Behavior Problems in Early Childhood
Conditions
Keywords
Selected early intervention, parental sensitivity and sensitive discipline, child externalizing behavior, pedagogues
Brief summary
Supportive parenting is a strong predictor of positive outcomes for children, and harsh parenting is a risk factor for child development, especially for the child developing externalizing problems (overactive, oppositional, and aggressive behavior). Externalizing problems in preschoolers are predictive of a variety of problems in later childhood. Thus, parents are key targets for change in preventive programs with children at risk for developing externalizing problems. More than 95% of 2-6 year old Danish children spend an average of 7.5 hours, 5 days a week in a daycare setting, thus pedagogues are key frontline staff in the promotion of parental abilities and early childhood mental health. However, a recent Danish study shows that pedagogues experience a need for systematic skills and methods for intervening in families with a child at risk. Attachment-based programs enhancing parental sensitivity and parental sensitive discipline show promising results. This efficacy study examines the Video-feedback Intervention to Promote Positive Parenting and Sensitive Discipline (VIPP-SD)delivered by 22 VIPP-SD trained pedagogues at home-visits to 120 families with a child (1-6 years) identified to be at risk. Pedagogues are supervised by four VIPP municipality psychologists, thus promoting the cross-disciplinary collaboration. The results will point to future identification of families that may (and may not) profit from a pedagogue delivered VIPP-SD intervention, as well as to revise the intervention in order to maximizing its effect, i.e. point to changes to tailor intervention to the particular needs of different families in a Danish context.
Interventions
BEHAVIORALVIPP-SD
Parenting program
Sponsors
University of Copenhagen
University of Aarhus
Study design
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
PREVENTION
Masking
SINGLE (Outcomes Assessor)
Masking description
Outcomes Assessor: The individual who evaluates the video-based outcome(s) of interest
Intervention model description
The study population will be randomly allocated in the ratio 1:1 to either VIPP-SD or CAU. The randomization is stratified by municipality. A computer-generated list of random numbers is used for the allocation of participants. The allocation list is created using block randomization with block sizes of 10. The allocation sequence is generated by an investigator with no clinical involvement in the project.
Eligibility
Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
2 Years to 6 Years
Healthy volunteers
No
Inclusion criteria
* Child 2-6 year old * Parent must be more than 18 years old * Parent must speak and understand Danish * Family must live in the municipalities of Frederiksberg or Roskilde - and having no intentions of moving out of the municipality before after the intervention has ended * Parent can attend other treatment initiatives * Child must attend a daycare center in one of the two municipalities * Child must be at risk of developing externalizing behavior, i.e. showing signs of overactive, oppositional, and aggressive behavior.
Exclusion criteria
* Sexual or physical abuse by parent * Parental drug or alcohol abuse * Child diagnosis of autism * Child is not considered at risk of developing externalizing behavior problems, but may have other problems, such as delayed language or motordevelopment etc
Design outcomes
Primary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Parental attitudes toward sensitivity and sensitive discipline (ATSSD) | Through study completion, an average of 6 months | Questionnaire regarding parents' attitudes towards parenting (Bakermans-Kranenburg \& Van IJzendoorn, 2003) |
Secondary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Parenting Daily Hassles (PDH) | Through study completion, an average of 6 months | Parenting Daily Hassles scale where parents are asked to rate 20 minor parenting stresses that often occur in families with small children (Crnic \& Greenberg, 1990). |
| Parenting Stress | Through study completion, an average of 6 months | via self-report using Parenting Stress IndexTM, Fourth Edition Short Form (PSI-4-SF;Abidin, 1995) |
| Parental Mentalizing | Through study completion, an average of 6 months | self-report using the Parental Reflective Functioning Questionnaire (PRFQ; Luyten, Mayes, Nijssens, \& Fonagy, 2017). |
| Family functioning | Through study completion, an average of 6 months | self-report using the McMaster Family Assessment Device (FAD), the six item version (de Haan et al., 2015) |
| Parental symptoms of anxiety | Through study completion, an average of 6 months | Anxiety symptoms will be assessed with GAD-7, which is a 7-item screening questionnaire for generalized anxiety disorder (Spitzer, Kroenke, Williams \& Löwe, 2006). |
| Parental behavioral sensitivity and sensitive discipline | Through study completion, an average of 6 months | Parental sensitivity will be coded from video recordings of parent-child free play. Coding will be conducted using Coding Interactive Behavior (CIB) (Feldman, 1998). Parental sensitive discipline will be coded from video recordings of a "don't touch task" and a "clean-up task". Coding procedure will be based on guidelines from Kuczynski et al., 1987 and Van der Mark et al., 2002. |
| Child behavior problems | Through study completion, an average of 6 months | This is measured using the Strengths and Difficulties questionnaire (SDQ), which is completed by both parents and pedagogues (Goodman, 1997; Danish version by Niclasen et al., 2012). |
| Child socio-emotional development | Through study completion, an average of 6 months | Child socio-emotional development is assessed via parental report using the Ages \& Stages Questionnaires®: Social-Emotional, Second Edition (ASQ®:SE-2) (Squires, Bricker, \& Twombly, 2015). |
| Parental symptoms of depression | Through study completion, an average of 6 months | Depression symptoms will be assessed with PHQ-9, which is a 9-item questionnaire to monitor the severity of depression symptoms (Kroenke, Sptizer \& Williams, 2001). |
Countries
Denmark
Contacts
PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATORmette væver, PhD
University of Copenhagen
Outcome results
None listed