Conductive Hearing Loss, Conductive Hearing Loss, Bilateral, Conductive Hearing Loss, Unilateral, Ear Diseases, Hearing Disability, Hearing Loss, Conductive, Hearing Loss Mixed
Conditions
Brief summary
The study is part of the Post Market Clinical Follow (PMCF) activity. The investigational device is the CE-marked Ponto 3 SuperPower (available on the market since December 2016) already fitted to the subjects, and data is collected retrospectively from clinical routine visits. The study is a retrospective study. Therefore there will be no study visits for treatment or follow-up in the study. Subject inclusion for this clinical investigation will be performed among subjects who has been fitted with the Ponto 3 SuperPower. To have a wide representative selection of subjects, enrollment will be spread over the 4 years since the device was available on the market since December 2016. The endpoints in the study will investigate the improvement of hearing with the Ponto 3 SuperPower. The data will be collected from the subjects in the time period from the clinical routine visit where the Ponto 3 SuperPower where fitted or just prior, and from the clinical routine visit following the fitting, where audiologic fitting follow-up procedures are performed (approximately 3 months).
Interventions
Unmasked and if available masked BC thresholds from audiogram obtained prior to Ponto 3 SuperPower were fitted.
BC In-situ thresholds will be collected from the BC In-situ audiogram obtained when Ponto 3 SuperPower were fitted
Sound field thresholds for frequencies 500Hz, 1kHz, 2 kHz, 3kHz and 4kHz will be collected from sound field audiogram obtained as follow-up after Ponto 3 SuperPower fitting, typically this is collected 3 months post fitting, alternatively from the fitting visit. Thresholds will be obtained aided, and when available unaided
Speech intelligibility is measured in a sound treated room using sentence tests. The sentence tests used at Norwich and Norfolk hospital is the BKB (Bamford-Kowal-Bench) and/or the The AB\[s\] Isophonemic Monosyllabic Word test (7). The sentence tests are measured in quiet and/or with background speech-weighted noise.
Classification of skin reactions around skin penetrating implants will be made using the Holgers score. The Holgers classification is a scale from 0 to 4 that is used to grade skin reactions
The Glasgow Benefit Inventory (GBI) contains 18 health status questions, which ask specific questions about how the health problem, in this study hearing loss, has affected their quality of life at the time the GBI is completed. In this study GBI has been collected on patients before intervention and 3 months after fitting of Ponto 3 SuperPower on abutment.
Average power-on usage hours from Ponto 3 SuperPower will be collected.
Sponsors
Study design
Eligibility
Inclusion criteria
1. Subjects who have consented to Section 3 of the document: GDPR - what this means to you (Appendix A) as part of a clinical routine visit. 2. Fitted unilaterally or bilaterally with the Ponto 3 SuperPower(s) on abutment(s) 3. Adult subjects (18 years or older) 4. Patient has attended a clinical routine visit where fitting of Ponto 3 SuperPower has been performed and at least one following clinical routine visit where audiological measurements has been performed
Exclusion criteria
There are no
Design outcomes
Primary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Change in Functional Gain Thresholds: Unaided Air Conduction (AC) Thresholds Compared to Aided Bone Conduction (BC) Thresholds, in Ponto 3 SuperPower Users With Conductive Hearing Loss (CHL) and/or Mixed Hearing Loss (MHL). | Visit 2, 3 months | Functional gain is the difference between the average unaided threshold measured across the frequencies of 500, 1000, 2000 and 4000 Hz and the average aided (i.e. with the Ponto 3 SuperPower) threshold measured across the frequencies of 500, 1000, 2000 and 4000 Hz. For bilaterally fitted patients, the best ear is selected. |
Secondary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Improvement of Speech Recognition in Quiet and in Noise With Ponto 3 SuperPower for Patients With CHL/MHL | Visit 2, 3 months | Aided speech recognition (% correct words) measured in quiet and in noise with the BKB sentence test and the AB\[s\] short list test averaged across patients. Only participants with data for both visits were included in analysis. |
| Speech Recognition in Noise Improvements With Ponto 3 SuperPower on for Patients With SSD | Visit 2, 3 months | Difference in speech recognition score (%) for speech recognition in noise between unaided and aided when speech is directed to the aided ear, and noise is directed to the non-implanted ear, and when speech is directed to the non-implanted ear, and when noise is directed to the aided ear. Aided and unaided speech recognition (% correct words) measured with the AB\[s\] short list. |
| Degree of Compensation for Hearing Loss on the Implanted Ear(s) With the Ponto 3 SuperPower for Patients With CHL/MHL. | visit 2, 3 months | Effective gain with Ponto 3 SuperPower, i.e. the difference between aided sound field thresholds and the BC In-situ thresholds on the aided ear(s) measured when the Ponto 3 SuperPower(s) was fitted. The effective gain is calculated as the average (PTA4) of frequencies 500, 1000, 2000 and 4000 Hz. Only participants with data for both study visits were included in the analysis. |
| Functional Gain With the Ponto 3 SuperPower for Patients With CHL/MHL. | Visit 1, Day 1 | Functional gain with Ponto 3 SuperPower, i.e. the difference between average unaided AC thresholds and aided sound field thresholds for frequencies 500, 1000, 2000, 3000 and 4000 Hz. For bilaterally fitted patients, the best ear is selected. |
| Individual Level Evaluation of Objectives 1-6; Improved Hearing | Change between visit 1 (day 1) and visit 2 (3 months)t of study | Improved hearing was analyzed as the percentage of subjects whose performance is better or equal in the unaided to aided comparisons, i.e., have a difference ≥0. Functional gain was used for CHL/MHL patients and speech recognition in noise was used for SSD patients. |
| Air to Bone Gap (PTA3) on the Implanted Ear(s) for Patients With CHL/MHL | Visit 1 day 1 | The difference between masked (if not available unmasked) BC and AC thresholds (unaided), denoted 'air to bone gap', calculated for frequencies 500, 1000, and 2000 Hz for the patients with CHL/MHL within indication on the implanted ear. For bilateral patients, the best ear was selected. Only participants that had complete data for these frequencies were included in the analysis. |
| Skin Condition Assessment Around the Abutment | Visit 2, 3 months | Skin condition around the abutment was assessed via Holgers score (scale 0-4). Holgers 0: No skin reaction Holgers 1: Redness with slight swelling Holgers 2: Redness, moistness, and moderate swelling Holgers 3: Redness, moistness, and moderate swelling with tissue granulation Holgers 4: Profound signs of infection, resulting in removal of the implant Only participants who had recorded Holgers score in record were analyzed. |
| Quality of Life Improvements With the Ponto 3 SuperPower | Visit 2, 3 months | Glasgow Benefit Inventory (GBI) total score per target population. The GBI consists of 18 items, each on a 5 point Likert scale. Responses are scaled and averaged to give a score with a range -100 (poorest outcome) through 0 (no change) to +100 (best outcome). |
Countries
United Kingdom
Participant flow
Pre-assignment details
Target population 1 - Conductive/Mixed Hearing Loss (CHL/MHL) within indication Target population 1 - Bilaterally fitted CHL/MHL within indication Target population 2 - Single Sided Deafness (SSD) within indication Participants were assigned into groups based on type of hearing loss (not by ears or any other unit).
Participants by arm
| Arm | Count |
|---|---|
| Target Population 1 - CHL/MHL TP 1 - Conductive Hearing Loss (CHL) / Mixed Hearing Loss (MHL) within indication. | 46 |
| Target Population 2 - Bilateral TP 2- Patients with CHL/MHL who were bilaterally fitted. | 8 |
| Target Population 3 - SSD TP 3 - Single Sided Deafness (SSD) within indication | 3 |
| Total | 57 |
Baseline characteristics
| Characteristic | Target Population 1 - CHL/MHL | Target Population 2 - Bilateral | Target Population 3 - SSD | Total |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Age, Continuous | 59.5 years STANDARD_DEVIATION 16.4 | 63.5 years STANDARD_DEVIATION 15.6 | 57.7 years STANDARD_DEVIATION 4.7 | 60.6 years STANDARD_DEVIATION 15.6 |
| Race and Ethnicity Not Collected | — | — | — | 0 Participants |
| Sex: Female, Male Female | 30 Participants | 7 Participants | 1 Participants | 38 Participants |
| Sex: Female, Male Male | 16 Participants | 1 Participants | 2 Participants | 19 Participants |
Adverse events
| Event type | EG000 affected / at risk |
|---|---|
| deaths Total, all-cause mortality | 0 / 57 |
| other Total, other adverse events | 0 / 57 |
| serious Total, serious adverse events | 0 / 57 |
Outcome results
Change in Functional Gain Thresholds: Unaided Air Conduction (AC) Thresholds Compared to Aided Bone Conduction (BC) Thresholds, in Ponto 3 SuperPower Users With Conductive Hearing Loss (CHL) and/or Mixed Hearing Loss (MHL).
Functional gain is the difference between the average unaided threshold measured across the frequencies of 500, 1000, 2000 and 4000 Hz and the average aided (i.e. with the Ponto 3 SuperPower) threshold measured across the frequencies of 500, 1000, 2000 and 4000 Hz. For bilaterally fitted patients, the best ear is selected.
Time frame: Visit 2, 3 months
Population: Measurement not applicable for Target Population 3 - SSD
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Target Population 1 - CHL/MHL | Change in Functional Gain Thresholds: Unaided Air Conduction (AC) Thresholds Compared to Aided Bone Conduction (BC) Thresholds, in Ponto 3 SuperPower Users With Conductive Hearing Loss (CHL) and/or Mixed Hearing Loss (MHL). | Unaided AC [dB] | 70.2 dB | Standard Deviation 17.9 |
| Target Population 1 - CHL/MHL | Change in Functional Gain Thresholds: Unaided Air Conduction (AC) Thresholds Compared to Aided Bone Conduction (BC) Thresholds, in Ponto 3 SuperPower Users With Conductive Hearing Loss (CHL) and/or Mixed Hearing Loss (MHL). | Aided sound field [dB] | 35.6 dB | Standard Deviation 9 |
| Target Population 1 - CHL/MHL | Change in Functional Gain Thresholds: Unaided Air Conduction (AC) Thresholds Compared to Aided Bone Conduction (BC) Thresholds, in Ponto 3 SuperPower Users With Conductive Hearing Loss (CHL) and/or Mixed Hearing Loss (MHL). | Functional gain Unaided (AC) - Aided [dB] | 36.0 dB | Standard Deviation 13.9 |
| Target Population 2 - Bilateral | Change in Functional Gain Thresholds: Unaided Air Conduction (AC) Thresholds Compared to Aided Bone Conduction (BC) Thresholds, in Ponto 3 SuperPower Users With Conductive Hearing Loss (CHL) and/or Mixed Hearing Loss (MHL). | Unaided AC [dB] | 64.2 dB | Standard Deviation 19.4 |
| Target Population 2 - Bilateral | Change in Functional Gain Thresholds: Unaided Air Conduction (AC) Thresholds Compared to Aided Bone Conduction (BC) Thresholds, in Ponto 3 SuperPower Users With Conductive Hearing Loss (CHL) and/or Mixed Hearing Loss (MHL). | Aided sound field [dB] | 35.2 dB | Standard Deviation 4.2 |
| Target Population 2 - Bilateral | Change in Functional Gain Thresholds: Unaided Air Conduction (AC) Thresholds Compared to Aided Bone Conduction (BC) Thresholds, in Ponto 3 SuperPower Users With Conductive Hearing Loss (CHL) and/or Mixed Hearing Loss (MHL). | Functional gain Unaided (AC) - Aided [dB] | 31.9 dB | Standard Deviation 15.4 |
Air to Bone Gap (PTA3) on the Implanted Ear(s) for Patients With CHL/MHL
The difference between masked (if not available unmasked) BC and AC thresholds (unaided), denoted 'air to bone gap', calculated for frequencies 500, 1000, and 2000 Hz for the patients with CHL/MHL within indication on the implanted ear. For bilateral patients, the best ear was selected. Only participants that had complete data for these frequencies were included in the analysis.
Time frame: Visit 1 day 1
Population: This variable is specific for patients with CHL/MHL only and thus not applicable for those with single-sided deafness, i.e., Target Population 3 - SSD.
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Target Population 1 - CHL/MHL | Air to Bone Gap (PTA3) on the Implanted Ear(s) for Patients With CHL/MHL | PTA3 | 33.6 Air to bone gap AC - BC [dB] | Standard Deviation 12.4 |
| Target Population 1 - CHL/MHL | Air to Bone Gap (PTA3) on the Implanted Ear(s) for Patients With CHL/MHL | 500 Hz | 37.7 Air to bone gap AC - BC [dB] | Standard Deviation 17.9 |
| Target Population 1 - CHL/MHL | Air to Bone Gap (PTA3) on the Implanted Ear(s) for Patients With CHL/MHL | 1000 Hz | 37.4 Air to bone gap AC - BC [dB] | Standard Deviation 13.1 |
| Target Population 1 - CHL/MHL | Air to Bone Gap (PTA3) on the Implanted Ear(s) for Patients With CHL/MHL | 2000 Hz | 25.7 Air to bone gap AC - BC [dB] | Standard Deviation 13.1 |
| Target Population 2 - Bilateral | Air to Bone Gap (PTA3) on the Implanted Ear(s) for Patients With CHL/MHL | 2000 Hz | 15.0 Air to bone gap AC - BC [dB] | Standard Deviation 14.1 |
| Target Population 2 - Bilateral | Air to Bone Gap (PTA3) on the Implanted Ear(s) for Patients With CHL/MHL | PTA3 | 21.7 Air to bone gap AC - BC [dB] | Standard Deviation 16.7 |
| Target Population 2 - Bilateral | Air to Bone Gap (PTA3) on the Implanted Ear(s) for Patients With CHL/MHL | 1000 Hz | 30.0 Air to bone gap AC - BC [dB] | Standard Deviation 20 |
| Target Population 2 - Bilateral | Air to Bone Gap (PTA3) on the Implanted Ear(s) for Patients With CHL/MHL | 500 Hz | 25.0 Air to bone gap AC - BC [dB] | Standard Deviation 18 |
Degree of Compensation for Hearing Loss on the Implanted Ear(s) With the Ponto 3 SuperPower for Patients With CHL/MHL.
Effective gain with Ponto 3 SuperPower, i.e. the difference between aided sound field thresholds and the BC In-situ thresholds on the aided ear(s) measured when the Ponto 3 SuperPower(s) was fitted. The effective gain is calculated as the average (PTA4) of frequencies 500, 1000, 2000 and 4000 Hz. Only participants with data for both study visits were included in the analysis.
Time frame: visit 2, 3 months
Population: Analysis includes tested frequencies. This variable is specific for patients with CHL/MHL only and thus not applicable for those with single-sided deafness, i.e., Target Population 3 - SSD.
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Target Population 1 - CHL/MHL | Degree of Compensation for Hearing Loss on the Implanted Ear(s) With the Ponto 3 SuperPower for Patients With CHL/MHL. | PTA 4 | -0.22 Effective gain Aided - BC In-situ [dB] | Standard Deviation 7.96 |
| Target Population 1 - CHL/MHL | Degree of Compensation for Hearing Loss on the Implanted Ear(s) With the Ponto 3 SuperPower for Patients With CHL/MHL. | 500 Hz | 4.09 Effective gain Aided - BC In-situ [dB] | Standard Deviation 9.88 |
| Target Population 1 - CHL/MHL | Degree of Compensation for Hearing Loss on the Implanted Ear(s) With the Ponto 3 SuperPower for Patients With CHL/MHL. | 1000 Hz | -2.42 Effective gain Aided - BC In-situ [dB] | Standard Deviation 10.01 |
| Target Population 1 - CHL/MHL | Degree of Compensation for Hearing Loss on the Implanted Ear(s) With the Ponto 3 SuperPower for Patients With CHL/MHL. | 2000 Hz | -0.46 Effective gain Aided - BC In-situ [dB] | Standard Deviation 9.95 |
| Target Population 1 - CHL/MHL | Degree of Compensation for Hearing Loss on the Implanted Ear(s) With the Ponto 3 SuperPower for Patients With CHL/MHL. | 3000 Hz | 1.45 Effective gain Aided - BC In-situ [dB] | Standard Deviation 9.68 |
| Target Population 1 - CHL/MHL | Degree of Compensation for Hearing Loss on the Implanted Ear(s) With the Ponto 3 SuperPower for Patients With CHL/MHL. | 4000 Hz | -2.03 Effective gain Aided - BC In-situ [dB] | Standard Deviation 9.74 |
| Target Population 2 - Bilateral | Degree of Compensation for Hearing Loss on the Implanted Ear(s) With the Ponto 3 SuperPower for Patients With CHL/MHL. | 3000 Hz | -0.71 Effective gain Aided - BC In-situ [dB] | Standard Deviation 9.76 |
| Target Population 2 - Bilateral | Degree of Compensation for Hearing Loss on the Implanted Ear(s) With the Ponto 3 SuperPower for Patients With CHL/MHL. | PTA 4 | -0.36 Effective gain Aided - BC In-situ [dB] | Standard Deviation 8.5 |
| Target Population 2 - Bilateral | Degree of Compensation for Hearing Loss on the Implanted Ear(s) With the Ponto 3 SuperPower for Patients With CHL/MHL. | 2000 Hz | -1.43 Effective gain Aided - BC In-situ [dB] | Standard Deviation 11.07 |
| Target Population 2 - Bilateral | Degree of Compensation for Hearing Loss on the Implanted Ear(s) With the Ponto 3 SuperPower for Patients With CHL/MHL. | 500 Hz | 5.71 Effective gain Aided - BC In-situ [dB] | Standard Deviation 8.38 |
| Target Population 2 - Bilateral | Degree of Compensation for Hearing Loss on the Implanted Ear(s) With the Ponto 3 SuperPower for Patients With CHL/MHL. | 4000 Hz | -3.57 Effective gain Aided - BC In-situ [dB] | Standard Deviation 12.82 |
| Target Population 2 - Bilateral | Degree of Compensation for Hearing Loss on the Implanted Ear(s) With the Ponto 3 SuperPower for Patients With CHL/MHL. | 1000 Hz | -2.14 Effective gain Aided - BC In-situ [dB] | Standard Deviation 8.59 |
Functional Gain With the Ponto 3 SuperPower for Patients With CHL/MHL.
Functional gain with Ponto 3 SuperPower, i.e. the difference between average unaided AC thresholds and aided sound field thresholds for frequencies 500, 1000, 2000, 3000 and 4000 Hz. For bilaterally fitted patients, the best ear is selected.
Time frame: Visit 1, Day 1
Population: This variable is specific for patients with CHL/MHL only and thus not applicable for those with single-sided deafness, i.e., Target Population 3 - SSD.
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Target Population 1 - CHL/MHL | Functional Gain With the Ponto 3 SuperPower for Patients With CHL/MHL. | 1000 Hz | 37.4 Functional gain Unaided (AC) - Aided [dB | Standard Deviation 15.8 |
| Target Population 1 - CHL/MHL | Functional Gain With the Ponto 3 SuperPower for Patients With CHL/MHL. | 3000 Hz | 34.2 Functional gain Unaided (AC) - Aided [dB | Standard Deviation 18.2 |
| Target Population 1 - CHL/MHL | Functional Gain With the Ponto 3 SuperPower for Patients With CHL/MHL. | 2000 Hz | 31.7 Functional gain Unaided (AC) - Aided [dB | Standard Deviation 17.1 |
| Target Population 1 - CHL/MHL | Functional Gain With the Ponto 3 SuperPower for Patients With CHL/MHL. | 4000 Hz | 37.0 Functional gain Unaided (AC) - Aided [dB | Standard Deviation 16.5 |
| Target Population 1 - CHL/MHL | Functional Gain With the Ponto 3 SuperPower for Patients With CHL/MHL. | 500 Hz | 38.3 Functional gain Unaided (AC) - Aided [dB | Standard Deviation 17.6 |
| Target Population 2 - Bilateral | Functional Gain With the Ponto 3 SuperPower for Patients With CHL/MHL. | 4000 Hz | 35.0 Functional gain Unaided (AC) - Aided [dB | Standard Deviation 21.2 |
| Target Population 2 - Bilateral | Functional Gain With the Ponto 3 SuperPower for Patients With CHL/MHL. | 500 Hz | 35.0 Functional gain Unaided (AC) - Aided [dB | Standard Deviation 12.9 |
| Target Population 2 - Bilateral | Functional Gain With the Ponto 3 SuperPower for Patients With CHL/MHL. | 1000 Hz | 35.7 Functional gain Unaided (AC) - Aided [dB | Standard Deviation 15.7 |
| Target Population 2 - Bilateral | Functional Gain With the Ponto 3 SuperPower for Patients With CHL/MHL. | 2000 Hz | 26.4 Functional gain Unaided (AC) - Aided [dB | Standard Deviation 16.8 |
| Target Population 2 - Bilateral | Functional Gain With the Ponto 3 SuperPower for Patients With CHL/MHL. | 3000 Hz | 32.1 Functional gain Unaided (AC) - Aided [dB | Standard Deviation 24.5 |
Improvement of Speech Recognition in Quiet and in Noise With Ponto 3 SuperPower for Patients With CHL/MHL
Aided speech recognition (% correct words) measured in quiet and in noise with the BKB sentence test and the AB\[s\] short list test averaged across patients. Only participants with data for both visits were included in analysis.
Time frame: Visit 2, 3 months
Population: Participants with speech recognition scores recorded included in analysis speech recognition scores. This variable is specific for patients with CHL/MHL only and thus not applicable for those with single-sided deafness, i.e., Target Population 3 - SSD.
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Target Population 1 - CHL/MHL | Improvement of Speech Recognition in Quiet and in Noise With Ponto 3 SuperPower for Patients With CHL/MHL | BKB Sentence Test in Noise | 73.5 percent correct words | Standard Deviation 19 |
| Target Population 1 - CHL/MHL | Improvement of Speech Recognition in Quiet and in Noise With Ponto 3 SuperPower for Patients With CHL/MHL | BKB Sentence Test in Quiet | 88.6 percent correct words | Standard Deviation 11.3 |
| Target Population 1 - CHL/MHL | Improvement of Speech Recognition in Quiet and in Noise With Ponto 3 SuperPower for Patients With CHL/MHL | AB[s] short list in Noise | 67.6 percent correct words | Standard Deviation 21 |
| Target Population 1 - CHL/MHL | Improvement of Speech Recognition in Quiet and in Noise With Ponto 3 SuperPower for Patients With CHL/MHL | AB[s] short list in Quiet | 84.1 percent correct words | Standard Deviation 18.7 |
| Target Population 2 - Bilateral | Improvement of Speech Recognition in Quiet and in Noise With Ponto 3 SuperPower for Patients With CHL/MHL | AB[s] short list in Quiet | 87.7 percent correct words | Standard Deviation 9.3 |
| Target Population 2 - Bilateral | Improvement of Speech Recognition in Quiet and in Noise With Ponto 3 SuperPower for Patients With CHL/MHL | BKB Sentence Test in Noise | 66.5 percent correct words | Standard Deviation 23.8 |
| Target Population 2 - Bilateral | Improvement of Speech Recognition in Quiet and in Noise With Ponto 3 SuperPower for Patients With CHL/MHL | AB[s] short list in Noise | 59.0 percent correct words | Standard Deviation 21.8 |
| Target Population 2 - Bilateral | Improvement of Speech Recognition in Quiet and in Noise With Ponto 3 SuperPower for Patients With CHL/MHL | BKB Sentence Test in Quiet | 91.5 percent correct words | Standard Deviation 7.1 |
Individual Level Evaluation of Objectives 1-6; Improved Hearing
Improved hearing was analyzed as the percentage of subjects whose performance is better or equal in the unaided to aided comparisons, i.e., have a difference ≥0. Functional gain was used for CHL/MHL patients and speech recognition in noise was used for SSD patients.
Time frame: Change between visit 1 (day 1) and visit 2 (3 months)t of study
Population: Functional gain for CHL/MHL based on PTA4 was not available for all individuals. Speech recognition in noise was measured aided and unaided for only one SSD patient within indication (TP3 - SSD).
| Arm | Measure | Value (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS) |
|---|---|---|
| Target Population 1 - CHL/MHL | Individual Level Evaluation of Objectives 1-6; Improved Hearing | 33 Participants |
| Target Population 2 - Bilateral | Individual Level Evaluation of Objectives 1-6; Improved Hearing | 7 Participants |
| Target Population 3 - SSD | Individual Level Evaluation of Objectives 1-6; Improved Hearing | 1 Participants |
Quality of Life Improvements With the Ponto 3 SuperPower
Glasgow Benefit Inventory (GBI) total score per target population. The GBI consists of 18 items, each on a 5 point Likert scale. Responses are scaled and averaged to give a score with a range -100 (poorest outcome) through 0 (no change) to +100 (best outcome).
Time frame: Visit 2, 3 months
| Arm | Measure | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|
| Target Population 1 - CHL/MHL | Quality of Life Improvements With the Ponto 3 SuperPower | 53.9 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 20.9 |
| Target Population 2 - Bilateral | Quality of Life Improvements With the Ponto 3 SuperPower | 56.4 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 26.6 |
| Target Population 3 - SSD | Quality of Life Improvements With the Ponto 3 SuperPower | 41.9 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 24.3 |
Skin Condition Assessment Around the Abutment
Skin condition around the abutment was assessed via Holgers score (scale 0-4). Holgers 0: No skin reaction Holgers 1: Redness with slight swelling Holgers 2: Redness, moistness, and moderate swelling Holgers 3: Redness, moistness, and moderate swelling with tissue granulation Holgers 4: Profound signs of infection, resulting in removal of the implant Only participants who had recorded Holgers score in record were analyzed.
Time frame: Visit 2, 3 months
Population: For Target Population 2 - Bilateral both treated ears are considered.
| Arm | Measure | Category | Value (COUNT_OF_UNITS) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Target Population 1 - CHL/MHL | Skin Condition Assessment Around the Abutment | Holger's score 0-1 | 35 Number of ears |
| Target Population 1 - CHL/MHL | Skin Condition Assessment Around the Abutment | Holger's score 2-4 | 1 Number of ears |
| Target Population 2 - Bilateral | Skin Condition Assessment Around the Abutment | Holger's score 0-1 | 15 Number of ears |
| Target Population 2 - Bilateral | Skin Condition Assessment Around the Abutment | Holger's score 2-4 | 1 Number of ears |
| Target Population 3 - SSD | Skin Condition Assessment Around the Abutment | Holger's score 0-1 | 2 Number of ears |
| Target Population 3 - SSD | Skin Condition Assessment Around the Abutment | Holger's score 2-4 | 0 Number of ears |
Speech Recognition in Noise Improvements With Ponto 3 SuperPower on for Patients With SSD
Difference in speech recognition score (%) for speech recognition in noise between unaided and aided when speech is directed to the aided ear, and noise is directed to the non-implanted ear, and when speech is directed to the non-implanted ear, and when noise is directed to the aided ear. Aided and unaided speech recognition (% correct words) measured with the AB\[s\] short list.
Time frame: Visit 2, 3 months
Population: The aided condition was obtained from two patients while the unaided condition was measured for one patient from the SSD patients within indication (TP2 - SSD, n=3). This outcome is only applicable for Target Population 3 - SSD.
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Target Population 3 - SSD | Speech Recognition in Noise Improvements With Ponto 3 SuperPower on for Patients With SSD | Aided SimplatedNnon-implanted - % correct | 60.0 percent correct words | Standard Deviation 9.5 |
| Target Population 3 - SSD | Speech Recognition in Noise Improvements With Ponto 3 SuperPower on for Patients With SSD | Unaided SimplatedNnon-implanted - % correct | 36.7 percent correct words | Standard Deviation 0 |
| Target Population 3 - SSD | Speech Recognition in Noise Improvements With Ponto 3 SuperPower on for Patients With SSD | Difference: Aided - Unaided SimplatedNnon-implanted - % correct | 30.0 percent correct words | Standard Deviation 0 |
| Target Population 3 - SSD | Speech Recognition in Noise Improvements With Ponto 3 SuperPower on for Patients With SSD | Aided Snon-implatedNimplanted - % correct | 80.0 percent correct words | Standard Deviation 23.6 |
| Target Population 3 - SSD | Speech Recognition in Noise Improvements With Ponto 3 SuperPower on for Patients With SSD | Unaided Snon-implatedNimplanted - % correct | 91.3 percent correct words | Standard Deviation 0 |
| Target Population 3 - SSD | Speech Recognition in Noise Improvements With Ponto 3 SuperPower on for Patients With SSD | Difference: Aided- Unaided Snon-implatedNimplanted - % correct | 5.40 percent correct words | Standard Deviation 0 |