Family Planning Services
Conditions
Keywords
Human-centered design, Health provider bias
Brief summary
Beyond Bias will evaluate the impact of an intervention designed to reduce family planning provider bias towards young, unmarried, and nulliparous women in Tanzania, Burkina Faso, and Pakistan. The intervention has three components: 1) a summit that includes impactful stories told to and by family planning providers that highlight the consequences of provider bias, 2) a forum for continued communication between providers, and 3) a rewards program where clinics in which providers exhibit less biased client interactions or who have improved the most towards this end will be rewarded with social recognition and a ceremony. Half of the eligible clinics in each country (233 in total) are randomly assigned to receive the intervention, while the remaining half serves as control. The objective of the evaluation is to estimate the impact of the intervention on a range of outcomes related to quality of family planning care among young, unmarried, and nulliparous women. The investigators hypothesize that the intervention will increase the share of young, unmarried, and nulliparous women who received counseling on a range of methods, counseling on long acting methods, and who received their preferred method. The investigators will collect four types of data to evaluate the intervention: 1) provider surveys, 2) mystery clients' visits, 3) direct observations of client-provider interactions, and 4) qualitative interviews with clients, providers, and implementors.
Interventions
OTHERBeyond Bias Treatment
The intervention has three components: 1) a summit that includes impactful stories told to and by family planning providers that highlight the consequences of provider bias, 2) a forum for continued communication between providers, and 3) a rewards program where clinics in which providers exhibit less biased client interactions or who have improved the most towards this end will be rewarded with social recognition and a ceremony.
Sponsors
University of California, Los Angeles
Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation
Pathfinder International
RAND
Study design
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
HEALTH_SERVICES_RESEARCH
Masking
NONE
Intervention model description
Half of the eligible clinics in each country (233 in total) are randomly assigned to receive the intervention, while the remaining half serves as control.
Eligibility
Sex/Gender
FEMALE
Age
No minimum to 24 Years
Healthy volunteers
Yes
Inclusion criteria
for Providers: * All providers that are part of Pathfinder Internal's supported clinic network in Burkina Faso, Tanzania, and Pakistan.
Exclusion criteria
for Providers: * None Inclusion Criteria for Clients: * All clients aged 24 or under that visit a clinic that is enrolled in the study
Design outcomes
Primary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Whether client was able to receive services | 12 months after the intervention starts | This is a measure of whether the client received family planning services on the day they came into the clinic. This will be measured from real clients using client exit surveys and using mystery clients. |
| Optimal Counseling | 12 months after the intervention starts | This is a measure of whether the client was counseled on all methods that were good options for the client given her background and preferences. This will be coded as 1 if client was counseled on the full set of optimal family planning methods and zero if the client was not counseled on the full set of optimal family planning methods. This will be collected in the client exit survey and in by mystery clients. |
| Received modern method | 12 months after the intervention starts | This is a measure of whether the client received a modern family planning method during her visit. This will be collected in the client exit survey only. |
| Perceived patient centeredness | 12 months after the intervention starts | This is a composite scale (ranging from 0 to 1) that measures the extent to which the client perceived the her interaction with family provider as patient centered. The questions included in the scale will be chosen based on data driven factor analysis methods. Higher scores will indicate better patient centeredness. This will be collected in the client exit survey and in by mystery clients. |
Secondary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Provider biased attitudes | 12 months after the intervention starts | This is a composite scale (ranging from 0 to 1) that measures the extent to which providers have biased attitudes towards young, unmarried, and adolescent women. The questions included in the scale will be chosen based on data driven factor analysis methods. Higher scores will indicate better patient centeredness. This will be collected through a provider survey. |
Countries
United States
Outcome results
None listed