Skip to content

The Impact of Inhalation vs Total Intravenous Anesthesia on the Immune Status and Mortality in Patients Undergoing Breast Cancer Surgery: a Prospective Double-Blind Randomized Clinical Trial.

The Impact of Inhalation vs Total Intravenous Anesthesia on the Immune Status and Mortality in Patients Undergoing Breast Cancer Surgery: a Prospective Double-Blind Randomized Clinical Trial (TeMP - Trial).

Status
Recruiting
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT04800393
Acronym
TeMP
Enrollment
130
Registered
2021-03-16
Start date
2022-03-29
Completion date
2028-04-01
Last updated
2023-04-26

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Anesthesia, Breast Cancer

Keywords

Anesthesia, Breast Cancer, Phagocyte Cell Dysfunction, Immune Suppression, Inhalation anesthesia, volatile anesthesia, total intravenous anesthesia, interleukins, phagocytosis, neutrophil-lymphocyte ratio, natural killers, oncology

Brief summary

Even decade ago it was believed that the choice method of anesthesia did not affect the course of the oncological process, but recent evidence has begun to emerge that inhalation anesthesia vs TIVA is associated with a higher number of adverse outcomes. Apparently, it makes sense to conduct mRCT in order to assess the effect of IA on immune system in patients operated on for breast cancer comprehensively. The results of that kind of RCT may finally give us an answer whether the choice of anesthesia affects the immune status of patients undergoing surgery for breast cancer. The evaluation of complications and long-term survival will allow to recommend to use or not to use IA for this type of surgery. Objective: The Impact of Inhalation vs Total Intravenous Anesthesia on the Immune Status and Mortality in Patients Undergoing Breast Cancer Surgery

Detailed description

The power calculation for this study was based on an assessment of Neutrophil-lymphocyte ratio (NLR) in patients undergoing breast cancer resection with total intravenous and inhalation anesthesia in two studies: 1. Cho J.S. et al., 2017 - 48 patients (PMID: 28924368, TIVA group: NLR = 3.37 ± 1.27; inhalation group: NLR = 3.85 ± 1.46) 2. Ní Eochagáin A. et al., 2018 - 116 patients (PMID: 29457215, TIVA group: NLR = 3.20 ± 1.37; inhalation group: NLR = 4.10 ± 1.90). The pooled mean NLR in the TIVA group is 3.25±1.34, in the inhalation anesthesia group: 4.03±1.78. Difference in means (effect size): 0.78, for level α=0.05, power 1-β=80% and expected standard deviation of 1.5, 65 patients in each group should be recruited, taking into account a 10% margin (total number of patients: 130).

Interventions

DRUGSevoflurane

induction of anesthesia with propofol, maintenance of anesthesia with sevoflurane during breast cancer surgery

DRUGPropofol

propofol-based total intravenous anesthesia during breast cancer surgery

Sponsors

Negovsky Reanimatology Research Institute
CollaboratorOTHER_GOV
Moscow Clinical Scientific Center
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
PREVENTION
Masking
DOUBLE (Subject, Outcomes Assessor)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
FEMALE
Age
45 Years to 74 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* The age of the patients is from 45 to 74 years; * Primary operable breast cancer (BC) without prior chemotherapy; * Cytologically confirmed breast malignant tumor of IA-IIA stages (T1-2, N0, M0); * Signed informed consent.

Exclusion criteria

* Acute cerebrovascular accident (CVA) occurred in the previous 6 months; * Myocardial infarction (MI) occurred in the previous 6 months; * Acute arterial thrombosis occurred in the previous 6 months; * Acute venous thromboembolism occurred in the previous 6 months; * Subarachnoid hemorrhage occurred during the previous 3 months; * Chronic kidney disease (CKD) stage 3B-5; * Сhronic heart failure (NYHA) class 3-4; * Pregnancy; * History of another location cancer; * History of drug addiction; * Autoimmune diseases in history; * Post-randomization: withdrawal of informed consent (refusal to continue participating in the study); * Post-randomization: surgical intervention, performed not in full (verified non-resected lesions in the early p/o period, 2 weeks p/o).

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Neutrophil-lymphocyte ratio1 hour after surgeryAbsolute number of neutrophils divided by the absolute number of lymphocytes

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Matrix metallopeptidase 91 hour after surgeryng/mL
C-reactive protein1 hour after surgerymg/L
Natural killer cells of blood (CD3-CD16 +)1 hour after surgeryAbsolute number (х 10\^9 /L)
Immunoregulatory index of T helpers (CD3 + CD4 +) / cytotoxic T cells (CD3 + CD8 +)1 hour after surgerythe ratio of T helper cells to cytotoxic T cells
IL-61 hour after surgerypg/ml

Other

MeasureTime frameDescription
IgA1 hour after surgeryg/L
IgM1 hour after surgeryg/L
IgG1 hour after surgeryg/L
T cells of blood (CD3 +)1 hour after surgeryAbsolute number (х 10 /L)
Complement component C41 hour after surgeryg/L
Overall survival1 yearpercentage of survival patients
Disease-free survival1 yearpercentage of survival patients
Complement component C31 hour after surgeryg/L
T helpers of blood (CD3 + CD4 +)1 hour after surgeryAbsolute number (х 10\^9 /L)
Cytotoxic T cells of blood (CD3 + CD8 +)1 hour after surgeryAbsolute number (х 10\^9 /L)
B cells of blood (CD19 + CD3-)1 hour after surgeryAbsolute number (х 10\^9 /L)
T cells (CD3 +) + B cells (CD19 + CD3 -) + Natural killer cells (CD3-CD16 +) of blood1 hour after surgerypercentage
Phagocytosis1 hour after surgerypercentage

Countries

Russia

Contacts

Primary ContactValerii Subbotin, PhD
subbotin67@mail.ru+79166122504
Backup ContactKristina Kadantseva
kristina161093@gmail.com+79168306947

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026