Skip to content

ReActiv8 Stimulation Therapy vs Optimal Medical Management: A Randomized Evaluation

ReActiv8 Stimulation Therapy vs Optimal Medical Management: A Randomized Evaluation

Status
Completed
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT04803214
Acronym
RESTORE
Enrollment
203
Registered
2021-03-17
Start date
2021-07-14
Completion date
2026-01-05
Last updated
2026-01-23

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Chronic Low-back Pain

Keywords

Neurostimulation, Stimulation, Multifidus, Restorative neurostimulation, Multifidus muscle control, Neurostimulator

Brief summary

This study is a prospective, randomized study comparing ReActiv8 Therapy to Optimal Medical Management (OMM).

Detailed description

This study is a prospective, randomized study comparing ReActiv8 Therapy to Optimal Medical Management (OMM), where OMM means the patient is managed according to available guideline-directed treatments (e.g., medication, physical therapy, injections) individualized to meet the patient needs. All patients who satisfy the enrollment criteria are randomized (1:1) to receive either ReActiv8 (Treatment group) or OMM (Control group).

Interventions

DEVICEReActiv8

Market-approved ReActiv8 device implanted

Sponsors

Mainstay Medical
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
21 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

1. Age ≥21 years 2. Evidence of lumbar multifidus muscle dysfunction 3. Intractable Chronic Low Back Pain that has persisted \>6 months resulting in pain most of the days in the past 12 months 4. Failed therapy including pain medications and physical therapy 5. Not a candidate for spine surgery 6. Low Back Pain NRS of ≥6 and ≤9 7. Oswestry Disability Index score ≥30 and ≤60 8. Willing and capable of giving Informed Consent 9. Able to comply with this protocol 10. On Optimal Medical Management per the Investigator

Exclusion criteria

1. Contraindicated for the ReActiv8 System 2. BMI \> 35 3. Any surgical correction procedure for scoliosis at any time, or a current clinical diagnosis of moderate to severe scoliosis 4. An independent MRI assessment identifying a pathology that is likely the cause of the CLBP and is amenable to surgery 5. Leg pain described as being worse than back pain, or radiculopathy (neuropathic pain) below the knee 6. Any condition unrelated to CLBP which, in the opinion of the Investigator, could limit physical movement or compliance with the protocol, or interfere with the assessment of efficacy 7. Surgical and other procedure exclusions 8. Psycho-social exclusions 9. Protocol compliance exclusions 10. General exclusions

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Change in Oswestry Disability Index (ODI)1 yearComparison of 1-year change from baseline in ODI between Treatment and Control with MMRM for missing data. ODI is measured on a scale of 0 to 100 where a lower score is a better outcome.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Change in Low Back Pain Numerical Rating Scale (LBP NRS)1 yearComparison of 1-year change from baseline in LBP NRS between Treatment and Control with MMRM for missing data. NRS is measured on a scale of 0 to 10 where a higher score is a better outcome.
Change in EQ-5D1 yearComparison of 1-year change from baseline in EQ-5D between Treatment and Control with MMRM for missing data. EQ-5D is measured on a scale of -0.5 to 1.0 where a higher score is a better outcome.

Countries

United States

Contacts

STUDY_CHAIRFrank Schwab

New York-Presbyterian

STUDY_CHAIRChris Gilligan

Brigham and Women's Hospital

STUDY_CHAIRKiran Patel

Northwell Health

Participant flow

Recruitment details

386 participants were screened across 25 clinical sites. The first participant was enrolled in July 2021 and the last participant was enrolled in July 2023.

Pre-assignment details

Of the 386 participants screened, 203 were randomized and attended at least one follow-up visit. The protocol and analysis plan required randomized patients attend at least one follow-up visit to be included in analyses.

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Treatment (ReActiv8)
Participants were treated with restorative neurostimulation (ReActiv8) which consists of two 30-minute stimulation sessions per day at the L2 medial branch of the dorsal ramus in addition to continued OMM through 1 year Stimulation frequency: 20 Hz
99
Control (OMM)
A treatment plan consisting of non-investigational interventions (e.g., pharmacological agents, physical or psychosocial therapies) individualized to each patient's specific needs that was established prior to randomization through 1 year
104
Total203

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicTreatment (ReActiv8)Control (OMM)Total
Age, Continuous45 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 11
48 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 13
47 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 12
Body Mass Index (BMI)29 kg/m^2
STANDARD_DEVIATION 4
28 kg/m^2
STANDARD_DEVIATION 4
29 kg/m^2
STANDARD_DEVIATION 4
EQ-5D-5L index score0.626 units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 0.116
0.612 units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 0.125
0.619 units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 0.12
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Hispanic or Latino
4 Participants4 Participants8 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Not Hispanic or Latino
95 Participants100 Participants195 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
LBP NRS7.1 units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 0.8
7.1 units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 0.9
7.1 units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 0.9
Leg pain31 Participants28 Participants59 Participants
ODI44 units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 8
44 units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 8
44 units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 8
Pain duration (years from first occurrence)11.8 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 9.7
11.1 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 7.5
11.4 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 8.7
Percent of Days with low back pain (LBP) in the last 12 months95 % of days
STANDARD_DEVIATION 13
97 % of days
STANDARD_DEVIATION 8
96 % of days
STANDARD_DEVIATION 11
Race (NIH/OMB)
American Indian or Alaska Native
0 Participants1 Participants1 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Asian
0 Participants2 Participants2 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Black or African American
4 Participants2 Participants6 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
More than one race
2 Participants2 Participants4 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
1 Participants0 Participants1 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
White
92 Participants97 Participants189 Participants
Region of Enrollment
United States
99 participants104 participants203 participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
58 Participants68 Participants126 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
41 Participants36 Participants77 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
0 / 990 / 104
other
Total, other adverse events
22 / 9910 / 104
serious
Total, serious adverse events
7 / 991 / 104

Outcome results

Primary

Change in Oswestry Disability Index (ODI)

Comparison of 1-year change from baseline in ODI between Treatment and Control with MMRM for missing data. ODI is measured on a scale of 0 to 100 where a lower score is a better outcome.

Time frame: 1 year

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Treatment (ReActiv8)Change in Oswestry Disability Index (ODI)-19.7 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.4
Control (OMM)Change in Oswestry Disability Index (ODI)-2.9 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.4
p-value: <0.001t-test, 2 sided
Secondary

Change in EQ-5D

Comparison of 1-year change from baseline in EQ-5D between Treatment and Control with MMRM for missing data. EQ-5D is measured on a scale of -0.5 to 1.0 where a higher score is a better outcome.

Time frame: 1 year

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Treatment (ReActiv8)Change in EQ-5D0.155 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.012
Control (OMM)Change in EQ-5D0.008 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.012
p-value: <0.001t-test, 2 sided
Secondary

Change in Low Back Pain Numerical Rating Scale (LBP NRS)

Comparison of 1-year change from baseline in LBP NRS between Treatment and Control with MMRM for missing data. NRS is measured on a scale of 0 to 10 where a higher score is a better outcome.

Time frame: 1 year

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Treatment (ReActiv8)Change in Low Back Pain Numerical Rating Scale (LBP NRS)-3.6 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.2
Control (OMM)Change in Low Back Pain Numerical Rating Scale (LBP NRS)-0.6 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.2
p-value: <0.001t-test, 2 sided

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 10, 2026