Least 0.30 logMAR in Monocular (Better-seeing Eye) Distance-corrected Near Visual Acuity (DCNVA) (Without Near Correction) From Baseline at Month 37.8 Percentage of participants
p-value: 0.72895% CI: [0.089, 3.593]Multiple Imputation, Logistic Regression
p-value: 0.42895% CI: [0.242, 5.529]Multiple Imputation, Logistic Regression
p-value: 0.5Multiple Imputation, Logistic Regression
p-value: 0.85195% CI: [0.026, 3.07]Multiple Imputation, Logistic Regression
Secondary

Percentage of Participants Gaining at Least 0.30 logMAR in Monocular (Worse-seeing Eye) Distance-corrected Near Visual Acuity (DCNVA) (Without Near Correction) From Baseline at Month 3

Percentage of participants gaining at least 0.3 logMAR in monocular (worse-seeing eye) DCNVA compared to baseline at Month 3. DCNVA is measured in Logarithm of Minimum Angle of Resolution (logMAR) at 40 cm, with subjects corrected for any distance refraction error. A low logMAR score represents good vision while a high logMAR score represents bad vision. Percentages were derived from Rubin's rule by integrating all results from multiple imputations. For subjects with missing DCNVA at Month 3, the value of DCNVA was imputed and dichotomized to derive the endpoint of gaining of 3 lines.

Time frame: Baseline, Month 3

Population: Full Analysis Set

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
UNR844 5 mg/mLPercentage of Participants Gaining at Least 0.30 logMAR in Monocular (Worse-seeing Eye) Distance-corrected Near Visual Acuity (DCNVA) (Without Near Correction) From Baseline at Month 313.0 Percentage of participants
UNR844 13.3 mg/mLPercentage of Participants Gaining at Least 0.30 logMAR in Monocular (Worse-seeing Eye) Distance-corrected Near Visual Acuity (DCNVA) (Without Near Correction) From Baseline at Month 39.0 Percentage of participants
UNR844 23 mg/mLPercentage of Participants Gaining at Least 0.30 logMAR in Monocular (Worse-seeing Eye) Distance-corrected Near Visual Acuity (DCNVA) (Without Near Correction) From Baseline at Month 38.7 Percentage of participants
UNR844 30 mg/mLPercentage of Participants Gaining at Least 0.30 logMAR in Monocular (Worse-seeing Eye) Distance-corrected Near Visual Acuity (DCNVA) (Without Near Correction) From Baseline at Month 310.0 Percentage of participants
Placebo Ophthalmic SolutionPercentage of Participants Gaining at Least 0.30 logMAR in Monocular (Worse-seeing Eye) Distance-corrected Near Visual Acuity (DCNVA) (Without Near Correction) From Baseline at Month 311.9 Percentage of participants
p-value: 0.57795% CI: [0.201, 3.726]Multiple Imputation, Logistic Regression
p-value: 0.80495% CI: [0.113, 2.353]Multiple Imputation, Logistic Regression
p-value: 0.8595% CI: [0.045, 2.602]Multiple Imputation, Logistic Regression
p-value: 0.68495% CI: [0.157, 3.08]Multiple Imputation, Logistic Regression
Post Hoc

All Collected Deaths

On-treatment deaths were collected from first dose of study medication to 30 days after the last dose of study medication, for a maximum timeframe of approx. 4 months. Post-treatment deaths were collected from day 31 after last dose of study medication to end of study, up to approx. 1 year and 1 month. All deaths refer to the sum of on-treatment and post-treatment deaths.

Time frame: On-treatment: up to 121 days, approx. 4 months. Off treatment: up to approx. 1 year and 1 month

Population: Safety Set

ArmMeasureGroupValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
UNR844 5 mg/mLAll Collected DeathsTotal Deaths0 Participants
UNR844 5 mg/mLAll Collected DeathsPost-Treatment Deaths0 Participants
UNR844 5 mg/mLAll Collected DeathsOn-Treatment Deaths0 Participants
UNR844 13.3 mg/mLAll Collected DeathsOn-Treatment Deaths0 Participants
UNR844 13.3 mg/mLAll Collected DeathsTotal Deaths0 Participants
UNR844 13.3 mg/mLAll Collected DeathsPost-Treatment Deaths0 Participants
UNR844 23 mg/mLAll Collected DeathsOn-Treatment Deaths0 Participants
UNR844 23 mg/mLAll Collected DeathsTotal Deaths0 Participants
UNR844 23 mg/mLAll Collected DeathsPost-Treatment Deaths0 Participants
UNR844 30 mg/mLAll Collected DeathsTotal Deaths0 Participants
UNR844 30 mg/mLAll Collected DeathsPost-Treatment Deaths0 Participants
UNR844 30 mg/mLAll Collected DeathsOn-Treatment Deaths0 Participants
Placebo Ophthalmic SolutionAll Collected DeathsOn-Treatment Deaths0 Participants
Placebo Ophthalmic SolutionAll Collected DeathsTotal Deaths1 Participants
Placebo Ophthalmic SolutionAll Collected DeathsPost-Treatment Deaths1 Participants

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026