Eating Disorders
Conditions
Brief summary
Eating disorders (EDs) are serious mental illnesses associated with high morbidity and mortality, clinical impairment, and comorbid psychopathology. Although evidence-based treatments for EDs have been established, the treatment gap is wide. Indeed, \<20% of individuals with EDs receive treatment. There is need for a novel solution not only to identify individuals with EDs but also to encourage mental health services use and to address treatment barriers. This study aims to implement a conversational agent or chatbot that is optimized to increase mental health services use among individuals with EDs through such features as: 1) education on the seriousness and consequences of EDs; 2) engaging the user in motivational interviewing to overcome barriers to care; 3) providing a personalized recommendation for seeking intervention; 4) repeated check-ins with the user to encourage follow-up with care. This study will utilize a randomized optimization trial with adults who have completed screening on the National Eating Disorders Association (NEDA) website and screen positive for an ED but are not in treatment to determine chatbot feasibility and to generate data on the effect of the chatbot on motivation for treatment and mental health services use. This trial will employ the Multiphase Optimization Strategy framework, using a 2\^4 full factorial design, to randomly assign participants to a combination of the four proposed intervention components (n=16 conditions) to isolate the active ingredients.
Interventions
A discussion with the chatbot, including follow ups over the course of 2 weeks to encourage help seeking for their eating disorder.
A discussion with the chatbot, including identifying a personalized recommendation for accessing help for their eating disorder.
A discussion with the chatbot, including motivational interviewing techniques to help overcome barriers to seeking care for their eating disorder.
A discussion with the chatbot, including only the core modules.
A discussion with the chatbot, including motivational interviewing techniques to help overcome barriers to seeking care for their eating disorder, identifying a personalized recommendation for accessing help for their eating disorder, and follow ups over the course of 2 weeks to encourage help seeking for their eating disorder.
A discussion with the chatbot, including motivational interviewing techniques to help overcome barriers to seeking care for their eating disorder and follow ups over the course of 2 weeks to encourage help seeking for their eating disorder.
A discussion with the chatbot, including identifying a personalized recommendation for accessing help for their eating disorder and follow ups over the course of 2 weeks to encourage help seeking for their eating disorder.
A discussion with the chatbot, including motivational interviewing techniques to help overcome barriers to seeking care for their eating disorder and identifying a personalized recommendation for accessing help for their eating disorder.
A discussion with the chatbot, including psychoeducational content to increase knowledge related to eating disorders.
A discussion with the chatbot, including psychoeducational content to increase knowledge related to eating disorders and follow ups over the course of 2 weeks to encourage help seeking for their eating disorder.
A discussion with the chatbot, including psychoeducational content to increase knowledge related to eating disorders and identifying a personalized recommendation for accessing help for their eating disorder.
A discussion with the chatbot, including psychoeducational content to increase knowledge related to eating disorders and motivational interviewing techniques to help overcome barriers to seeking care for their eating disorder.
A discussion with the chatbot, including psychoeducational content to increase knowledge related to eating disorders, motivational interviewing techniques to help overcome barriers to seeking care for their eating disorder, and identifying a personalized recommendation for accessing help for their eating disorder.
A discussion with the chatbot, including psychoeducational content to increase knowledge related to eating disorders, identifying a personalized recommendation for accessing help for their eating disorder, and follow ups over the course of 2 weeks to encourage help seeking for their eating disorder.
A discussion with the chatbot, including psychoeducational content to increase knowledge related to eating disorders, motivational interviewing techniques to help overcome barriers to seeking care for their eating disorder, and follow ups over the course of 2 weeks to encourage help seeking for their eating disorder.
A discussion with the chatbot, including psychoeducational content to increase knowledge related to eating disorders, motivational interviewing techniques to help overcome barriers to seeking care for their eating disorder, identifying a personalized recommendation for accessing help for their eating disorder, and follow ups over the course of 2 weeks to encourage help seeking for their eating disorder.
Sponsors
Study design
Eligibility
Inclusion criteria
* U.S. resident * English-speaking * Age 18 years or older * Owns a personal smartphone * Screens positive for a Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, 5th Edition (DSM-5) clinical or subclinical eating disorder * Not currently receiving treatment for an eating disorder
Exclusion criteria
* Non-U.S. resident * Younger than 18 years old * Does not own a personal smartphone * Does not screen positive for a DSM-5 clinical or subclinical eating disorder * Screens positive for Avoidant Restrictive Food Intake Disorder * Currently receiving treatment for an eating disorder
Design outcomes
Primary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Rates of Treatment/Services Utilization for Eating, Shape, or Weight Concerns Among All Participants Randomized to the Intervention Following Online Eating Disorder Screening | 2, 6, 14 Weeks from Engagement with the Intervention | Treatment utilization was measured at each follow-up time point (2, 6, and 14 weeks), which was assessed via the prompt, Have you tried or used any type of mental health help (e.g., self-help app, telehealth/in-person counseling, etc.) for your concerns related to your eating, shape, or weight in the past \[2, 6, or 14\] weeks?. We defined a participant as having utilized treatment at the first time they responded, yes (vs. no) to this question. The data presented below indicate the rates of self-reported receipt of treatment/services utilization among participants assigned (component on) or not assigned (component off) to each of the four chatbot components (motivational interviewing, psychoeducation, personalized recommendations, repeated administration), as delineated by each time point during which the aforementioned item was assesed. |
Secondary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Mean Willingness to Seek Psychotherapy | Baseline, 2 Weeks, 6 Weeks, 14 Weeks | Participants' willingness to seek psychotherapy was assessed via an identical item in the baseline assessment (i.e., before the initial chatbot assessment) as well as each off the follow-up assessments delivered at 2, 6, and 14 weeks post-intervention. The item prompted users to rate their willingness to seek in-person or telehealth psychotherapy in subsequent weeks. Responses were rated on a Likert scale from 1 (not at all important/ready) to 7 (very important/ready). Mean values reported below indicate the average Likert scale willingness rating among all participants at each time point who did (component turned on) and did not (component turned off). Statistical analyses outline the time and component effects on changes in mean willingness to seek pyschotherapy from baseline to 14 weeks post-interventioon. |
| Mean Attitude Toward Change for Concerns Related to Eating, Shape, or Weight Concerns Among All Participants Randomized to the Intervention Following Online Eating Disorder Screening | Baseline, 2 weeks, 6 weeks, 14 weeks | Participants' attitudes toward making changes (i.e., motivation toward seeking help) to address their personal eating, shape, and weight concerns were measured via identical items in the baseline assessment, and in each of the 2, 6, and 14 week follow-up assessments. Items included, How important is it for you to change your eating, shape, or weight concerns? and, How ready are you to make changes in your eating, shape, or weight concerns?. Both items were rated on a Likert scale from 1 (not at all important/ready) to 7 (very important/ready), and the sum of the two questions was used as an index of change/motivation attitudes. Values below indicate the average Likert scale attitude rating (from 2 (lowest) to 14 (highest)) among all participants at each time point who did (component turned on) and did not (component turned off) receive each component. Analyses outline the time, component, and time by component interaction effects on changes in motivation attitudes since baseline. |
Countries
United States
Participant flow
Recruitment details
Individuals who completed the NEDA screen and met all eligibility criteria were shown the baseline assessment. Individuals who completed the baseline, were U.S. residents, and endorsed owning a smartphone were shown the consent form. N= 205 individuals provided consent and were randomized to a condition.
Participants by arm
| Arm | Count |
|---|---|
| Repeated Administration Repeated Administration: A discussion with the chatbot, including follow ups over the course of 2 weeks to encourage help seeking for their eating disorder. | 13 |
| Personalized Recommendation Personalized Recommendation: A discussion with the chatbot, including identifying a personalized recommendation for accessing help for their eating disorder. | 12 |
| Motivational Interviewing Motivational Interviewing: A discussion with the chatbot, including motivational interviewing techniques to help overcome barriers to seeking care for their eating disorder. | 11 |
| Core Modules Only Core Modules Only: A discussion with the chatbot, including only the core modules. | 14 |
| Motivational Interviewing, Personalized Recommendation, Repeated Administration Motivational Interviewing, Personalized Recommendation, Repeated Administration: A discussion with the chatbot, including motivational interviewing techniques to help overcome barriers to seeking care for their eating disorder, identifying a personalized recommendation for accessing help for their eating disorder, and follow ups over the course of 2 weeks to encourage help seeking for their eating disorder. | 13 |
| Motivational Interviewing, Repeated Administration Motivational Interviewing, Repeated Administration: A discussion with the chatbot, including motivational interviewing techniques to help overcome barriers to seeking care for their eating disorder and follow ups over the course of 2 weeks to encourage help seeking for their eating disorder. | 13 |
| Motivational Interviewing, Personalized Recommendation Motivational Interviewing, Personalized Recommendation: A discussion with the chatbot, including motivational interviewing techniques to help overcome barriers to seeking care for their eating disorder and identifying a personalized recommendation for accessing help for their eating disorder. | 14 |
| Personalized Recommendation, Repeated Administration Personalized Recommendation, Repeated Administration: A discussion with the chatbot, including identifying a personalized recommendation for accessing help for their eating disorder and follow ups over the course of 2 weeks to encourage help seeking for their eating disorder. | 13 |
| Psychoeducation Psychoeducation: A discussion with the chatbot, including psychoeducational content to increase knowledge related to eating disorders. | 13 |
| Psychoeducation, Repeated Administration Psychoeducation, Repeated Administration: A discussion with the chatbot, including psychoeducational content to increase knowledge related to eating disorders and follow ups over the course of 2 weeks to encourage help seeking for their eating disorder. | 12 |
| Psychoeducation, Personalized Recommendation Psychoeducation, Personalized Recommendation: A discussion with the chatbot, including psychoeducational content to increase knowledge related to eating disorders and identifying a personalized recommendation for accessing help for their eating disorder. | 13 |
| Psychoeducation, Motivational Interviewing Psychoeducation, Motivational Interviewing: A discussion with the chatbot, including psychoeducational content to increase knowledge related to eating disorders and motivational interviewing techniques to help overcome barriers to seeking care for their eating disorder. | 13 |
| Psychoeducation, Motivational Interviewing, Personalized Recommendation Psychoeducation, Motivational Interviewing, Personalized Recommendation: A discussion with the chatbot, including psychoeducational content to increase knowledge related to eating disorders, motivational interviewing techniques to help overcome barriers to seeking care for their eating disorder, and identifying a personalized recommendation for accessing help for their eating disorder. | 13 |
| Psychoeducation, Personalized Recommendation, Repeated Administration Psychoeducation, Personalized Recommendation, Repeated Administration: A discussion with the chatbot, including psychoeducational content to increase knowledge related to eating disorders, identifying a personalized recommendation for accessing help for their eating disorder, and follow ups over the course of 2 weeks to encourage help seeking for their eating disorder. | 13 |
| Psychoeducation, Motivational Interviewing, Repeated Administration Psychoeducation, Motivational Interviewing, Repeated Administration: A discussion with the chatbot, including psychoeducational content to increase knowledge related to eating disorders, motivational interviewing techniques to help overcome barriers to seeking care for their eating disorder, and follow ups over the course of 2 weeks to encourage help seeking for their eating disorder. | 12 |
| Psychoeducation, Motivational Interviewing, Personalized Recommendation, Repeated Administration Psychoeducation, Motivational Interviewing, Personalized Recommendation, Repeated Administration: A discussion with the chatbot, including psychoeducational content to increase knowledge related to eating disorders, motivational interviewing techniques to help overcome barriers to seeking care for their eating disorder, identifying a personalized recommendation for accessing help for their eating disorder, and follow ups over the course of 2 weeks to encourage help seeking for their eating disorder. | 13 |
| Total | 205 |
Baseline characteristics
| Characteristic | Personalized Recommendation | Motivational Interviewing | Core Modules Only | Motivational Interviewing, Personalized Recommendation, Repeated Administration | Motivational Interviewing, Repeated Administration | Motivational Interviewing, Personalized Recommendation | Personalized Recommendation, Repeated Administration | Psychoeducation | Repeated Administration | Psychoeducation, Repeated Administration | Psychoeducation, Personalized Recommendation | Psychoeducation, Motivational Interviewing | Psychoeducation, Motivational Interviewing, Personalized Recommendation | Psychoeducation, Personalized Recommendation, Repeated Administration | Psychoeducation, Motivational Interviewing, Repeated Administration | Psychoeducation, Motivational Interviewing, Personalized Recommendation, Repeated Administration | Total |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Age, Continuous | 29.50 years STANDARD_DEVIATION 8.19 | 36.27 years STANDARD_DEVIATION 13.98 | 38.42 years STANDARD_DEVIATION 15.32 | 30.69 years STANDARD_DEVIATION 10.93 | 37.69 years STANDARD_DEVIATION 14.85 | 29.57 years STANDARD_DEVIATION 7.74 | 29.57 years STANDARD_DEVIATION 7.74 | 40.46 years STANDARD_DEVIATION 18.33 | 28.31 years STANDARD_DEVIATION 7.71 | 29.15 years STANDARD_DEVIATION 9.51 | 32.42 years STANDARD_DEVIATION 13.34 | 39.31 years STANDARD_DEVIATION 14.06 | 31.10 years STANDARD_DEVIATION 10.65 | 30.38 years STANDARD_DEVIATION 12.47 | 32.38 years STANDARD_DEVIATION 13.12 | 34.58 years STANDARD_DEVIATION 14.09 | 30.00 years STANDARD_DEVIATION 9.41 |
| Age, Customized 18-24 | 2 participants | 2 participants | 3 participants | 5 participants | 3 participants | 3 participants | 4 participants | 5 participants | 6 participants | 3 participants | 2 participants | 4 participants | 6 participants | 4 participants | 4 participants | 5 participants | 61 participants |
| Age, Customized 25-34 | 7 participants | 4 participants | 4 participants | 4 participants | 3 participants | 9 participants | 2 participants | 5 participants | 5 participants | 4 participants | 3 participants | 5 participants | 3 participants | 5 participants | 3 participants | 5 participants | 71 participants |
| Age, Customized 35-44 | 3 participants | 2 participants | 1 participants | 2 participants | 2 participants | 1 participants | 1 participants | 2 participants | 1 participants | 3 participants | 4 participants | 1 participants | 1 participants | 2 participants | 3 participants | 2 participants | 31 participants |
| Age, Customized 45-54 | 0 participants | 2 participants | 3 participants | 2 participants | 4 participants | 1 participants | 3 participants | 1 participants | 1 participants | 0 participants | 2 participants | 3 participants | 3 participants | 1 participants | 1 participants | 0 participants | 27 participants |
| Age, Customized 55-64 | 0 participants | 1 participants | 3 participants | 0 participants | 1 participants | 0 participants | 2 participants | 0 participants | 0 participants | 1 participants | 1 participants | 0 participants | 0 participants | 1 participants | 0 participants | 1 participants | 11 participants |
| Age, Customized 65-74 | 0 participants | 0 participants | 0 participants | 0 participants | 0 participants | 0 participants | 1 participants | 0 participants | 0 participants | 1 participants | 1 participants | 0 participants | 0 participants | 0 participants | 1 participants | 0 participants | 4 participants |
| Ethnicity (NIH/OMB) Hispanic or Latino | 1 Participants | 1 Participants | 0 Participants | 1 Participants | 3 Participants | 1 Participants | 1 Participants | 1 Participants | 1 Participants | 0 Participants | 0 Participants | 2 Participants | 2 Participants | 1 Participants | 1 Participants | 1 Participants | 17 Participants |
| Ethnicity (NIH/OMB) Not Hispanic or Latino | 11 Participants | 10 Participants | 14 Participants | 12 Participants | 10 Participants | 13 Participants | 12 Participants | 12 Participants | 12 Participants | 12 Participants | 13 Participants | 11 Participants | 11 Participants | 12 Participants | 11 Participants | 12 Participants | 188 Participants |
| Ethnicity (NIH/OMB) Unknown or Not Reported | 0 Participants | 0 Participants | 0 Participants | 0 Participants | 0 Participants | 0 Participants | 0 Participants | 0 Participants | 0 Participants | 0 Participants | 0 Participants | 0 Participants | 0 Participants | 0 Participants | 0 Participants | 0 Participants | 0 Participants |
| Race (NIH/OMB) American Indian or Alaska Native | 0 Participants | 0 Participants | 0 Participants | 0 Participants | 0 Participants | 0 Participants | 0 Participants | 0 Participants | 0 Participants | 0 Participants | 0 Participants | 0 Participants | 0 Participants | 0 Participants | 0 Participants | 0 Participants | 0 Participants |
| Race (NIH/OMB) Asian | 2 Participants | 0 Participants | 0 Participants | 0 Participants | 1 Participants | 1 Participants | 1 Participants | 1 Participants | 0 Participants | 0 Participants | 2 Participants | 1 Participants | 3 Participants | 0 Participants | 0 Participants | 2 Participants | 14 Participants |
| Race (NIH/OMB) Black or African American | 0 Participants | 0 Participants | 1 Participants | 1 Participants | 0 Participants | 1 Participants | 0 Participants | 0 Participants | 0 Participants | 0 Participants | 0 Participants | 0 Participants | 0 Participants | 0 Participants | 0 Participants | 0 Participants | 3 Participants |
| Race (NIH/OMB) More than one race | 1 Participants | 1 Participants | 0 Participants | 0 Participants | 1 Participants | 1 Participants | 3 Participants | 0 Participants | 1 Participants | 0 Participants | 0 Participants | 3 Participants | 1 Participants | 1 Participants | 1 Participants | 2 Participants | 16 Participants |
| Race (NIH/OMB) Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander | 0 Participants | 0 Participants | 0 Participants | 0 Participants | 0 Participants | 0 Participants | 0 Participants | 0 Participants | 0 Participants | 0 Participants | 0 Participants | 0 Participants | 0 Participants | 0 Participants | 0 Participants | 0 Participants | 0 Participants |
| Race (NIH/OMB) Unknown or Not Reported | 0 Participants | 1 Participants | 1 Participants | 1 Participants | 2 Participants | 0 Participants | 0 Participants | 0 Participants | 1 Participants | 0 Participants | 0 Participants | 0 Participants | 0 Participants | 1 Participants | 1 Participants | 1 Participants | 9 Participants |
| Race (NIH/OMB) White | 9 Participants | 9 Participants | 12 Participants | 11 Participants | 9 Participants | 11 Participants | 9 Participants | 12 Participants | 11 Participants | 12 Participants | 11 Participants | 9 Participants | 9 Participants | 11 Participants | 10 Participants | 8 Participants | 163 Participants |
| Region of Enrollment United States | 12 participants | 11 participants | 14 participants | 13 participants | 13 participants | 14 participants | 13 participants | 13 participants | 13 participants | 12 participants | 13 participants | 13 participants | 13 participants | 13 participants | 12 participants | 13 participants | 205 participants |
| Sex: Female, Male Female | 10 Participants | 10 Participants | 14 Participants | 12 Participants | 13 Participants | 14 Participants | 13 Participants | 12 Participants | 9 Participants | 11 Participants | 13 Participants | 13 Participants | 13 Participants | 11 Participants | 11 Participants | 13 Participants | 192 Participants |
| Sex: Female, Male Male | 2 Participants | 1 Participants | 0 Participants | 1 Participants | 0 Participants | 0 Participants | 0 Participants | 1 Participants | 4 Participants | 1 Participants | 0 Participants | 0 Participants | 0 Participants | 2 Participants | 1 Participants | 0 Participants | 13 Participants |
| Sex/Gender, Customized Female | 10 Participants | 10 Participants | 14 Participants | 11 Participants | 12 Participants | 13 Participants | 13 Participants | 11 Participants | 9 Participants | 11 Participants | 13 Participants | 11 Participants | 13 Participants | 10 Participants | 10 Participants | 13 Participants | 184 Participants |
| Sex/Gender, Customized Male | 2 Participants | 1 Participants | 0 Participants | 1 Participants | 0 Participants | 0 Participants | 0 Participants | 1 Participants | 3 Participants | 1 Participants | 0 Participants | 0 Participants | 0 Participants | 2 Participants | 1 Participants | 0 Participants | 12 Participants |
| Sex/Gender, Customized Non-binary/third gender | 0 Participants | 0 Participants | 0 Participants | 1 Participants | 1 Participants | 0 Participants | 0 Participants | 1 Participants | 1 Participants | 0 Participants | 0 Participants | 1 Participants | 0 Participants | 1 Participants | 1 Participants | 0 Participants | 7 Participants |
| Sex/Gender, Customized Prefer not to say | 0 Participants | 0 Participants | 0 Participants | 0 Participants | 0 Participants | 1 Participants | 0 Participants | 0 Participants | 0 Participants | 0 Participants | 0 Participants | 1 Participants | 0 Participants | 0 Participants | 0 Participants | 0 Participants | 2 Participants |
Adverse events
| Event type | EG000 affected / at risk | EG001 affected / at risk | EG002 affected / at risk | EG003 affected / at risk | EG004 affected / at risk | EG005 affected / at risk | EG006 affected / at risk | EG007 affected / at risk | EG008 affected / at risk | EG009 affected / at risk | EG010 affected / at risk | EG011 affected / at risk | EG012 affected / at risk | EG013 affected / at risk | EG014 affected / at risk | EG015 affected / at risk |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| deaths Total, all-cause mortality | 0 / 13 | 0 / 12 | 0 / 11 | 0 / 14 | 0 / 13 | 0 / 13 | 0 / 14 | 0 / 13 | 0 / 13 | 0 / 12 | 0 / 13 | 0 / 13 | 0 / 13 | 0 / 13 | 0 / 12 | 0 / 13 |
| other Total, other adverse events | 0 / 13 | 0 / 12 | 0 / 11 | 0 / 14 | 0 / 13 | 0 / 13 | 0 / 14 | 0 / 13 | 0 / 13 | 0 / 12 | 0 / 13 | 0 / 13 | 0 / 13 | 0 / 13 | 0 / 12 | 0 / 13 |
| serious Total, serious adverse events | 0 / 13 | 0 / 12 | 0 / 11 | 0 / 14 | 0 / 13 | 0 / 13 | 0 / 14 | 0 / 13 | 0 / 13 | 0 / 12 | 0 / 13 | 0 / 13 | 0 / 13 | 0 / 13 | 0 / 12 | 0 / 13 |
Outcome results
Rates of Treatment/Services Utilization for Eating, Shape, or Weight Concerns Among All Participants Randomized to the Intervention Following Online Eating Disorder Screening
Treatment utilization was measured at each follow-up time point (2, 6, and 14 weeks), which was assessed via the prompt, Have you tried or used any type of mental health help (e.g., self-help app, telehealth/in-person counseling, etc.) for your concerns related to your eating, shape, or weight in the past \[2, 6, or 14\] weeks?. We defined a participant as having utilized treatment at the first time they responded, yes (vs. no) to this question. The data presented below indicate the rates of self-reported receipt of treatment/services utilization among participants assigned (component on) or not assigned (component off) to each of the four chatbot components (motivational interviewing, psychoeducation, personalized recommendations, repeated administration), as delineated by each time point during which the aforementioned item was assesed.
Time frame: 2, 6, 14 Weeks from Engagement with the Intervention
Population: All participants who engaged with the intervention and completed the treatment utilization item at each follow up assessment (2, 6, and 14 weeks post intervention) are included. Participants in each of the 16 factorial conditions were sorted based on whether or not each of the four chatbot components were assigned. This method was used in order to understand which combination of components are essential in the design of an optimized chatbot for use in a future randomized controlled trial.
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Motivational Interviewing On | Rates of Treatment/Services Utilization for Eating, Shape, or Weight Concerns Among All Participants Randomized to the Intervention Following Online Eating Disorder Screening | Number of Participants Reporting New Treatment Receipt at 6 Weeks from Baseline | 5 Participants |
| Motivational Interviewing On | Rates of Treatment/Services Utilization for Eating, Shape, or Weight Concerns Among All Participants Randomized to the Intervention Following Online Eating Disorder Screening | Number of Participants Reporting New Treatment Receipt at 14 Weeks from Baseline | 6 Participants |
| Motivational Interviewing On | Rates of Treatment/Services Utilization for Eating, Shape, or Weight Concerns Among All Participants Randomized to the Intervention Following Online Eating Disorder Screening | Number of Participants Reporting New Treatment Receipt at 2 Weeks from Baseline | 40 Participants |
| Motivational Interviewing On | Rates of Treatment/Services Utilization for Eating, Shape, or Weight Concerns Among All Participants Randomized to the Intervention Following Online Eating Disorder Screening | Cumulative Sum of Participants Reporting Treatment Receipt over Study Period | 51 Participants |
| Motivational Interviewing Off | Rates of Treatment/Services Utilization for Eating, Shape, or Weight Concerns Among All Participants Randomized to the Intervention Following Online Eating Disorder Screening | Number of Participants Reporting New Treatment Receipt at 2 Weeks from Baseline | 41 Participants |
| Motivational Interviewing Off | Rates of Treatment/Services Utilization for Eating, Shape, or Weight Concerns Among All Participants Randomized to the Intervention Following Online Eating Disorder Screening | Number of Participants Reporting New Treatment Receipt at 14 Weeks from Baseline | 9 Participants |
| Motivational Interviewing Off | Rates of Treatment/Services Utilization for Eating, Shape, or Weight Concerns Among All Participants Randomized to the Intervention Following Online Eating Disorder Screening | Number of Participants Reporting New Treatment Receipt at 6 Weeks from Baseline | 10 Participants |
| Motivational Interviewing Off | Rates of Treatment/Services Utilization for Eating, Shape, or Weight Concerns Among All Participants Randomized to the Intervention Following Online Eating Disorder Screening | Cumulative Sum of Participants Reporting Treatment Receipt over Study Period | 60 Participants |
| Personalized Recommendation On | Rates of Treatment/Services Utilization for Eating, Shape, or Weight Concerns Among All Participants Randomized to the Intervention Following Online Eating Disorder Screening | Cumulative Sum of Participants Reporting Treatment Receipt over Study Period | 45 Participants |
| Personalized Recommendation On | Rates of Treatment/Services Utilization for Eating, Shape, or Weight Concerns Among All Participants Randomized to the Intervention Following Online Eating Disorder Screening | Number of Participants Reporting New Treatment Receipt at 2 Weeks from Baseline | 45 Participants |
| Personalized Recommendation On | Rates of Treatment/Services Utilization for Eating, Shape, or Weight Concerns Among All Participants Randomized to the Intervention Following Online Eating Disorder Screening | Number of Participants Reporting New Treatment Receipt at 6 Weeks from Baseline | 8 Participants |
| Personalized Recommendation On | Rates of Treatment/Services Utilization for Eating, Shape, or Weight Concerns Among All Participants Randomized to the Intervention Following Online Eating Disorder Screening | Number of Participants Reporting New Treatment Receipt at 14 Weeks from Baseline | 6 Participants |
| Personalized Recommendation Off | Rates of Treatment/Services Utilization for Eating, Shape, or Weight Concerns Among All Participants Randomized to the Intervention Following Online Eating Disorder Screening | Number of Participants Reporting New Treatment Receipt at 14 Weeks from Baseline | 9 Participants |
| Personalized Recommendation Off | Rates of Treatment/Services Utilization for Eating, Shape, or Weight Concerns Among All Participants Randomized to the Intervention Following Online Eating Disorder Screening | Number of Participants Reporting New Treatment Receipt at 6 Weeks from Baseline | 7 Participants |
| Personalized Recommendation Off | Rates of Treatment/Services Utilization for Eating, Shape, or Weight Concerns Among All Participants Randomized to the Intervention Following Online Eating Disorder Screening | Cumulative Sum of Participants Reporting Treatment Receipt over Study Period | 36 Participants |
| Personalized Recommendation Off | Rates of Treatment/Services Utilization for Eating, Shape, or Weight Concerns Among All Participants Randomized to the Intervention Following Online Eating Disorder Screening | Number of Participants Reporting New Treatment Receipt at 2 Weeks from Baseline | 36 Participants |
| Psychoeducation On | Rates of Treatment/Services Utilization for Eating, Shape, or Weight Concerns Among All Participants Randomized to the Intervention Following Online Eating Disorder Screening | Number of Participants Reporting New Treatment Receipt at 6 Weeks from Baseline | 3 Participants |
| Psychoeducation On | Rates of Treatment/Services Utilization for Eating, Shape, or Weight Concerns Among All Participants Randomized to the Intervention Following Online Eating Disorder Screening | Number of Participants Reporting New Treatment Receipt at 14 Weeks from Baseline | 8 Participants |
| Psychoeducation On | Rates of Treatment/Services Utilization for Eating, Shape, or Weight Concerns Among All Participants Randomized to the Intervention Following Online Eating Disorder Screening | Number of Participants Reporting New Treatment Receipt at 2 Weeks from Baseline | 42 Participants |
| Psychoeducation On | Rates of Treatment/Services Utilization for Eating, Shape, or Weight Concerns Among All Participants Randomized to the Intervention Following Online Eating Disorder Screening | Cumulative Sum of Participants Reporting Treatment Receipt over Study Period | 42 Participants |
| Psychoeducation Off | Rates of Treatment/Services Utilization for Eating, Shape, or Weight Concerns Among All Participants Randomized to the Intervention Following Online Eating Disorder Screening | Number of Participants Reporting New Treatment Receipt at 2 Weeks from Baseline | 39 Participants |
| Psychoeducation Off | Rates of Treatment/Services Utilization for Eating, Shape, or Weight Concerns Among All Participants Randomized to the Intervention Following Online Eating Disorder Screening | Number of Participants Reporting New Treatment Receipt at 14 Weeks from Baseline | 7 Participants |
| Psychoeducation Off | Rates of Treatment/Services Utilization for Eating, Shape, or Weight Concerns Among All Participants Randomized to the Intervention Following Online Eating Disorder Screening | Number of Participants Reporting New Treatment Receipt at 6 Weeks from Baseline | 12 Participants |
| Psychoeducation Off | Rates of Treatment/Services Utilization for Eating, Shape, or Weight Concerns Among All Participants Randomized to the Intervention Following Online Eating Disorder Screening | Cumulative Sum of Participants Reporting Treatment Receipt over Study Period | 39 Participants |
| Repeated Administration On | Rates of Treatment/Services Utilization for Eating, Shape, or Weight Concerns Among All Participants Randomized to the Intervention Following Online Eating Disorder Screening | Cumulative Sum of Participants Reporting Treatment Receipt over Study Period | 46 Participants |
| Repeated Administration On | Rates of Treatment/Services Utilization for Eating, Shape, or Weight Concerns Among All Participants Randomized to the Intervention Following Online Eating Disorder Screening | Number of Participants Reporting New Treatment Receipt at 6 Weeks from Baseline | 5 Participants |
| Repeated Administration On | Rates of Treatment/Services Utilization for Eating, Shape, or Weight Concerns Among All Participants Randomized to the Intervention Following Online Eating Disorder Screening | Number of Participants Reporting New Treatment Receipt at 2 Weeks from Baseline | 46 Participants |
| Repeated Administration On | Rates of Treatment/Services Utilization for Eating, Shape, or Weight Concerns Among All Participants Randomized to the Intervention Following Online Eating Disorder Screening | Number of Participants Reporting New Treatment Receipt at 14 Weeks from Baseline | 8 Participants |
| Repeated Administration Off | Rates of Treatment/Services Utilization for Eating, Shape, or Weight Concerns Among All Participants Randomized to the Intervention Following Online Eating Disorder Screening | Number of Participants Reporting New Treatment Receipt at 2 Weeks from Baseline | 35 Participants |
| Repeated Administration Off | Rates of Treatment/Services Utilization for Eating, Shape, or Weight Concerns Among All Participants Randomized to the Intervention Following Online Eating Disorder Screening | Number of Participants Reporting New Treatment Receipt at 14 Weeks from Baseline | 7 Participants |
| Repeated Administration Off | Rates of Treatment/Services Utilization for Eating, Shape, or Weight Concerns Among All Participants Randomized to the Intervention Following Online Eating Disorder Screening | Cumulative Sum of Participants Reporting Treatment Receipt over Study Period | 35 Participants |
| Repeated Administration Off | Rates of Treatment/Services Utilization for Eating, Shape, or Weight Concerns Among All Participants Randomized to the Intervention Following Online Eating Disorder Screening | Number of Participants Reporting New Treatment Receipt at 6 Weeks from Baseline | 10 Participants |
Mean Attitude Toward Change for Concerns Related to Eating, Shape, or Weight Concerns Among All Participants Randomized to the Intervention Following Online Eating Disorder Screening
Participants' attitudes toward making changes (i.e., motivation toward seeking help) to address their personal eating, shape, and weight concerns were measured via identical items in the baseline assessment, and in each of the 2, 6, and 14 week follow-up assessments. Items included, How important is it for you to change your eating, shape, or weight concerns? and, How ready are you to make changes in your eating, shape, or weight concerns?. Both items were rated on a Likert scale from 1 (not at all important/ready) to 7 (very important/ready), and the sum of the two questions was used as an index of change/motivation attitudes. Values below indicate the average Likert scale attitude rating (from 2 (lowest) to 14 (highest)) among all participants at each time point who did (component turned on) and did not (component turned off) receive each component. Analyses outline the time, component, and time by component interaction effects on changes in motivation attitudes since baseline.
Time frame: Baseline, 2 weeks, 6 weeks, 14 weeks
Population: All participants randomized to the intervention (n=205) were included, with missing data accommodated using maximum likelihood estimation. This study uses a factorial design; participants were randomized to one of 16 conditions, with each condition receiving a different combination of the four chatbot components (motivational interviewing, psychoeducation, personalized recommendations, repeated administration) turned off or on. Data below are presented as such.
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Motivational Interviewing On | Mean Attitude Toward Change for Concerns Related to Eating, Shape, or Weight Concerns Among All Participants Randomized to the Intervention Following Online Eating Disorder Screening | Baseline | 11.80 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 2.35 |
| Motivational Interviewing On | Mean Attitude Toward Change for Concerns Related to Eating, Shape, or Weight Concerns Among All Participants Randomized to the Intervention Following Online Eating Disorder Screening | 2 Weeks from Baseline | 10.73 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 2.59 |
| Motivational Interviewing On | Mean Attitude Toward Change for Concerns Related to Eating, Shape, or Weight Concerns Among All Participants Randomized to the Intervention Following Online Eating Disorder Screening | 6 Weeks from Baseline | 10.27 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 2.91 |
| Motivational Interviewing On | Mean Attitude Toward Change for Concerns Related to Eating, Shape, or Weight Concerns Among All Participants Randomized to the Intervention Following Online Eating Disorder Screening | 14 Weeks from Baseline | 9.87 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 3.09 |
| Motivational Interviewing Off | Mean Attitude Toward Change for Concerns Related to Eating, Shape, or Weight Concerns Among All Participants Randomized to the Intervention Following Online Eating Disorder Screening | 14 Weeks from Baseline | 10.45 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 3.28 |
| Motivational Interviewing Off | Mean Attitude Toward Change for Concerns Related to Eating, Shape, or Weight Concerns Among All Participants Randomized to the Intervention Following Online Eating Disorder Screening | 2 Weeks from Baseline | 10.70 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 2.95 |
| Motivational Interviewing Off | Mean Attitude Toward Change for Concerns Related to Eating, Shape, or Weight Concerns Among All Participants Randomized to the Intervention Following Online Eating Disorder Screening | Baseline | 11.05 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 2.89 |
| Motivational Interviewing Off | Mean Attitude Toward Change for Concerns Related to Eating, Shape, or Weight Concerns Among All Participants Randomized to the Intervention Following Online Eating Disorder Screening | 6 Weeks from Baseline | 10.97 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 2.99 |
| Personalized Recommendation On | Mean Attitude Toward Change for Concerns Related to Eating, Shape, or Weight Concerns Among All Participants Randomized to the Intervention Following Online Eating Disorder Screening | Baseline | 11.40 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 2.66 |
| Personalized Recommendation On | Mean Attitude Toward Change for Concerns Related to Eating, Shape, or Weight Concerns Among All Participants Randomized to the Intervention Following Online Eating Disorder Screening | 14 Weeks from Baseline | 10.45 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 3.27 |
| Personalized Recommendation On | Mean Attitude Toward Change for Concerns Related to Eating, Shape, or Weight Concerns Among All Participants Randomized to the Intervention Following Online Eating Disorder Screening | 2 Weeks from Baseline | 10.53 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 2.65 |
| Personalized Recommendation On | Mean Attitude Toward Change for Concerns Related to Eating, Shape, or Weight Concerns Among All Participants Randomized to the Intervention Following Online Eating Disorder Screening | 6 Weeks from Baseline | 10.62 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 3.01 |
| Personalized Recommendation Off | Mean Attitude Toward Change for Concerns Related to Eating, Shape, or Weight Concerns Among All Participants Randomized to the Intervention Following Online Eating Disorder Screening | Baseline | 11.45 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 2.68 |
| Personalized Recommendation Off | Mean Attitude Toward Change for Concerns Related to Eating, Shape, or Weight Concerns Among All Participants Randomized to the Intervention Following Online Eating Disorder Screening | 2 Weeks from Baseline | 10.90 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 2.89 |
| Personalized Recommendation Off | Mean Attitude Toward Change for Concerns Related to Eating, Shape, or Weight Concerns Among All Participants Randomized to the Intervention Following Online Eating Disorder Screening | 6 Weeks from Baseline | 10.64 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 2.93 |
| Personalized Recommendation Off | Mean Attitude Toward Change for Concerns Related to Eating, Shape, or Weight Concerns Among All Participants Randomized to the Intervention Following Online Eating Disorder Screening | 14 Weeks from Baseline | 9.86 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 3.1 |
| Psychoeducation On | Mean Attitude Toward Change for Concerns Related to Eating, Shape, or Weight Concerns Among All Participants Randomized to the Intervention Following Online Eating Disorder Screening | 14 Weeks from Baseline | 10.01 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 3.28 |
| Psychoeducation On | Mean Attitude Toward Change for Concerns Related to Eating, Shape, or Weight Concerns Among All Participants Randomized to the Intervention Following Online Eating Disorder Screening | 6 Weeks from Baseline | 10.37 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 3.09 |
| Psychoeducation On | Mean Attitude Toward Change for Concerns Related to Eating, Shape, or Weight Concerns Among All Participants Randomized to the Intervention Following Online Eating Disorder Screening | 2 Weeks from Baseline | 10.31 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 2.93 |
| Psychoeducation On | Mean Attitude Toward Change for Concerns Related to Eating, Shape, or Weight Concerns Among All Participants Randomized to the Intervention Following Online Eating Disorder Screening | Baseline | 11.40 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 2.7 |
| Psychoeducation Off | Mean Attitude Toward Change for Concerns Related to Eating, Shape, or Weight Concerns Among All Participants Randomized to the Intervention Following Online Eating Disorder Screening | 14 Weeks from Baseline | 10.32 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 3.12 |
| Psychoeducation Off | Mean Attitude Toward Change for Concerns Related to Eating, Shape, or Weight Concerns Among All Participants Randomized to the Intervention Following Online Eating Disorder Screening | 6 Weeks from Baseline | 10.90 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 2.81 |
| Psychoeducation Off | Mean Attitude Toward Change for Concerns Related to Eating, Shape, or Weight Concerns Among All Participants Randomized to the Intervention Following Online Eating Disorder Screening | 2 Weeks from Baseline | 11.10 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 2.57 |
| Psychoeducation Off | Mean Attitude Toward Change for Concerns Related to Eating, Shape, or Weight Concerns Among All Participants Randomized to the Intervention Following Online Eating Disorder Screening | Baseline | 11.45 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 2.63 |
| Repeated Administration On | Mean Attitude Toward Change for Concerns Related to Eating, Shape, or Weight Concerns Among All Participants Randomized to the Intervention Following Online Eating Disorder Screening | 14 Weeks from Baseline | 10.54 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 3.02 |
| Repeated Administration On | Mean Attitude Toward Change for Concerns Related to Eating, Shape, or Weight Concerns Among All Participants Randomized to the Intervention Following Online Eating Disorder Screening | Baseline | 11.34 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 2.76 |
| Repeated Administration On | Mean Attitude Toward Change for Concerns Related to Eating, Shape, or Weight Concerns Among All Participants Randomized to the Intervention Following Online Eating Disorder Screening | 6 Weeks from Baseline | 10.89 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 2.72 |
| Repeated Administration On | Mean Attitude Toward Change for Concerns Related to Eating, Shape, or Weight Concerns Among All Participants Randomized to the Intervention Following Online Eating Disorder Screening | 2 Weeks from Baseline | 10.86 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 2.6 |
| Repeated Administration Off | Mean Attitude Toward Change for Concerns Related to Eating, Shape, or Weight Concerns Among All Participants Randomized to the Intervention Following Online Eating Disorder Screening | 2 Weeks from Baseline | 10.57 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 2.94 |
| Repeated Administration Off | Mean Attitude Toward Change for Concerns Related to Eating, Shape, or Weight Concerns Among All Participants Randomized to the Intervention Following Online Eating Disorder Screening | 6 Weeks from Baseline | 10.36 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 3.19 |
| Repeated Administration Off | Mean Attitude Toward Change for Concerns Related to Eating, Shape, or Weight Concerns Among All Participants Randomized to the Intervention Following Online Eating Disorder Screening | 14 Weeks from Baseline | 9.83 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 3.33 |
| Repeated Administration Off | Mean Attitude Toward Change for Concerns Related to Eating, Shape, or Weight Concerns Among All Participants Randomized to the Intervention Following Online Eating Disorder Screening | Baseline | 11.50 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 2.57 |
Mean Willingness to Seek Psychotherapy
Participants' willingness to seek psychotherapy was assessed via an identical item in the baseline assessment (i.e., before the initial chatbot assessment) as well as each off the follow-up assessments delivered at 2, 6, and 14 weeks post-intervention. The item prompted users to rate their willingness to seek in-person or telehealth psychotherapy in subsequent weeks. Responses were rated on a Likert scale from 1 (not at all important/ready) to 7 (very important/ready). Mean values reported below indicate the average Likert scale willingness rating among all participants at each time point who did (component turned on) and did not (component turned off). Statistical analyses outline the time and component effects on changes in mean willingness to seek pyschotherapy from baseline to 14 weeks post-interventioon.
Time frame: Baseline, 2 Weeks, 6 Weeks, 14 Weeks
Population: The analysis population included those individuals who did not report utilizing treatment/services at any of the three follow-up assessments. Treatment utilization was assessed via the item,Have you tried or used any type of mental health help (e.g., self-help app, telehealth/in-person counseling, etc.) for your concerns related to your eating, shape, or weight in the past past \[2, 6, or 14\] weeks? Participants who did not respond yes to this item were included in this analysis.
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Motivational Interviewing On | Mean Willingness to Seek Psychotherapy | 6 Weeks from Baseline | 3.77 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 2.07 |
| Motivational Interviewing On | Mean Willingness to Seek Psychotherapy | 14 Weeks from Baseline | 3.71 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 1.98 |
| Motivational Interviewing On | Mean Willingness to Seek Psychotherapy | 2 Weeks from Baseline | 3.88 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 2.03 |
| Motivational Interviewing On | Mean Willingness to Seek Psychotherapy | Baseline | 4.64 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 1.92 |
| Motivational Interviewing Off | Mean Willingness to Seek Psychotherapy | Baseline | 4.23 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 2.03 |
| Motivational Interviewing Off | Mean Willingness to Seek Psychotherapy | 6 Weeks from Baseline | 3.56 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 2.13 |
| Motivational Interviewing Off | Mean Willingness to Seek Psychotherapy | 2 Weeks from Baseline | 3.47 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 1.9 |
| Motivational Interviewing Off | Mean Willingness to Seek Psychotherapy | 14 Weeks from Baseline | 3.41 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 1.77 |
| Personalized Recommendation On | Mean Willingness to Seek Psychotherapy | 6 Weeks from Baseline | 4.00 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 2.1 |
| Personalized Recommendation On | Mean Willingness to Seek Psychotherapy | 2 Weeks from Baseline | 3.85 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 1.84 |
| Personalized Recommendation On | Mean Willingness to Seek Psychotherapy | 14 Weeks from Baseline | 3.11 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 1.78 |
| Personalized Recommendation On | Mean Willingness to Seek Psychotherapy | Baseline | 4.30 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 1.88 |
| Personalized Recommendation Off | Mean Willingness to Seek Psychotherapy | 2 Weeks from Baseline | 3.60 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 2.08 |
| Personalized Recommendation Off | Mean Willingness to Seek Psychotherapy | Baseline | 4.57 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 2.05 |
| Personalized Recommendation Off | Mean Willingness to Seek Psychotherapy | 14 Weeks from Baseline | 4.00 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 1.89 |
| Personalized Recommendation Off | Mean Willingness to Seek Psychotherapy | 6 Weeks from Baseline | 3.45 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 2.06 |
| Psychoeducation On | Mean Willingness to Seek Psychotherapy | 14 Weeks from Baseline | 3.62 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 2.11 |
| Psychoeducation On | Mean Willingness to Seek Psychotherapy | Baseline | 4.30 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 2.08 |
| Psychoeducation On | Mean Willingness to Seek Psychotherapy | 2 Weeks from Baseline | 3.96 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 1.88 |
| Psychoeducation On | Mean Willingness to Seek Psychotherapy | 6 Weeks from Baseline | 3.86 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 2.19 |
| Psychoeducation Off | Mean Willingness to Seek Psychotherapy | 6 Weeks from Baseline | 3.44 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 1.93 |
| Psychoeducation Off | Mean Willingness to Seek Psychotherapy | Baseline | 4.60 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 1.87 |
| Psychoeducation Off | Mean Willingness to Seek Psychotherapy | 14 Weeks from Baseline | 3.53 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 1.59 |
| Psychoeducation Off | Mean Willingness to Seek Psychotherapy | 2 Weeks from Baseline | 3.43 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 2.06 |
| Repeated Administration On | Mean Willingness to Seek Psychotherapy | 2 Weeks from Baseline | 4.71 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 1.79 |
| Repeated Administration On | Mean Willingness to Seek Psychotherapy | 6 Weeks from Baseline | 3.93 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 2.12 |
| Repeated Administration On | Mean Willingness to Seek Psychotherapy | Baseline | 4.69 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 2.03 |
| Repeated Administration On | Mean Willingness to Seek Psychotherapy | 14 Weeks from Baseline | 3.85 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 1.72 |
| Repeated Administration Off | Mean Willingness to Seek Psychotherapy | 14 Weeks from Baseline | 3.44 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 1.96 |
| Repeated Administration Off | Mean Willingness to Seek Psychotherapy | Baseline | 4.25 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 1.92 |
| Repeated Administration Off | Mean Willingness to Seek Psychotherapy | 2 Weeks from Baseline | 3.11 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 1.83 |
| Repeated Administration Off | Mean Willingness to Seek Psychotherapy | 6 Weeks from Baseline | 3.52 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 2.06 |