Skip to content

Biomarkers of Exposure and Biomarkers of Potential Harm in Adult Smokers Who Completely Switch to E-vapor Products

An Open-Label, Parallel-Group, Controlled Study to Evaluate Changes in Biomarkers of Cigarette Smoke Exposure and Biomarkers of Potential Harm in Adult Smokers Who Completely Switch to Using e-Vapor Products for 24 Weeks

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT04800211
Enrollment
450
Registered
2021-03-16
Start date
2017-01-17
Completion date
2018-11-06
Last updated
2025-03-12

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Tobacco Use

Brief summary

The purpose of this study was to estimate changes in biomarkers of exposure (BoE) and biomarkers of potential harm (BoPH) in adult cigarette smokers (AS) who switched to using an e-vapor product (EVP) relative to adult smokers who continue smoking exclusively.

Detailed description

This study was conducted as a randomized, parallel-group, open-label, 24-week, controlled clinical study split into an initial 12-week study (Study 1), with a follow-up at 24 weeks (Study 2) in a sub-population of switchers. For Study 1 a total of 450 subjects were enrolled. Of those subjects who successfully completed Study 1, 150 were then enrolled into Study 2 with no interruption in study participation. The study compared changes in BoE and BoPH in AS who switched to ad libitum use of one of two test EVPs with those in the Control group who continued to smoke conventional cigarettes. The study enrolled AS who were considered to be in overall good health.

Interventions

OTHERExperimental: Test Product 1

Subjects were instructed to completely replace their cigarettes with the Test Product 1 EVP (Nu Mark LLC, MarkTen® XL Bold CLASSIC)

OTHERExperimental: Test Product 2

Subjects were instructed to completely replace their cigarettes with the Test Product 2 EVP (Nu Mark LLC, MarkTen® XL Bold MENTHOL)

Sponsors

Altria Client Services LLC
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
OTHER
Masking
NONE

Intervention model description

This research study utilized a parallel-group, open-label, controlled design and was conducted at multiple study sites.

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
30 Years to 65 Years
Healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

Study 1 Subjects must satisfy the following criteria before being enrolled into the study. Subjects must: 1. sign an IRB-approved informed consent form (ICF) for the study; 2. be between the ages of 30 and 65 years, inclusive, at the time of Screening, Visit 1; 3. have \> 500 ng/ml urine cotinine measurement at Screening, Visit 1; 4. have smoked for ≥ 10 years and smoked an average of ≥ 10 manufactured cigarettes per day during the 12 months prior to Screening, Visit 1; a) Brief periods \[i.e., up to 7 consecutive days\] of non smoking during the 12 months prior to Screening, Visit 1 due to illness, trying to quit, or participation in a study where smoking was prohibited are acceptable. 5. indicate that he/she is definitely or probably willing and able to replace their cigarettes for 12 weeks with the assigned test e-Vapor product; 6. have daily access to text messaging capable cellular phone for daily product use reporting; 7. have a negative ethanol breath test and amphetamines, opiates, cannabinoids, and cocaine urine drug screen results at Screening, Visit 1; a) Subjects with a prescription from a licensed physician will not be exempted from this criterion. 8. if female (all females), have a negative serum pregnancy test at Visit 1 and negative urine pregnancy test at Visit 2 through Visit 7, inclusive; 9. if female, heterosexually active, and of childbearing potential (i.e., not surgically sterile or 2 years naturally postmenopausal), must have used a medically accepted method of contraception (listed below in a) and b)) prior to Screening, Visit 1 and must agree to continue to use such method(s) through the End of Study; 1. Surgically sterile includes bilateral tubal ligation, Essure, hysterectomy, or bilateral oophorectomy at least 6 months prior to Screening, Visit 1. Naturally postmenopausal is defined as women having 2 years without menses. 2. Acceptable methods of contraception are: hormonal (i.e., oral, transdermal patch, implant, or injection) consistently for at least 3 months prior to Screening, Visit 1; double barrier (i.e., condom with spermicide or diaphragm with spermicide) consistently for at least 4 weeks prior to Screening, Visit 1; and intrauterine device for at least 3 months prior to Screening, Visit 1; or only have a partner who has been vasectomized for at least 6 months prior to Screening, Visit 1. 10. Be willing and able to comply with the requirements of the study. Study 2 Subjects must satisfy the following criteria before being enrolled into the study. Subject must: 1. have participated in and completed the 12-week ALCS-RA-16-06-EV study and have Baseline biomarker samples collected; 2. demonstrate willingness to participate by signing an Institutional Review Board (IRB)-approved ICF for the study; 3. have demonstrated consistent daily reporting of product use in the 12-week ALCS-RA-16-06-EV (≥ 80% reporting compliance); 4. if randomized to a Test group, have reported an average of no more than 10% of Baseline cigarette smoking per day through Week 11 of the 12-week ALCS-RA-16-06-EV study; 5. if randomized to a Test group, have reported use of at least two Test product cartridges per week in the 12-week ALCS-RA-16-06-EV study; 6. if randomized to a Test group, have exhaled carbon monoxide (eCO) measurements of ≤ 8 ppm at each post-Baseline time point in the 12-week ALCS-RA-16-06-EV study; 7. have daily access to text messaging capable cellular phone for daily product use reporting; 8. if female (all females), have a negative urine pregnancy test at Week 12 (Visit 1) through Week 24 (Visit 5), inclusive; 9. if female, heterosexually active, and of childbearing potential (i.e., not surgically sterile or 2 years naturally postmenopausal), must have used a medically accepted method of contraception (listed below in a) and b)) prior to Screening, Visit 1 of the 12-week ALCS-RA-16-06-EV study and must agree to continue to use such method(s) through Week 24 (EOS); 1. Surgically sterile includes bilateral tubal ligation, Essure, hysterectomy, or bilateral oophorectomy at least 6 months prior to Screening, Visit 1 of the 12-week ALCS-RA-16-06-EV study. Naturally postmenopausal is defined as women having 2 years without menses. 2. Acceptable methods of contraception are: hormonal (i.e., oral, transdermal patch, implant, or injection) consistently for at least 3 months prior to Screening, Visit 1 of the 12-week ALCS-RA-16-06-EV study; double barrier (i.e., condom with spermicide or diaphragm with spermicide) consistently for at least 4 weeks prior to Screening, Visit 1 of the 12-week ALCS-RA-16-06-EV study; and intrauterine device for at least 3 months prior to Screening, Visit 1 of the 12-week ALCS-RA-16-06-EV study; or only have a partner who has been vasectomized for at least 6 months prior to Screening, Visit 1 of the 12-week ALCS-RA-16-06-EV study. 10. Be willing and able to comply with the requirements of the study.

Exclusion criteria

Study 1 Subjects may be excluded from the study if there is evidence of any of the following criteria. Exceptions may be permitted at the discretion of the Investigator and in consultation with the Sponsor or designee provided there would be no additional risk to the subject. Any exceptions will be documented. 1. History or presence of clinically significant gastrointestinal, renal, hepatic, neurologic, hematologic, endocrine, oncologic, urologic, diabetes, existing respiratory diseases, immunologic, psychiatric, or cardiovascular disease, or any other condition that, in the opinion of the Investigator, would jeopardize the safety of the subject or impact the validity of the study results. (Note: chronic medical conditions controlled and on stable medications \[over past 3 months\] may not necessarily be exclusionary per Investigator discretion); 2. Currently taking medication for depression, asthma or diabetes; 3. Allergy to menthol; 4. Systolic blood pressure \> 140 mmHg and / or diastolic blood pressure \> 90 mmHg at Screening Visit 1. 5. Have clinically significant abnormal findings on the physical examination, vital signs, electrocardiogram (ECG), or medical history that would jeopardize the safety of the subject, in the opinion of the Investigator; 6. Positive test for human immunodeficiency virus (HIV), hepatitis B surface antigen (HbsAg), or hepatitis C virus (HCV) at Screening, Visit 1; 7. Current evidence or any history of congestive heart failure; 8. Any acute illness (e.g., upper respiratory infection, viral infection) requiring treatment within 2 weeks before Visit 3 (Day 1); 9. History of drug or alcohol abuse within 24 months of Visit 3 (Day 1) as defined by the Investigator; 10. BMI greater than 40.0 kg/m2 or less than 18.0 kg/m2 at Screening, Visit 1; 11. Post-bronchodilator Forced expiratory volume at one second (FEV1):Forced vital capacity (FVC) ratio \< 0.7 and FEV1 \< 50% of predicted at Screening, Visit 2; 12. Post-bronchodilator FEV1:FVC ratio \< 0.75 and FEV1 increase ≥ 12% and \> 200 mL from pre- to post-bronchodilator at Screening, Visit 2; 13. Estimated creatinine clearance (by Cockcroft-Gault equation) \< 80 mL/min at Screening, Visit 1; 14. Serum alanine aminotransferase (ALT) and/or aspartate aminotransferase (AST) \> 1.5 times the upper limit of the reference range at Screening, Visit 1; 15. Female candidates who are pregnant, lactating, or intend to become pregnant from Screening, Visit 1 through End of Study; 16. Use of HDL-C raising medication / supplements (e.g., niacin, gemfibrizole, fenofibrate, etc.) within the past 3 months prior to Screening, Visit 1 or any time during the study; 17. Use of nicotine-containing products other than manufactured cigarettes (e.g., roll-your-own cigarettes, e-cigarette or e-Vapor products, Bidis, snuff, nicotine inhaler, pipe, cigar, smokeless tobacco, nicotine patch, nicotine spray, nicotine lozenge, or nicotine gum) within 14 days prior to Screening, Visit 1 through Visit 3 (Day 1) except as required for the purpose of this study; 18. Donation of blood or blood products, including plasma, history of significant blood loss in the opinion of the investigator, or receipt of whole blood or a blood product transfusion within 60 days prior to Visit 3 (Day 1); 19. Participation in a clinical study of an investigational drug, medical device, biologic, or of a tobacco product, within 30 days before Visit 3 (Day 1); 20. Participation in more than two ALCS studies within 12 months before Visit 3 (Day 1); 21. Already enrolled or failed screening for the current study at a different study site; 22. Subject or a first-degree relative (i.e., parent, spouse, sibling, or child) is a current or former employee of the tobacco industry or a named party or class representative in litigation with any tobacco company. Study 2 Subjects may be excluded from the study if there is evidence of any of the following. Exceptions may be permitted at the discretion of the Investigator and in consultation with the Sponsor or designee provided there would be no additional risk to the subject. Any exceptions will be documented. 1. Have clinically significant abnormal findings on the physical examination, vital signs, or ECG at the EOS visit (Visit 7) of the 12-week ALCS-RA-16-06-EV study that would jeopardize the safety of the subject, in the opinion of the Investigator; 2. Female subjects who are pregnant (as determined at the EOS visit \[Visit 7\] of the 12-week study), lactating, or intend to become pregnant from Visit 1 (Week 12) through Week 24 (EOS); 3. Use of any medication for depression, asthma, or diabetes at any time during the study; 4. Use of HDL-C raising medication / supplements (e.g., niacin, gemfibrozil, fenofibrate, etc.) at any time during the study; 5. Subject or a first-degree relative (i.e., parent, spouse, sibling, or child) is a current or former employee of the tobacco industry or a named party or class representative in litigation with any tobacco company; 6. Subject or a first-degree relative (i.e., parent, spouse, sibling, or child) is a current or former employee of Celerion or any of the clinical study sites.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Summary of Whole Blood COHB Absolute Change From Baseline (% Saturation) by Study Group From Week 1 to Week 12 (mITT Population With Outliers Excluded) [ALCS-RA-16-06-EV]Week 1 (Baseline) and Week 12 for a total of of 12 weeks from randomizationSummary of whole blood COHB absolute change from Baseline in Week 12 is presented (Study ALCS-RA-16-06-EV). Blood samples were collected via direct venipuncture at Visits 3 and 7 and analyzed for the biomarker. Data outliers were examined through Proc Mixed model residual diagnosis (+/- 4 studentized residuals). A sensitivity analysis excluding outliers was performed for Visit 7 (Week 12). Absolute change from baseline = Post Product Use Value - Baseline Value Baseline / Visit 3 (Week 1) = Day 1 Visit 7 (Week 12) = Day 84 ± 3
Summary of Whole Blood WBC Absolute Change From Baseline (10^3 Cells/uL) by Study Group From Week 1 to Week 12 (mITT Population With Outliers Excluded) [ALCS-RA-16-06-EV]Week 1 (Baseline) and Week 12 for a total of of 12 weeks from randomizationSummary of whole blood WBC absolute change from Baseline in Week 12 is presented (Study ALCS-RA-16-06-EV). Blood samples were collected via direct venipuncture at Visits 3 and 7 and analyzed for the biomarker. Data outliers were examined through Proc Mixed model residual diagnosis (+/- 4 studentized residuals). A sensitivity analysis excluding outliers was performed for Visit 7 (Week 12). Absolute change from baseline = Post Product Use Value - Baseline Value Baseline / Visit 3 (Week 1) = Day 1 Visit 7 (Week 12) = Day 84 ± 3
Summary of Serum HDL-C Absolute Change From Baseline (mg/dL) by Study Group From Week 1 to Week 12 (mITT Population With Outliers Excluded) [ALCS-RA-16-06-EV]Week 1 (Baseline) and Week 12 for a total of of 12 weeks from randomizationSummary of serum HDL-C absolute change from Baseline in Week 12 is presented (Study ALCS-RA-16-06-EV). Blood samples were collected via direct venipuncture at Visits 3 and 7 and analyzed for the biomarker. Data outliers were examined through Proc Mixed model residual diagnosis (+/- 4 studentized residuals). A sensitivity analysis excluding outliers was performed for Visit 7 (Week 12). Absolute change from baseline = Post Product Use Value - Baseline Value Baseline / Visit 3 (Week 1) = Day 1 Visit 7 (Week 12) = Day 84 ± 3
Summary of Urine 8-epi-prostaglandin F2alpha Absolute Change From Baseline (ng/g) by Study Group From Week 1 to Week 12 (mITT Population With Outliers Excluded) [ALCS-RA-16-06-EV]Week 1 (Baseline) and Week 12 for a total of of 12 weeks from randomizationSummary of urine 8-epi-prostaglandin F2alpha absolute change from Baseline in Week 12 is presented (Study ALCS-RA-16-06-EV). The first urine void of the day on Visits 3 and 7 was analyzed for the urine biomarker. Data outliers were examined through Proc Mixed model residual diagnosis (+/- 4 studentized residuals). A sensitivity analysis excluding outliers was performed for Visit 7 (Week 12). Urine creatinine concentration was measured in the urine collection and used to adjust the urine biomarker concentration value as follows: Urine biomarker (ng/g creatinine) = urine biomarker (pg/mL) x 100 / creatinine (mg/dL) Absolute change from baseline = Post Product Use Value - Baseline Value Baseline / Visit 3 (Week 1) = Day 1 Visit 7 (Week 12) = Day 84 ± 3
Summary of Urine 11-dehydrothromboxane B2 Absolute Change From Baseline (ng/g) by Study Group From Week 1 to Week 12 (mITT Population With Outliers Excluded) [ALCS-RA-16-06-EV]Week 1 (Baseline) and Week 12 for a total of of 12 weeks from randomizationSummary of urine 11-dehydrothromboxane B2 absolute change from Baseline in Week 12 is presented (Study ALCS-RA-16-06-EV). The first urine void of the day on Visits 3 and 7 was analyzed for the urine biomarker. Data outliers were examined through Proc Mixed model residual diagnosis (+/- 4 studentized residuals). A sensitivity analysis excluding outliers was performed for Visit 7 (Week 12). Urine creatinine concentration was measured in the urine collection and used to adjust the urine biomarker concentration value as follows: Urine biomarker (ng/g creatinine) = urine biomarker (pg/mL) x 100 / creatinine (mg/dL) Absolute change from baseline = Post Product Use Value - Baseline Value Baseline / Visit 3 (Week 1) = Day 1 Visit 7 (Week 12) = Day 84 ± 3
Summary of Plasma sICAM-1 Absolute Change From Baseline (ng/mL) by Study Group From Week 1 to Week 12 (mITT Population With Outliers Excluded) [ALCS-RA-16-06-EV]Week 1 (Baseline) and Week 12 for a total of of 12 weeks from randomizationSummary of plasma sICAM-1 absolute change from Baseline in Week 12 is presented (Study ALCS-RA-16-06-EV). Blood samples were collected via direct venipuncture at Visits 3 and 7 and analyzed for the biomarker. Data outliers were examined through Proc Mixed model residual diagnosis (+/- 4 studentized residuals). A sensitivity analysis excluding outliers was performed for Visit 7 (Week 12). Absolute change from baseline = Post Product Use Value - Baseline Value Baseline / Visit 3 (Week 1) = Day 1 Visit 7 (Week 12) = Day 84 ± 3
Summary of Urine Total NNAL Absolute Change From Baseline (ng/g) by Study Group From Week 1 to Week 12 (mITT Population With Outliers Excluded) [ALCS-RA-16-06-EV]Week 1 (Baseline) and Week 12 for a total of of 12 weeks from randomizationSummary of urine total NNAL absolute change from Baseline in Week 12 is presented (Study ALCS-RA-16-06-EV). The first urine void of the day on Visits 3 and 7 was analyzed for the urine biomarker. Data outliers were examined through Proc Mixed model residual diagnosis (+/- 4 studentized residuals). A sensitivity analysis excluding outliers was performed for Visit 7 (Week 12). Urine creatinine concentration was measured in the urine collection and used to adjust the urine biomarker concentration value as follows: Urine biomarker (ng/g creatinine) = urine biomarker (pg/mL) x 100 / creatinine (mg/dL) Absolute change from baseline = Post Product Use Value - Baseline Value Baseline / Visit 3 (Week 1) = Day 1 Visit 7 (Week 12) = Day 84 ± 3
Summary of Urine Total NNAL and Absolute Change From Baseline (ng/g) by Study Group and Visit From Week 1 to Week 12 (mITT Population) [ALCS-RA-16-06-EV]12 weeks total with measurement timepoints at Week 1/Baseline, Week 6 and Week 12Summary of urine total 4-(methylnitrosamino)-1-(3-pyridyl)-1-butanol (NNAL) (ng/g) and absolute change from Baseline in Weeks 6 and 12 are presented (Study ALCS-RA-16-06-EV). Baseline / Visit 3 (Week 1) = Day 1 Visit 5 (Week 6) = Day 42 ± 3 Visit 7 (Week 12) = Day 84 ± 3 The first urine void of the day was collected at Visits 3, 5 and 7. Urine creatinine concentration was measured in the urine collection and used to adjust the urine biomarker concentration values as follows: Urine biomarker (ng/g creatinine) = urine biomarker (pg/mL) x 100 / creatinine (mg/dL) Absolute change from baseline = Post Product Use Value - Baseline Value
Summary of Urine Total NNAL and Absolute Change From Baseline (ng/g) by Study Group and Visit From Week 1 to Week 24 (mITT Population) [ALCS-RA-17-11-EV]24 weeks total with measurement timepoints at Week 1/Baseline [ALCS-RA-16-06-EV study]), and Week 12, Week 18 and Week 24 [ALCS-RA-17-11-EV study]Summary of Urine Total NNAL (ng/g) and absolute change from Baseline in Weeks 12, 18 and 24 are presented (Study ALCS-RA-17-11-EV). The first urine void of the day was collected at Visits 1, 3 and 5 of the ALCS-RA-17-11-EV study. Baseline samples were collected Week 1 of the ALCS-RA-16-06-EV study. Urine creatinine concentration was measured in the urine collection and used to adjust the urine biomarker concentration value as follows: Urine biomarker (ng/g creatinine) = urine biomarker (pg/mL) x 100 / creatinine (mg/dL) Change from Baseline was calculated as follows: Absolute change from baseline = Post Product Use Value - Baseline Value, where Baseline = values reported on Day 1 (Week 1) of the 12-week ALCS-RA-16-06-EV study Baseline = Day 1 (Week 1), Visit 1 = Week 12 (Day 84 ± 3), Visit 3 = Week 18 (Day 126 ± 3), and Visit 5 = Week 24 (Day 168 ± 3), relative to the start of the 12-week ALCS-RA-16-06-EV study
Summary of Whole Blood COHb and Absolute Change From Baseline (% Saturation) by Study Group and Visit From Week 1 to Week 12 (mITT Population) [ALCS-RA-16-06-EV]12 weeks total with measurement timepoints at Week 1/Baseline, Week 6 and Week 12Summary of whole blood carboxyhemoglobin (COHb) (% Saturation) and absolute change from Baseline in Weeks 6 and 12 are presented (Study ALCS-RA-16-06-EV). Blood samples were collected via direct venipuncture at Visits 3, 5, and 7. Absolute change from baseline = Post Product Use Value - Baseline Value Baseline / Visit 3 (Week 1) = Day 1 Visit 5 (Week 6) = Day 42 ± 3 Visit 7 (Week 12) = Day 84 ± 3
Summary of Whole Blood COHb and Absolute Change From Baseline (% Saturation) by Study Group and Visit From Week 1 to Week 24 (mITT Population) [ALCS-RA-17-11-EV]24 weeks total with measurement timepoints at Week 1/Baseline [ALCS-RA-16-06-EV study]), and Week 12, Week 18 and Week 24 [ALCS-RA-17-11-EV study]Summary of Whole Blood COHb (% Saturation) and absolute change from Baseline in Weeks 12, 18 and 24 are presented (Study ALCS-RA-17-11-EV). Blood samples were collected via direct venipuncture on Visits 1, 3 and 5 of the ALCS-RA-17-11-EV study. Baseline samples were collected Week 1 of the ALCS-RA-16-06-EV study. Change from Baseline was calculated as follows: Absolute change from baseline = Post Product Use Value - Baseline Value, where Baseline = values reported on Day 1 (Week 1) of the 12-week ALCS-RA-16-06-EV study Baseline = Day 1 (Week 1), Visit 1 = Week 12 (Day 84 ± 3), Visit 3 = Week 18 (Day 126 ± 3), and Visit 5 = Week 24 (Day 168 ± 3), relative to the start of the 12-week ALCS-RA-16-06-EV study
Summary of Whole Blood WBC Count and Absolute Change From Baseline (10^3 Cells/uL) by Study Group and Visit From Week 1 to Week 12 (mITT Population) [ALCS-RA-16-06-EV]12 weeks total with measurement timepoints at Week 1/Baseline, Week 6 and Week 12Summary of whole blood white blood cell (WBC) count (10\^3 cells/uL) and absolute change from Baseline in Weeks 6 and 12 are presented (Study ALCS-RA-16-06-EV). Blood samples were collected via direct venipuncture at Visits 3, 5, and 7. Absolute change from baseline = Post Product Use Value - Baseline Value Baseline / Visit 3 (Week 1) = Day 1 Visit 5 (Week 6) = Day 42 ± 3 Visit 7 (Week 12) = Day 84 ± 3
Summary of Whole Blood WBC Count and Absolute Change From Baseline (10^3 Cells/uL) by Study Group and Visit From Week 1 to Week 24 (mITT Population) [ALCS-RA-17-11-EV]24 weeks total with measurement timepoints at Week 1/Baseline [ALCS-RA-16-06-EV study]), and Week 12, Week 18 and Week 24 [ALCS-RA-17-11-EV study]Summary of Whole Blood WBC Count (10\^3 cells/uL) and absolute change from Baseline in Weeks 12, 18 and 24 are presented (Study ALCS-RA-17-11-EV). Blood samples were collected via direct venipuncture on Visits 1, 3 and 5 of the ALCS-RA-17-11-EV study. Baseline samples were collected Week 1 of the ALCS-RA-16-06-EV study. Change from Baseline was calculated as follows: Absolute change from baseline = Post Product Use Value - Baseline Value, where Baseline = values reported on Day 1 (Week 1) of the 12-week ALCS-RA-16-06-EV study Baseline = Day 1 (Week 1), Visit 1 = Week 12 (Day 84 ± 3), Visit 3 = Week 18 (Day 126 ± 3), and Visit 5 = Week 24 (Day 168 ± 3), relative to the start of the 12-week ALCS-RA-16-06-EV study
Summary of Serum HDL-C and Absolute Change From Baseline (mg/dL) by Study Group and Visit From Week 1 to Week 12 (mITT Population) [ALCS-RA-16-06-EV]12 weeks total with measurement timepoints at Week 1/Baseline, Week 6 and Week 12Summary of serum high density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL-C) (mg/dL) and absolute change from Baseline in Weeks 6 and 12 are presented (Study ALCS-RA-16-06-EV). Blood samples were collected via direct venipuncture at Visits 3, 5, and 7. Absolute change from baseline = Post Product Use Value - Baseline Value Baseline / Visit 3 (Week 1) = Day 1 Visit 5 (Week 6) = Day 42 ± 3 Visit 7 (Week 12) = Day 84 ± 3
Summary of Serum HDL-C and Absolute Change From Baseline (mg/dL) by Study Group and Visit From Week 1 to Week 24 (mITT Population) [ALCS-RA-17-11-EV]24 weeks total with measurement timepoints at Week 1/Baseline [ALCS-RA-16-06-EV study]), and Week 12, Week 18 and Week 24 [ALCS-RA-17-11-EV study]Summary of serum HDL-C (mg/dL) and absolute change from Baseline in Weeks 12, 18 and 24 are presented (Study ALCS-RA-17-11-EV). Blood samples were collected via direct venipuncture on Visits 1, 3 and 5 of the ALCS-RA-17-11-EV study. Baseline samples were collected Week 1 of the ALCS-RA-16-06-EV study. Change from Baseline was calculated as follows: Absolute change from baseline = Post Product Use Value - Baseline Value, where Baseline = values reported on Day 1 (Week 1) of the 12-week ALCS-RA-16-06-EV study Baseline = Day 1 (Week 1), Visit 1 = Week 12 (Day 84 ± 3), Visit 3 = Week 18 (Day 126 ± 3), and Visit 5 = Week 24 (Day 168 ± 3), relative to the start of the 12-week ALCS-RA-16-06-EV study
Summary of Urine 8-epi-prostaglandin F2alpha and Absolute Change From Baseline (ng/g) by Study Group and Visit From Week 1 to Week 12 (mITT Population) [ALCS-RA-16-06-EV]12 weeks total with measurement timepoints at Week 1/Baseline, Week 6 and Week 12Summary of urine 8-epi-prostaglandin F2alpha (ng/g) and absolute change from Baseline in Weeks 6 and 12 are presented (Study ALCS-RA-16-06-EV). Baseline / Visit 3 (Week 1) = Day 1 Visit 5 (Week 6) = Day 42 ± 3 Visit 7 (Week 12) = Day 84 ± 3 The first urine void of the day was collected at Visits 3, 5 and 7. Urine creatinine concentration was measured in the urine collection and used to adjust the urine biomarker concentration values as follows: Urine biomarker (ng/g creatinine) = urine biomarker (pg/mL) x 100 / creatinine (mg/dL) Absolute change from baseline = Post Product Use Value - Baseline Value
Summary of Urine 8-epi-prostaglandin F2alpha and Absolute Change From Baseline (ng/g) by Study Group and Visit From Week 1 to Week 24 (mITT Population) [ALCS-RA-17-11-EV]24 weeks total with measurement timepoints at Week 1/Baseline [ALCS-RA-16-06-EV study]), and Week 12, Week 18 and Week 24 [ALCS-RA-17-11-EV study]Summary of urine 8-epi-prostaglandin F2alpha (ng/g) and absolute change from Baseline in Weeks 12, 18 and 24 are presented (Study ALCS-RA-17-11-EV). The first urine void of the day was collected at Visits 1, 3 and 5 of the ALCS-RA-17-11-EV study. Baseline samples were collected Week 1 of the ALCS-RA-16-06-EV study. Urine creatinine concentration was measured in the urine collection and used to adjust the urine biomarker concentration value as follows: Urine biomarker (ng/g creatinine) = urine biomarker (pg/mL) x 100 / creatinine (mg/dL) Change from Baseline was calculated as follows: Absolute change from baseline = Post Product Use Value - Baseline Value, where Baseline = values reported on Day 1 (Week 1) of the 12-week ALCS-RA-16-06-EV study Baseline = Day 1 (Week 1), Visit 1 = Week 12 (Day 84 ± 3), Visit 3 = Week 18 (Day 126 ± 3), and Visit 5 = Week 24 (Day 168 ± 3), relative to the start of the 12-week ALCS-RA-16-06-EV study
Summary of Urine 11-dehydrothromboxane B2 and Absolute Change From Baseline (ng/g) by Study Group and Visit From Week 1 to Week 12 (mITT Population) [ALCS-RA-16-06-EV]12 weeks total with measurement timepoints at Week 1/Baseline, Week 6 and Week 12Summary of urine 11-dehydrothromboxane B2 (ng/g) and absolute change from Baseline in Weeks 6 and 12 are presented (Study ALCS-RA-16-06-EV). Baseline / Visit 3 (Week 1) = Day 1 Visit 5 (Week 6) = Day 42 ± 3 Visit 7 (Week 12) = Day 84 ± 3 The first urine void of the day was collected at Visits 3, 5 and 7. Urine creatinine concentration was measured in the urine collection and used to adjust the urine biomarker concentration values as follows: Urine biomarker (ng/g creatinine) = urine biomarker (pg/mL) x 100 / creatinine (mg/dL) Absolute change from baseline = Post Product Use Value - Baseline Value
Summary of Urine 11-dehydrothromboxane B2 and Absolute Change From Baseline (ng/g) by Study Group and Visit From Week 1 to Week 24 (mITT Population) [ALCS-RA-17-11-EV]24 weeks total with measurement timepoints at Week 1/Baseline [ALCS-RA-16-06-EV study]), and Week 12, Week 18 and Week 24 [ALCS-RA-17-11-EV study]Summary of urine 11-dehydrothromboxane B2 (ng/g) and absolute change from Baseline in Weeks 12, 18 and 24 are presented (Study ALCS-RA-17-11-EV). The first urine void of the day was collected at Visits 1, 3 and 5 of the ALCS-RA-17-11-EV study. Baseline samples were collected Week 1 of the ALCS-RA-16-06-EV study. Urine creatinine concentration was measured in the urine collection and used to adjust the urine biomarker concentration value as follows: Urine biomarker (ng/g creatinine) = urine biomarker (pg/mL) x 100 / creatinine (mg/dL) Change from Baseline was calculated as follows: Absolute change from baseline = Post Product Use Value - Baseline Value, where Baseline = values reported on Day 1 (Week 1) of the 12-week ALCS-RA-16-06-EV study Baseline = Day 1 (Week 1), Visit 1 = Week 12 (Day 84 ± 3), Visit 3 = Week 18 (Day 126 ± 3), and Visit 5 = Week 24 (Day 168 ± 3), relative to the start of the 12-week ALCS-RA-16-06-EV study
Summary of Plasma sICAM-1 and Absolute Change From Baseline (ng/mL) by Study Group and Visit From Week 1 to Week 12 (mITT Population) [ALCS-RA-16-06-EV]12 weeks total with measurement timepoints at Week 1/Baseline, Week 6 and Week 12Summary of plasma soluble Intercellular Adhesion Molecule-1 (sICAM-1) (ng/mL) and absolute change from Baseline in Weeks 6 and 12 are presented (Study ALCS-RA-16-06-EV). Blood samples were collected via direct venipuncture at Visits 3, 5, and 7. Absolute change from baseline = Post Product Use Value - Baseline Value Baseline / Visit 3 (Week 1) = Day 1 Visit 5 (Week 6) = Day 42 ± 3 Visit 7 (Week 12) = Day 84 ± 3
Summary of Plasma sICAM-1 and Absolute Change From Baseline (ng/mL) by Study Group and Visit From Week 1 to Week 24 (mITT Population) [ALCS-RA-17-11-EV]24 weeks total with measurement timepoints at Week 1/Baseline [ALCS-RA-16-06-EV study]), and Week 12, Week 18 and Week 24 [ALCS-RA-17-11-EV study]Summary of plasma sICAM-1 (ng/mL) and absolute change from Baseline in Weeks 12, 18 and 24 are presented (Study ALCS-RA-17-11-EV). Blood samples were collected via direct venipuncture on Visits 1, 3 and 5 of the ALCS-RA-17-11-EV study. Baseline samples were collected Week 1 of the ALCS-RA-16-06-EV study. Change from Baseline was calculated as follows: Absolute change from baseline = Post Product Use Value - Baseline Value, where Baseline = values reported on Day 1 (Week 1) of the 12-week ALCS-RA-16-06-EV study Baseline = Day 1 (Week 1), Visit 1 = Week 12 (Day 84 ± 3), Visit 3 = Week 18 (Day 126 ± 3), and Visit 5 = Week 24 (Day 168 ± 3), relative to the start of the 12-week ALCS-RA-16-06-EV study

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Frequency of eCO as Compliance Indicator, Weeks 12 (Study ALCS-RA-16-06-EV) and 24 (Study ALCS-RA-17-11-EV)Weeks 12 (Study ALCS-RA-16-06-EV) and Week 24 (Study ALCS-RA-17-11-EV) from randomizationParticipant compliance for the abstention of any type of tobacco/nicotine product for the duration of the study was assessed by measuring the participant's exhaled carbon monoxide (eCO, ppm). According to their eCO measurements at Weeks 12 (study ALCS-RA-16-06-EV) and Week 24 (study ALCS-RA-17-11-EV), participants were categorized into 1 of 3 categories: 'eCO ≤ 5', 'eCO \< 5 - ≤ 8', or 'eCO \> 8'. Lower eCO values represent lower smoking exposure and increased compliance, with the 'eCO ≤ 5' category indicating that the participant abstained from smoking, the 'eCO \< 5 - ≤ 8' category indicating low smoking exposure to the participant, and the 'eCO \> 8' category indicating non-compliance with the study criteria that the participant refrain from smoking during the study.
Percentage of Predicted FEV1 and Absolute Change From Baseline to Week 12 by Study Group (mITT Population) [ALCS-RA-16-06-EV]Assessments at Screening (Day -28 to Day -5) and Week 12 (Day 84 +/- 3 )Percentage of predicted forced expiratory volume in the first second (FEV1) and absolute change from Baseline to Week 12 by Study Group is presented (Study ALCS-RA-16-06-EV). Baseline / Screening = Day -28 to Day -5 Visit 7 (Week 12) = Day 84 ± 3 Absolute change from baseline = Post Product Use Value - Baseline Value FEV1 = Forced Expiratory Volume in 1 Second
Percentage of Predicted FVC and Absolute Change From Baseline to Week 12 by Study Group (mITT Population) [ALCS-RA-16-06-EV]Assessments at Screening (Day -28 to Day -5) and Week 12 (Day 84 +/- 3 )Percentage of predicted forced vital capacity (FVC) and absolute change from Baseline to Week 12 by Study Group is presented (Study ALCS-RA-16-06-EV). Baseline / Screening = Day -28 to Day -5 Visit 7 (Week 12) = Day 84 ± 3 Absolute change from baseline = Post Product Use Value - Baseline Value FVC = Forced Vital Capacity
Percentage of Predicted FEV1/FVC and Absolute Change From Baseline to Week 12 by Study Group (mITT Population) [ALCS-RA-16-06-EV]Assessments at Screening (Day -28 to Day -5) and Week 12 (Day 84 +/- 3 )Percentage of predicted FEV1/FVC and absolute change from Baseline to Week 12 by Study Group is presented (Study ALCS-RA-16-06-EV). Baseline / Screening = Day -28 to Day -5 Visit 7 (Week 12) = Day 84 ± 3 Absolute change from baseline = Post Product Use Value - Baseline Value FEV1 = Forced Expiratory Volume in 1 Second, FVC = Forced Vital Capacity.

Other

MeasureTime frameDescription
Summary of Urine Nicotine Equivalents and Absolute Change From Baseline (mg/g) by Study Group and Visit From Week 1 to Week 24 (mITT Population) [ALCS-RA-17-11-EV]24 weeks total with measurement timepoints at Week 1/Baseline [ALCS-RA-16-06-EV study]), and Week 12, Week 18 and Week 24 [ALCS-RA-17-11-EV study]Summary of urine nicotine equivalents (mg/g Cr) and absolute change from Baseline in Weeks 12, 18 and 24 are presented (Study ALCS-RA-17-11-EV). The first urine void of the day was collected at Visits 1, 3 and 5 of the ALCS-RA-17-11-EV study. Baseline samples were collected Week 1 of the ALCS-RA-16-06-EV study. Nicotine equivalents (μg/mL) = (nicotine \[ng/mL\]/162.23 \[mg/mmol\] + nicotinegluc (ng/mL)/338.36 \[mg/mmol\] + cotinine \[ng/mL\]/176.22 \[mg/mmol\] + cotininegluc \[ng/mL\]/352.34 \[mg/mmol\] + trans-3'-hydroxycotinine \[ng/mL\]/192.22 \[mg/mmol\] + trans-3'-hydroxycotinine-gluc \[ng/mL\]/368.34 \[mg/mmol\]) x 162.23 (mg/mmol) x 1 μg/1000 ng Urine creatinine concentration was measured in the urine collection and used to adjust the urine biomarker concentration value as follows: Urine biomarker (ng/g creatinine) = urine biomarker (pg/mL) x 100 / creatinine (mg/dL) Change from Baseline was calculated as follows: Absolute change from baseline = Post Product Use Value - Baseline Val
Summary of Urine Nicotine Equivalents and Absolute Change From Baseline (mg/g) by Study Group and Visit From Week 1 to Week 12 (mITT Population) [ALCS-RA-16-06-EV]12 weeks total with measurement timepoints at Week 1/Baseline, Week 6 and Week 12Summary of urine Nicotine Equivalents (mg/g) and absolute change from Baseline in Weeks 6 and 12 are presented (Study ALCS-RA-16-06-EV). The first urine void of the day was collected at Visits 3, 5 and 7. Nicotine equivalents (μg/mL) = (nicotine \[ng/mL\]/162.23 \[mg/mmol\] + nicotinegluc (ng/mL)/338.36 \[mg/mmol\] + cotinine \[ng/mL\]/176.22 \[mg/mmol\] + cotininegluc \[ng/mL\]/352.34 \[mg/mmol\] + trans-3'-hydroxycotinine \[ng/mL\]/192.22 \[mg/mmol\] + trans-3'-hydroxycotinine-gluc \[ng/mL\]/368.34 \[mg/mmol\]) x 162.23 (mg/mmol) x 1 μg/1000 ng Urine creatinine concentration was measured in the urine collection and used to adjust the urine biomarker concentration value as follows: Urine biomarker (ng/g creatinine) = urine biomarker (pg/mL) x 100 / creatinine (mg/dL) Absolute change from baseline = Post Product Use Value - Baseline Value Baseline / Visit 3 (Week 1) = Day 1 Visit 5 (Week 6) = Day 42 ± 3 Visit 7 (Week 12) = Day 84 ± 3

Countries

United States

Participant flow

Pre-assignment details

After screening, subjects who met all eligibility criteria were randomized to one of the study groups. Eligible subjects who completed ALCS-RA-16-06-EV were entered into the ALCS-RA-17-11-EV 12-week extension study and assigned to the same study groups as the ALCS-RA-16-06-EV study.

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Test 1
Exclusive ad libitum use of test e-Vapor Product NuMark LLC, MarkTen® XL Bold CLASSIC\* without use of any other type of tobacco/nicotine containing product, for the entire duration of study participation. \*Product no longer sold commercially Experimental: Test Product 1: Subjects were instructed to completely replace their cigarettes with the Test Product 1 EVP (Nu Mark LLC, MarkTen® XL Bold CLASSIC)
151
Test 2
Exclusive ad libitum use of test e-Vapor Product Nu Mark LLC, MarkTen® XL Bold MENTHOL\* without use of any other type of tobacco/nicotine containing product, for the entire duration of study participation. \*Product no longer sold commercially Experimental: Test Product 2: Subjects were instructed to completely replace their cigarettes with the Test Product 2 EVP (Nu Mark LLC, MarkTen® XL Bold MENTHOL)
150
Control
Continue smoking under ad libitum use of subjects' own brand of conventional lit-end cigarettes, without use of any other type of tobacco/nicotine containing product, for the entire duration of study participation.
149
Total450

Withdrawals & dropouts

PeriodReasonFG000FG001FG002
ALCS-RA-16-06-EV (Weeks 1-12)Adverse Event410
ALCS-RA-16-06-EV (Weeks 1-12)Failure To Meet Ie Post Enrollment100
ALCS-RA-16-06-EV (Weeks 1-12)Lost to Follow-up882
ALCS-RA-16-06-EV (Weeks 1-12)Non-Compliance With Study Procedures872
ALCS-RA-16-06-EV (Weeks 1-12)Other122
ALCS-RA-16-06-EV (Weeks 1-12)Physician Decision001
ALCS-RA-16-06-EV (Weeks 1-12)Pregnancy001
ALCS-RA-16-06-EV (Weeks 1-12)Withdrawal by Subject875
ALCS-RA-17-11-EV (Weeks 12-24)Non-Compliance With Study Procedures001
ALCS-RA-17-11-EV (Weeks 12-24)Other002
ALCS-RA-17-11-EV (Weeks 12-24)Withdrawal by Subject100

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicTest 2TotalTest 1Control
Age, Continuous44.1 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 9.26
44.1 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 9.24
43.9 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 8.45
44.4 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 10.1
Annual Income
$100,000 - $149,999
4 Participants14 Participants4 Participants6 Participants
Annual Income
$150,000 AND OVER
0 Participants5 Participants1 Participants4 Participants
Annual Income
$20,000 - $29,999
25 Participants89 Participants39 Participants25 Participants
Annual Income
$30,000 - $39,999
20 Participants66 Participants25 Participants21 Participants
Annual Income
$40,000 - $49,999
11 Participants33 Participants10 Participants12 Participants
Annual Income
$50,000 - $59,999
8 Participants27 Participants7 Participants12 Participants
Annual Income
$60,000 - $74,999
8 Participants18 Participants5 Participants5 Participants
Annual Income
$75,000 - $99,000
10 Participants29 Participants10 Participants9 Participants
Annual Income
I DO NOT WISH TO ANSWER
17 Participants40 Participants13 Participants10 Participants
Annual Income
UNDER $20,000
47 Participants129 Participants37 Participants45 Participants
Body Mass Index27.915 (kg/m²)
STANDARD_DEVIATION 5.1466
27.820 (kg/m²)
STANDARD_DEVIATION 5.0753
27.810 (kg/m²)
STANDARD_DEVIATION 5.1312
27.733 (kg/m²)
STANDARD_DEVIATION 4.9777
Daily Cigarette Use17.0 Cigarettes per day
STANDARD_DEVIATION 5.23
17.5 Cigarettes per day
STANDARD_DEVIATION 5.59
18.2 Cigarettes per day
STANDARD_DEVIATION 5.71
17.4 Cigarettes per day
STANDARD_DEVIATION 5.79
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Hispanic or Latino
8 Participants20 Participants8 Participants4 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Not Hispanic or Latino
142 Participants430 Participants143 Participants145 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Height171.40 cm
STANDARD_DEVIATION 9.682
171.31 cm
STANDARD_DEVIATION 9.56
171.51 cm
STANDARD_DEVIATION 9.402
171.00 cm
STANDARD_DEVIATION 9.651
Highest Degree
COLLEGE 1 YEAR TO 3 YEARS (SOME COLLEGE
56 Participants191 Participants69 Participants66 Participants
Highest Degree
COLLEGE 4 YEARS OR MORE (COLLEGE GRADUATE
24 Participants55 Participants12 Participants19 Participants
Highest Degree
GRADE 12 OR GED (HIGH SCHOOL GRADUATE)
55 Participants166 Participants61 Participants50 Participants
Highest Degree
GRADES 1 THROUGH 8 (ELEMENTARY)
1 Participants2 Participants1 Participants0 Participants
Highest Degree
GRADES 9 THROUGH 11 (SOME HIGH SCHOOL)
9 Participants19 Participants4 Participants6 Participants
Highest Degree
I DO NOT WISH TO ANSWER
1 Participants2 Participants0 Participants1 Participants
Highest Degree
OTHER
0 Participants1 Participants1 Participants0 Participants
Highest Degree
POSTGRADUATE/MASTERS/DOCTORATE/LAW/MD
4 Participants14 Participants3 Participants7 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
American Indian or Alaska Native
0 Participants2 Participants2 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Asian
2 Participants6 Participants0 Participants4 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Black or African American
37 Participants119 Participants44 Participants38 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
More than one race
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
0 Participants3 Participants2 Participants1 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
White
111 Participants320 Participants103 Participants106 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
75 Participants222 Participants74 Participants73 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
75 Participants228 Participants77 Participants76 Participants
Weight82.2 kilograms
STANDARD_DEVIATION 17.63
81.8 kilograms
STANDARD_DEVIATION 16.98
82.0 kilograms
STANDARD_DEVIATION 17.43
81.1 kilograms
STANDARD_DEVIATION 15.9
Years Smoked25.0 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 9.48
24.5 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 9.2
24.1 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 8.32
24.5 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 9.78

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
EG002
affected / at risk
EG003
affected / at risk
EG004
affected / at risk
EG005
affected / at risk
EG006
affected / at risk
EG007
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
0 / 1510 / 1500 / 1490 / 4500 / 480 / 500 / 520 / 150
other
Total, other adverse events
49 / 15147 / 15024 / 149120 / 45013 / 4815 / 5010 / 5238 / 150
serious
Total, serious adverse events
1 / 1511 / 1501 / 1493 / 4500 / 480 / 500 / 520 / 150

Outcome results

Primary

Summary of Plasma sICAM-1 Absolute Change From Baseline (ng/mL) by Study Group From Week 1 to Week 12 (mITT Population With Outliers Excluded) [ALCS-RA-16-06-EV]

Summary of plasma sICAM-1 absolute change from Baseline in Week 12 is presented (Study ALCS-RA-16-06-EV). Blood samples were collected via direct venipuncture at Visits 3 and 7 and analyzed for the biomarker. Data outliers were examined through Proc Mixed model residual diagnosis (+/- 4 studentized residuals). A sensitivity analysis excluding outliers was performed for Visit 7 (Week 12). Absolute change from baseline = Post Product Use Value - Baseline Value Baseline / Visit 3 (Week 1) = Day 1 Visit 7 (Week 12) = Day 84 ± 3

Time frame: Week 1 (Baseline) and Week 12 for a total of of 12 weeks from randomization

Population: Modified ITT Population with Outliers Excluded: All subjects were randomized according to the randomization schedule; who used at least one study products after randomization was recorded and for whom there was a valid (within ±3 days of the planned measurement day) baseline and at least one post-baseline biomarker. Data outliers, defined as any observation with a studentized residual that is greater than +/- 4, were excluded from the analysis.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Test 1Summary of Plasma sICAM-1 Absolute Change From Baseline (ng/mL) by Study Group From Week 1 to Week 12 (mITT Population With Outliers Excluded) [ALCS-RA-16-06-EV]-23.71 ng/mLStandard Deviation 52.739
Test 2Summary of Plasma sICAM-1 Absolute Change From Baseline (ng/mL) by Study Group From Week 1 to Week 12 (mITT Population With Outliers Excluded) [ALCS-RA-16-06-EV]-26.02 ng/mLStandard Deviation 46.433
Test 1 + Test 2 GroupSummary of Plasma sICAM-1 Absolute Change From Baseline (ng/mL) by Study Group From Week 1 to Week 12 (mITT Population With Outliers Excluded) [ALCS-RA-16-06-EV]-7.056 ng/mLStandard Deviation 37.619
Comparison: Null hypothesis: Absolute change from Baseline (Week 1) for Plasma sICAM-1 (ng/mL) in Test 1 is equal to Control on Visit 7 (Week 12). Alternate hypothesis: Absolute change from Baseline (Week 1) for Plasma sICAM-1 (ng/mL) in Test 1 is NOT equal to Control on Visit 7 (Week 12). (mITT Population)p-value: 0.000395% CI: [-32.447, -7.573]Mixed Models Analysis
Comparison: Null hypothesis: Absolute change from Baseline (Week 1) for Plasma sICAM-1 (ng/mL) in Test 2 is equal to Control on Visit 7 (Week 12). Alternate hypothesis: Absolute change from Baseline (Week 1) for Plasma sICAM-1 (ng/mL) in Test 2 is NOT equal to Control on Visit 7 (Week 12). (mITT Population)p-value: <0.000195% CI: [-34.837, -10.295]Mixed Models Analysis
Primary

Summary of Plasma sICAM-1 and Absolute Change From Baseline (ng/mL) by Study Group and Visit From Week 1 to Week 12 (mITT Population) [ALCS-RA-16-06-EV]

Summary of plasma soluble Intercellular Adhesion Molecule-1 (sICAM-1) (ng/mL) and absolute change from Baseline in Weeks 6 and 12 are presented (Study ALCS-RA-16-06-EV). Blood samples were collected via direct venipuncture at Visits 3, 5, and 7. Absolute change from baseline = Post Product Use Value - Baseline Value Baseline / Visit 3 (Week 1) = Day 1 Visit 5 (Week 6) = Day 42 ± 3 Visit 7 (Week 12) = Day 84 ± 3

Time frame: 12 weeks total with measurement timepoints at Week 1/Baseline, Week 6 and Week 12

Population: Modified ITT: All subjects were randomized according to the randomization schedule; who used at least one study products after randomization was recorded and for whom there was a valid (within ±3 days of the planned measurement day) baseline and at least one post-baseline biomarker.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Test 1Summary of Plasma sICAM-1 and Absolute Change From Baseline (ng/mL) by Study Group and Visit From Week 1 to Week 12 (mITT Population) [ALCS-RA-16-06-EV]Visit 3 (Baseline): Week 1230.4 ng/mLStandard Deviation 76.704
Test 1Summary of Plasma sICAM-1 and Absolute Change From Baseline (ng/mL) by Study Group and Visit From Week 1 to Week 12 (mITT Population) [ALCS-RA-16-06-EV]Change from Baseline (Week 6)-31.96 ng/mLStandard Deviation 50.532
Test 1Summary of Plasma sICAM-1 and Absolute Change From Baseline (ng/mL) by Study Group and Visit From Week 1 to Week 12 (mITT Population) [ALCS-RA-16-06-EV]Visit 7: Week 12204.1 ng/mLStandard Deviation 58.502
Test 1Summary of Plasma sICAM-1 and Absolute Change From Baseline (ng/mL) by Study Group and Visit From Week 1 to Week 12 (mITT Population) [ALCS-RA-16-06-EV]Change from Baseline (Week 12)-23.71 ng/mLStandard Deviation 52.739
Test 1Summary of Plasma sICAM-1 and Absolute Change From Baseline (ng/mL) by Study Group and Visit From Week 1 to Week 12 (mITT Population) [ALCS-RA-16-06-EV]Visit 5: Week 6198.5 ng/mLStandard Deviation 54.783
Test 2Summary of Plasma sICAM-1 and Absolute Change From Baseline (ng/mL) by Study Group and Visit From Week 1 to Week 12 (mITT Population) [ALCS-RA-16-06-EV]Change from Baseline (Week 12)-25.34 ng/mLStandard Deviation 46.825
Test 2Summary of Plasma sICAM-1 and Absolute Change From Baseline (ng/mL) by Study Group and Visit From Week 1 to Week 12 (mITT Population) [ALCS-RA-16-06-EV]Visit 3 (Baseline): Week 1222.8 ng/mLStandard Deviation 77.888
Test 2Summary of Plasma sICAM-1 and Absolute Change From Baseline (ng/mL) by Study Group and Visit From Week 1 to Week 12 (mITT Population) [ALCS-RA-16-06-EV]Visit 5: Week 6199.8 ng/mLStandard Deviation 65.911
Test 2Summary of Plasma sICAM-1 and Absolute Change From Baseline (ng/mL) by Study Group and Visit From Week 1 to Week 12 (mITT Population) [ALCS-RA-16-06-EV]Visit 7: Week 12197.7 ng/mLStandard Deviation 71.517
Test 2Summary of Plasma sICAM-1 and Absolute Change From Baseline (ng/mL) by Study Group and Visit From Week 1 to Week 12 (mITT Population) [ALCS-RA-16-06-EV]Change from Baseline (Week 6)-22.43 ng/mLStandard Deviation 47.51
Test 1 + Test 2 GroupSummary of Plasma sICAM-1 and Absolute Change From Baseline (ng/mL) by Study Group and Visit From Week 1 to Week 12 (mITT Population) [ALCS-RA-16-06-EV]Visit 5: Week 6199.2 ng/mLStandard Deviation 60.529
Test 1 + Test 2 GroupSummary of Plasma sICAM-1 and Absolute Change From Baseline (ng/mL) by Study Group and Visit From Week 1 to Week 12 (mITT Population) [ALCS-RA-16-06-EV]Change from Baseline (Week 12)-24.56 ng/mLStandard Deviation 49.652
Test 1 + Test 2 GroupSummary of Plasma sICAM-1 and Absolute Change From Baseline (ng/mL) by Study Group and Visit From Week 1 to Week 12 (mITT Population) [ALCS-RA-16-06-EV]Visit 3 (Baseline): Week 1226.6 ng/mLStandard Deviation 77.25
Test 1 + Test 2 GroupSummary of Plasma sICAM-1 and Absolute Change From Baseline (ng/mL) by Study Group and Visit From Week 1 to Week 12 (mITT Population) [ALCS-RA-16-06-EV]Change from Baseline (Week 6)-27.16 ng/mLStandard Deviation 49.166
Test 1 + Test 2 GroupSummary of Plasma sICAM-1 and Absolute Change From Baseline (ng/mL) by Study Group and Visit From Week 1 to Week 12 (mITT Population) [ALCS-RA-16-06-EV]Visit 7: Week 12200.8 ng/mLStandard Deviation 65.523
ControlSummary of Plasma sICAM-1 and Absolute Change From Baseline (ng/mL) by Study Group and Visit From Week 1 to Week 12 (mITT Population) [ALCS-RA-16-06-EV]Visit 3 (Baseline): Week 1230.6 ng/mLStandard Deviation 77.084
ControlSummary of Plasma sICAM-1 and Absolute Change From Baseline (ng/mL) by Study Group and Visit From Week 1 to Week 12 (mITT Population) [ALCS-RA-16-06-EV]Visit 7: Week 12224.3 ng/mLStandard Deviation 70.515
ControlSummary of Plasma sICAM-1 and Absolute Change From Baseline (ng/mL) by Study Group and Visit From Week 1 to Week 12 (mITT Population) [ALCS-RA-16-06-EV]Change from Baseline (Week 6)-6.613 ng/mLStandard Deviation 39.668
ControlSummary of Plasma sICAM-1 and Absolute Change From Baseline (ng/mL) by Study Group and Visit From Week 1 to Week 12 (mITT Population) [ALCS-RA-16-06-EV]Change from Baseline (Week 12)-7.056 ng/mLStandard Deviation 37.619
ControlSummary of Plasma sICAM-1 and Absolute Change From Baseline (ng/mL) by Study Group and Visit From Week 1 to Week 12 (mITT Population) [ALCS-RA-16-06-EV]Visit 5: Week 6224.6 ng/mLStandard Deviation 64.515
Comparison: Null hypothesis: Absolute change from Baseline (Week 1) for Plasma sICAM-1 (ng/mL) in Test 1 is equal to zero on Visit 5 (Week 6). Alternate hypothesis: Absolute change from Baseline (Week 1) for Plasma sICAM-1 (ng/mL) in Test 1 is NOT equal to zero on Visit 5 (Week 6). (mITT Population)p-value: <0.000195% CI: [-39.375, -26.208]Mixed Models Analysis
Comparison: Null hypothesis: Absolute change from Baseline (Week 1) for Plasma sICAM-1 (ng/mL) in Test 1 is equal to zero on Visit 7 (Week 12). Alternate hypothesis: Absolute change from Baseline (Week 1) for Plasma sICAM-1 (ng/mL) in Test 1 is NOT equal to zero on Visit 7 (Week 12). (mITT Population)p-value: <0.000195% CI: [-33.398, -18.443]Mixed Models Analysis
Comparison: Null hypothesis: Absolute change from Baseline (Week 1) for Plasma sICAM-1 (ng/mL) in Test 2 is equal to zero on Visit 5 (Week 6). Alternate hypothesis: Absolute change from Baseline (Week 1) for Plasma sICAM-1 (ng/mL) in Test 2 is NOT equal to zero on Visit 5 (Week 6). (mITT Population)p-value: <0.000195% CI: [-31.99, -18.979]Mixed Models Analysis
Comparison: Null hypothesis: Absolute change from Baseline (Week 1) for Plasma sICAM-1 (ng/mL) in Test 2 is equal to zero on Visit 7 (Week 12). Alternate hypothesis: Absolute change from Baseline (Week 1) for Plasma sICAM-1 (ng/mL) in Test 2 is NOT equal to zero on Visit 7 (Week 12). (mITT Population)p-value: <0.000195% CI: [-34.135, -19.663]Mixed Models Analysis
Comparison: Null hypothesis: Absolute change from Baseline (Week 1) for Plasma sICAM-1 (ng/mL) in Test 1 + Test 2 is equal to zero on Visit 7 (Week 12). Alternate hypothesis: Absolute change from Baseline (Week 1) for Plasma sICAM-1 (ng/mL) in Test 1 + Test 2 is NOT equal to zero on Visit 7 (Week 12). (mITT Population)p-value: <0.000195% CI: [-31.716, -21.103]Mixed Models Analysis
Comparison: Null hypothesis: Absolute change from Baseline (Week 1) for Plasma sICAM-1 (ng/mL) in Control is equal to zero on Visit 5 (Week 6). Alternate hypothesis: Absolute change from Baseline (Week 1) for Plasma sICAM-1 (ng/mL) in Control is NOT equal to zero on Visit 5 (Week 6). (mITT Population)p-value: 0.02895% CI: [-13.278, -0.763]Mixed Models Analysis
Comparison: Null hypothesis: Absolute change from Baseline (Week 1) for Plasma sICAM-1 (ng/mL) in Control is equal to zero on Visit 7 (Week 12). Alternate hypothesis: Absolute change from Baseline (Week 1) for Plasma sICAM-1 (ng/mL) in Control is NOT equal to zero on Visit 7 (Week 12). (mITT Population)p-value: 0.097295% CI: [-12.881, 1.077]Mixed Models Analysis
Comparison: Null hypothesis: Absolute change from Baseline (Week 1) for Plasma sICAM-1 (ng/mL) in Test 1 is equal to Control on Visit 5 (Week 6). Alternate hypothesis: Absolute change from Baseline (Week 1) for Plasma sICAM-1 (ng/mL) in Test 1 is NOT equal to Control on Visit 5 (Week 6). (mITT Population)p-value: <0.000195% CI: [-37.189, -14.353]Mixed Models Analysis
Comparison: Null hypothesis: Absolute change from Baseline (Week 1) for Plasma sICAM-1 (ng/mL) in Test 1 is equal to Control on Visit 7 (Week 12). Alternate hypothesis: Absolute change from Baseline (Week 1) for Plasma sICAM-1 (ng/mL) in Test 1 is NOT equal to Control on Visit 7 (Week 12). (mITT Population)p-value: 0.000595% CI: [-32.833, -7.205]Mixed Models Analysis
Comparison: Null hypothesis: Absolute change from Baseline (Week 1) for Plasma sICAM-1 (ng/mL) in Test 2 is equal to Control on Visit 5 (Week 6). Alternate hypothesis: Absolute change from Baseline (Week 1) for Plasma sICAM-1 (ng/mL) in Test 2 is NOT equal to Control on Visit 5 (Week 6). (mITT Population)p-value: 0.000295% CI: [-29.825, -7.101]Mixed Models Analysis
Comparison: Null hypothesis: Absolute change from Baseline (Week 1) for Plasma sICAM-1 (ng/mL) in Test 2 is equal to Control on Visit 7 (Week 12). Alternate hypothesis: Absolute change from Baseline (Week 1) for Plasma sICAM-1 (ng/mL) in Test 2 is NOT equal to Control on Visit 7 (Week 12). (mITT Population)p-value: 0.000295% CI: [-33.619, -8.375]Mixed Models Analysis
Comparison: Null hypothesis: Absolute change from Baseline (Week 1) for Plasma sICAM-1 (ng/mL) in Test 1 + Test 2 is equal to Control on Visit 7 (Week 12). Alternate hypothesis: Absolute change from Baseline (Week 1) for Plasma sICAM-1 (ng/mL) in Test 1 + Test 2 is NOT equal to Control on Visit 7 (Week 12). (mITT Population)p-value: <0.000195% CI: [-29.061, -11.955]Mixed Models Analysis
Comparison: Null hypothesis: Absolute change from Baseline (Week 1) for Plasma sICAM-1 (ng/mL) in Test 1 is equal to Test 2 on Visit 7 (Week 12). Alternate hypothesis: Absolute change from Baseline (Week 1) for Plasma sICAM-1 (ng/mL) in Test 1 is NOT equal to Test 2 on Visit 7 (Week 12). (mITT Population)p-value: 0.850495% CI: [-9.216, 11.172]Mixed Models Analysis
Primary

Summary of Plasma sICAM-1 and Absolute Change From Baseline (ng/mL) by Study Group and Visit From Week 1 to Week 24 (mITT Population) [ALCS-RA-17-11-EV]

Summary of plasma sICAM-1 (ng/mL) and absolute change from Baseline in Weeks 12, 18 and 24 are presented (Study ALCS-RA-17-11-EV). Blood samples were collected via direct venipuncture on Visits 1, 3 and 5 of the ALCS-RA-17-11-EV study. Baseline samples were collected Week 1 of the ALCS-RA-16-06-EV study. Change from Baseline was calculated as follows: Absolute change from baseline = Post Product Use Value - Baseline Value, where Baseline = values reported on Day 1 (Week 1) of the 12-week ALCS-RA-16-06-EV study Baseline = Day 1 (Week 1), Visit 1 = Week 12 (Day 84 ± 3), Visit 3 = Week 18 (Day 126 ± 3), and Visit 5 = Week 24 (Day 168 ± 3), relative to the start of the 12-week ALCS-RA-16-06-EV study

Time frame: 24 weeks total with measurement timepoints at Week 1/Baseline [ALCS-RA-16-06-EV study]), and Week 12, Week 18 and Week 24 [ALCS-RA-17-11-EV study]

Population: Modified ITT: All subjects were randomized according to the randomization schedule; who used at least one study products after randomization was recorded and for whom there was a valid (within ±3 days of the planned measurement day) baseline and at least one post-baseline biomarker.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Test 1Summary of Plasma sICAM-1 and Absolute Change From Baseline (ng/mL) by Study Group and Visit From Week 1 to Week 24 (mITT Population) [ALCS-RA-17-11-EV]Visit 3: Week 18187.9 ng/mLStandard Deviation 52.027
Test 1Summary of Plasma sICAM-1 and Absolute Change From Baseline (ng/mL) by Study Group and Visit From Week 1 to Week 24 (mITT Population) [ALCS-RA-17-11-EV]Change from Baseline (Week 18)-26.73 ng/mLStandard Deviation 53.383
Test 1Summary of Plasma sICAM-1 and Absolute Change From Baseline (ng/mL) by Study Group and Visit From Week 1 to Week 24 (mITT Population) [ALCS-RA-17-11-EV]Visit 5: Week 24184.4 ng/mLStandard Deviation 55.223
Test 1Summary of Plasma sICAM-1 and Absolute Change From Baseline (ng/mL) by Study Group and Visit From Week 1 to Week 24 (mITT Population) [ALCS-RA-17-11-EV]Visit 1: Week 12184.0 ng/mLStandard Deviation 48.515
Test 1Summary of Plasma sICAM-1 and Absolute Change From Baseline (ng/mL) by Study Group and Visit From Week 1 to Week 24 (mITT Population) [ALCS-RA-17-11-EV]Change from Baseline (Week 12)-22.54 ng/mLStandard Deviation 45.013
Test 1Summary of Plasma sICAM-1 and Absolute Change From Baseline (ng/mL) by Study Group and Visit From Week 1 to Week 24 (mITT Population) [ALCS-RA-17-11-EV]Baseline: Week 1206.6 ng/mLStandard Deviation 60.303
Test 1Summary of Plasma sICAM-1 and Absolute Change From Baseline (ng/mL) by Study Group and Visit From Week 1 to Week 24 (mITT Population) [ALCS-RA-17-11-EV]Change from Baseline (Week 24)-25.36 ng/mLStandard Deviation 56.8
Test 2Summary of Plasma sICAM-1 and Absolute Change From Baseline (ng/mL) by Study Group and Visit From Week 1 to Week 24 (mITT Population) [ALCS-RA-17-11-EV]Baseline: Week 1205.0 ng/mLStandard Deviation 57.117
Test 2Summary of Plasma sICAM-1 and Absolute Change From Baseline (ng/mL) by Study Group and Visit From Week 1 to Week 24 (mITT Population) [ALCS-RA-17-11-EV]Visit 1: Week 12176.7 ng/mLStandard Deviation 41.375
Test 2Summary of Plasma sICAM-1 and Absolute Change From Baseline (ng/mL) by Study Group and Visit From Week 1 to Week 24 (mITT Population) [ALCS-RA-17-11-EV]Change from Baseline (Week 18)-23.27 ng/mLStandard Deviation 57.191
Test 2Summary of Plasma sICAM-1 and Absolute Change From Baseline (ng/mL) by Study Group and Visit From Week 1 to Week 24 (mITT Population) [ALCS-RA-17-11-EV]Change from Baseline (Week 24)-21.06 ng/mLStandard Deviation 67.737
Test 2Summary of Plasma sICAM-1 and Absolute Change From Baseline (ng/mL) by Study Group and Visit From Week 1 to Week 24 (mITT Population) [ALCS-RA-17-11-EV]Visit 3: Week 18182.2 ng/mLStandard Deviation 50.009
Test 2Summary of Plasma sICAM-1 and Absolute Change From Baseline (ng/mL) by Study Group and Visit From Week 1 to Week 24 (mITT Population) [ALCS-RA-17-11-EV]Visit 5: Week 24184.7 ng/mLStandard Deviation 62.726
Test 2Summary of Plasma sICAM-1 and Absolute Change From Baseline (ng/mL) by Study Group and Visit From Week 1 to Week 24 (mITT Population) [ALCS-RA-17-11-EV]Change from Baseline (Week 12)-28.33 ng/mLStandard Deviation 49.987
Test 1 + Test 2 GroupSummary of Plasma sICAM-1 and Absolute Change From Baseline (ng/mL) by Study Group and Visit From Week 1 to Week 24 (mITT Population) [ALCS-RA-17-11-EV]Change from Baseline (Week 24)-23.09 ng/mLStandard Deviation 62.5
Test 1 + Test 2 GroupSummary of Plasma sICAM-1 and Absolute Change From Baseline (ng/mL) by Study Group and Visit From Week 1 to Week 24 (mITT Population) [ALCS-RA-17-11-EV]Visit 1: Week 12180.2 ng/mLStandard Deviation 44.893
Test 1 + Test 2 GroupSummary of Plasma sICAM-1 and Absolute Change From Baseline (ng/mL) by Study Group and Visit From Week 1 to Week 24 (mITT Population) [ALCS-RA-17-11-EV]Visit 3: Week 18184.8 ng/mLStandard Deviation 50.712
Test 1 + Test 2 GroupSummary of Plasma sICAM-1 and Absolute Change From Baseline (ng/mL) by Study Group and Visit From Week 1 to Week 24 (mITT Population) [ALCS-RA-17-11-EV]Change from Baseline (Week 18)-24.82 ng/mLStandard Deviation 55.227
Test 1 + Test 2 GroupSummary of Plasma sICAM-1 and Absolute Change From Baseline (ng/mL) by Study Group and Visit From Week 1 to Week 24 (mITT Population) [ALCS-RA-17-11-EV]Change from Baseline (Week 12)-25.52 ng/mLStandard Deviation 47.484
Test 1 + Test 2 GroupSummary of Plasma sICAM-1 and Absolute Change From Baseline (ng/mL) by Study Group and Visit From Week 1 to Week 24 (mITT Population) [ALCS-RA-17-11-EV]Visit 5: Week 24184.6 ng/mLStandard Deviation 58.971
Test 1 + Test 2 GroupSummary of Plasma sICAM-1 and Absolute Change From Baseline (ng/mL) by Study Group and Visit From Week 1 to Week 24 (mITT Population) [ALCS-RA-17-11-EV]Baseline: Week 1205.8 ng/mLStandard Deviation 58.381
ControlSummary of Plasma sICAM-1 and Absolute Change From Baseline (ng/mL) by Study Group and Visit From Week 1 to Week 24 (mITT Population) [ALCS-RA-17-11-EV]Change from Baseline (Week 18)1.702 ng/mLStandard Deviation 47.092
ControlSummary of Plasma sICAM-1 and Absolute Change From Baseline (ng/mL) by Study Group and Visit From Week 1 to Week 24 (mITT Population) [ALCS-RA-17-11-EV]Change from Baseline (Week 24)2.091 ng/mLStandard Deviation 47.116
ControlSummary of Plasma sICAM-1 and Absolute Change From Baseline (ng/mL) by Study Group and Visit From Week 1 to Week 24 (mITT Population) [ALCS-RA-17-11-EV]Visit 5: Week 24244.3 ng/mLStandard Deviation 78.272
ControlSummary of Plasma sICAM-1 and Absolute Change From Baseline (ng/mL) by Study Group and Visit From Week 1 to Week 24 (mITT Population) [ALCS-RA-17-11-EV]Change from Baseline (Week 12)-11.80 ng/mLStandard Deviation 36.195
ControlSummary of Plasma sICAM-1 and Absolute Change From Baseline (ng/mL) by Study Group and Visit From Week 1 to Week 24 (mITT Population) [ALCS-RA-17-11-EV]Visit 1: Week 12229.5 ng/mLStandard Deviation 69.888
ControlSummary of Plasma sICAM-1 and Absolute Change From Baseline (ng/mL) by Study Group and Visit From Week 1 to Week 24 (mITT Population) [ALCS-RA-17-11-EV]Visit 3: Week 18244.9 ng/mLStandard Deviation 85.893
ControlSummary of Plasma sICAM-1 and Absolute Change From Baseline (ng/mL) by Study Group and Visit From Week 1 to Week 24 (mITT Population) [ALCS-RA-17-11-EV]Baseline: Week 1241.3 ng/mLStandard Deviation 81.966
Comparison: Null hypothesis: Absolute change from Baseline for Plasma sICAM-1 (ng/mL) in Test 1 is equal to zero on Visit 1 (Week 12), relative to the start of the 12-week ALCS-RA-16-06-EV study. Alternate hypothesis: Absolute change from Baseline (Week 1) for Plasma sICAM-1 (ng/mL) in Test 1 is NOT equal to zero on Visit 1 (Week 12), relative to the start of the 12-week ALCS-RA-16-06-EV study. (mITT Population)p-value: <0.000195% CI: [-41.957, -20.557]Mixed Models Analysis
Comparison: Null hypothesis: Absolute change from Baseline for Plasma sICAM-1 (ng/mL) in Test 1 is equal to zero on Visit 3 (Week 18), relative to the start of the 12-week ALCS-RA-16-06-EV study. Alternate hypothesis: Absolute change from Baseline (Week 1) for Plasma sICAM-1 (ng/mL) in Test 1 is NOT equal to zero on Visit 3 (Week 18), relative to the start of the 12-week ALCS-RA-16-06-EV study. (mITT Population)p-value: <0.000195% CI: [-44.234, -15.491]Mixed Models Analysis
Comparison: Null hypothesis: Absolute change from Baseline for Plasma sICAM-1 (ng/mL) in Test 1 is equal to zero on Visit 5 (Week 24), relative to the start of the 12-week ALCS-RA-16-06-EV study. Alternate hypothesis: Absolute change from Baseline (Week 1) for Plasma sICAM-1 (ng/mL) in Test 1 is NOT equal to zero on Visit 5 (Week 24), relative to the start of the 12-week ALCS-RA-16-06-EV study. (mITT Population)p-value: <0.000195% CI: [-46.971, -16.053]Mixed Models Analysis
Comparison: Null hypothesis: Absolute change from Baseline for Plasma sICAM-1 (ng/mL) in Test 2 is equal to zero on Visit 1 (Week 12), relative to the start of the 12-week ALCS-RA-16-06-EV study. Alternate hypothesis: Absolute change from Baseline (Week 1) for Plasma sICAM-1 (ng/mL) in Test 2 is NOT equal to zero on Visit 1 (Week 12), relative to the start of the 12-week ALCS-RA-16-06-EV study. (mITT Population)p-value: <0.000195% CI: [-47.522, -26.872]Mixed Models Analysis
Comparison: Null hypothesis: Absolute change from Baseline for Plasma sICAM-1 (ng/mL) in Test 2 is equal to zero on Visit 3 (Week 18), relative to the start of the 12-week ALCS-RA-16-06-EV study. Alternate hypothesis: Absolute change from Baseline (Week 1) for Plasma sICAM-1 (ng/mL) in Test 2 is NOT equal to zero on Visit 3 (Week 18), relative to the start of the 12-week ALCS-RA-16-06-EV study. (mITT Population)p-value: <0.000195% CI: [-44.96, -17.923]Mixed Models Analysis
Comparison: Null hypothesis: Absolute change from Baseline for Plasma sICAM-1 (ng/mL) in Test2 is equal to zero on Visit 5 (Week 24), relative to the start of the 12-week ALCS-RA-16-06-EV study. Alternate hypothesis: Absolute change from Baseline (Week 1) for Plasma sICAM-1 (ng/mL) in Test2 is NOT equal to zero on Visit 5 (Week 24), relative to the start of the 12-week ALCS-RA-16-06-EV study. (mITT Population)p-value: 0.000295% CI: [-43.34, -13.853]Mixed Models Analysis
Comparison: Null hypothesis: Absolute change from Baseline for Plasma sICAM-1 (ng/mL) in Test 1 + Test 2 is equal to zero on Visit 5 (Week 24), relative to the start of the 12-week ALCS-RA-16-06-EV study. Alternate hypothesis: Absolute change from Baseline (Week 1) for Plasma sICAM-1 (ng/mL) in Test 1 + Test 2 is NOT equal to zero on Visit 5 (Week 24), relative to the start of the 12-week ALCS-RA-16-06-EV study. (mITT Population)p-value: <0.000195% CI: [-40.943, -19.166]Mixed Models Analysis
Comparison: Null hypothesis: Absolute change from Baseline for Plasma sICAM-1 (ng/mL) in Control is equal to zero on Visit 1 (Week 12), relative to the start of the 12-week ALCS-RA-16-06-EV study. Alternate hypothesis: Absolute change from Baseline (Week 1) for Plasma sICAM-1 (ng/mL) in Control is NOT equal to zero on Visit 1 (Week 12), relative to the start of the 12-week ALCS-RA-16-06-EV study. (mITT Population)p-value: 0.266795% CI: [-16.37, 4.563]Mixed Models Analysis
Comparison: Null hypothesis: Absolute change from Baseline for Plasma sICAM-1 (ng/mL) in Control is equal to zero on Visit 3 (Week 18), relative to the start of the 12-week ALCS-RA-16-06-EV study. Alternate hypothesis: Absolute change from Baseline (Week 1) for Plasma sICAM-1 (ng/mL) in Control is NOT equal to zero on Visit 3 (Week 18), relative to the start of the 12-week ALCS-RA-16-06-EV study. (mITT Population)p-value: 0.208595% CI: [-4.95, 22.485]Mixed Models Analysis
Comparison: Null hypothesis: Absolute change from Baseline for Plasma sICAM-1 (ng/mL) in Control is equal to zero on Visit 5 (Week 24), relative to the start of the 12-week ALCS-RA-16-06-EV study. Alternate hypothesis: Absolute change from Baseline (Week 1) for Plasma sICAM-1 (ng/mL) in Control is NOT equal to zero on Visit 5 (Week 24), relative to the start of the 12-week ALCS-RA-16-06-EV study. (mITT Population)p-value: 0.104195% CI: [-2.595, 27.505]Mixed Models Analysis
Comparison: Null hypothesis: Absolute change from Baseline for Plasma sICAM-1 (ng/mL) in Test 1 is equal to Control on Visit 1 (Week 12), relative to the start of the 12-week ALCS-RA-16-06-EV study. Alternate hypothesis: Absolute change from Baseline (Week 1) for Plasma sICAM-1 (ng/mL) in Test 1 is NOT equal to Control on Visit 1 (Week 12), relative to the start of the 12-week ALCS-RA-16-06-EV study. (mITT Population)p-value: 0.005895% CI: [-45.41, -5.295]Mixed Models Analysis
Comparison: Null hypothesis: Absolute change from Baseline for Plasma sICAM-1 (ng/mL) in Test 1 is equal to Control on Visit 3 (Week 18), relative to the start of the 12-week ALCS-RA-16-06-EV study. Alternate hypothesis: Absolute change from Baseline (Week 1) for Plasma sICAM-1 (ng/mL) in Test 1 is NOT equal to Control on Visit 3 (Week 18), relative to the start of the 12-week ALCS-RA-16-06-EV study. (mITT Population)p-value: 0.00195% CI: [-65.062, -12.197]Mixed Models Analysis
Comparison: Null hypothesis: Absolute change from Baseline for Plasma sICAM-1 (ng/mL) in Test 1 is equal to Control on Visit 5 (Week 24), relative to the start of the 12-week ALCS-RA-16-06-EV study. Alternate hypothesis: Absolute change from Baseline (Week 1) for Plasma sICAM-1 (ng/mL) in Test 1 is NOT equal to Control on Visit 5 (Week 24), relative to the start of the 12-week ALCS-RA-16-06-EV study. (mITT Population)p-value: 0.000595% CI: [-72.443, -15.491]Mixed Models Analysis
Comparison: Null hypothesis: Absolute change from Baseline for Plasma sICAM-1 (ng/mL) in Test 2 is equal to Control on Visit 1 (Week 12), relative to the start of the 12-week ALCS-RA-16-06-EV study. Alternate hypothesis: Absolute change from Baseline (Week 1) for Plasma sICAM-1 (ng/mL) in Test 2 is NOT equal to Control on Visit 1 (Week 12), relative to the start of the 12-week ALCS-RA-16-06-EV study. (mITT Population)p-value: 0.000395% CI: [-51.159, -11.428]Mixed Models Analysis
Comparison: Null hypothesis: Absolute change from Baseline for Plasma sICAM-1 (ng/mL) in Test 2 is equal to Control on Visit 3 (Week 18), relative to the start of the 12-week ALCS-RA-16-06-EV study. Alternate hypothesis: Absolute change from Baseline (Week 1) for Plasma sICAM-1 (ng/mL) in Test 2 is NOT equal to Control on Visit 3 (Week 18), relative to the start of the 12-week ALCS-RA-16-06-EV study. (mITT Population)p-value: 0.000495% CI: [-65.941, -14.477]Mixed Models Analysis
Comparison: Null hypothesis: Absolute change from Baseline for Plasma sICAM-1 (ng/mL) in Test 2 is equal to Control on Visit 5 (Week 24), relative to the start of the 12-week ALCS-RA-16-06-EV study. Alternate hypothesis: Absolute change from Baseline (Week 1) for Plasma sICAM-1 (ng/mL) in Test 2 is NOT equal to Control on Visit 5 (Week 24), relative to the start of the 12-week ALCS-RA-16-06-EV study. (mITT Population)p-value: 0.001195% CI: [-68.965, -13.138]Mixed Models Analysis
Comparison: Null hypothesis: Absolute change from Baseline for Plasma sICAM-1 (ng/mL) in Test 1 + Test 2 is equal to Control on Visit 5 (Week 24), relative to the start of the 12-week ALCS-RA-16-06-EV study. Alternate hypothesis: Absolute change from Baseline (Week 1) for Plasma sICAM-1 (ng/mL) in Test 1 + Test 2 is NOT equal to Control on Visit 5 (Week 24), relative to the start of the 12-week ALCS-RA-16-06-EV study. (mITT Population)p-value: <0.000195% CI: [-60.902, -24.116]Mixed Models Analysis
Comparison: Null hypothesis: Absolute change from Baseline for Plasma sICAM-1 (ng/mL) in Test 2 is equal to Test 1 on Visit 5 (Week 24), relative to the start of the 12-week ALCS-RA-16-06-EV study. Alternate hypothesis: Absolute change from Baseline (Week 1) for Plasma sICAM-1 (ng/mL) in Test 2 is NOT equal to Test 1 on Visit 5 (Week 24), relative to the start of the 12-week ALCS-RA-16-06-EV study. (mITT Population)p-value: 0.783595% CI: [-23.855, 18.025]Mixed Models Analysis
Primary

Summary of Serum HDL-C Absolute Change From Baseline (mg/dL) by Study Group From Week 1 to Week 12 (mITT Population With Outliers Excluded) [ALCS-RA-16-06-EV]

Summary of serum HDL-C absolute change from Baseline in Week 12 is presented (Study ALCS-RA-16-06-EV). Blood samples were collected via direct venipuncture at Visits 3 and 7 and analyzed for the biomarker. Data outliers were examined through Proc Mixed model residual diagnosis (+/- 4 studentized residuals). A sensitivity analysis excluding outliers was performed for Visit 7 (Week 12). Absolute change from baseline = Post Product Use Value - Baseline Value Baseline / Visit 3 (Week 1) = Day 1 Visit 7 (Week 12) = Day 84 ± 3

Time frame: Week 1 (Baseline) and Week 12 for a total of of 12 weeks from randomization

Population: Modified ITT Population with Outliers Excluded: All subjects were randomized according to the randomization schedule; who used at least one study products after randomization was recorded and for whom there was a valid (within ±3 days of the planned measurement day) baseline and at least one post-baseline biomarker. Data outliers, defined as any observation with a studentized residual that is greater than +/- 4, were excluded from the analysis.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Test 1Summary of Serum HDL-C Absolute Change From Baseline (mg/dL) by Study Group From Week 1 to Week 12 (mITT Population With Outliers Excluded) [ALCS-RA-16-06-EV]3.3 mg/dLStandard Deviation 6.68
Test 2Summary of Serum HDL-C Absolute Change From Baseline (mg/dL) by Study Group From Week 1 to Week 12 (mITT Population With Outliers Excluded) [ALCS-RA-16-06-EV]2.3 mg/dLStandard Deviation 6.95
Test 1 + Test 2 GroupSummary of Serum HDL-C Absolute Change From Baseline (mg/dL) by Study Group From Week 1 to Week 12 (mITT Population With Outliers Excluded) [ALCS-RA-16-06-EV]0.4 mg/dLStandard Deviation 7.54
Comparison: Null hypothesis: Absolute change from Baseline (Week 1) for Serum HDL-C (mg/dL) in Test 1 is equal to Control on Visit 7 (Week 12). Alternate hypothesis: Absolute change from Baseline (Week 1) for Serum HDL-C (mg/dL) in Test 1 is NOT equal to Control on Visit 7 (Week 12). (mITT Population with Outliers Excluded)p-value: 0.036295% CI: [0.11, 4.705]Mixed Models Analysis
Comparison: Null hypothesis: Absolute change from Baseline (Week 1) for Serum HDL-C (mg/dL) in Test 2 is equal to Control on Visit 7 (Week 12). Alternate hypothesis: Absolute change from Baseline (Week 1) for Serum HDL-C (mg/dL) in Test 2 is NOT equal to Control on Visit 7 (Week 12). (mITT Population)p-value: 0.214295% CI: [-0.569, 3.953]Mixed Models Analysis
Primary

Summary of Serum HDL-C and Absolute Change From Baseline (mg/dL) by Study Group and Visit From Week 1 to Week 12 (mITT Population) [ALCS-RA-16-06-EV]

Summary of serum high density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL-C) (mg/dL) and absolute change from Baseline in Weeks 6 and 12 are presented (Study ALCS-RA-16-06-EV). Blood samples were collected via direct venipuncture at Visits 3, 5, and 7. Absolute change from baseline = Post Product Use Value - Baseline Value Baseline / Visit 3 (Week 1) = Day 1 Visit 5 (Week 6) = Day 42 ± 3 Visit 7 (Week 12) = Day 84 ± 3

Time frame: 12 weeks total with measurement timepoints at Week 1/Baseline, Week 6 and Week 12

Population: Modified ITT: All subjects were randomized according to the randomization schedule; who used at least one study products after randomization was recorded and for whom there was a valid (within ±3 days of the planned measurement day) baseline and at least one post-baseline biomarker.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Test 1Summary of Serum HDL-C and Absolute Change From Baseline (mg/dL) by Study Group and Visit From Week 1 to Week 12 (mITT Population) [ALCS-RA-16-06-EV]Visit 7: Week 1247.3 mg/dLStandard Deviation 14.43
Test 1Summary of Serum HDL-C and Absolute Change From Baseline (mg/dL) by Study Group and Visit From Week 1 to Week 12 (mITT Population) [ALCS-RA-16-06-EV]Visit 3 (Baseline): Week 144.8 mg/dLStandard Deviation 14.15
Test 1Summary of Serum HDL-C and Absolute Change From Baseline (mg/dL) by Study Group and Visit From Week 1 to Week 12 (mITT Population) [ALCS-RA-16-06-EV]Change from Baseline (Week 6)2.3 mg/dLStandard Deviation 6.15
Test 1Summary of Serum HDL-C and Absolute Change From Baseline (mg/dL) by Study Group and Visit From Week 1 to Week 12 (mITT Population) [ALCS-RA-16-06-EV]Visit 5: Week 647.2 mg/dLStandard Deviation 15.01
Test 1Summary of Serum HDL-C and Absolute Change From Baseline (mg/dL) by Study Group and Visit From Week 1 to Week 12 (mITT Population) [ALCS-RA-16-06-EV]Change from Baseline (Week 12)3.3 mg/dLStandard Deviation 6.68
Test 2Summary of Serum HDL-C and Absolute Change From Baseline (mg/dL) by Study Group and Visit From Week 1 to Week 12 (mITT Population) [ALCS-RA-16-06-EV]Visit 7: Week 1248.9 mg/dLStandard Deviation 14.52
Test 2Summary of Serum HDL-C and Absolute Change From Baseline (mg/dL) by Study Group and Visit From Week 1 to Week 12 (mITT Population) [ALCS-RA-16-06-EV]Visit 5: Week 648.0 mg/dLStandard Deviation 12.52
Test 2Summary of Serum HDL-C and Absolute Change From Baseline (mg/dL) by Study Group and Visit From Week 1 to Week 12 (mITT Population) [ALCS-RA-16-06-EV]Change from Baseline (Week 6)1.6 mg/dLStandard Deviation 7.47
Test 2Summary of Serum HDL-C and Absolute Change From Baseline (mg/dL) by Study Group and Visit From Week 1 to Week 12 (mITT Population) [ALCS-RA-16-06-EV]Visit 3 (Baseline): Week 146.1 mg/dLStandard Deviation 12.56
Test 2Summary of Serum HDL-C and Absolute Change From Baseline (mg/dL) by Study Group and Visit From Week 1 to Week 12 (mITT Population) [ALCS-RA-16-06-EV]Change from Baseline (Week 12)3.1 mg/dLStandard Deviation 9.37
Test 1 + Test 2 GroupSummary of Serum HDL-C and Absolute Change From Baseline (mg/dL) by Study Group and Visit From Week 1 to Week 12 (mITT Population) [ALCS-RA-16-06-EV]Change from Baseline (Week 12)3.2 mg/dLStandard Deviation 8.17
Test 1 + Test 2 GroupSummary of Serum HDL-C and Absolute Change From Baseline (mg/dL) by Study Group and Visit From Week 1 to Week 12 (mITT Population) [ALCS-RA-16-06-EV]Visit 3 (Baseline): Week 145.5 mg/dLStandard Deviation 13.35
Test 1 + Test 2 GroupSummary of Serum HDL-C and Absolute Change From Baseline (mg/dL) by Study Group and Visit From Week 1 to Week 12 (mITT Population) [ALCS-RA-16-06-EV]Visit 5: Week 647.6 mg/dLStandard Deviation 13.78
Test 1 + Test 2 GroupSummary of Serum HDL-C and Absolute Change From Baseline (mg/dL) by Study Group and Visit From Week 1 to Week 12 (mITT Population) [ALCS-RA-16-06-EV]Visit 7: Week 1248.2 mg/dLStandard Deviation 14.46
Test 1 + Test 2 GroupSummary of Serum HDL-C and Absolute Change From Baseline (mg/dL) by Study Group and Visit From Week 1 to Week 12 (mITT Population) [ALCS-RA-16-06-EV]Change from Baseline (Week 6)2.0 mg/dLStandard Deviation 6.84
ControlSummary of Serum HDL-C and Absolute Change From Baseline (mg/dL) by Study Group and Visit From Week 1 to Week 12 (mITT Population) [ALCS-RA-16-06-EV]Change from Baseline (Week 12)0.8 mg/dLStandard Deviation 8.88
ControlSummary of Serum HDL-C and Absolute Change From Baseline (mg/dL) by Study Group and Visit From Week 1 to Week 12 (mITT Population) [ALCS-RA-16-06-EV]Change from Baseline (Week 6)0.6 mg/dLStandard Deviation 10.36
ControlSummary of Serum HDL-C and Absolute Change From Baseline (mg/dL) by Study Group and Visit From Week 1 to Week 12 (mITT Population) [ALCS-RA-16-06-EV]Visit 5: Week 647.6 mg/dLStandard Deviation 18.13
ControlSummary of Serum HDL-C and Absolute Change From Baseline (mg/dL) by Study Group and Visit From Week 1 to Week 12 (mITT Population) [ALCS-RA-16-06-EV]Visit 3 (Baseline): Week 146.8 mg/dLStandard Deviation 16.84
ControlSummary of Serum HDL-C and Absolute Change From Baseline (mg/dL) by Study Group and Visit From Week 1 to Week 12 (mITT Population) [ALCS-RA-16-06-EV]Visit 7: Week 1247.4 mg/dLStandard Deviation 18
Comparison: Null hypothesis: Absolute change from Baseline (Week 1) for Serum HDL-C (mg/dL) in Test 1 is equal to zero on Visit 5 (Week 6). Alternate hypothesis: Absolute change from Baseline (Week 1) for Serum HDL-C (mg/dL) in Test 1 is NOT equal to zero on Visit 5 (Week 6). (mITT Population)p-value: 0.000295% CI: [1.369, 4.273]Mixed Models Analysis
Comparison: Null hypothesis: Absolute change from Baseline (Week 1) for Serum HDL-C (mg/dL) in Test 1 is equal to zero on Visit 7 (Week 12). Alternate hypothesis: Absolute change from Baseline (Week 1) for Serum HDL-C (mg/dL) in Test 1 is NOT equal to zero on Visit 7 (Week 12). (mITT Population)p-value: <0.000195% CI: [1.85, 5.086]Mixed Models Analysis
Comparison: Null hypothesis: Absolute change from Baseline (Week 1) for Serum HDL-C (mg/dL) in Test 2 is equal to zero on Visit 5 (Week 6). Alternate hypothesis: Absolute change from Baseline (Week 1) for Serum HDL-C (mg/dL) in Test 2 is NOT equal to zero on Visit 5 (Week 6). (mITT Population)p-value: 0.002295% CI: [0.812, 3.679]Mixed Models Analysis
Comparison: Null hypothesis: Absolute change from Baseline (Week 1) for Serum HDL-C (mg/dL) in Test 2 is equal to zero on Visit 7 (Week 12). Alternate hypothesis: Absolute change from Baseline (Week 1) for Serum HDL-C (mg/dL) in Test 2 is NOT equal to zero on Visit 7 (Week 12). (mITT Population)p-value: <0.000195% CI: [1.768, 4.891]Mixed Models Analysis
Comparison: Null hypothesis: Absolute change from Baseline (Week 1) for Serum HDL-C (mg/dL) in Test 1 + Test 2 is equal to zero on Visit 7 (Week 12). Alternate hypothesis: Absolute change from Baseline (Week 1) for Serum HDL-C (mg/dL) in Test 1 + Test 2 is NOT equal to zero on Visit 7 (Week 12). (mITT Population)p-value: <0.000195% CI: [2.252, 4.545]Mixed Models Analysis
Comparison: Null hypothesis: Absolute change from Baseline (Week 1) for Serum HDL-C (mg/dL) in Control is equal to zero on Visit 5 (Week 6). Alternate hypothesis: Absolute change from Baseline (Week 1) for Serum HDL-C (mg/dL) in Control is NOT equal to zero on Visit 5 (Week 6). (mITT Population)p-value: 0.076195% CI: [-0.132, 2.633]Mixed Models Analysis
Comparison: Null hypothesis: Absolute change from Baseline (Week 1) for Serum HDL-C (mg/dL) in Control is equal to zero on Visit 7 (Week 12). Alternate hypothesis: Absolute change from Baseline (Week 1) for Serum HDL-C (mg/dL) in Control is NOT equal to zero on Visit 7 (Week 12). (mITT Population)p-value: 0.021195% CI: [0.269, 3.286]Mixed Models Analysis
Comparison: Null hypothesis: Absolute change from Baseline (Week 1) for Serum HDL-C (mg/dL) in Test 1 is equal to Control on Visit 5 (Week 6). Alternate hypothesis: Absolute change from Baseline (Week 1) for Serum HDL-C (mg/dL) in Test 1 is NOT equal to Control on Visit 5 (Week 6). (mITT Population)p-value: 0.384195% CI: [-0.951, 4.092]Mixed Models Analysis
Comparison: Null hypothesis: Absolute change from Baseline (Week 1) for Serum HDL-C (mg/dL) in Test 1 is equal to Control on Visit 7 (Week 12). Alternate hypothesis: Absolute change from Baseline (Week 1) for Serum HDL-C (mg/dL) in Test 1 is NOT equal to Control on Visit 7 (Week 12). (mITT Population)p-value: 0.393495% CI: [-1.084, 4.464]Mixed Models Analysis
Comparison: Null hypothesis: Absolute change from Baseline (Week 1) for Serum HDL-C (mg/dL) in Test 2 is equal to Control on Visit 5 (Week 6). Alternate hypothesis: Absolute change from Baseline (Week 1) for Serum HDL-C (mg/dL) in Test 2 is NOT equal to Control on Visit 5 (Week 6). (mITT Population)p-value: 0.778295% CI: [-1.505, 3.494]Mixed Models Analysis
Comparison: Null hypothesis: Absolute change from Baseline (Week 1) for Serum HDL-C (mg/dL) in Test 2 is equal to Control on Visit 7 (Week 12). Alternate hypothesis: Absolute change from Baseline (Week 1) for Serum HDL-C (mg/dL) in Test 2 is NOT equal to Control on Visit 7 (Week 12). (mITT Population)p-value: 0.457695% CI: [-1.171, 4.274]Mixed Models Analysis
Comparison: Null hypothesis: Absolute change from Baseline (Week 1) for Serum HDL-C (mg/dL) in Test 1 + Test 2 is equal to Control on Visit 7 (Week 12). Alternate hypothesis: Absolute change from Baseline (Week 1) for Serum HDL-C (mg/dL) in Test 1 + Test 2 is NOT equal to Control on Visit 7 (Week 12). (mITT Population)p-value: 0.084995% CI: [-0.224, 3.466]Mixed Models Analysis
Comparison: Null hypothesis: Absolute change from Baseline (Week 1) for Serum HDL-C (mg/dL) in Test 1 is equal to Test 2 on Visit 7 (Week 12). Alternate hypothesis: Absolute change from Baseline (Week 1) for Serum HDL-C (mg/dL) in Test 1 is NOT equal to Test 2 on Visit 7 (Week 12). (mITT Population)p-value: 0.901695% CI: [-2.064, 2.341]Mixed Models Analysis
Primary

Summary of Serum HDL-C and Absolute Change From Baseline (mg/dL) by Study Group and Visit From Week 1 to Week 24 (mITT Population) [ALCS-RA-17-11-EV]

Summary of serum HDL-C (mg/dL) and absolute change from Baseline in Weeks 12, 18 and 24 are presented (Study ALCS-RA-17-11-EV). Blood samples were collected via direct venipuncture on Visits 1, 3 and 5 of the ALCS-RA-17-11-EV study. Baseline samples were collected Week 1 of the ALCS-RA-16-06-EV study. Change from Baseline was calculated as follows: Absolute change from baseline = Post Product Use Value - Baseline Value, where Baseline = values reported on Day 1 (Week 1) of the 12-week ALCS-RA-16-06-EV study Baseline = Day 1 (Week 1), Visit 1 = Week 12 (Day 84 ± 3), Visit 3 = Week 18 (Day 126 ± 3), and Visit 5 = Week 24 (Day 168 ± 3), relative to the start of the 12-week ALCS-RA-16-06-EV study

Time frame: 24 weeks total with measurement timepoints at Week 1/Baseline [ALCS-RA-16-06-EV study]), and Week 12, Week 18 and Week 24 [ALCS-RA-17-11-EV study]

Population: Modified ITT: All subjects were randomized according to the randomization schedule; who used at least one study products after randomization was recorded and for whom there was a valid (within ±3 days of the planned measurement day) baseline and at least one post-baseline biomarker.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Test 1Summary of Serum HDL-C and Absolute Change From Baseline (mg/dL) by Study Group and Visit From Week 1 to Week 24 (mITT Population) [ALCS-RA-17-11-EV]Baseline: Week 146.3 mg/dLStandard Deviation 13.05
Test 1Summary of Serum HDL-C and Absolute Change From Baseline (mg/dL) by Study Group and Visit From Week 1 to Week 24 (mITT Population) [ALCS-RA-17-11-EV]Change from Baseline (Week 18)1.5 mg/dLStandard Deviation 5.8
Test 1Summary of Serum HDL-C and Absolute Change From Baseline (mg/dL) by Study Group and Visit From Week 1 to Week 24 (mITT Population) [ALCS-RA-17-11-EV]Change from Baseline (Week 12)4.2 mg/dLStandard Deviation 6.51
Test 1Summary of Serum HDL-C and Absolute Change From Baseline (mg/dL) by Study Group and Visit From Week 1 to Week 24 (mITT Population) [ALCS-RA-17-11-EV]Visit 1: Week 1250.4 mg/dLStandard Deviation 14.44
Test 1Summary of Serum HDL-C and Absolute Change From Baseline (mg/dL) by Study Group and Visit From Week 1 to Week 24 (mITT Population) [ALCS-RA-17-11-EV]Change from Baseline (Week 24)4.1 mg/dLStandard Deviation 9.02
Test 1Summary of Serum HDL-C and Absolute Change From Baseline (mg/dL) by Study Group and Visit From Week 1 to Week 24 (mITT Population) [ALCS-RA-17-11-EV]Visit 3: Week 1848.4 mg/dLStandard Deviation 13.35
Test 1Summary of Serum HDL-C and Absolute Change From Baseline (mg/dL) by Study Group and Visit From Week 1 to Week 24 (mITT Population) [ALCS-RA-17-11-EV]Visit 5: Week 2450.6 mg/dLStandard Deviation 17.37
Test 2Summary of Serum HDL-C and Absolute Change From Baseline (mg/dL) by Study Group and Visit From Week 1 to Week 24 (mITT Population) [ALCS-RA-17-11-EV]Change from Baseline (Week 18)2.8 mg/dLStandard Deviation 12.2
Test 2Summary of Serum HDL-C and Absolute Change From Baseline (mg/dL) by Study Group and Visit From Week 1 to Week 24 (mITT Population) [ALCS-RA-17-11-EV]Visit 5: Week 2448.5 mg/dLStandard Deviation 17.95
Test 2Summary of Serum HDL-C and Absolute Change From Baseline (mg/dL) by Study Group and Visit From Week 1 to Week 24 (mITT Population) [ALCS-RA-17-11-EV]Visit 3: Week 1847.8 mg/dLStandard Deviation 14.61
Test 2Summary of Serum HDL-C and Absolute Change From Baseline (mg/dL) by Study Group and Visit From Week 1 to Week 24 (mITT Population) [ALCS-RA-17-11-EV]Change from Baseline (Week 12)5.5 mg/dLStandard Deviation 11.96
Test 2Summary of Serum HDL-C and Absolute Change From Baseline (mg/dL) by Study Group and Visit From Week 1 to Week 24 (mITT Population) [ALCS-RA-17-11-EV]Change from Baseline (Week 24)3.5 mg/dLStandard Deviation 13.67
Test 2Summary of Serum HDL-C and Absolute Change From Baseline (mg/dL) by Study Group and Visit From Week 1 to Week 24 (mITT Population) [ALCS-RA-17-11-EV]Visit 1: Week 1250.7 mg/dLStandard Deviation 16.02
Test 2Summary of Serum HDL-C and Absolute Change From Baseline (mg/dL) by Study Group and Visit From Week 1 to Week 24 (mITT Population) [ALCS-RA-17-11-EV]Baseline: Week 145.2 mg/dLStandard Deviation 12.29
Test 1 + Test 2 GroupSummary of Serum HDL-C and Absolute Change From Baseline (mg/dL) by Study Group and Visit From Week 1 to Week 24 (mITT Population) [ALCS-RA-17-11-EV]Visit 5: Week 2449.5 mg/dLStandard Deviation 17.61
Test 1 + Test 2 GroupSummary of Serum HDL-C and Absolute Change From Baseline (mg/dL) by Study Group and Visit From Week 1 to Week 24 (mITT Population) [ALCS-RA-17-11-EV]Baseline: Week 145.7 mg/dLStandard Deviation 12.61
Test 1 + Test 2 GroupSummary of Serum HDL-C and Absolute Change From Baseline (mg/dL) by Study Group and Visit From Week 1 to Week 24 (mITT Population) [ALCS-RA-17-11-EV]Visit 1: Week 1250.5 mg/dLStandard Deviation 15.19
Test 1 + Test 2 GroupSummary of Serum HDL-C and Absolute Change From Baseline (mg/dL) by Study Group and Visit From Week 1 to Week 24 (mITT Population) [ALCS-RA-17-11-EV]Visit 3: Week 1848.1 mg/dLStandard Deviation 13.98
Test 1 + Test 2 GroupSummary of Serum HDL-C and Absolute Change From Baseline (mg/dL) by Study Group and Visit From Week 1 to Week 24 (mITT Population) [ALCS-RA-17-11-EV]Change from Baseline (Week 12)4.8 mg/dLStandard Deviation 9.68
Test 1 + Test 2 GroupSummary of Serum HDL-C and Absolute Change From Baseline (mg/dL) by Study Group and Visit From Week 1 to Week 24 (mITT Population) [ALCS-RA-17-11-EV]Change from Baseline (Week 18)2.2 mg/dLStandard Deviation 9.83
Test 1 + Test 2 GroupSummary of Serum HDL-C and Absolute Change From Baseline (mg/dL) by Study Group and Visit From Week 1 to Week 24 (mITT Population) [ALCS-RA-17-11-EV]Change from Baseline (Week 24)3.8 mg/dLStandard Deviation 11.65
ControlSummary of Serum HDL-C and Absolute Change From Baseline (mg/dL) by Study Group and Visit From Week 1 to Week 24 (mITT Population) [ALCS-RA-17-11-EV]Visit 3: Week 1844.0 mg/dLStandard Deviation 22.75
ControlSummary of Serum HDL-C and Absolute Change From Baseline (mg/dL) by Study Group and Visit From Week 1 to Week 24 (mITT Population) [ALCS-RA-17-11-EV]Change from Baseline (Week 24)-1.1 mg/dLStandard Deviation 6.79
ControlSummary of Serum HDL-C and Absolute Change From Baseline (mg/dL) by Study Group and Visit From Week 1 to Week 24 (mITT Population) [ALCS-RA-17-11-EV]Change from Baseline (Week 18)-0.2 mg/dLStandard Deviation 12.26
ControlSummary of Serum HDL-C and Absolute Change From Baseline (mg/dL) by Study Group and Visit From Week 1 to Week 24 (mITT Population) [ALCS-RA-17-11-EV]Visit 1: Week 1244.0 mg/dLStandard Deviation 21.54
ControlSummary of Serum HDL-C and Absolute Change From Baseline (mg/dL) by Study Group and Visit From Week 1 to Week 24 (mITT Population) [ALCS-RA-17-11-EV]Baseline: Week 144.4 mg/dLStandard Deviation 16.04
ControlSummary of Serum HDL-C and Absolute Change From Baseline (mg/dL) by Study Group and Visit From Week 1 to Week 24 (mITT Population) [ALCS-RA-17-11-EV]Change from Baseline (Week 12)-0.4 mg/dLStandard Deviation 10.1
ControlSummary of Serum HDL-C and Absolute Change From Baseline (mg/dL) by Study Group and Visit From Week 1 to Week 24 (mITT Population) [ALCS-RA-17-11-EV]Visit 5: Week 2440.8 mg/dLStandard Deviation 13.01
Comparison: Null hypothesis: Absolute change from Baseline for Serum HDL-C (mg/dL) in Test 1 is equal to zero on Visit 1 (Week 12), relative to the start of the 12-week ALCS-RA-16-06-EV study. Alternate hypothesis: Absolute change from Baseline (Week 1) for Serum HDL-C (mg/dL) in Test 1 is NOT equal to zero on Visit 1 (Week 12), relative to the start of the 12-week ALCS-RA-16-06-EV study. (mITT Population)p-value: 0.000495% CI: [2.511, 8.662]Mixed Models Analysis
Comparison: Null hypothesis: Absolute change from Baseline for Serum HDL-C (mg/dL) in Test 1 is equal to zero on Visit 3 (Week 18), relative to the start of the 12-week ALCS-RA-16-06-EV study. Alternate hypothesis: Absolute change from Baseline (Week 1) for Serum HDL-C (mg/dL) in Test 1 is NOT equal to zero on Visit 3 (Week 18), relative to the start of the 12-week ALCS-RA-16-06-EV study. (mITT Population)p-value: 0.114195% CI: [-0.62, 5.732]Mixed Models Analysis
Comparison: Null hypothesis: Absolute change from Baseline for Serum HDL-C (mg/dL) in Test 1 is equal to zero on Visit 5 (Week 24), relative to the start of the 12-week ALCS-RA-16-06-EV study. Alternate hypothesis: Absolute change from Baseline (Week 1) for Serum HDL-C (mg/dL) in Test 1 is NOT equal to zero on Visit 5 (Week 24), relative to the start of the 12-week ALCS-RA-16-06-EV study. (mITT Population)p-value: 0.000795% CI: [2.367, 8.705]Mixed Models Analysis
Comparison: Null hypothesis: Absolute change from Baseline for Serum HDL-C (mg/dL) in Test 2 is equal to zero on Visit 1 (Week 12), relative to the start of the 12-week ALCS-RA-16-06-EV study. Alternate hypothesis: Absolute change from Baseline (Week 1) for Serum HDL-C (mg/dL) in Test 2 is NOT equal to zero on Visit 1 (Week 12), relative to the start of the 12-week ALCS-RA-16-06-EV study. (mITT Population)p-value: <0.000195% CI: [3.68, 9.577]Mixed Models Analysis
Comparison: Null hypothesis: Absolute change from Baseline for Serum HDL-C (mg/dL) in Test 2 is equal to zero on Visit 3 (Week 18), relative to the start of the 12-week ALCS-RA-16-06-EV study. Alternate hypothesis: Absolute change from Baseline (Week 1) for Serum HDL-C (mg/dL) in Test 2 is NOT equal to zero on Visit 3 (Week 18), relative to the start of the 12-week ALCS-RA-16-06-EV study. (mITT Population)p-value: 0.007295% CI: [1.118, 7.047]Mixed Models Analysis
Comparison: Null hypothesis: Absolute change from Baseline for Serum HDL-C (mg/dL) in Test2 is equal to zero on Visit 5 (Week 24), relative to the start of the 12-week ALCS-RA-16-06-EV study. Alternate hypothesis: Absolute change from Baseline (Week 1) for Serum HDL-C (mg/dL) in Test2 is NOT equal to zero on Visit 5 (Week 24), relative to the start of the 12-week ALCS-RA-16-06-EV study. (mITT Population)p-value: 0.002395% CI: [1.691, 7.686]Mixed Models Analysis
Comparison: Null hypothesis: Absolute change from Baseline for Serum HDL-C (mg/dL) in Test 1 + Test 2 is equal to zero on Visit 5 (Week 24), relative to the start of the 12-week ALCS-RA-16-06-EV study. Alternate hypothesis: Absolute change from Baseline (Week 1) for Serum HDL-C (mg/dL) in Test 1 + Test 2 is NOT equal to zero on Visit 5 (Week 24), relative to the start of the 12-week ALCS-RA-16-06-EV study. (mITT Population)p-value: <0.000195% CI: [2.874, 7.35]Mixed Models Analysis
Comparison: Null hypothesis: Absolute change from Baseline for Serum HDL-C (mg/dL) in Control is equal to zero on Visit 1 (Week 12), relative to the start of the 12-week ALCS-RA-16-06-EV study. Alternate hypothesis: Absolute change from Baseline (Week 1) for Serum HDL-C (mg/dL) in Control is NOT equal to zero on Visit 1 (Week 12), relative to the start of the 12-week ALCS-RA-16-06-EV study. (mITT Population)p-value: 0.60395% CI: [-2.165, 3.72]Mixed Models Analysis
Comparison: Null hypothesis: Absolute change from Baseline for Serum HDL-C (mg/dL) in Control is equal to zero on Visit 3 (Week 18), relative to the start of the 12-week ALCS-RA-16-06-EV study. Alternate hypothesis: Absolute change from Baseline (Week 1) for Serum HDL-C (mg/dL) in Control is NOT equal to zero on Visit 3 (Week 18), relative to the start of the 12-week ALCS-RA-16-06-EV study. (mITT Population)p-value: 0.505395% CI: [-1.96, 3.967]Mixed Models Analysis
Comparison: Null hypothesis: Absolute change from Baseline for Serum HDL-C (mg/dL) in Control is equal to zero on Visit 5 (Week 24), relative to the start of the 12-week ALCS-RA-16-06-EV study. Alternate hypothesis: Absolute change from Baseline (Week 1) for Serum HDL-C (mg/dL) in Control is NOT equal to zero on Visit 5 (Week 24), relative to the start of the 12-week ALCS-RA-16-06-EV study. (mITT Population)p-value: 0.660795% CI: [-2.347, 3.694]Mixed Models Analysis
Comparison: Null hypothesis: Absolute change from Baseline for Serum HDL-C (mg/dL) in Test 1 is equal to Control on Visit 1 (Week 12), relative to the start of the 12-week ALCS-RA-16-06-EV study. Alternate hypothesis: Absolute change from Baseline (Week 1) for Serum HDL-C (mg/dL) in Test 1 is NOT equal to Control on Visit 1 (Week 12), relative to the start of the 12-week ALCS-RA-16-06-EV study. (mITT Population)p-value: 0.130995% CI: [-0.827, 10.446]Mixed Models Analysis
Comparison: Null hypothesis: Absolute change from Baseline for Serum HDL-C (mg/dL) in Test 1 is equal to Control on Visit 3 (Week 18), relative to the start of the 12-week ALCS-RA-16-06-EV study. Alternate hypothesis: Absolute change from Baseline (Week 1) for Serum HDL-C (mg/dL) in Test 1 is NOT equal to Control on Visit 3 (Week 18), relative to the start of the 12-week ALCS-RA-16-06-EV study. (mITT Population)p-value: 0.977695% CI: [-4.212, 7.318]Mixed Models Analysis
Comparison: Null hypothesis: Absolute change from Baseline for Serum HDL-C (mg/dL) in Test 1 is equal to Control on Visit 5 (Week 24), relative to the start of the 12-week ALCS-RA-16-06-EV study. Alternate hypothesis: Absolute change from Baseline (Week 1) for Serum HDL-C (mg/dL) in Test 1 is NOT equal to Control on Visit 5 (Week 24), relative to the start of the 12-week ALCS-RA-16-06-EV study. (mITT Population)p-value: 0.142295% CI: [-0.939, 10.663]Mixed Models Analysis
Comparison: Null hypothesis: Absolute change from Baseline for Serum HDL-C (mg/dL) in Test 2 is equal to Control on Visit 1 (Week 12), relative to the start of the 12-week ALCS-RA-16-06-EV study. Alternate hypothesis: Absolute change from Baseline (Week 1) for Serum HDL-C (mg/dL) in Test 2 is NOT equal to Control on Visit 1 (Week 12), relative to the start of the 12-week ALCS-RA-16-06-EV study. (mITT Population)p-value: 0.033495% CI: [0.307, 11.396]Mixed Models Analysis
Comparison: Null hypothesis: Absolute change from Baseline for Serum HDL-C (mg/dL) in Test 2 is equal to Control on Visit 3 (Week 18), relative to the start of the 12-week ALCS-RA-16-06-EV study. Alternate hypothesis: Absolute change from Baseline (Week 1) for Serum HDL-C (mg/dL) in Test 2 is NOT equal to Control on Visit 3 (Week 18), relative to the start of the 12-week ALCS-RA-16-06-EV study. (mITT Population)p-value: 0.562295% CI: [-2.501, 8.66]Mixed Models Analysis
Comparison: Null hypothesis: Absolute change from Baseline for Serum HDL-C (mg/dL) in Test 2 is equal to Control on Visit 5 (Week 24), relative to the start of the 12-week ALCS-RA-16-06-EV study. Alternate hypothesis: Absolute change from Baseline (Week 1) for Serum HDL-C (mg/dL) in Test 2 is NOT equal to Control on Visit 5 (Week 24), relative to the start of the 12-week ALCS-RA-16-06-EV study. (mITT Population)p-value: 0.284195% CI: [-1.643, 9.672]Mixed Models Analysis
Comparison: Null hypothesis: Absolute change from Baseline for Serum HDL-C (mg/dL) in Test 1 + Test 2 is equal to Control on Visit 5 (Week 24), relative to the start of the 12-week ALCS-RA-16-06-EV study. Alternate hypothesis: Absolute change from Baseline (Week 1) for Serum HDL-C (mg/dL) in Test 1 + Test 2 is NOT equal to Control on Visit 5 (Week 24), relative to the start of the 12-week ALCS-RA-16-06-EV study. (mITT Population)p-value: 0.017895% CI: [0.774, 8.103]Mixed Models Analysis
Comparison: Null hypothesis: Absolute change from Baseline for Serum HDL-C (mg/dL) in Test 2 is equal to Test 1 on Visit 5 (Week 24), relative to the start of the 12-week ALCS-RA-16-06-EV study. Alternate hypothesis: Absolute change from Baseline (Week 1) for Serum HDL-C (mg/dL) in Test 2 is NOT equal to Test 1 on Visit 5 (Week 24), relative to the start of the 12-week ALCS-RA-16-06-EV study. (mITT Population)p-value: 0.694495% CI: [-3.398, 5.093]Mixed Models Analysis
Primary

Summary of Urine 11-dehydrothromboxane B2 Absolute Change From Baseline (ng/g) by Study Group From Week 1 to Week 12 (mITT Population With Outliers Excluded) [ALCS-RA-16-06-EV]

Summary of urine 11-dehydrothromboxane B2 absolute change from Baseline in Week 12 is presented (Study ALCS-RA-16-06-EV). The first urine void of the day on Visits 3 and 7 was analyzed for the urine biomarker. Data outliers were examined through Proc Mixed model residual diagnosis (+/- 4 studentized residuals). A sensitivity analysis excluding outliers was performed for Visit 7 (Week 12). Urine creatinine concentration was measured in the urine collection and used to adjust the urine biomarker concentration value as follows: Urine biomarker (ng/g creatinine) = urine biomarker (pg/mL) x 100 / creatinine (mg/dL) Absolute change from baseline = Post Product Use Value - Baseline Value Baseline / Visit 3 (Week 1) = Day 1 Visit 7 (Week 12) = Day 84 ± 3

Time frame: Week 1 (Baseline) and Week 12 for a total of of 12 weeks from randomization

Population: Modified ITT Population with Outliers Excluded: All subjects were randomized according to the randomization schedule; who used at least one study products after randomization was recorded and for whom there was a valid (within ±3 days of the planned measurement day) baseline and at least one post-baseline biomarker. Data outliers, defined as any observation with a studentized residual that is greater than +/- 4, were excluded from the analysis.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Test 1Summary of Urine 11-dehydrothromboxane B2 Absolute Change From Baseline (ng/g) by Study Group From Week 1 to Week 12 (mITT Population With Outliers Excluded) [ALCS-RA-16-06-EV]-47.736 ng/gStandard Deviation 488.1213
Test 2Summary of Urine 11-dehydrothromboxane B2 Absolute Change From Baseline (ng/g) by Study Group From Week 1 to Week 12 (mITT Population With Outliers Excluded) [ALCS-RA-16-06-EV]-55.751 ng/gStandard Deviation 486.6897
Test 1 + Test 2 GroupSummary of Urine 11-dehydrothromboxane B2 Absolute Change From Baseline (ng/g) by Study Group From Week 1 to Week 12 (mITT Population With Outliers Excluded) [ALCS-RA-16-06-EV]-3.878 ng/gStandard Deviation 414.5263
Comparison: Null hypothesis: Absolute change from Baseline (Week 1) for Urine 11-dehydrothromboxane B2 (ng/g creatinine) in Test 1 is equal to Control on Visit 7 (Week 12). Alternate hypothesis: Absolute change from Baseline (Week 1) for Urine 11-dehydrothromboxane B2 (ng/g creatinine) in Test 1 is NOT equal to Control on Visit 7 (Week 12). (mITT Population)p-value: 0.677895% CI: [-177.281, 68.485]Mixed Models Analysis
Comparison: Null hypothesis: Absolute change from Baseline (Week 1) for Urine 11-dehydrothromboxane B2 (ng/g creatinine) in Test 2 is equal to Control on Visit 7 (Week 12). Alternate hypothesis: Absolute change from Baseline (Week 1) for Urine 11-dehydrothromboxane B2 (ng/g creatinine) in Test 2 is NOT equal to Control on Visit 7 (Week 12). (mITT Population)p-value: 0.749795% CI: [-168.697, 71.908]Mixed Models Analysis
Primary

Summary of Urine 11-dehydrothromboxane B2 and Absolute Change From Baseline (ng/g) by Study Group and Visit From Week 1 to Week 12 (mITT Population) [ALCS-RA-16-06-EV]

Summary of urine 11-dehydrothromboxane B2 (ng/g) and absolute change from Baseline in Weeks 6 and 12 are presented (Study ALCS-RA-16-06-EV). Baseline / Visit 3 (Week 1) = Day 1 Visit 5 (Week 6) = Day 42 ± 3 Visit 7 (Week 12) = Day 84 ± 3 The first urine void of the day was collected at Visits 3, 5 and 7. Urine creatinine concentration was measured in the urine collection and used to adjust the urine biomarker concentration values as follows: Urine biomarker (ng/g creatinine) = urine biomarker (pg/mL) x 100 / creatinine (mg/dL) Absolute change from baseline = Post Product Use Value - Baseline Value

Time frame: 12 weeks total with measurement timepoints at Week 1/Baseline, Week 6 and Week 12

Population: Modified ITT: All subjects were randomized according to the randomization schedule; who used at least one study products after randomization was recorded and for whom there was a valid (within ±3 days of the planned measurement day) baseline and at least one post-baseline biomarker.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Test 1Summary of Urine 11-dehydrothromboxane B2 and Absolute Change From Baseline (ng/g) by Study Group and Visit From Week 1 to Week 12 (mITT Population) [ALCS-RA-16-06-EV]Visit 3 (Baseline): Week 1824.877 ng/gStandard Deviation 726.5075
Test 1Summary of Urine 11-dehydrothromboxane B2 and Absolute Change From Baseline (ng/g) by Study Group and Visit From Week 1 to Week 12 (mITT Population) [ALCS-RA-16-06-EV]Visit 5: Week 6680.700 ng/gStandard Deviation 371.6959
Test 1Summary of Urine 11-dehydrothromboxane B2 and Absolute Change From Baseline (ng/g) by Study Group and Visit From Week 1 to Week 12 (mITT Population) [ALCS-RA-16-06-EV]Visit 7: Week 12703.664 ng/gStandard Deviation 444.1672
Test 1Summary of Urine 11-dehydrothromboxane B2 and Absolute Change From Baseline (ng/g) by Study Group and Visit From Week 1 to Week 12 (mITT Population) [ALCS-RA-16-06-EV]Change from Baseline (Week 12)-47.736 ng/gStandard Deviation 488.1213
Test 1Summary of Urine 11-dehydrothromboxane B2 and Absolute Change From Baseline (ng/g) by Study Group and Visit From Week 1 to Week 12 (mITT Population) [ALCS-RA-16-06-EV]Change from Baseline (Week 6)-148.001 ng/gStandard Deviation 660.1311
Test 2Summary of Urine 11-dehydrothromboxane B2 and Absolute Change From Baseline (ng/g) by Study Group and Visit From Week 1 to Week 12 (mITT Population) [ALCS-RA-16-06-EV]Change from Baseline (Week 12)-55.751 ng/gStandard Deviation 486.6897
Test 2Summary of Urine 11-dehydrothromboxane B2 and Absolute Change From Baseline (ng/g) by Study Group and Visit From Week 1 to Week 12 (mITT Population) [ALCS-RA-16-06-EV]Visit 5: Week 6614.562 ng/gStandard Deviation 312.1994
Test 2Summary of Urine 11-dehydrothromboxane B2 and Absolute Change From Baseline (ng/g) by Study Group and Visit From Week 1 to Week 12 (mITT Population) [ALCS-RA-16-06-EV]Visit 7: Week 12714.007 ng/gStandard Deviation 413.0628
Test 2Summary of Urine 11-dehydrothromboxane B2 and Absolute Change From Baseline (ng/g) by Study Group and Visit From Week 1 to Week 12 (mITT Population) [ALCS-RA-16-06-EV]Visit 3 (Baseline): Week 1761.598 ng/gStandard Deviation 518.6039
Test 2Summary of Urine 11-dehydrothromboxane B2 and Absolute Change From Baseline (ng/g) by Study Group and Visit From Week 1 to Week 12 (mITT Population) [ALCS-RA-16-06-EV]Change from Baseline (Week 6)-141.502 ng/gStandard Deviation 409.6231
Test 1 + Test 2 GroupSummary of Urine 11-dehydrothromboxane B2 and Absolute Change From Baseline (ng/g) by Study Group and Visit From Week 1 to Week 12 (mITT Population) [ALCS-RA-16-06-EV]Visit 3 (Baseline): Week 1792.622 ng/gStandard Deviation 628.7305
Test 1 + Test 2 GroupSummary of Urine 11-dehydrothromboxane B2 and Absolute Change From Baseline (ng/g) by Study Group and Visit From Week 1 to Week 12 (mITT Population) [ALCS-RA-16-06-EV]Visit 5: Week 6647.766 ng/gStandard Deviation 344.2553
Test 1 + Test 2 GroupSummary of Urine 11-dehydrothromboxane B2 and Absolute Change From Baseline (ng/g) by Study Group and Visit From Week 1 to Week 12 (mITT Population) [ALCS-RA-16-06-EV]Change from Baseline (Week 6)-144.765 ng/gStandard Deviation 548.7304
Test 1 + Test 2 GroupSummary of Urine 11-dehydrothromboxane B2 and Absolute Change From Baseline (ng/g) by Study Group and Visit From Week 1 to Week 12 (mITT Population) [ALCS-RA-16-06-EV]Change from Baseline (Week 12)-51.917 ng/gStandard Deviation 486.3259
Test 1 + Test 2 GroupSummary of Urine 11-dehydrothromboxane B2 and Absolute Change From Baseline (ng/g) by Study Group and Visit From Week 1 to Week 12 (mITT Population) [ALCS-RA-16-06-EV]Visit 7: Week 12709.060 ng/gStandard Deviation 427.3102
ControlSummary of Urine 11-dehydrothromboxane B2 and Absolute Change From Baseline (ng/g) by Study Group and Visit From Week 1 to Week 12 (mITT Population) [ALCS-RA-16-06-EV]Change from Baseline (Week 12)5.028 ng/gStandard Deviation 424.6884
ControlSummary of Urine 11-dehydrothromboxane B2 and Absolute Change From Baseline (ng/g) by Study Group and Visit From Week 1 to Week 12 (mITT Population) [ALCS-RA-16-06-EV]Change from Baseline (Week 6)-2.414 ng/gStandard Deviation 427.2816
ControlSummary of Urine 11-dehydrothromboxane B2 and Absolute Change From Baseline (ng/g) by Study Group and Visit From Week 1 to Week 12 (mITT Population) [ALCS-RA-16-06-EV]Visit 5: Week 6776.000 ng/gStandard Deviation 480.7616
ControlSummary of Urine 11-dehydrothromboxane B2 and Absolute Change From Baseline (ng/g) by Study Group and Visit From Week 1 to Week 12 (mITT Population) [ALCS-RA-16-06-EV]Visit 7: Week 12777.506 ng/gStandard Deviation 471.4327
ControlSummary of Urine 11-dehydrothromboxane B2 and Absolute Change From Baseline (ng/g) by Study Group and Visit From Week 1 to Week 12 (mITT Population) [ALCS-RA-16-06-EV]Visit 3 (Baseline): Week 1785.424 ng/gStandard Deviation 457.4472
Comparison: Null hypothesis: Absolute change from Baseline (Week 1) for Urine 11-dehydrothromboxane B2 (ng/g creatinine) in Test 1 is equal to zero on Visit 5 (Week 6). Alternate hypothesis: Absolute change from Baseline (Week 1) for Urine 11-dehydrothromboxane B2 (ng/g creatinine) in Test 1 is NOT equal to zero on Visit 5 (Week 6). (mITT Population)p-value: 0.000395% CI: [-177.973, -52.539]Mixed Models Analysis
Comparison: Null hypothesis: Absolute change from Baseline (Week 1) for Urine 11-dehydrothromboxane B2 (ng/g creatinine) in Test 1 is equal to zero on Visit 7 (Week 12). Alternate hypothesis: Absolute change from Baseline (Week 1) for Urine 11-dehydrothromboxane B2 (ng/g creatinine) in Test 1 is NOT equal to zero on Visit 7 (Week 12). (mITT Population)p-value: 0.046795% CI: [-148.706, -1.102]Mixed Models Analysis
Comparison: Null hypothesis: Absolute change from Baseline (Week 1) for Urine 11-dehydrothromboxane B2 (ng/g creatinine) in Test 2 is equal to zero on Visit 5 (Week 6). Alternate hypothesis: Absolute change from Baseline (Week 1) for Urine 11-dehydrothromboxane B2 (ng/g creatinine) in Test 2 is NOT equal to zero on Visit 5 (Week 6). (mITT Population)p-value: <0.000195% CI: [-206.668, -81.402]Mixed Models Analysis
Comparison: Null hypothesis: Absolute change from Baseline (Week 1) for Urine 11-dehydrothromboxane B2 (ng/g creatinine) in Test 2 is equal to zero on Visit 7 (Week 12). Alternate hypothesis: Absolute change from Baseline (Week 1) for Urine 11-dehydrothromboxane B2 (ng/g creatinine) in Test 2 is NOT equal to zero on Visit 7 (Week 12). (mITT Population)p-value: 0.080795% CI: [-133.221, 7.71]Mixed Models Analysis
Comparison: Null hypothesis: Absolute change from Baseline (Week 1) for Urine 11-dehydrothromboxane B2 (ng/g creatinine) in Test 1 + Test 2 is equal to zero on Visit 7 (Week 12). Alternate hypothesis: Absolute change from Baseline (Week 1) for Urine 11-dehydrothromboxane B2 (ng/g creatinine) in Test 1 + Test 2 is NOT equal to zero on Visit 7 (Week 12). (mITT Population)p-value: 0.009595% CI: [-120.753, -16.907]Mixed Models Analysis
Comparison: Null hypothesis: Absolute change from Baseline (Week 1) for Urine 11-dehydrothromboxane B2 (ng/g creatinine) in Control is equal to zero on Visit 5 (Week 6). Alternate hypothesis: Absolute change from Baseline (Week 1) for Urine 11-dehydrothromboxane B2 (ng/g creatinine) in Control is NOT equal to zero on Visit 5 (Week 6). (mITT Population)p-value: 0.958695% CI: [-61.873, 58.687]Mixed Models Analysis
Comparison: Null hypothesis: Absolute change from Baseline (Week 1) for Urine 11-dehydrothromboxane B2 (ng/g creatinine) in Control is equal to zero on Visit 7 (Week 12). Alternate hypothesis: Absolute change from Baseline (Week 1) for Urine 11-dehydrothromboxane B2 (ng/g creatinine) in Control is NOT equal to zero on Visit 7 (Week 12). (mITT Population)p-value: 0.940295% CI: [-71.714, 66.443]Mixed Models Analysis
Comparison: Null hypothesis: Absolute change from Baseline (Week 1) for Urine 11-dehydrothromboxane B2 (ng/g creatinine) in Test 1 is equal to Control on Visit 5 (Week 6). Alternate hypothesis: Absolute change from Baseline (Week 1) for Urine 11-dehydrothromboxane B2 (ng/g creatinine) in Test 1 is NOT equal to Control on Visit 5 (Week 6). (mITT Population)p-value: 0.03995% CI: [-223.33, -3.996]Mixed Models Analysis
Comparison: Null hypothesis: Absolute change from Baseline (Week 1) for Urine 11-dehydrothromboxane B2 (ng/g creatinine) in Test 1 is equal to Control on Visit 7 (Week 12). Alternate hypothesis: Absolute change from Baseline (Week 1) for Urine 11-dehydrothromboxane B2 (ng/g creatinine) in Test 1 is NOT equal to Control on Visit 7 (Week 12). (mITT Population)p-value: 0.454395% CI: [-199.091, 54.554]Mixed Models Analysis
Comparison: Null hypothesis: Absolute change from Baseline (Week 1) for Urine 11-dehydrothromboxane B2 (ng/g creatinine) in Test 2 is equal to Control on Visit 5 (Week 6). Alternate hypothesis: Absolute change from Baseline (Week 1) for Urine 11-dehydrothromboxane B2 (ng/g creatinine) in Test 2 is NOT equal to Control on Visit 5 (Week 6). (mITT Population)p-value: 0.005195% CI: [-252.08, -32.805]Mixed Models Analysis
Comparison: Null hypothesis: Absolute change from Baseline (Week 1) for Urine 11-dehydrothromboxane B2 (ng/g creatinine) in Test 2 is equal to Control on Visit 7 (Week 12). Alternate hypothesis: Absolute change from Baseline (Week 1) for Urine 11-dehydrothromboxane B2 (ng/g creatinine) in Test 2 is NOT equal to Control on Visit 7 (Week 12). (mITT Population)p-value: 0.606195% CI: [-184.286, 64.046]Mixed Models Analysis
Comparison: Null hypothesis: Absolute change from Baseline (Week 1) for Urine 11-dehydrothromboxane B2 (ng/g creatinine) in Test 1 + Test 2 is equal to Control on Visit 7 (Week 12). Alternate hypothesis: Absolute change from Baseline (Week 1) for Urine 11-dehydrothromboxane B2 (ng/g creatinine) in Test 1 + Test 2 is NOT equal to Control on Visit 7 (Week 12). (mITT Population)p-value: 0.124295% CI: [-150.672, 18.284]Mixed Models Analysis
Comparison: Null hypothesis: Absolute change from Baseline (Week 1) for Urine 11-dehydrothromboxane B2 (ng/g creatinine) in Test 1 is equal to Test 2 on Visit 7 (Week 12). Alternate hypothesis: Absolute change from Baseline (Week 1) for Urine 11-dehydrothromboxane B2 (ng/g creatinine) in Test 1 is NOT equal to Test 2 on Visit 7 (Week 12). (mITT Population)p-value: 0.811795% CI: [-112.35, 88.052]Mixed Models Analysis
Primary

Summary of Urine 11-dehydrothromboxane B2 and Absolute Change From Baseline (ng/g) by Study Group and Visit From Week 1 to Week 24 (mITT Population) [ALCS-RA-17-11-EV]

Summary of urine 11-dehydrothromboxane B2 (ng/g) and absolute change from Baseline in Weeks 12, 18 and 24 are presented (Study ALCS-RA-17-11-EV). The first urine void of the day was collected at Visits 1, 3 and 5 of the ALCS-RA-17-11-EV study. Baseline samples were collected Week 1 of the ALCS-RA-16-06-EV study. Urine creatinine concentration was measured in the urine collection and used to adjust the urine biomarker concentration value as follows: Urine biomarker (ng/g creatinine) = urine biomarker (pg/mL) x 100 / creatinine (mg/dL) Change from Baseline was calculated as follows: Absolute change from baseline = Post Product Use Value - Baseline Value, where Baseline = values reported on Day 1 (Week 1) of the 12-week ALCS-RA-16-06-EV study Baseline = Day 1 (Week 1), Visit 1 = Week 12 (Day 84 ± 3), Visit 3 = Week 18 (Day 126 ± 3), and Visit 5 = Week 24 (Day 168 ± 3), relative to the start of the 12-week ALCS-RA-16-06-EV study

Time frame: 24 weeks total with measurement timepoints at Week 1/Baseline [ALCS-RA-16-06-EV study]), and Week 12, Week 18 and Week 24 [ALCS-RA-17-11-EV study]

Population: Modified ITT: All subjects were randomized according to the randomization schedule; who used at least one study products after randomization was recorded and for whom there was a valid (within ±3 days of the planned measurement day) baseline and at least one post-baseline biomarker.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Test 1Summary of Urine 11-dehydrothromboxane B2 and Absolute Change From Baseline (ng/g) by Study Group and Visit From Week 1 to Week 24 (mITT Population) [ALCS-RA-17-11-EV]Visit 1: Week 12616.618 ng/gStandard Deviation 317.4293
Test 1Summary of Urine 11-dehydrothromboxane B2 and Absolute Change From Baseline (ng/g) by Study Group and Visit From Week 1 to Week 24 (mITT Population) [ALCS-RA-17-11-EV]Baseline: Week 1710.827 ng/gStandard Deviation 429.3286
Test 1Summary of Urine 11-dehydrothromboxane B2 and Absolute Change From Baseline (ng/g) by Study Group and Visit From Week 1 to Week 24 (mITT Population) [ALCS-RA-17-11-EV]Change from Baseline (Week 12)-93.029 ng/gStandard Deviation 372.9436
Test 1Summary of Urine 11-dehydrothromboxane B2 and Absolute Change From Baseline (ng/g) by Study Group and Visit From Week 1 to Week 24 (mITT Population) [ALCS-RA-17-11-EV]Change from Baseline (Week 18)-68.815 ng/gStandard Deviation 363.6867
Test 1Summary of Urine 11-dehydrothromboxane B2 and Absolute Change From Baseline (ng/g) by Study Group and Visit From Week 1 to Week 24 (mITT Population) [ALCS-RA-17-11-EV]Visit 3: Week 18665.371 ng/gStandard Deviation 399.2899
Test 1Summary of Urine 11-dehydrothromboxane B2 and Absolute Change From Baseline (ng/g) by Study Group and Visit From Week 1 to Week 24 (mITT Population) [ALCS-RA-17-11-EV]Visit 5: Week 24567.102 ng/gStandard Deviation 375.2503
Test 1Summary of Urine 11-dehydrothromboxane B2 and Absolute Change From Baseline (ng/g) by Study Group and Visit From Week 1 to Week 24 (mITT Population) [ALCS-RA-17-11-EV]Change from Baseline (Week 24)-165.586 ng/gStandard Deviation 402.137
Test 2Summary of Urine 11-dehydrothromboxane B2 and Absolute Change From Baseline (ng/g) by Study Group and Visit From Week 1 to Week 24 (mITT Population) [ALCS-RA-17-11-EV]Change from Baseline (Week 24)-47.287 ng/gStandard Deviation 382.6278
Test 2Summary of Urine 11-dehydrothromboxane B2 and Absolute Change From Baseline (ng/g) by Study Group and Visit From Week 1 to Week 24 (mITT Population) [ALCS-RA-17-11-EV]Visit 1: Week 12703.961 ng/gStandard Deviation 467.6549
Test 2Summary of Urine 11-dehydrothromboxane B2 and Absolute Change From Baseline (ng/g) by Study Group and Visit From Week 1 to Week 24 (mITT Population) [ALCS-RA-17-11-EV]Visit 5: Week 24706.929 ng/gStandard Deviation 341.1676
Test 2Summary of Urine 11-dehydrothromboxane B2 and Absolute Change From Baseline (ng/g) by Study Group and Visit From Week 1 to Week 24 (mITT Population) [ALCS-RA-17-11-EV]Change from Baseline (Week 12)-46.559 ng/gStandard Deviation 438.032
Test 2Summary of Urine 11-dehydrothromboxane B2 and Absolute Change From Baseline (ng/g) by Study Group and Visit From Week 1 to Week 24 (mITT Population) [ALCS-RA-17-11-EV]Baseline: Week 1750.519 ng/gStandard Deviation 463.9992
Test 2Summary of Urine 11-dehydrothromboxane B2 and Absolute Change From Baseline (ng/g) by Study Group and Visit From Week 1 to Week 24 (mITT Population) [ALCS-RA-17-11-EV]Visit 3: Week 18731.003 ng/gStandard Deviation 403.6885
Test 2Summary of Urine 11-dehydrothromboxane B2 and Absolute Change From Baseline (ng/g) by Study Group and Visit From Week 1 to Week 24 (mITT Population) [ALCS-RA-17-11-EV]Change from Baseline (Week 18)-14.677 ng/gStandard Deviation 390.028
Test 1 + Test 2 GroupSummary of Urine 11-dehydrothromboxane B2 and Absolute Change From Baseline (ng/g) by Study Group and Visit From Week 1 to Week 24 (mITT Population) [ALCS-RA-17-11-EV]Change from Baseline (Week 24)-102.493 ng/gStandard Deviation 394.1247
Test 1 + Test 2 GroupSummary of Urine 11-dehydrothromboxane B2 and Absolute Change From Baseline (ng/g) by Study Group and Visit From Week 1 to Week 24 (mITT Population) [ALCS-RA-17-11-EV]Visit 3: Week 18701.170 ng/gStandard Deviation 400.7346
Test 1 + Test 2 GroupSummary of Urine 11-dehydrothromboxane B2 and Absolute Change From Baseline (ng/g) by Study Group and Visit From Week 1 to Week 24 (mITT Population) [ALCS-RA-17-11-EV]Visit 5: Week 24641.676 ng/gStandard Deviation 362.2939
Test 1 + Test 2 GroupSummary of Urine 11-dehydrothromboxane B2 and Absolute Change From Baseline (ng/g) by Study Group and Visit From Week 1 to Week 24 (mITT Population) [ALCS-RA-17-11-EV]Baseline: Week 1731.287 ng/gStandard Deviation 445.6561
Test 1 + Test 2 GroupSummary of Urine 11-dehydrothromboxane B2 and Absolute Change From Baseline (ng/g) by Study Group and Visit From Week 1 to Week 24 (mITT Population) [ALCS-RA-17-11-EV]Change from Baseline (Week 12)-68.826 ng/gStandard Deviation 406.6859
Test 1 + Test 2 GroupSummary of Urine 11-dehydrothromboxane B2 and Absolute Change From Baseline (ng/g) by Study Group and Visit From Week 1 to Week 24 (mITT Population) [ALCS-RA-17-11-EV]Change from Baseline (Week 18)-39.285 ng/gStandard Deviation 377.1052
Test 1 + Test 2 GroupSummary of Urine 11-dehydrothromboxane B2 and Absolute Change From Baseline (ng/g) by Study Group and Visit From Week 1 to Week 24 (mITT Population) [ALCS-RA-17-11-EV]Visit 1: Week 12662.109 ng/gStandard Deviation 403.0592
ControlSummary of Urine 11-dehydrothromboxane B2 and Absolute Change From Baseline (ng/g) by Study Group and Visit From Week 1 to Week 24 (mITT Population) [ALCS-RA-17-11-EV]Change from Baseline (Week 18)107.568 ng/gStandard Deviation 617.2994
ControlSummary of Urine 11-dehydrothromboxane B2 and Absolute Change From Baseline (ng/g) by Study Group and Visit From Week 1 to Week 24 (mITT Population) [ALCS-RA-17-11-EV]Baseline: Week 1842.642 ng/gStandard Deviation 493.4473
ControlSummary of Urine 11-dehydrothromboxane B2 and Absolute Change From Baseline (ng/g) by Study Group and Visit From Week 1 to Week 24 (mITT Population) [ALCS-RA-17-11-EV]Visit 1: Week 12856.055 ng/gStandard Deviation 517.3135
ControlSummary of Urine 11-dehydrothromboxane B2 and Absolute Change From Baseline (ng/g) by Study Group and Visit From Week 1 to Week 24 (mITT Population) [ALCS-RA-17-11-EV]Visit 3: Week 18942.559 ng/gStandard Deviation 644.6484
ControlSummary of Urine 11-dehydrothromboxane B2 and Absolute Change From Baseline (ng/g) by Study Group and Visit From Week 1 to Week 24 (mITT Population) [ALCS-RA-17-11-EV]Change from Baseline (Week 12)6.436 ng/gStandard Deviation 462.7865
ControlSummary of Urine 11-dehydrothromboxane B2 and Absolute Change From Baseline (ng/g) by Study Group and Visit From Week 1 to Week 24 (mITT Population) [ALCS-RA-17-11-EV]Change from Baseline (Week 24)103.927 ng/gStandard Deviation 469.7284
ControlSummary of Urine 11-dehydrothromboxane B2 and Absolute Change From Baseline (ng/g) by Study Group and Visit From Week 1 to Week 24 (mITT Population) [ALCS-RA-17-11-EV]Visit 5: Week 24969.562 ng/gStandard Deviation 545.1937
Comparison: Null hypothesis: Absolute change from Baseline for Urine 11-dehydrothromboxane B2 (ng/g creatinine) in Test 1 is equal to zero on Visit 1 (Week 12), relative to the start of the 12-week ALCS-RA-16-06-EV study. Alternate hypothesis: Absolute change from Baseline (Week 1) for Urine 11-dehydrothromboxane B2 (ng/g creatinine) in Test 1 is NOT equal to zero on Visit 1 (Week 12), relative to the start of the 12-week ALCS-RA-16-06-EV study. (mITT Population)p-value: 0.056795% CI: [-227.151, 3.237]Mixed Models Analysis
Comparison: Null hypothesis: Absolute change from Baseline for Urine 11-dehydrothromboxane B2 (ng/g creatinine) in Test 1 is equal to zero on Visit 3 (Week 18), relative to the start of the 12-week ALCS-RA-16-06-EV study. Alternate hypothesis: Absolute change from Baseline (Week 1) for Urine 11-dehydrothromboxane B2 (ng/g creatinine) in Test 1 is NOT equal to zero on Visit 3 (Week 18), relative to the start of the 12-week ALCS-RA-16-06-EV study. (mITT Population)p-value: 0.210395% CI: [-197.025, 43.569]Mixed Models Analysis
Comparison: Null hypothesis: Absolute change from Baseline for Urine 11-dehydrothromboxane B2 (ng/g creatinine) in Test 1 is equal to zero on Visit 5 (Week 24), relative to the start of the 12-week ALCS-RA-16-06-EV study. Alternate hypothesis: Absolute change from Baseline (Week 1) for Urine 11-dehydrothromboxane B2 (ng/g creatinine) in Test 1 is NOT equal to zero on Visit 5 (Week 24), relative to the start of the 12-week ALCS-RA-16-06-EV study. (mITT Population)p-value: 0.005295% CI: [-288.22, -51.251]Mixed Models Analysis
Comparison: Null hypothesis: Absolute change from Baseline for Urine 11-dehydrothromboxane B2 (ng/g creatinine) in Test 2 is equal to zero on Visit 1 (Week 12), relative to the start of the 12-week ALCS-RA-16-06-EV study. Alternate hypothesis: Absolute change from Baseline (Week 1) for Urine 11-dehydrothromboxane B2 (ng/g creatinine) in Test 2 is NOT equal to zero on Visit 1 (Week 12), relative to the start of the 12-week ALCS-RA-16-06-EV study. (mITT Population)p-value: 0.34995% CI: [-162.721, 57.711]Mixed Models Analysis
Comparison: Null hypothesis: Absolute change from Baseline for Urine 11-dehydrothromboxane B2 (ng/g creatinine) in Test 2 is equal to zero on Visit 3 (Week 18), relative to the start of the 12-week ALCS-RA-16-06-EV study. Alternate hypothesis: Absolute change from Baseline (Week 1) for Urine 11-dehydrothromboxane B2 (ng/g creatinine) in Test 2 is NOT equal to zero on Visit 3 (Week 18), relative to the start of the 12-week ALCS-RA-16-06-EV study. (mITT Population)p-value: 0.84195% CI: [-123.333, 100.507]Mixed Models Analysis
Comparison: Null hypothesis: Absolute change from Baseline for Urine 11-dehydrothromboxane B2 (ng/g creatinine) in Test2 is equal to zero on Visit 5 (Week 24), relative to the start of the 12-week ALCS-RA-16-06-EV study. Alternate hypothesis: Absolute change from Baseline (Week 1) for Urine 11-dehydrothromboxane B2 (ng/g creatinine) in Test2 is NOT equal to zero on Visit 5 (Week 24), relative to the start of the 12-week ALCS-RA-16-06-EV study. (mITT Population)p-value: 0.346595% CI: [-165.4, 58.27]Mixed Models Analysis
Comparison: Null hypothesis: Absolute change from Baseline for Urine 11-dehydrothromboxane B2 (ng/g creatinine) in Test 1 + Test 2 is equal to zero on Visit 5 (Week 24), relative to the start of the 12-week ALCS-RA-16-06-EV study. Alternate hypothesis: Absolute change from Baseline (Week 1) for Urine 11-dehydrothromboxane B2 (ng/g creatinine) in Test 1 + Test 2 is NOT equal to zero on Visit 5 (Week 24), relative to the start of the 12-week ALCS-RA-16-06-EV study. (mITT Population)p-value: 0.008795% CI: [-194.865, -28.435]Mixed Models Analysis
Comparison: Null hypothesis: Absolute change from Baseline for Urine 11-dehydrothromboxane B2 (ng/g creatinine) in Control is equal to zero on Visit 1 (Week 12), relative to the start of the 12-week ALCS-RA-16-06-EV study. Alternate hypothesis: Absolute change from Baseline (Week 1) for Urine 11-dehydrothromboxane B2 (ng/g creatinine) in Control is NOT equal to zero on Visit 1 (Week 12), relative to the start of the 12-week ALCS-RA-16-06-EV study. (mITT Population)p-value: 0.268895% CI: [-49.678, 177.565]Mixed Models Analysis
Comparison: Null hypothesis: Absolute change from Baseline for Urine 11-dehydrothromboxane B2 (ng/g creatinine) in Control is equal to zero on Visit 3 (Week 18), relative to the start of the 12-week ALCS-RA-16-06-EV study. Alternate hypothesis: Absolute change from Baseline (Week 1) for Urine 11-dehydrothromboxane B2 (ng/g creatinine) in Control is NOT equal to zero on Visit 3 (Week 18), relative to the start of the 12-week ALCS-RA-16-06-EV study. (mITT Population)p-value: 0.009695% CI: [37.114, 265.33]Mixed Models Analysis
Comparison: Null hypothesis: Absolute change from Baseline for Urine 11-dehydrothromboxane B2 (ng/g creatinine) in Control is equal to zero on Visit 5 (Week 24), relative to the start of the 12-week ALCS-RA-16-06-EV study. Alternate hypothesis: Absolute change from Baseline (Week 1) for Urine 11-dehydrothromboxane B2 (ng/g creatinine) in Control is NOT equal to zero on Visit 5 (Week 24), relative to the start of the 12-week ALCS-RA-16-06-EV study. (mITT Population)p-value: 0.002395% CI: [65.754, 299.509]Mixed Models Analysis
Comparison: Null hypothesis: Absolute change from Baseline for Urine 11-dehydrothromboxane B2 (ng/g creatinine) in Test 1 is equal to Control on Visit 1 (Week 12), relative to the start of the 12-week ALCS-RA-16-06-EV study. Alternate hypothesis: Absolute change from Baseline (Week 1) for Urine 11-dehydrothromboxane B2 (ng/g creatinine) in Test 1 is NOT equal to Control on Visit 1 (Week 12), relative to the start of the 12-week ALCS-RA-16-06-EV study. (mITT Population)p-value: 0.161295% CI: [-390.865, 39.063]Mixed Models Analysis
Comparison: Null hypothesis: Absolute change from Baseline for Urine 11-dehydrothromboxane B2 (ng/g creatinine) in Test 1 is equal to Control on Visit 3 (Week 18), relative to the start of the 12-week ALCS-RA-16-06-EV study. Alternate hypothesis: Absolute change from Baseline (Week 1) for Urine 11-dehydrothromboxane B2 (ng/g creatinine) in Test 1 is NOT equal to Control on Visit 3 (Week 18), relative to the start of the 12-week ALCS-RA-16-06-EV study. (mITT Population)p-value: 0.039695% CI: [-448.725, -7.175]Mixed Models Analysis
Comparison: Null hypothesis: Absolute change from Baseline for Urine 11-dehydrothromboxane B2 (ng/g creatinine) in Test 1 is equal to Control on Visit 5 (Week 24), relative to the start of the 12-week ALCS-RA-16-06-EV study. Alternate hypothesis: Absolute change from Baseline (Week 1) for Urine 11-dehydrothromboxane B2 (ng/g creatinine) in Test 1 is NOT equal to Control on Visit 5 (Week 24), relative to the start of the 12-week ALCS-RA-16-06-EV study. (mITT Population)p-value: 0.000295% CI: [-573.315, -131.418]Mixed Models Analysis
Comparison: Null hypothesis: Absolute change from Baseline for Urine 11-dehydrothromboxane B2 (ng/g creatinine) in Test 2 is equal to Control on Visit 1 (Week 12), relative to the start of the 12-week ALCS-RA-16-06-EV study. Alternate hypothesis: Absolute change from Baseline (Week 1) for Urine 11-dehydrothromboxane B2 (ng/g creatinine) in Test 2 is NOT equal to Control on Visit 1 (Week 12), relative to the start of the 12-week ALCS-RA-16-06-EV study. (mITT Population)p-value: 0.561695% CI: [-327.445, 94.547]Mixed Models Analysis
Comparison: Null hypothesis: Absolute change from Baseline for Urine 11-dehydrothromboxane B2 (ng/g creatinine) in Test 2 is equal to Control on Visit 3 (Week 18), relative to the start of the 12-week ALCS-RA-16-06-EV study. Alternate hypothesis: Absolute change from Baseline (Week 1) for Urine 11-dehydrothromboxane B2 (ng/g creatinine) in Test 2 is NOT equal to Control on Visit 3 (Week 18), relative to the start of the 12-week ALCS-RA-16-06-EV study. (mITT Population)p-value: 0.217695% CI: [-375.57, 50.299]Mixed Models Analysis
Comparison: Null hypothesis: Absolute change from Baseline for Urine 11-dehydrothromboxane B2 (ng/g creatinine) in Test 2 is equal to Control on Visit 5 (Week 24), relative to the start of the 12-week ALCS-RA-16-06-EV study. Alternate hypothesis: Absolute change from Baseline (Week 1) for Urine 11-dehydrothromboxane B2 (ng/g creatinine) in Test 2 is NOT equal to Control on Visit 5 (Week 24), relative to the start of the 12-week ALCS-RA-16-06-EV study. (mITT Population)p-value: 0.024295% CI: [-451.334, -21.059]Mixed Models Analysis
Comparison: Null hypothesis: Absolute change from Baseline for Urine 11-dehydrothromboxane B2 (ng/g creatinine) in Test 1 + Test 2 is equal to Control on Visit 5 (Week 24), relative to the start of the 12-week ALCS-RA-16-06-EV study. Alternate hypothesis: Absolute change from Baseline (Week 1) for Urine 11-dehydrothromboxane B2 (ng/g creatinine) in Test 1 + Test 2 is NOT equal to Control on Visit 5 (Week 24), relative to the start of the 12-week ALCS-RA-16-06-EV study. (mITT Population)p-value: <0.000195% CI: [-434.513, -154.05]Mixed Models Analysis
Comparison: Null hypothesis: Absolute change from Baseline for Urine 11-dehydrothromboxane B2 (ng/g creatinine) in Test 2 is equal to Test 1 on Visit 5 (Week 24), relative to the start of the 12-week ALCS-RA-16-06-EV study. Alternate hypothesis: Absolute change from Baseline (Week 1) for Urine 11-dehydrothromboxane B2 (ng/g creatinine) in Test 2 is NOT equal to Test 1 on Visit 5 (Week 24), relative to the start of the 12-week ALCS-RA-16-06-EV study. (mITT Population)p-value: 0.152495% CI: [-275.521, 43.18]Mixed Models Analysis
Primary

Summary of Urine 8-epi-prostaglandin F2alpha Absolute Change From Baseline (ng/g) by Study Group From Week 1 to Week 12 (mITT Population With Outliers Excluded) [ALCS-RA-16-06-EV]

Summary of urine 8-epi-prostaglandin F2alpha absolute change from Baseline in Week 12 is presented (Study ALCS-RA-16-06-EV). The first urine void of the day on Visits 3 and 7 was analyzed for the urine biomarker. Data outliers were examined through Proc Mixed model residual diagnosis (+/- 4 studentized residuals). A sensitivity analysis excluding outliers was performed for Visit 7 (Week 12). Urine creatinine concentration was measured in the urine collection and used to adjust the urine biomarker concentration value as follows: Urine biomarker (ng/g creatinine) = urine biomarker (pg/mL) x 100 / creatinine (mg/dL) Absolute change from baseline = Post Product Use Value - Baseline Value Baseline / Visit 3 (Week 1) = Day 1 Visit 7 (Week 12) = Day 84 ± 3

Time frame: Week 1 (Baseline) and Week 12 for a total of of 12 weeks from randomization

Population: Modified ITT Population with Outliers Excluded: All subjects were randomized according to the randomization schedule; who used at least one study products after randomization was recorded and for whom there was a valid (within ±3 days of the planned measurement day) baseline and at least one post-baseline biomarker. Data outliers, defined as any observation with a studentized residual that is greater than +/- 4, were excluded from the analysis.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Test 1Summary of Urine 8-epi-prostaglandin F2alpha Absolute Change From Baseline (ng/g) by Study Group From Week 1 to Week 12 (mITT Population With Outliers Excluded) [ALCS-RA-16-06-EV]-61.644 ng/gStandard Deviation 138.3599
Test 2Summary of Urine 8-epi-prostaglandin F2alpha Absolute Change From Baseline (ng/g) by Study Group From Week 1 to Week 12 (mITT Population With Outliers Excluded) [ALCS-RA-16-06-EV]-18.092 ng/gStandard Deviation 135.9049
Test 1 + Test 2 GroupSummary of Urine 8-epi-prostaglandin F2alpha Absolute Change From Baseline (ng/g) by Study Group From Week 1 to Week 12 (mITT Population With Outliers Excluded) [ALCS-RA-16-06-EV]-11.452 ng/gStandard Deviation 133.6618
Comparison: Null hypothesis: Absolute change from Baseline (Week 1) for Urine 8-epi-prostaglandin F2alpha (ng/g creatinine) in Test 1 is equal to Control on Visit 7 (Week 12). Alternate hypothesis: Absolute change from Baseline (Week 1) for Urine 8-epi-prostaglandin F2alpha (ng/g creatinine) in Test 1 is NOT equal to Control on Visit 7 (Week 12). (mITT Population)p-value: 0.02595% CI: [-75.396, -3.605]Mixed Models Analysis
Comparison: Null hypothesis: Absolute change from Baseline (Week 1) for Urine 8-epi-prostaglandin F2alpha (ng/g creatinine) in Test 2 is equal to Control on Visit 7 (Week 12). Alternate hypothesis: Absolute change from Baseline (Week 1) for Urine 8-epi-prostaglandin F2alpha (ng/g creatinine) in Test 2 is NOT equal to Control on Visit 7 (Week 12). (mITT Population)p-value: 0.999795% CI: [-37.896, 32.016]Mixed Models Analysis
Primary

Summary of Urine 8-epi-prostaglandin F2alpha and Absolute Change From Baseline (ng/g) by Study Group and Visit From Week 1 to Week 12 (mITT Population) [ALCS-RA-16-06-EV]

Summary of urine 8-epi-prostaglandin F2alpha (ng/g) and absolute change from Baseline in Weeks 6 and 12 are presented (Study ALCS-RA-16-06-EV). Baseline / Visit 3 (Week 1) = Day 1 Visit 5 (Week 6) = Day 42 ± 3 Visit 7 (Week 12) = Day 84 ± 3 The first urine void of the day was collected at Visits 3, 5 and 7. Urine creatinine concentration was measured in the urine collection and used to adjust the urine biomarker concentration values as follows: Urine biomarker (ng/g creatinine) = urine biomarker (pg/mL) x 100 / creatinine (mg/dL) Absolute change from baseline = Post Product Use Value - Baseline Value

Time frame: 12 weeks total with measurement timepoints at Week 1/Baseline, Week 6 and Week 12

Population: Modified ITT: All subjects were randomized according to the randomization schedule; who used at least one study products after randomization was recorded and for whom there was a valid (within ±3 days of the planned measurement day) baseline and at least one post-baseline biomarker.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Test 1Summary of Urine 8-epi-prostaglandin F2alpha and Absolute Change From Baseline (ng/g) by Study Group and Visit From Week 1 to Week 12 (mITT Population) [ALCS-RA-16-06-EV]Visit 3 (Baseline): Week 1377.138 ng/gStandard Deviation 211.0106
Test 1Summary of Urine 8-epi-prostaglandin F2alpha and Absolute Change From Baseline (ng/g) by Study Group and Visit From Week 1 to Week 12 (mITT Population) [ALCS-RA-16-06-EV]Change from Baseline (Week 12)-39.547 ng/gStandard Deviation 191.4551
Test 1Summary of Urine 8-epi-prostaglandin F2alpha and Absolute Change From Baseline (ng/g) by Study Group and Visit From Week 1 to Week 12 (mITT Population) [ALCS-RA-16-06-EV]Visit 5: Week 6332.952 ng/gStandard Deviation 212.6164
Test 1Summary of Urine 8-epi-prostaglandin F2alpha and Absolute Change From Baseline (ng/g) by Study Group and Visit From Week 1 to Week 12 (mITT Population) [ALCS-RA-16-06-EV]Change from Baseline (Week 6)-44.354 ng/gStandard Deviation 162.5679
Test 1Summary of Urine 8-epi-prostaglandin F2alpha and Absolute Change From Baseline (ng/g) by Study Group and Visit From Week 1 to Week 12 (mITT Population) [ALCS-RA-16-06-EV]Visit 7: Week 12332.455 ng/gStandard Deviation 219.2878
Test 2Summary of Urine 8-epi-prostaglandin F2alpha and Absolute Change From Baseline (ng/g) by Study Group and Visit From Week 1 to Week 12 (mITT Population) [ALCS-RA-16-06-EV]Visit 7: Week 12335.687 ng/gStandard Deviation 143.1724
Test 2Summary of Urine 8-epi-prostaglandin F2alpha and Absolute Change From Baseline (ng/g) by Study Group and Visit From Week 1 to Week 12 (mITT Population) [ALCS-RA-16-06-EV]Change from Baseline (Week 6)-33.320 ng/gStandard Deviation 120.3646
Test 2Summary of Urine 8-epi-prostaglandin F2alpha and Absolute Change From Baseline (ng/g) by Study Group and Visit From Week 1 to Week 12 (mITT Population) [ALCS-RA-16-06-EV]Change from Baseline (Week 12)-18.092 ng/gStandard Deviation 135.9049
Test 2Summary of Urine 8-epi-prostaglandin F2alpha and Absolute Change From Baseline (ng/g) by Study Group and Visit From Week 1 to Week 12 (mITT Population) [ALCS-RA-16-06-EV]Visit 3 (Baseline): Week 1355.984 ng/gStandard Deviation 177.9443
Test 2Summary of Urine 8-epi-prostaglandin F2alpha and Absolute Change From Baseline (ng/g) by Study Group and Visit From Week 1 to Week 12 (mITT Population) [ALCS-RA-16-06-EV]Visit 5: Week 6315.095 ng/gStandard Deviation 150.5924
Test 1 + Test 2 GroupSummary of Urine 8-epi-prostaglandin F2alpha and Absolute Change From Baseline (ng/g) by Study Group and Visit From Week 1 to Week 12 (mITT Population) [ALCS-RA-16-06-EV]Visit 3 (Baseline): Week 1366.397 ng/gStandard Deviation 194.8302
Test 1 + Test 2 GroupSummary of Urine 8-epi-prostaglandin F2alpha and Absolute Change From Baseline (ng/g) by Study Group and Visit From Week 1 to Week 12 (mITT Population) [ALCS-RA-16-06-EV]Visit 7: Week 12334.134 ng/gStandard Deviation 183.3207
Test 1 + Test 2 GroupSummary of Urine 8-epi-prostaglandin F2alpha and Absolute Change From Baseline (ng/g) by Study Group and Visit From Week 1 to Week 12 (mITT Population) [ALCS-RA-16-06-EV]Change from Baseline (Week 6)-38.882 ng/gStandard Deviation 143.0167
Test 1 + Test 2 GroupSummary of Urine 8-epi-prostaglandin F2alpha and Absolute Change From Baseline (ng/g) by Study Group and Visit From Week 1 to Week 12 (mITT Population) [ALCS-RA-16-06-EV]Visit 5: Week 6324.096 ng/gStandard Deviation 184.324
Test 1 + Test 2 GroupSummary of Urine 8-epi-prostaglandin F2alpha and Absolute Change From Baseline (ng/g) by Study Group and Visit From Week 1 to Week 12 (mITT Population) [ALCS-RA-16-06-EV]Change from Baseline (Week 12)-28.401 ng/gStandard Deviation 164.9314
ControlSummary of Urine 8-epi-prostaglandin F2alpha and Absolute Change From Baseline (ng/g) by Study Group and Visit From Week 1 to Week 12 (mITT Population) [ALCS-RA-16-06-EV]Visit 7: Week 12355.639 ng/gStandard Deviation 233.4254
ControlSummary of Urine 8-epi-prostaglandin F2alpha and Absolute Change From Baseline (ng/g) by Study Group and Visit From Week 1 to Week 12 (mITT Population) [ALCS-RA-16-06-EV]Visit 5: Week 6346.856 ng/gStandard Deviation 195.702
ControlSummary of Urine 8-epi-prostaglandin F2alpha and Absolute Change From Baseline (ng/g) by Study Group and Visit From Week 1 to Week 12 (mITT Population) [ALCS-RA-16-06-EV]Visit 3 (Baseline): Week 1368.710 ng/gStandard Deviation 200.0174
ControlSummary of Urine 8-epi-prostaglandin F2alpha and Absolute Change From Baseline (ng/g) by Study Group and Visit From Week 1 to Week 12 (mITT Population) [ALCS-RA-16-06-EV]Change from Baseline (Week 12)-7.204 ng/gStandard Deviation 178.4608
ControlSummary of Urine 8-epi-prostaglandin F2alpha and Absolute Change From Baseline (ng/g) by Study Group and Visit From Week 1 to Week 12 (mITT Population) [ALCS-RA-16-06-EV]Change from Baseline (Week 6)-15.247 ng/gStandard Deviation 141.7366
Comparison: Null hypothesis: Absolute change from Baseline (Week 1) for Urine 8-epi-prostaglandin F2alpha (ng/g creatinine) in Test 1 is equal to zero on Visit 5 (Week 6). Alternate hypothesis: Absolute change from Baseline (Week 1) for Urine 8-epi-prostaglandin F2alpha (ng/g creatinine) in Test 1 is NOT equal to zero on Visit 5 (Week 6). (mITT Population)p-value: 0.003195% CI: [-59.038, -12.075]Mixed Models Analysis
Comparison: Null hypothesis: Absolute change from Baseline (Week 1) for Urine 8-epi-prostaglandin F2alpha (ng/g creatinine) in Test 1 is equal to zero on Visit 7 (Week 12). Alternate hypothesis: Absolute change from Baseline (Week 1) for Urine 8-epi-prostaglandin F2alpha (ng/g creatinine) in Test 1 is NOT equal to zero on Visit 7 (Week 12). (mITT Population)p-value: 0.037195% CI: [-60.818, -1.882]Mixed Models Analysis
Comparison: Null hypothesis: Absolute change from Baseline (Week 1) for Urine 8-epi-prostaglandin F2alpha (ng/g creatinine) in Test 2 is equal to zero on Visit 5 (Week 6). Alternate hypothesis: Absolute change from Baseline (Week 1) for Urine 8-epi-prostaglandin F2alpha (ng/g creatinine) in Test 2 is NOT equal to zero on Visit 5 (Week 6). (mITT Population)p-value: 0.004395% CI: [-57.877, -10.834]Mixed Models Analysis
Comparison: Null hypothesis: Absolute change from Baseline (Week 1) for Urine 8-epi-prostaglandin F2alpha (ng/g creatinine) in Test 2 is equal to zero on Visit 7 (Week 12). Alternate hypothesis: Absolute change from Baseline (Week 1) for Urine 8-epi-prostaglandin F2alpha (ng/g creatinine) in Test 2 is NOT equal to zero on Visit 7 (Week 12). (mITT Population)p-value: 0.209195% CI: [-46.375, 10.183]Mixed Models Analysis
Comparison: Null hypothesis: Absolute change from Baseline (Week 1) for Urine 8-epi-prostaglandin F2alpha (ng/g creatinine) in Test 1 + Test 2 is equal to zero on Visit 7 (Week 12). Alternate hypothesis: Absolute change from Baseline (Week 1) for Urine 8-epi-prostaglandin F2alpha (ng/g creatinine) in Test 1 + Test 2 is NOT equal to zero on Visit 7 (Week 12). (mITT Population)p-value: 0.019795% CI: [-45.473, -3.973]Mixed Models Analysis
Comparison: Null hypothesis: Absolute change from Baseline (Week 1) for Urine 8-epi-prostaglandin F2alpha (ng/g creatinine) in Control is equal to zero on Visit 5 (Week 6). Alternate hypothesis: Absolute change from Baseline (Week 1) for Urine 8-epi-prostaglandin F2alpha (ng/g creatinine) in Control is NOT equal to zero on Visit 5 (Week 6). (mITT Population)p-value: 0.235395% CI: [-36.08, 8.891]Mixed Models Analysis
Comparison: Null hypothesis: Absolute change from Baseline (Week 1) for Urine 8-epi-prostaglandin F2alpha (ng/g creatinine) in Control is equal to zero on Visit 7 (Week 12). Alternate hypothesis: Absolute change from Baseline (Week 1) for Urine 8-epi-prostaglandin F2alpha (ng/g creatinine) in Control is NOT equal to zero on Visit 7 (Week 12). (mITT Population)p-value: 0.732995% CI: [-32.159, 22.641]Mixed Models Analysis
Comparison: Null hypothesis: Absolute change from Baseline (Week 1) for Urine 8-epi-prostaglandin F2alpha (ng/g creatinine) in Test 1 is equal to Control on Visit 5 (Week 6). Alternate hypothesis: Absolute change from Baseline (Week 1) for Urine 8-epi-prostaglandin F2alpha (ng/g creatinine) in Test 1 is NOT equal to Control on Visit 5 (Week 6). (mITT Population)p-value: 0.54295% CI: [-62.989, 19.065]Mixed Models Analysis
Comparison: Null hypothesis: Absolute change from Baseline (Week 1) for Urine 8-epi-prostaglandin F2alpha (ng/g creatinine) in Test 1 is equal to Control on Visit 7 (Week 12). Alternate hypothesis: Absolute change from Baseline (Week 1) for Urine 8-epi-prostaglandin F2alpha (ng/g creatinine) in Test 1 is NOT equal to Control on Visit 7 (Week 12). (mITT Population)p-value: 0.523495% CI: [-77.049, 23.866]Mixed Models Analysis
Comparison: Null hypothesis: Absolute change from Baseline (Week 1) for Urine 8-epi-prostaglandin F2alpha (ng/g creatinine) in Test 2 is equal to Control on Visit 5 (Week 6). Alternate hypothesis: Absolute change from Baseline (Week 1) for Urine 8-epi-prostaglandin F2alpha (ng/g creatinine) in Test 2 is NOT equal to Control on Visit 5 (Week 6). (mITT Population)p-value: 0.597595% CI: [-61.867, 20.344]Mixed Models Analysis
Comparison: Null hypothesis: Absolute change from Baseline (Week 1) for Urine 8-epi-prostaglandin F2alpha (ng/g creatinine) in Test 2 is equal to Control on Visit 7 (Week 12). Alternate hypothesis: Absolute change from Baseline (Week 1) for Urine 8-epi-prostaglandin F2alpha (ng/g creatinine) in Test 2 is NOT equal to Control on Visit 7 (Week 12). (mITT Population)p-value: 0.933195% CI: [-62.853, 36.179]Mixed Models Analysis
Comparison: Null hypothesis: Absolute change from Baseline (Week 1) for Urine 8-epi-prostaglandin F2alpha (ng/g creatinine) in Test 1 + Test 2 is equal to Control on Visit 7 (Week 12). Alternate hypothesis: Absolute change from Baseline (Week 1) for Urine 8-epi-prostaglandin F2alpha (ng/g creatinine) in Test 1 + Test 2 is NOT equal to Control on Visit 7 (Week 12). (mITT Population)p-value: 0.244495% CI: [-53.637, 13.709]Mixed Models Analysis
Comparison: Null hypothesis: Absolute change from Baseline (Week 1) for Urine 8-epi-prostaglandin F2alpha (ng/g creatinine) in Test 1 is equal to Test 2 on Visit 7 (Week 12). Alternate hypothesis: Absolute change from Baseline (Week 1) for Urine 8-epi-prostaglandin F2alpha (ng/g creatinine) in Test 1 is NOT equal to Test 2 on Visit 7 (Week 12). (mITT Population)p-value: 0.516995% CI: [-53.427, 26.919]Mixed Models Analysis
Primary

Summary of Urine 8-epi-prostaglandin F2alpha and Absolute Change From Baseline (ng/g) by Study Group and Visit From Week 1 to Week 24 (mITT Population) [ALCS-RA-17-11-EV]

Summary of urine 8-epi-prostaglandin F2alpha (ng/g) and absolute change from Baseline in Weeks 12, 18 and 24 are presented (Study ALCS-RA-17-11-EV). The first urine void of the day was collected at Visits 1, 3 and 5 of the ALCS-RA-17-11-EV study. Baseline samples were collected Week 1 of the ALCS-RA-16-06-EV study. Urine creatinine concentration was measured in the urine collection and used to adjust the urine biomarker concentration value as follows: Urine biomarker (ng/g creatinine) = urine biomarker (pg/mL) x 100 / creatinine (mg/dL) Change from Baseline was calculated as follows: Absolute change from baseline = Post Product Use Value - Baseline Value, where Baseline = values reported on Day 1 (Week 1) of the 12-week ALCS-RA-16-06-EV study Baseline = Day 1 (Week 1), Visit 1 = Week 12 (Day 84 ± 3), Visit 3 = Week 18 (Day 126 ± 3), and Visit 5 = Week 24 (Day 168 ± 3), relative to the start of the 12-week ALCS-RA-16-06-EV study

Time frame: 24 weeks total with measurement timepoints at Week 1/Baseline [ALCS-RA-16-06-EV study]), and Week 12, Week 18 and Week 24 [ALCS-RA-17-11-EV study]

Population: Modified ITT: All subjects were randomized according to the randomization schedule; who used at least one study products after randomization was recorded and for whom there was a valid (within ±3 days of the planned measurement day) baseline and at least one post-baseline biomarker.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Test 1Summary of Urine 8-epi-prostaglandin F2alpha and Absolute Change From Baseline (ng/g) by Study Group and Visit From Week 1 to Week 24 (mITT Population) [ALCS-RA-17-11-EV]Change from Baseline (Week 18)-87.745 ng/gStandard Deviation 92.1074
Test 1Summary of Urine 8-epi-prostaglandin F2alpha and Absolute Change From Baseline (ng/g) by Study Group and Visit From Week 1 to Week 24 (mITT Population) [ALCS-RA-17-11-EV]Visit 1: Week 12295.921 ng/gStandard Deviation 199.4031
Test 1Summary of Urine 8-epi-prostaglandin F2alpha and Absolute Change From Baseline (ng/g) by Study Group and Visit From Week 1 to Week 24 (mITT Population) [ALCS-RA-17-11-EV]Change from Baseline (Week 12)-35.569 ng/gStandard Deviation 162.6996
Test 1Summary of Urine 8-epi-prostaglandin F2alpha and Absolute Change From Baseline (ng/g) by Study Group and Visit From Week 1 to Week 24 (mITT Population) [ALCS-RA-17-11-EV]Baseline: Week 1331.217 ng/gStandard Deviation 145.3767
Test 1Summary of Urine 8-epi-prostaglandin F2alpha and Absolute Change From Baseline (ng/g) by Study Group and Visit From Week 1 to Week 24 (mITT Population) [ALCS-RA-17-11-EV]Visit 5: Week 24305.481 ng/gStandard Deviation 310.8112
Test 1Summary of Urine 8-epi-prostaglandin F2alpha and Absolute Change From Baseline (ng/g) by Study Group and Visit From Week 1 to Week 24 (mITT Population) [ALCS-RA-17-11-EV]Visit 3: Week 18251.448 ng/gStandard Deviation 105.3359
Test 1Summary of Urine 8-epi-prostaglandin F2alpha and Absolute Change From Baseline (ng/g) by Study Group and Visit From Week 1 to Week 24 (mITT Population) [ALCS-RA-17-11-EV]Change from Baseline (Week 24)-32.869 ng/gStandard Deviation 328.5303
Test 2Summary of Urine 8-epi-prostaglandin F2alpha and Absolute Change From Baseline (ng/g) by Study Group and Visit From Week 1 to Week 24 (mITT Population) [ALCS-RA-17-11-EV]Visit 3: Week 18314.650 ng/gStandard Deviation 145.3787
Test 2Summary of Urine 8-epi-prostaglandin F2alpha and Absolute Change From Baseline (ng/g) by Study Group and Visit From Week 1 to Week 24 (mITT Population) [ALCS-RA-17-11-EV]Visit 5: Week 24331.678 ng/gStandard Deviation 190.5315
Test 2Summary of Urine 8-epi-prostaglandin F2alpha and Absolute Change From Baseline (ng/g) by Study Group and Visit From Week 1 to Week 24 (mITT Population) [ALCS-RA-17-11-EV]Baseline: Week 1359.269 ng/gStandard Deviation 204.436
Test 2Summary of Urine 8-epi-prostaglandin F2alpha and Absolute Change From Baseline (ng/g) by Study Group and Visit From Week 1 to Week 24 (mITT Population) [ALCS-RA-17-11-EV]Visit 1: Week 12337.996 ng/gStandard Deviation 138.6722
Test 2Summary of Urine 8-epi-prostaglandin F2alpha and Absolute Change From Baseline (ng/g) by Study Group and Visit From Week 1 to Week 24 (mITT Population) [ALCS-RA-17-11-EV]Change from Baseline (Week 24)-31.868 ng/gStandard Deviation 179.4879
Test 2Summary of Urine 8-epi-prostaglandin F2alpha and Absolute Change From Baseline (ng/g) by Study Group and Visit From Week 1 to Week 24 (mITT Population) [ALCS-RA-17-11-EV]Change from Baseline (Week 12)-21.273 ng/gStandard Deviation 159.7813
Test 2Summary of Urine 8-epi-prostaglandin F2alpha and Absolute Change From Baseline (ng/g) by Study Group and Visit From Week 1 to Week 24 (mITT Population) [ALCS-RA-17-11-EV]Change from Baseline (Week 18)-48.891 ng/gStandard Deviation 115.7881
Test 1 + Test 2 GroupSummary of Urine 8-epi-prostaglandin F2alpha and Absolute Change From Baseline (ng/g) by Study Group and Visit From Week 1 to Week 24 (mITT Population) [ALCS-RA-17-11-EV]Change from Baseline (Week 24)-32.335 ng/gStandard Deviation 258.3306
Test 1 + Test 2 GroupSummary of Urine 8-epi-prostaglandin F2alpha and Absolute Change From Baseline (ng/g) by Study Group and Visit From Week 1 to Week 24 (mITT Population) [ALCS-RA-17-11-EV]Baseline: Week 1345.677 ng/gStandard Deviation 177.9266
Test 1 + Test 2 GroupSummary of Urine 8-epi-prostaglandin F2alpha and Absolute Change From Baseline (ng/g) by Study Group and Visit From Week 1 to Week 24 (mITT Population) [ALCS-RA-17-11-EV]Visit 1: Week 12317.835 ng/gStandard Deviation 170.8786
Test 1 + Test 2 GroupSummary of Urine 8-epi-prostaglandin F2alpha and Absolute Change From Baseline (ng/g) by Study Group and Visit From Week 1 to Week 24 (mITT Population) [ALCS-RA-17-11-EV]Visit 3: Week 18285.922 ng/gStandard Deviation 131.884
Test 1 + Test 2 GroupSummary of Urine 8-epi-prostaglandin F2alpha and Absolute Change From Baseline (ng/g) by Study Group and Visit From Week 1 to Week 24 (mITT Population) [ALCS-RA-17-11-EV]Visit 5: Week 24319.453 ng/gStandard Deviation 252.6784
Test 1 + Test 2 GroupSummary of Urine 8-epi-prostaglandin F2alpha and Absolute Change From Baseline (ng/g) by Study Group and Visit From Week 1 to Week 24 (mITT Population) [ALCS-RA-17-11-EV]Change from Baseline (Week 12)-28.123 ng/gStandard Deviation 160.495
Test 1 + Test 2 GroupSummary of Urine 8-epi-prostaglandin F2alpha and Absolute Change From Baseline (ng/g) by Study Group and Visit From Week 1 to Week 24 (mITT Population) [ALCS-RA-17-11-EV]Change from Baseline (Week 18)-66.552 ng/gStandard Deviation 106.8853
ControlSummary of Urine 8-epi-prostaglandin F2alpha and Absolute Change From Baseline (ng/g) by Study Group and Visit From Week 1 to Week 24 (mITT Population) [ALCS-RA-17-11-EV]Visit 1: Week 12413.638 ng/gStandard Deviation 328.91
ControlSummary of Urine 8-epi-prostaglandin F2alpha and Absolute Change From Baseline (ng/g) by Study Group and Visit From Week 1 to Week 24 (mITT Population) [ALCS-RA-17-11-EV]Change from Baseline (Week 18)-20.874 ng/gStandard Deviation 255.5397
ControlSummary of Urine 8-epi-prostaglandin F2alpha and Absolute Change From Baseline (ng/g) by Study Group and Visit From Week 1 to Week 24 (mITT Population) [ALCS-RA-17-11-EV]Baseline: Week 1421.529 ng/gStandard Deviation 277.7803
ControlSummary of Urine 8-epi-prostaglandin F2alpha and Absolute Change From Baseline (ng/g) by Study Group and Visit From Week 1 to Week 24 (mITT Population) [ALCS-RA-17-11-EV]Change from Baseline (Week 24)-54.946 ng/gStandard Deviation 159.6202
ControlSummary of Urine 8-epi-prostaglandin F2alpha and Absolute Change From Baseline (ng/g) by Study Group and Visit From Week 1 to Week 24 (mITT Population) [ALCS-RA-17-11-EV]Change from Baseline (Week 12)-7.891 ng/gStandard Deviation 226.9262
ControlSummary of Urine 8-epi-prostaglandin F2alpha and Absolute Change From Baseline (ng/g) by Study Group and Visit From Week 1 to Week 24 (mITT Population) [ALCS-RA-17-11-EV]Visit 5: Week 24344.100 ng/gStandard Deviation 142.3191
ControlSummary of Urine 8-epi-prostaglandin F2alpha and Absolute Change From Baseline (ng/g) by Study Group and Visit From Week 1 to Week 24 (mITT Population) [ALCS-RA-17-11-EV]Visit 3: Week 18403.656 ng/gStandard Deviation 359.5415
Comparison: Null hypothesis: Absolute change from Baseline for Urine 8-epi-prostaglandin F2alpha (ng/g creatinine) in Test 1 is equal to zero on Visit 1 (Week 12), relative to the start of the 12-week ALCS-RA-16-06-EV study. Alternate hypothesis: Absolute change from Baseline (Week 1) for Urine 8-epi-prostaglandin F2alpha (ng/g creatinine) in Test 1 is NOT equal to zero on Visit 1 (Week 12), relative to the start of the 12-week ALCS-RA-16-06-EV study. (mITT Population)p-value: 0.135995% CI: [-93.12, 12.772]Mixed Models Analysis
Comparison: Null hypothesis: Absolute change from Baseline for Urine 8-epi-prostaglandin F2alpha (ng/g creatinine) in Test 1 is equal to zero on Visit 3 (Week 18), relative to the start of the 12-week ALCS-RA-16-06-EV study. Alternate hypothesis: Absolute change from Baseline (Week 1) for Urine 8-epi-prostaglandin F2alpha (ng/g creatinine) in Test 1 is NOT equal to zero on Visit 3 (Week 18), relative to the start of the 12-week ALCS-RA-16-06-EV study. (mITT Population)p-value: 0.012995% CI: [-127.961, -15.49]Mixed Models Analysis
Comparison: Null hypothesis: Absolute change from Baseline for Urine 8-epi-prostaglandin F2alpha (ng/g creatinine) in Test 1 is equal to zero on Visit 5 (Week 24), relative to the start of the 12-week ALCS-RA-16-06-EV study. Alternate hypothesis: Absolute change from Baseline (Week 1) for Urine 8-epi-prostaglandin F2alpha (ng/g creatinine) in Test 1 is NOT equal to zero on Visit 5 (Week 24), relative to the start of the 12-week ALCS-RA-16-06-EV study. (mITT Population)p-value: 0.326295% CI: [-112.293, 37.678]Mixed Models Analysis
Comparison: Null hypothesis: Absolute change from Baseline for Urine 8-epi-prostaglandin F2alpha (ng/g creatinine) in Test 2 is equal to zero on Visit 1 (Week 12), relative to the start of the 12-week ALCS-RA-16-06-EV study. Alternate hypothesis: Absolute change from Baseline (Week 1) for Urine 8-epi-prostaglandin F2alpha (ng/g creatinine) in Test 2 is NOT equal to zero on Visit 1 (Week 12), relative to the start of the 12-week ALCS-RA-16-06-EV study. (mITT Population)p-value: 0.434395% CI: [-70.468, 30.444]Mixed Models Analysis
Comparison: Null hypothesis: Absolute change from Baseline for Urine 8-epi-prostaglandin F2alpha (ng/g creatinine) in Test 2 is equal to zero on Visit 3 (Week 18), relative to the start of the 12-week ALCS-RA-16-06-EV study. Alternate hypothesis: Absolute change from Baseline (Week 1) for Urine 8-epi-prostaglandin F2alpha (ng/g creatinine) in Test 2 is NOT equal to zero on Visit 3 (Week 18), relative to the start of the 12-week ALCS-RA-16-06-EV study. (mITT Population)p-value: 0.096795% CI: [-97.481, 8.167]Mixed Models Analysis
Comparison: Null hypothesis: Absolute change from Baseline for Urine 8-epi-prostaglandin F2alpha (ng/g creatinine) in Test2 is equal to zero on Visit 5 (Week 24), relative to the start of the 12-week ALCS-RA-16-06-EV study. Alternate hypothesis: Absolute change from Baseline (Week 1) for Urine 8-epi-prostaglandin F2alpha (ng/g creatinine) in Test2 is NOT equal to zero on Visit 5 (Week 24), relative to the start of the 12-week ALCS-RA-16-06-EV study. (mITT Population)p-value: 0.419895% CI: [-99.915, 41.966]Mixed Models Analysis
Comparison: Null hypothesis: Absolute change from Baseline for Urine 8-epi-prostaglandin F2alpha (ng/g creatinine) in Test 1 + Test 2 is equal to zero on Visit 5 (Week 24), relative to the start of the 12-week ALCS-RA-16-06-EV study. Alternate hypothesis: Absolute change from Baseline (Week 1) for Urine 8-epi-prostaglandin F2alpha (ng/g creatinine) in Test 1 + Test 2 is NOT equal to zero on Visit 5 (Week 24), relative to the start of the 12-week ALCS-RA-16-06-EV study. (mITT Population)p-value: 0.212195% CI: [-85.475, 19.193]Mixed Models Analysis
Comparison: Null hypothesis: Absolute change from Baseline for Urine 8-epi-prostaglandin F2alpha (ng/g creatinine) in Control is equal to zero on Visit 1 (Week 12), relative to the start of the 12-week ALCS-RA-16-06-EV study. Alternate hypothesis: Absolute change from Baseline (Week 1) for Urine 8-epi-prostaglandin F2alpha (ng/g creatinine) in Control is NOT equal to zero on Visit 1 (Week 12), relative to the start of the 12-week ALCS-RA-16-06-EV study. (mITT Population)p-value: 0.544595% CI: [-35.614, 67.212]Mixed Models Analysis
Comparison: Null hypothesis: Absolute change from Baseline for Urine 8-epi-prostaglandin F2alpha (ng/g creatinine) in Control is equal to zero on Visit 3 (Week 18), relative to the start of the 12-week ALCS-RA-16-06-EV study. Alternate hypothesis: Absolute change from Baseline (Week 1) for Urine 8-epi-prostaglandin F2alpha (ng/g creatinine) in Control is NOT equal to zero on Visit 3 (Week 18), relative to the start of the 12-week ALCS-RA-16-06-EV study. (mITT Population)p-value: 0.953495% CI: [-51.951, 55.116]Mixed Models Analysis
Comparison: Null hypothesis: Absolute change from Baseline for Urine 8-epi-prostaglandin F2alpha (ng/g creatinine) in Control is equal to zero on Visit 5 (Week 24), relative to the start of the 12-week ALCS-RA-16-06-EV study. Alternate hypothesis: Absolute change from Baseline (Week 1) for Urine 8-epi-prostaglandin F2alpha (ng/g creatinine) in Control is NOT equal to zero on Visit 5 (Week 24), relative to the start of the 12-week ALCS-RA-16-06-EV study. (mITT Population)p-value: 0.836695% CI: [-65.126, 80.295]Mixed Models Analysis
Comparison: Null hypothesis: Absolute change from Baseline for Urine 8-epi-prostaglandin F2alpha (ng/g creatinine) in Test 1 is equal to Control on Visit 1 (Week 12), relative to the start of the 12-week ALCS-RA-16-06-EV study. Alternate hypothesis: Absolute change from Baseline (Week 1) for Urine 8-epi-prostaglandin F2alpha (ng/g creatinine) in Test 1 is NOT equal to Control on Visit 1 (Week 12), relative to the start of the 12-week ALCS-RA-16-06-EV study. (mITT Population)p-value: 0.543795% CI: [-154.862, 42.916]Mixed Models Analysis
Comparison: Null hypothesis: Absolute change from Baseline for Urine 8-epi-prostaglandin F2alpha (ng/g creatinine) in Test 1 is equal to Control on Visit 3 (Week 18), relative to the start of the 12-week ALCS-RA-16-06-EV study. Alternate hypothesis: Absolute change from Baseline (Week 1) for Urine 8-epi-prostaglandin F2alpha (ng/g creatinine) in Test 1 is NOT equal to Control on Visit 3 (Week 18), relative to the start of the 12-week ALCS-RA-16-06-EV study. (mITT Population)p-value: 0.297495% CI: [-177.224, 30.608]Mixed Models Analysis
Comparison: Null hypothesis: Absolute change from Baseline for Urine 8-epi-prostaglandin F2alpha (ng/g creatinine) in Test 1 is equal to Control on Visit 5 (Week 24), relative to the start of the 12-week ALCS-RA-16-06-EV study. Alternate hypothesis: Absolute change from Baseline (Week 1) for Urine 8-epi-prostaglandin F2alpha (ng/g creatinine) in Test 1 is NOT equal to Control on Visit 5 (Week 24), relative to the start of the 12-week ALCS-RA-16-06-EV study. (mITT Population)p-value: 0.902695% CI: [-181.909, 92.126]Mixed Models Analysis
Comparison: Null hypothesis: Absolute change from Baseline for Urine 8-epi-prostaglandin F2alpha (ng/g creatinine) in Test 2 is equal to Control on Visit 1 (Week 12), relative to the start of the 12-week ALCS-RA-16-06-EV study. Alternate hypothesis: Absolute change from Baseline (Week 1) for Urine 8-epi-prostaglandin F2alpha (ng/g creatinine) in Test 2 is NOT equal to Control on Visit 1 (Week 12), relative to the start of the 12-week ALCS-RA-16-06-EV study. (mITT Population)p-value: 0.895495% CI: [-132.513, 60.891]Mixed Models Analysis
Comparison: Null hypothesis: Absolute change from Baseline for Urine 8-epi-prostaglandin F2alpha (ng/g creatinine) in Test 2 is equal to Control on Visit 3 (Week 18), relative to the start of the 12-week ALCS-RA-16-06-EV study. Alternate hypothesis: Absolute change from Baseline (Week 1) for Urine 8-epi-prostaglandin F2alpha (ng/g creatinine) in Test 2 is NOT equal to Control on Visit 3 (Week 18), relative to the start of the 12-week ALCS-RA-16-06-EV study. (mITT Population)p-value: 0.748595% CI: [-146.766, 54.288]Mixed Models Analysis
Comparison: Null hypothesis: Absolute change from Baseline for Urine 8-epi-prostaglandin F2alpha (ng/g creatinine) in Test 2 is equal to Control on Visit 5 (Week 24), relative to the start of the 12-week ALCS-RA-16-06-EV study. Alternate hypothesis: Absolute change from Baseline (Week 1) for Urine 8-epi-prostaglandin F2alpha (ng/g creatinine) in Test 2 is NOT equal to Control on Visit 5 (Week 24), relative to the start of the 12-week ALCS-RA-16-06-EV study. (mITT Population)p-value: 0.957895% CI: [-169.77, 96.653]Mixed Models Analysis
Comparison: Null hypothesis: Absolute change from Baseline for Urine 8-epi-prostaglandin F2alpha (ng/g creatinine) in Test 1 + Test 2 is equal to Control on Visit 5 (Week 24), relative to the start of the 12-week ALCS-RA-16-06-EV study. Alternate hypothesis: Absolute change from Baseline (Week 1) for Urine 8-epi-prostaglandin F2alpha (ng/g creatinine) in Test 1 + Test 2 is NOT equal to Control on Visit 5 (Week 24), relative to the start of the 12-week ALCS-RA-16-06-EV study. (mITT Population)p-value: 0.363595% CI: [-129.208, 47.757]Mixed Models Analysis
Comparison: Null hypothesis: Absolute change from Baseline for Urine 8-epi-prostaglandin F2alpha (ng/g creatinine) in Test 2 is equal to Test 1 on Visit 5 (Week 24), relative to the start of the 12-week ALCS-RA-16-06-EV study. Alternate hypothesis: Absolute change from Baseline (Week 1) for Urine 8-epi-prostaglandin F2alpha (ng/g creatinine) in Test 2 is NOT equal to Test 1 on Visit 5 (Week 24), relative to the start of the 12-week ALCS-RA-16-06-EV study. (mITT Population)p-value: 0.871395% CI: [-110.097, 93.431]Mixed Models Analysis
Primary

Summary of Urine Total NNAL Absolute Change From Baseline (ng/g) by Study Group From Week 1 to Week 12 (mITT Population With Outliers Excluded) [ALCS-RA-16-06-EV]

Summary of urine total NNAL absolute change from Baseline in Week 12 is presented (Study ALCS-RA-16-06-EV). The first urine void of the day on Visits 3 and 7 was analyzed for the urine biomarker. Data outliers were examined through Proc Mixed model residual diagnosis (+/- 4 studentized residuals). A sensitivity analysis excluding outliers was performed for Visit 7 (Week 12). Urine creatinine concentration was measured in the urine collection and used to adjust the urine biomarker concentration value as follows: Urine biomarker (ng/g creatinine) = urine biomarker (pg/mL) x 100 / creatinine (mg/dL) Absolute change from baseline = Post Product Use Value - Baseline Value Baseline / Visit 3 (Week 1) = Day 1 Visit 7 (Week 12) = Day 84 ± 3

Time frame: Week 1 (Baseline) and Week 12 for a total of of 12 weeks from randomization

Population: Modified ITT Population with Outliers Excluded: All subjects were randomized according to the randomization schedule; who used at least one study products after randomization was recorded and for whom there was a valid (within ±3 days of the planned measurement day) baseline and at least one post-baseline biomarker. Data outliers, defined as any observation with a studentized residual that is greater than +/- 4, were excluded from the analysis.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Test 1Summary of Urine Total NNAL Absolute Change From Baseline (ng/g) by Study Group From Week 1 to Week 12 (mITT Population With Outliers Excluded) [ALCS-RA-16-06-EV]-191.327 ng/gStandard Deviation 220.6982
Test 2Summary of Urine Total NNAL Absolute Change From Baseline (ng/g) by Study Group From Week 1 to Week 12 (mITT Population With Outliers Excluded) [ALCS-RA-16-06-EV]-160.201 ng/gStandard Deviation 192.1456
Test 1 + Test 2 GroupSummary of Urine Total NNAL Absolute Change From Baseline (ng/g) by Study Group From Week 1 to Week 12 (mITT Population With Outliers Excluded) [ALCS-RA-16-06-EV]-15.898 ng/gStandard Deviation 149.1447
Comparison: Null hypothesis: Absolute change from Baseline (Week 1) for Urine Total NNAL (ng/g creatinine) in Test 1 is equal to Control on Visit 7 (Week 12). Alternate hypothesis: Absolute change from Baseline (Week 1) for Urine Total NNAL (ng/g creatinine) in Test 1 is NOT equal to Control on Visit 7 (Week 12). (mITT Population)p-value: <0.000195% CI: [-225.708, -133.022]Mixed Models Analysis
Comparison: Null hypothesis: Absolute change from Baseline (Week 1) for Urine Total NNAL (ng/g creatinine) in Test 2 is equal to Control on Visit 7 (Week 12). Alternate hypothesis: Absolute change from Baseline (Week 1) for Urine Total NNAL (ng/g creatinine) in Test 2 is NOT equal to Control on Visit 7 (Week 12). (mITT Population)p-value: <0.000195% CI: [-198.93, -107.509]Mixed Models Analysis
Primary

Summary of Urine Total NNAL and Absolute Change From Baseline (ng/g) by Study Group and Visit From Week 1 to Week 12 (mITT Population) [ALCS-RA-16-06-EV]

Summary of urine total 4-(methylnitrosamino)-1-(3-pyridyl)-1-butanol (NNAL) (ng/g) and absolute change from Baseline in Weeks 6 and 12 are presented (Study ALCS-RA-16-06-EV). Baseline / Visit 3 (Week 1) = Day 1 Visit 5 (Week 6) = Day 42 ± 3 Visit 7 (Week 12) = Day 84 ± 3 The first urine void of the day was collected at Visits 3, 5 and 7. Urine creatinine concentration was measured in the urine collection and used to adjust the urine biomarker concentration values as follows: Urine biomarker (ng/g creatinine) = urine biomarker (pg/mL) x 100 / creatinine (mg/dL) Absolute change from baseline = Post Product Use Value - Baseline Value

Time frame: 12 weeks total with measurement timepoints at Week 1/Baseline, Week 6 and Week 12

Population: Modified Intention-to-Treat (mITT): All subjects were randomized according to the randomization schedule; who used at least one study products after randomization was recorded and for whom there was a valid (within ±3 days of the planned measurement day) baseline and at least one post-baseline biomarker.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Test 1Summary of Urine Total NNAL and Absolute Change From Baseline (ng/g) by Study Group and Visit From Week 1 to Week 12 (mITT Population) [ALCS-RA-16-06-EV]Change from Baseline (Week 6)-180.390 ng/gStandard Deviation 206.3278
Test 1Summary of Urine Total NNAL and Absolute Change From Baseline (ng/g) by Study Group and Visit From Week 1 to Week 12 (mITT Population) [ALCS-RA-16-06-EV]Visit 5: Week 6127.254 ng/gStandard Deviation 191.0786
Test 1Summary of Urine Total NNAL and Absolute Change From Baseline (ng/g) by Study Group and Visit From Week 1 to Week 12 (mITT Population) [ALCS-RA-16-06-EV]Change from Baseline (Week 12)-191.327 ng/gStandard Deviation 220.6982
Test 1Summary of Urine Total NNAL and Absolute Change From Baseline (ng/g) by Study Group and Visit From Week 1 to Week 12 (mITT Population) [ALCS-RA-16-06-EV]Visit 7: Week 12101.544 ng/gStandard Deviation 146.4668
Test 1Summary of Urine Total NNAL and Absolute Change From Baseline (ng/g) by Study Group and Visit From Week 1 to Week 12 (mITT Population) [ALCS-RA-16-06-EV]Visit 3 (Baseline): Week 1309.098 ng/gStandard Deviation 253.5221
Test 2Summary of Urine Total NNAL and Absolute Change From Baseline (ng/g) by Study Group and Visit From Week 1 to Week 12 (mITT Population) [ALCS-RA-16-06-EV]Visit 7: Week 12124.000 ng/gStandard Deviation 163.0721
Test 2Summary of Urine Total NNAL and Absolute Change From Baseline (ng/g) by Study Group and Visit From Week 1 to Week 12 (mITT Population) [ALCS-RA-16-06-EV]Change from Baseline (Week 6)-173.299 ng/gStandard Deviation 186.803
Test 2Summary of Urine Total NNAL and Absolute Change From Baseline (ng/g) by Study Group and Visit From Week 1 to Week 12 (mITT Population) [ALCS-RA-16-06-EV]Change from Baseline (Week 12)-160.201 ng/gStandard Deviation 192.1456
Test 2Summary of Urine Total NNAL and Absolute Change From Baseline (ng/g) by Study Group and Visit From Week 1 to Week 12 (mITT Population) [ALCS-RA-16-06-EV]Visit 5: Week 6120.568 ng/gStandard Deviation 157.7745
Test 2Summary of Urine Total NNAL and Absolute Change From Baseline (ng/g) by Study Group and Visit From Week 1 to Week 12 (mITT Population) [ALCS-RA-16-06-EV]Visit 3 (Baseline): Week 1294.831 ng/gStandard Deviation 212.1778
Test 1 + Test 2 GroupSummary of Urine Total NNAL and Absolute Change From Baseline (ng/g) by Study Group and Visit From Week 1 to Week 12 (mITT Population) [ALCS-RA-16-06-EV]Visit 7: Week 12113.159 ng/gStandard Deviation 155.3513
Test 1 + Test 2 GroupSummary of Urine Total NNAL and Absolute Change From Baseline (ng/g) by Study Group and Visit From Week 1 to Week 12 (mITT Population) [ALCS-RA-16-06-EV]Visit 3 (Baseline): Week 1301.854 ng/gStandard Deviation 233.0988
Test 1 + Test 2 GroupSummary of Urine Total NNAL and Absolute Change From Baseline (ng/g) by Study Group and Visit From Week 1 to Week 12 (mITT Population) [ALCS-RA-16-06-EV]Visit 5: Week 6123.925 ng/gStandard Deviation 174.9627
Test 1 + Test 2 GroupSummary of Urine Total NNAL and Absolute Change From Baseline (ng/g) by Study Group and Visit From Week 1 to Week 12 (mITT Population) [ALCS-RA-16-06-EV]Change from Baseline (Week 6)-176.859 ng/gStandard Deviation 196.4791
Test 1 + Test 2 GroupSummary of Urine Total NNAL and Absolute Change From Baseline (ng/g) by Study Group and Visit From Week 1 to Week 12 (mITT Population) [ALCS-RA-16-06-EV]Change from Baseline (Week 12)-175.228 ng/gStandard Deviation 206.5607
ControlSummary of Urine Total NNAL and Absolute Change From Baseline (ng/g) by Study Group and Visit From Week 1 to Week 12 (mITT Population) [ALCS-RA-16-06-EV]Change from Baseline (Week 6)-8.733 ng/gStandard Deviation 140.9375
ControlSummary of Urine Total NNAL and Absolute Change From Baseline (ng/g) by Study Group and Visit From Week 1 to Week 12 (mITT Population) [ALCS-RA-16-06-EV]Visit 5: Week 6308.521 ng/gStandard Deviation 220.7403
ControlSummary of Urine Total NNAL and Absolute Change From Baseline (ng/g) by Study Group and Visit From Week 1 to Week 12 (mITT Population) [ALCS-RA-16-06-EV]Visit 3 (Baseline): Week 1311.851 ng/gStandard Deviation 245.2203
ControlSummary of Urine Total NNAL and Absolute Change From Baseline (ng/g) by Study Group and Visit From Week 1 to Week 12 (mITT Population) [ALCS-RA-16-06-EV]Visit 7: Week 12300.819 ng/gStandard Deviation 217.6292
ControlSummary of Urine Total NNAL and Absolute Change From Baseline (ng/g) by Study Group and Visit From Week 1 to Week 12 (mITT Population) [ALCS-RA-16-06-EV]Change from Baseline (Week 12)-15.898 ng/gStandard Deviation 149.1447
Comparison: Null hypothesis: Absolute change from Baseline (Week 1) for Urine Total NNAL (ng/g) in Test 1 is equal to zero on Visit 5 (Week 6). Alternate hypothesis: Absolute change from Baseline (Week 1) for Urine Total NNAL (ng/g) in Test 1 is NOT equal to zero on Visit 5 (Week 6). (mITT Population)p-value: <0.000195% CI: [-204.899, -152.678]Mixed Models Analysis
Comparison: Null hypothesis: Absolute change from Baseline (Week 1) for Urine Total NNAL (ng/g) in Test 1 is equal to zero on Visit 7 (Week 12). Alternate hypothesis: Absolute change from Baseline (Week 1) for Urine Total NNAL (ng/g) in Test 1 is NOT equal to zero on Visit 7 (Week 12). (mITT Population)p-value: <0.000195% CI: [-211.184, -157.598]Mixed Models Analysis
Comparison: Null hypothesis: Absolute change from Baseline (Week 1) for Urine Total NNAL (ng/g) in Test 2 is equal to zero on Visit 5 (Week 6). Alternate hypothesis: Absolute change from Baseline (Week 1) for Urine Total NNAL (ng/g) in Test 2 is NOT equal to zero on Visit 5 (Week 6). (mITT Population)p-value: <0.000195% CI: [-200.964, -149.237]Mixed Models Analysis
Comparison: Null hypothesis: Absolute change from Baseline (Week 1) for Urine Total NNAL (ng/g) in Test 2 is equal to zero on Visit 7 (Week 12). Alternate hypothesis: Absolute change from Baseline (Week 1) for Urine Total NNAL (ng/g) in Test 2 is NOT equal to zero on Visit 7 (Week 12). (mITT Population)p-value: <0.000195% CI: [-187.543, -135.609]Mixed Models Analysis
Comparison: Null hypothesis: Absolute change from Baseline (Week 1) for Urine Total NNAL (ng/g) in Test 1 + Test 2 is equal to zero on Visit 7 (Week 12). Alternate hypothesis: Absolute change from Baseline (Week 1) for Urine Total NNAL (ng/g) in Test 1 + Test 2 is NOT equal to zero on Visit 7 (Week 12). (mITT Population)p-value: <0.000195% CI: [-192.08, -153.886]Mixed Models Analysis
Comparison: Null hypothesis: Absolute change from Baseline (Week 1) for Urine Total NNAL (ng/g) in Control is equal to zero on Visit 5 (Week 6). Alternate hypothesis: Absolute change from Baseline (Week 1) for Urine Total NNAL (ng/g) in Control is NOT equal to zero on Visit 5 (Week 6). (mITT Population)p-value: 0.778195% CI: [-28.572, 21.401]Mixed Models Analysis
Comparison: Null hypothesis: Absolute change from Baseline (Week 1) for Urine Total NNAL (ng/g) in Control is equal to zero on Visit 7 (Week 12). Alternate hypothesis: Absolute change from Baseline (Week 1) for Urine Total NNAL (ng/g) in Control is NOT equal to zero on Visit 7 (Week 12). (mITT Population)p-value: 0.545795% CI: [-32.993, 17.465]Mixed Models Analysis
Comparison: Null hypothesis: Absolute change from Baseline (Week 1) for Urine Total NNAL (ng/g) in Test 1 is equal to Control on Visit 5 (Week 6). Alternate hypothesis: Absolute change from Baseline (Week 1) for Urine Total NNAL (ng/g) in Test 1 is NOT equal to Control on Visit 5 (Week 6). (mITT Population)p-value: <0.000195% CI: [-220.445, -129.961]Mixed Models Analysis
Comparison: Null hypothesis: Absolute change from Baseline (Week 1) for Urine Total NNAL (ng/g) in Test 1 is equal to Control on Visit 7 (Week 12). Alternate hypothesis: Absolute change from Baseline (Week 1) for Urine Total NNAL (ng/g) in Test 1 is NOT equal to Control on Visit 7 (Week 12). (mITT Population)p-value: <0.000195% CI: [-222.672, -130.582]Mixed Models Analysis
Comparison: Null hypothesis: Absolute change from Baseline (Week 1) for Urine Total NNAL (ng/g) in Test 2 is equal to Control on Visit 5 (Week 6). Alternate hypothesis: Absolute change from Baseline (Week 1) for Urine Total NNAL (ng/g) in Test 2 is NOT equal to Control on Visit 5 (Week 6). (mITT Population)p-value: <0.000195% CI: [-216.626, -126.404]Mixed Models Analysis
Comparison: Null hypothesis: Absolute change from Baseline (Week 1) for Urine Total NNAL (ng/g) in Test 2 is equal to Control on Visit 7 (Week 12). Alternate hypothesis: Absolute change from Baseline (Week 1) for Urine Total NNAL (ng/g) in Test 2 is NOT equal to Control on Visit 7 (Week 12). (mITT Population)p-value: <0.000195% CI: [-199.27, -108.354]Mixed Models Analysis
Comparison: Null hypothesis: Absolute change from Baseline (Week 1) for Urine Total NNAL (ng/g) in Test 1 + Test 2 is equal to Control on Visit 7 (Week 12). Alternate hypothesis: Absolute change from Baseline (Week 1) for Urine Total NNAL (ng/g) in Test 1 + Test 2 is NOT equal to Control on Visit 7 (Week 12). (mITT Population)p-value: <0.000195% CI: [-195.898, -134.541]Mixed Models Analysis
Comparison: Null hypothesis: Absolute change from Baseline (Week 1) for Urine Total NNAL (ng/g) in Test 1 is equal to Test 2 on Visit 7 (Week 12). Alternate hypothesis: Absolute change from Baseline (Week 1) for Urine Total NNAL (ng/g) in Test 1 is NOT equal to Test 2 on Visit 7 (Week 12). (mITT Population)p-value: 0.218895% CI: [-59.223, 13.593]Mixed Models Analysis
Primary

Summary of Urine Total NNAL and Absolute Change From Baseline (ng/g) by Study Group and Visit From Week 1 to Week 24 (mITT Population) [ALCS-RA-17-11-EV]

Summary of Urine Total NNAL (ng/g) and absolute change from Baseline in Weeks 12, 18 and 24 are presented (Study ALCS-RA-17-11-EV). The first urine void of the day was collected at Visits 1, 3 and 5 of the ALCS-RA-17-11-EV study. Baseline samples were collected Week 1 of the ALCS-RA-16-06-EV study. Urine creatinine concentration was measured in the urine collection and used to adjust the urine biomarker concentration value as follows: Urine biomarker (ng/g creatinine) = urine biomarker (pg/mL) x 100 / creatinine (mg/dL) Change from Baseline was calculated as follows: Absolute change from baseline = Post Product Use Value - Baseline Value, where Baseline = values reported on Day 1 (Week 1) of the 12-week ALCS-RA-16-06-EV study Baseline = Day 1 (Week 1), Visit 1 = Week 12 (Day 84 ± 3), Visit 3 = Week 18 (Day 126 ± 3), and Visit 5 = Week 24 (Day 168 ± 3), relative to the start of the 12-week ALCS-RA-16-06-EV study

Time frame: 24 weeks total with measurement timepoints at Week 1/Baseline [ALCS-RA-16-06-EV study]), and Week 12, Week 18 and Week 24 [ALCS-RA-17-11-EV study]

Population: Modified ITT: All subjects were randomized according to the randomization schedule; who used at least one study products after randomization was recorded and for whom there was a valid (within ±3 days of the planned measurement day) baseline and at least one post-baseline biomarker.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Test 1Summary of Urine Total NNAL and Absolute Change From Baseline (ng/g) by Study Group and Visit From Week 1 to Week 24 (mITT Population) [ALCS-RA-17-11-EV]Baseline: Week 1258.644 ng/gStandard Deviation 190.1771
Test 1Summary of Urine Total NNAL and Absolute Change From Baseline (ng/g) by Study Group and Visit From Week 1 to Week 24 (mITT Population) [ALCS-RA-17-11-EV]Change from Baseline (Week 18)-222.851 ng/gStandard Deviation 172.2263
Test 1Summary of Urine Total NNAL and Absolute Change From Baseline (ng/g) by Study Group and Visit From Week 1 to Week 24 (mITT Population) [ALCS-RA-17-11-EV]Change from Baseline (Week 12)-221.403 ng/gStandard Deviation 177.5875
Test 1Summary of Urine Total NNAL and Absolute Change From Baseline (ng/g) by Study Group and Visit From Week 1 to Week 24 (mITT Population) [ALCS-RA-17-11-EV]Visit 1: Week 1237.240 ng/gStandard Deviation 74.0723
Test 1Summary of Urine Total NNAL and Absolute Change From Baseline (ng/g) by Study Group and Visit From Week 1 to Week 24 (mITT Population) [ALCS-RA-17-11-EV]Change from Baseline (Week 24)-218.417 ng/gStandard Deviation 171.7527
Test 1Summary of Urine Total NNAL and Absolute Change From Baseline (ng/g) by Study Group and Visit From Week 1 to Week 24 (mITT Population) [ALCS-RA-17-11-EV]Visit 3: Week 1834.715 ng/gStandard Deviation 73.2359
Test 1Summary of Urine Total NNAL and Absolute Change From Baseline (ng/g) by Study Group and Visit From Week 1 to Week 24 (mITT Population) [ALCS-RA-17-11-EV]Visit 5: Week 2440.991 ng/gStandard Deviation 80.9328
Test 2Summary of Urine Total NNAL and Absolute Change From Baseline (ng/g) by Study Group and Visit From Week 1 to Week 24 (mITT Population) [ALCS-RA-17-11-EV]Change from Baseline (Week 18)-234.967 ng/gStandard Deviation 198.3954
Test 2Summary of Urine Total NNAL and Absolute Change From Baseline (ng/g) by Study Group and Visit From Week 1 to Week 24 (mITT Population) [ALCS-RA-17-11-EV]Visit 5: Week 2480.808 ng/gStandard Deviation 174.5894
Test 2Summary of Urine Total NNAL and Absolute Change From Baseline (ng/g) by Study Group and Visit From Week 1 to Week 24 (mITT Population) [ALCS-RA-17-11-EV]Visit 3: Week 1856.986 ng/gStandard Deviation 110.8673
Test 2Summary of Urine Total NNAL and Absolute Change From Baseline (ng/g) by Study Group and Visit From Week 1 to Week 24 (mITT Population) [ALCS-RA-17-11-EV]Change from Baseline (Week 12)-228.678 ng/gStandard Deviation 187.6797
Test 2Summary of Urine Total NNAL and Absolute Change From Baseline (ng/g) by Study Group and Visit From Week 1 to Week 24 (mITT Population) [ALCS-RA-17-11-EV]Change from Baseline (Week 24)-215.432 ng/gStandard Deviation 213.0743
Test 2Summary of Urine Total NNAL and Absolute Change From Baseline (ng/g) by Study Group and Visit From Week 1 to Week 24 (mITT Population) [ALCS-RA-17-11-EV]Visit 1: Week 1265.631 ng/gStandard Deviation 105.4324
Test 2Summary of Urine Total NNAL and Absolute Change From Baseline (ng/g) by Study Group and Visit From Week 1 to Week 24 (mITT Population) [ALCS-RA-17-11-EV]Baseline: Week 1294.309 ng/gStandard Deviation 217.0554
Test 1 + Test 2 GroupSummary of Urine Total NNAL and Absolute Change From Baseline (ng/g) by Study Group and Visit From Week 1 to Week 24 (mITT Population) [ALCS-RA-17-11-EV]Visit 5: Week 2462.227 ng/gStandard Deviation 139.6906
Test 1 + Test 2 GroupSummary of Urine Total NNAL and Absolute Change From Baseline (ng/g) by Study Group and Visit From Week 1 to Week 24 (mITT Population) [ALCS-RA-17-11-EV]Baseline: Week 1277.028 ng/gStandard Deviation 204.202
Test 1 + Test 2 GroupSummary of Urine Total NNAL and Absolute Change From Baseline (ng/g) by Study Group and Visit From Week 1 to Week 24 (mITT Population) [ALCS-RA-17-11-EV]Visit 1: Week 1251.875 ng/gStandard Deviation 92.2293
Test 1 + Test 2 GroupSummary of Urine Total NNAL and Absolute Change From Baseline (ng/g) by Study Group and Visit From Week 1 to Week 24 (mITT Population) [ALCS-RA-17-11-EV]Visit 3: Week 1846.863 ng/gStandard Deviation 95.7548
Test 1 + Test 2 GroupSummary of Urine Total NNAL and Absolute Change From Baseline (ng/g) by Study Group and Visit From Week 1 to Week 24 (mITT Population) [ALCS-RA-17-11-EV]Change from Baseline (Week 12)-225.153 ng/gStandard Deviation 181.9443
Test 1 + Test 2 GroupSummary of Urine Total NNAL and Absolute Change From Baseline (ng/g) by Study Group and Visit From Week 1 to Week 24 (mITT Population) [ALCS-RA-17-11-EV]Change from Baseline (Week 18)-229.460 ng/gStandard Deviation 186.0037
Test 1 + Test 2 GroupSummary of Urine Total NNAL and Absolute Change From Baseline (ng/g) by Study Group and Visit From Week 1 to Week 24 (mITT Population) [ALCS-RA-17-11-EV]Change from Baseline (Week 24)-216.825 ng/gStandard Deviation 193.8228
ControlSummary of Urine Total NNAL and Absolute Change From Baseline (ng/g) by Study Group and Visit From Week 1 to Week 24 (mITT Population) [ALCS-RA-17-11-EV]Visit 3: Week 18294.906 ng/gStandard Deviation 194.0554
ControlSummary of Urine Total NNAL and Absolute Change From Baseline (ng/g) by Study Group and Visit From Week 1 to Week 24 (mITT Population) [ALCS-RA-17-11-EV]Change from Baseline (Week 24)-85.075 ng/gStandard Deviation 134.0116
ControlSummary of Urine Total NNAL and Absolute Change From Baseline (ng/g) by Study Group and Visit From Week 1 to Week 24 (mITT Population) [ALCS-RA-17-11-EV]Change from Baseline (Week 18)-78.423 ng/gStandard Deviation 149.1454
ControlSummary of Urine Total NNAL and Absolute Change From Baseline (ng/g) by Study Group and Visit From Week 1 to Week 24 (mITT Population) [ALCS-RA-17-11-EV]Visit 1: Week 12357.472 ng/gStandard Deviation 261.5709
ControlSummary of Urine Total NNAL and Absolute Change From Baseline (ng/g) by Study Group and Visit From Week 1 to Week 24 (mITT Population) [ALCS-RA-17-11-EV]Baseline: Week 1368.502 ng/gStandard Deviation 255.5299
ControlSummary of Urine Total NNAL and Absolute Change From Baseline (ng/g) by Study Group and Visit From Week 1 to Week 24 (mITT Population) [ALCS-RA-17-11-EV]Change from Baseline (Week 12)-11.030 ng/gStandard Deviation 130.5603
ControlSummary of Urine Total NNAL and Absolute Change From Baseline (ng/g) by Study Group and Visit From Week 1 to Week 24 (mITT Population) [ALCS-RA-17-11-EV]Visit 5: Week 24274.912 ng/gStandard Deviation 186.7002
Comparison: Null hypothesis: Absolute change from Baseline for Urine Total NNAL (ng/g creatinine) in Test 1 is equal to zero on Visit 1 (Week 12), relative to the start of the 12-week ALCS-RA-16-06-EV study. Alternate hypothesis: Absolute change from Baseline (Week 1) for Urine Total NNAL (ng/g creatinine) in Test 1 is NOT equal to zero on Visit 1 (Week 12), relative to the start of the 12-week ALCS-RA-16-06-EV study. (mITT Population)p-value: <0.000195% CI: [-286.423, -210.199]Mixed Models Analysis
Comparison: Null hypothesis: Absolute change from Baseline for Urine Total NNAL (ng/g creatinine) in Test 1 is equal to zero on Visit 3 (Week 18), relative to the start of the 12-week ALCS-RA-16-06-EV study. Alternate hypothesis: Absolute change from Baseline (Week 1) for Urine Total NNAL (ng/g creatinine) in Test 1 is NOT equal to zero on Visit 3 (Week 18), relative to the start of the 12-week ALCS-RA-16-06-EV study. (mITT Population)p-value: <0.000195% CI: [-280.904, -214.241]Mixed Models Analysis
Comparison: Null hypothesis: Absolute change from Baseline for Urine Total NNAL (ng/g creatinine) in Test 1 is equal to zero on Visit 5 (Week 24), relative to the start of the 12-week ALCS-RA-16-06-EV study. Alternate hypothesis: Absolute change from Baseline (Week 1) for Urine Total NNAL (ng/g creatinine) in Test 1 is NOT equal to zero on Visit 5 (Week 24), relative to the start of the 12-week ALCS-RA-16-06-EV study. (mITT Population)p-value: <0.000195% CI: [-284.945, -206.791]Mixed Models Analysis
Comparison: Null hypothesis: Absolute change from Baseline for Urine Total NNAL (ng/g creatinine) in Test 2 is equal to zero on Visit 1 (Week 12), relative to the start of the 12-week ALCS-RA-16-06-EV study. Alternate hypothesis: Absolute change from Baseline (Week 1) for Urine Total NNAL (ng/g creatinine) in Test 2 is NOT equal to zero on Visit 1 (Week 12), relative to the start of the 12-week ALCS-RA-16-06-EV study. (mITT Population)p-value: <0.000195% CI: [-271.603, -198.282]Mixed Models Analysis
Comparison: Null hypothesis: Absolute change from Baseline for Urine Total NNAL (ng/g creatinine) in Test 2 is equal to zero on Visit 3 (Week 18), relative to the start of the 12-week ALCS-RA-16-06-EV study. Alternate hypothesis: Absolute change from Baseline (Week 1) for Urine Total NNAL (ng/g creatinine) in Test 2 is NOT equal to zero on Visit 3 (Week 18), relative to the start of the 12-week ALCS-RA-16-06-EV study. (mITT Population)p-value: <0.000195% CI: [-275.269, -212.829]Mixed Models Analysis
Comparison: Null hypothesis: Absolute change from Baseline for Urine Total NNAL (ng/g creatinine) in Test2 is equal to zero on Visit 5 (Week 24), relative to the start of the 12-week ALCS-RA-16-06-EV study. Alternate hypothesis: Absolute change from Baseline (Week 1) for Urine Total NNAL (ng/g creatinine) in Test2 is NOT equal to zero on Visit 5 (Week 24), relative to the start of the 12-week ALCS-RA-16-06-EV study. (mITT Population)p-value: <0.000195% CI: [-258.371, -184.398]Mixed Models Analysis
Comparison: Null hypothesis: Absolute change from Baseline for Urine Total NNAL (ng/g creatinine) in Test 1 + Test 2 is equal to zero on Visit 5 (Week 24), relative to the start of the 12-week ALCS-RA-16-06-EV study. Alternate hypothesis: Absolute change from Baseline (Week 1) for Urine Total NNAL (ng/g creatinine) in Test 1 + Test 2 is NOT equal to zero on Visit 5 (Week 24), relative to the start of the 12-week ALCS-RA-16-06-EV study. (mITT Population)p-value: <0.000195% CI: [-261.113, -206.14]Mixed Models Analysis
Comparison: Null hypothesis: Absolute change from Baseline for Urine Total NNAL (ng/g creatinine) in Control is equal to zero on Visit 1 (Week 12), relative to the start of the 12-week ALCS-RA-16-06-EV study. Alternate hypothesis: Absolute change from Baseline (Week 1) for Urine Total NNAL (ng/g creatinine) in Control is NOT equal to zero on Visit 1 (Week 12), relative to the start of the 12-week ALCS-RA-16-06-EV study. (mITT Population)p-value: 0.167295% CI: [-11.13, 63.661]Mixed Models Analysis
Comparison: Null hypothesis: Absolute change from Baseline for Urine Total NNAL (ng/g creatinine) in Control is equal to zero on Visit 3 (Week 18), relative to the start of the 12-week ALCS-RA-16-06-EV study. Alternate hypothesis: Absolute change from Baseline (Week 1) for Urine Total NNAL (ng/g creatinine) in Control is NOT equal to zero on Visit 3 (Week 18), relative to the start of the 12-week ALCS-RA-16-06-EV study. (mITT Population)p-value: 0.01495% CI: [-71.881, -8.221]Mixed Models Analysis
Comparison: Null hypothesis: Absolute change from Baseline for Urine Total NNAL (ng/g creatinine) in Control is equal to zero on Visit 5 (Week 24), relative to the start of the 12-week ALCS-RA-16-06-EV study. Alternate hypothesis: Absolute change from Baseline (Week 1) for Urine Total NNAL (ng/g creatinine) in Control is NOT equal to zero on Visit 5 (Week 24), relative to the start of the 12-week ALCS-RA-16-06-EV study. (mITT Population)p-value: 0.028895% CI: [-80.785, -4.484]Mixed Models Analysis
Comparison: Null hypothesis: Absolute change from Baseline for Urine Total NNAL (ng/g creatinine) in Test 1 is equal to Control on Visit 1 (Week 12), relative to the start of the 12-week ALCS-RA-16-06-EV study. Alternate hypothesis: Absolute change from Baseline (Week 1) for Urine Total NNAL (ng/g creatinine) in Test 1 is NOT equal to Control on Visit 1 (Week 12), relative to the start of the 12-week ALCS-RA-16-06-EV study. (mITT Population)p-value: <0.000195% CI: [-345.428, -203.726]Mixed Models Analysis
Comparison: Null hypothesis: Absolute change from Baseline for Urine Total NNAL (ng/g creatinine) in Test 1 is equal to Control on Visit 3 (Week 18), relative to the start of the 12-week ALCS-RA-16-06-EV study. Alternate hypothesis: Absolute change from Baseline (Week 1) for Urine Total NNAL (ng/g creatinine) in Test 1 is NOT equal to Control on Visit 3 (Week 18), relative to the start of the 12-week ALCS-RA-16-06-EV study. (mITT Population)p-value: <0.000195% CI: [-269.198, -145.844]Mixed Models Analysis
Comparison: Null hypothesis: Absolute change from Baseline for Urine Total NNAL (ng/g creatinine) in Test 1 is equal to Control on Visit 5 (Week 24), relative to the start of the 12-week ALCS-RA-16-06-EV study. Alternate hypothesis: Absolute change from Baseline (Week 1) for Urine Total NNAL (ng/g creatinine) in Test 1 is NOT equal to Control on Visit 5 (Week 24), relative to the start of the 12-week ALCS-RA-16-06-EV study. (mITT Population)p-value: <0.000195% CI: [-275.683, -130.784]Mixed Models Analysis
Comparison: Null hypothesis: Absolute change from Baseline for Urine Total NNAL (ng/g creatinine) in Test 2 is equal to Control on Visit 1 (Week 12), relative to the start of the 12-week ALCS-RA-16-06-EV study. Alternate hypothesis: Absolute change from Baseline (Week 1) for Urine Total NNAL (ng/g creatinine) in Test 2 is NOT equal to Control on Visit 1 (Week 12), relative to the start of the 12-week ALCS-RA-16-06-EV study. (mITT Population)p-value: <0.000195% CI: [-330.647, -191.769]Mixed Models Analysis
Comparison: Null hypothesis: Absolute change from Baseline for Urine Total NNAL (ng/g creatinine) in Test 2 is equal to Control on Visit 3 (Week 18), relative to the start of the 12-week ALCS-RA-16-06-EV study. Alternate hypothesis: Absolute change from Baseline (Week 1) for Urine Total NNAL (ng/g creatinine) in Test 2 is NOT equal to Control on Visit 3 (Week 18), relative to the start of the 12-week ALCS-RA-16-06-EV study. (mITT Population)p-value: <0.000195% CI: [-263.396, -144.599]Mixed Models Analysis
Comparison: Null hypothesis: Absolute change from Baseline for Urine Total NNAL (ng/g creatinine) in Test 2 is equal to Control on Visit 5 (Week 24), relative to the start of the 12-week ALCS-RA-16-06-EV study. Alternate hypothesis: Absolute change from Baseline (Week 1) for Urine Total NNAL (ng/g creatinine) in Test 2 is NOT equal to Control on Visit 5 (Week 24), relative to the start of the 12-week ALCS-RA-16-06-EV study. (mITT Population)p-value: <0.000195% CI: [-249.092, -108.408]Mixed Models Analysis
Comparison: Null hypothesis: Absolute change from Baseline for Urine Total NNAL (ng/g creatinine) in Test 1 + Test 2 is equal to Control on Visit 5 (Week 24), relative to the start of the 12-week ALCS-RA-16-06-EV study. Alternate hypothesis: Absolute change from Baseline (Week 1) for Urine Total NNAL (ng/g creatinine) in Test 1 + Test 2 is NOT equal to Control on Visit 5 (Week 24), relative to the start of the 12-week ALCS-RA-16-06-EV study. (mITT Population)p-value: <0.000195% CI: [-237.134, -144.85]Mixed Models Analysis
Comparison: Null hypothesis: Absolute change from Baseline for Urine Total NNAL (ng/g creatinine) in Test 2 is equal to Test 1 on Visit 5 (Week 24), relative to the start of the 12-week ALCS-RA-16-06-EV study. Alternate hypothesis: Absolute change from Baseline (Week 1) for Urine Total NNAL (ng/g creatinine) in Test 2 is NOT equal to Test 1 on Visit 5 (Week 24), relative to the start of the 12-week ALCS-RA-16-06-EV study. (mITT Population)p-value: 0.35995% CI: [-77.096, 28.13]Mixed Models Analysis
Primary

Summary of Whole Blood COHB Absolute Change From Baseline (% Saturation) by Study Group From Week 1 to Week 12 (mITT Population With Outliers Excluded) [ALCS-RA-16-06-EV]

Summary of whole blood COHB absolute change from Baseline in Week 12 is presented (Study ALCS-RA-16-06-EV). Blood samples were collected via direct venipuncture at Visits 3 and 7 and analyzed for the biomarker. Data outliers were examined through Proc Mixed model residual diagnosis (+/- 4 studentized residuals). A sensitivity analysis excluding outliers was performed for Visit 7 (Week 12). Absolute change from baseline = Post Product Use Value - Baseline Value Baseline / Visit 3 (Week 1) = Day 1 Visit 7 (Week 12) = Day 84 ± 3

Time frame: Week 1 (Baseline) and Week 12 for a total of of 12 weeks from randomization

Population: Modified ITT Population with Outliers Excluded: All subjects were randomized according to the randomization schedule; who used at least one study products after randomization was recorded and for whom there was a valid (within ±3 days of the planned measurement day) baseline and at least one post-baseline biomarker. Data outliers, defined as any observation with a studentized residual that is greater than +/- 4, were excluded from the analysis.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Test 1Summary of Whole Blood COHB Absolute Change From Baseline (% Saturation) by Study Group From Week 1 to Week 12 (mITT Population With Outliers Excluded) [ALCS-RA-16-06-EV]-2.57 percent saturationStandard Deviation 2.363
Test 2Summary of Whole Blood COHB Absolute Change From Baseline (% Saturation) by Study Group From Week 1 to Week 12 (mITT Population With Outliers Excluded) [ALCS-RA-16-06-EV]-2.44 percent saturationStandard Deviation 2.187
Test 1 + Test 2 GroupSummary of Whole Blood COHB Absolute Change From Baseline (% Saturation) by Study Group From Week 1 to Week 12 (mITT Population With Outliers Excluded) [ALCS-RA-16-06-EV]0.07 percent saturationStandard Deviation 1.92
Comparison: Null hypothesis: Absolute change from Baseline (Week 1) for Whole Blood COHb (% Saturation) in Test 1 is equal to Control on Visit 7 (Week 12). Alternate hypothesis: Absolute change from Baseline (Week 1) for Whole Blood COHb (% Saturation) in Test 1 is NOT equal to Control on Visit 7 (Week 12). (mITT Population)p-value: <0.000195% CI: [-3.084, -2.054]Mixed Models Analysis
Comparison: Null hypothesis: Absolute change from Baseline (Week 1) for Whole Blood COHb (% Saturation) in Test 2 is equal to Control on Visit 7 (Week 12). Alternate hypothesis: Absolute change from Baseline (Week 1) for Whole Blood COHb (% Saturation) in Test 2 is NOT equal to Control on Visit 7 (Week 12). (mITT Population)p-value: <0.000195% CI: [-3.092, -2.081]Mixed Models Analysis
Primary

Summary of Whole Blood COHb and Absolute Change From Baseline (% Saturation) by Study Group and Visit From Week 1 to Week 12 (mITT Population) [ALCS-RA-16-06-EV]

Summary of whole blood carboxyhemoglobin (COHb) (% Saturation) and absolute change from Baseline in Weeks 6 and 12 are presented (Study ALCS-RA-16-06-EV). Blood samples were collected via direct venipuncture at Visits 3, 5, and 7. Absolute change from baseline = Post Product Use Value - Baseline Value Baseline / Visit 3 (Week 1) = Day 1 Visit 5 (Week 6) = Day 42 ± 3 Visit 7 (Week 12) = Day 84 ± 3

Time frame: 12 weeks total with measurement timepoints at Week 1/Baseline, Week 6 and Week 12

Population: Modified ITT: All subjects were randomized according to the randomization schedule; who used at least one study products after randomization was recorded and for whom there was a valid (within ±3 days of the planned measurement day) baseline and at least one post-baseline biomarker.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Test 1Summary of Whole Blood COHb and Absolute Change From Baseline (% Saturation) by Study Group and Visit From Week 1 to Week 12 (mITT Population) [ALCS-RA-16-06-EV]Change from Baseline (Week 6)-2.34 percent saturationStandard Deviation 2.278
Test 1Summary of Whole Blood COHb and Absolute Change From Baseline (% Saturation) by Study Group and Visit From Week 1 to Week 12 (mITT Population) [ALCS-RA-16-06-EV]Visit 5: Week 63.26 percent saturationStandard Deviation 1.79
Test 1Summary of Whole Blood COHb and Absolute Change From Baseline (% Saturation) by Study Group and Visit From Week 1 to Week 12 (mITT Population) [ALCS-RA-16-06-EV]Change from Baseline (Week 12)-2.49 percent saturationStandard Deviation 2.498
Test 1Summary of Whole Blood COHb and Absolute Change From Baseline (% Saturation) by Study Group and Visit From Week 1 to Week 12 (mITT Population) [ALCS-RA-16-06-EV]Visit 7: Week 122.99 percent saturationStandard Deviation 1.55
Test 1Summary of Whole Blood COHb and Absolute Change From Baseline (% Saturation) by Study Group and Visit From Week 1 to Week 12 (mITT Population) [ALCS-RA-16-06-EV]Visit 3 (Baseline): Week 15.63 percent saturationStandard Deviation 2.073
Test 2Summary of Whole Blood COHb and Absolute Change From Baseline (% Saturation) by Study Group and Visit From Week 1 to Week 12 (mITT Population) [ALCS-RA-16-06-EV]Visit 7: Week 122.92 percent saturationStandard Deviation 1.141
Test 2Summary of Whole Blood COHb and Absolute Change From Baseline (% Saturation) by Study Group and Visit From Week 1 to Week 12 (mITT Population) [ALCS-RA-16-06-EV]Change from Baseline (Week 6)-2.30 percent saturationStandard Deviation 2.355
Test 2Summary of Whole Blood COHb and Absolute Change From Baseline (% Saturation) by Study Group and Visit From Week 1 to Week 12 (mITT Population) [ALCS-RA-16-06-EV]Change from Baseline (Week 12)-2.44 percent saturationStandard Deviation 2.187
Test 2Summary of Whole Blood COHb and Absolute Change From Baseline (% Saturation) by Study Group and Visit From Week 1 to Week 12 (mITT Population) [ALCS-RA-16-06-EV]Visit 5: Week 63.10 percent saturationStandard Deviation 1.449
Test 2Summary of Whole Blood COHb and Absolute Change From Baseline (% Saturation) by Study Group and Visit From Week 1 to Week 12 (mITT Population) [ALCS-RA-16-06-EV]Visit 3 (Baseline): Week 15.39 percent saturationStandard Deviation 1.868
Test 1 + Test 2 GroupSummary of Whole Blood COHb and Absolute Change From Baseline (% Saturation) by Study Group and Visit From Week 1 to Week 12 (mITT Population) [ALCS-RA-16-06-EV]Visit 7: Week 122.95 percent saturationStandard Deviation 1.351
Test 1 + Test 2 GroupSummary of Whole Blood COHb and Absolute Change From Baseline (% Saturation) by Study Group and Visit From Week 1 to Week 12 (mITT Population) [ALCS-RA-16-06-EV]Visit 3 (Baseline): Week 15.51 percent saturationStandard Deviation 1.971
Test 1 + Test 2 GroupSummary of Whole Blood COHb and Absolute Change From Baseline (% Saturation) by Study Group and Visit From Week 1 to Week 12 (mITT Population) [ALCS-RA-16-06-EV]Visit 5: Week 63.18 percent saturationStandard Deviation 1.626
Test 1 + Test 2 GroupSummary of Whole Blood COHb and Absolute Change From Baseline (% Saturation) by Study Group and Visit From Week 1 to Week 12 (mITT Population) [ALCS-RA-16-06-EV]Change from Baseline (Week 6)-2.32 percent saturationStandard Deviation 2.313
Test 1 + Test 2 GroupSummary of Whole Blood COHb and Absolute Change From Baseline (% Saturation) by Study Group and Visit From Week 1 to Week 12 (mITT Population) [ALCS-RA-16-06-EV]Change from Baseline (Week 12)-2.46 percent saturationStandard Deviation 2.337
ControlSummary of Whole Blood COHb and Absolute Change From Baseline (% Saturation) by Study Group and Visit From Week 1 to Week 12 (mITT Population) [ALCS-RA-16-06-EV]Change from Baseline (Week 6)0.40 percent saturationStandard Deviation 1.813
ControlSummary of Whole Blood COHb and Absolute Change From Baseline (% Saturation) by Study Group and Visit From Week 1 to Week 12 (mITT Population) [ALCS-RA-16-06-EV]Visit 5: Week 66.05 percent saturationStandard Deviation 2.029
ControlSummary of Whole Blood COHb and Absolute Change From Baseline (% Saturation) by Study Group and Visit From Week 1 to Week 12 (mITT Population) [ALCS-RA-16-06-EV]Visit 3 (Baseline): Week 15.61 percent saturationStandard Deviation 1.957
ControlSummary of Whole Blood COHb and Absolute Change From Baseline (% Saturation) by Study Group and Visit From Week 1 to Week 12 (mITT Population) [ALCS-RA-16-06-EV]Visit 7: Week 125.68 percent saturationStandard Deviation 1.986
ControlSummary of Whole Blood COHb and Absolute Change From Baseline (% Saturation) by Study Group and Visit From Week 1 to Week 12 (mITT Population) [ALCS-RA-16-06-EV]Change from Baseline (Week 12)0.07 percent saturationStandard Deviation 1.92
Comparison: Null hypothesis: Absolute change from Baseline (Week 1) for Whole Blood COHb (% Saturation) in Test 1 is equal to zero on Visit 5 (Week 6). Alternate hypothesis: Absolute change from Baseline (Week 1) for Whole Blood COHb (% Saturation) in Test 1 is NOT equal to zero on Visit 5 (Week 6). (mITT Population)p-value: <0.000195% CI: [-2.582, -1.992]Mixed Models Analysis
Comparison: Null hypothesis: Absolute change from Baseline (Week 1) for Whole Blood COHb (% Saturation) in Test 1 is equal to zero on Visit 7 (Week 12). Alternate hypothesis: Absolute change from Baseline (Week 1) for Whole Blood COHb (% Saturation) in Test 1 is NOT equal to zero on Visit 7 (Week 12). (mITT Population)p-value: <0.000195% CI: [-2.722, -2.107]Mixed Models Analysis
Comparison: Null hypothesis: Absolute change from Baseline (Week 1) for Whole Blood COHb (% Saturation) in Test 2 is equal to zero on Visit 5 (Week 6). Alternate hypothesis: Absolute change from Baseline (Week 1) for Whole Blood COHb (% Saturation) in Test 2 is NOT equal to zero on Visit 5 (Week 6). (mITT Population)p-value: <0.000195% CI: [-2.673, -2.09]Mixed Models Analysis
Comparison: Null hypothesis: Absolute change from Baseline (Week 1) for Whole Blood COHb (% Saturation) in Test 2 is equal to zero on Visit 7 (Week 12). Alternate hypothesis: Absolute change from Baseline (Week 1) for Whole Blood COHb (% Saturation) in Test 2 is NOT equal to zero on Visit 7 (Week 12). (mITT Population)p-value: <0.000195% CI: [-2.782, -2.19]Mixed Models Analysis
Comparison: Null hypothesis: Absolute change from Baseline (Week 1) for Whole Blood COHb (% Saturation) in Test 1 + Test 2 is equal to zero on Visit 7 (Week 12). Alternate hypothesis: Absolute change from Baseline (Week 1) for Whole Blood COHb (% Saturation) in Test 1 + Test 2 is NOT equal to zero on Visit 7 (Week 12). (mITT Population)p-value: <0.000195% CI: [-2.668, -2.233]Mixed Models Analysis
Comparison: Null hypothesis: Absolute change from Baseline (Week 1) for Whole Blood COHb (% Saturation) in Control is equal to zero on Visit 5 (Week 6). Alternate hypothesis: Absolute change from Baseline (Week 1) for Whole Blood COHb (% Saturation) in Control is NOT equal to zero on Visit 5 (Week 6). (mITT Population)p-value: 0.001295% CI: [0.185, 0.747]Mixed Models Analysis
Comparison: Null hypothesis: Absolute change from Baseline (Week 1) for Whole Blood COHb (% Saturation) in Control is equal to zero on Visit 7 (Week 12). Alternate hypothesis: Absolute change from Baseline (Week 1) for Whole Blood COHb (% Saturation) in Control is NOT equal to zero on Visit 7 (Week 12). (mITT Population)p-value: 0.495795% CI: [-0.187, 0.386]Mixed Models Analysis
Comparison: Null hypothesis: Absolute change from Baseline (Week 1) for Whole Blood COHb (% Saturation) in Test 1 is equal to Control on Visit 5 (Week 6). Alternate hypothesis: Absolute change from Baseline (Week 1) for Whole Blood COHb (% Saturation) in Test 1 is NOT equal to Control on Visit 5 (Week 6). (mITT Population)p-value: <0.000195% CI: [-3.266, -2.239]Mixed Models Analysis
Comparison: Null hypothesis: Absolute change from Baseline (Week 1) for Whole Blood COHb (% Saturation) in Test 1 is equal to Control on Visit 7 (Week 12). Alternate hypothesis: Absolute change from Baseline (Week 1) for Whole Blood COHb (% Saturation) in Test 1 is NOT equal to Control on Visit 7 (Week 12). (mITT Population)p-value: <0.000195% CI: [-3.043, -1.986]Mixed Models Analysis
Comparison: Null hypothesis: Absolute change from Baseline (Week 1) for Whole Blood COHb (% Saturation) in Test 2 is equal to Control on Visit 5 (Week 6). Alternate hypothesis: Absolute change from Baseline (Week 1) for Whole Blood COHb (% Saturation) in Test 2 is NOT equal to Control on Visit 5 (Week 6). (mITT Population)p-value: <0.000195% CI: [-3.359, -2.336]Mixed Models Analysis
Comparison: Null hypothesis: Absolute change from Baseline (Week 1) for Whole Blood COHb (% Saturation) in Test 2 is equal to Control on Visit 7 (Week 12). Alternate hypothesis: Absolute change from Baseline (Week 1) for Whole Blood COHb (% Saturation) in Test 2 is NOT equal to Control on Visit 7 (Week 12). (mITT Population)p-value: <0.000195% CI: [-3.105, -2.066]Mixed Models Analysis
Comparison: Null hypothesis: Absolute change from Baseline (Week 1) for Whole Blood COHb (% Saturation) in Test 1 + Test 2 is equal to Control on Visit 7 (Week 12). Alternate hypothesis: Absolute change from Baseline (Week 1) for Whole Blood COHb (% Saturation) in Test 1 + Test 2 is NOT equal to Control on Visit 7 (Week 12). (mITT Population)p-value: <0.000195% CI: [-2.901, -2.199]Mixed Models Analysis
Comparison: Null hypothesis: Absolute change from Baseline (Week 1) for Whole Blood COHb (% Saturation) in Test 1 is equal to Test 2 on Visit 7 (Week 12). Alternate hypothesis: Absolute change from Baseline (Week 1) for Whole Blood COHb (% Saturation) in Test 1 is NOT equal to Test 2 on Visit 7 (Week 12). (mITT Population)p-value: 0.737295% CI: [-0.346, 0.489]Mixed Models Analysis
Primary

Summary of Whole Blood COHb and Absolute Change From Baseline (% Saturation) by Study Group and Visit From Week 1 to Week 24 (mITT Population) [ALCS-RA-17-11-EV]

Summary of Whole Blood COHb (% Saturation) and absolute change from Baseline in Weeks 12, 18 and 24 are presented (Study ALCS-RA-17-11-EV). Blood samples were collected via direct venipuncture on Visits 1, 3 and 5 of the ALCS-RA-17-11-EV study. Baseline samples were collected Week 1 of the ALCS-RA-16-06-EV study. Change from Baseline was calculated as follows: Absolute change from baseline = Post Product Use Value - Baseline Value, where Baseline = values reported on Day 1 (Week 1) of the 12-week ALCS-RA-16-06-EV study Baseline = Day 1 (Week 1), Visit 1 = Week 12 (Day 84 ± 3), Visit 3 = Week 18 (Day 126 ± 3), and Visit 5 = Week 24 (Day 168 ± 3), relative to the start of the 12-week ALCS-RA-16-06-EV study

Time frame: 24 weeks total with measurement timepoints at Week 1/Baseline [ALCS-RA-16-06-EV study]), and Week 12, Week 18 and Week 24 [ALCS-RA-17-11-EV study]

Population: Modified ITT: All subjects were randomized according to the randomization schedule; who used at least one study products after randomization was recorded and for whom there was a valid (within ±3 days of the planned measurement day) baseline and at least one post-baseline biomarker.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Test 1Summary of Whole Blood COHb and Absolute Change From Baseline (% Saturation) by Study Group and Visit From Week 1 to Week 24 (mITT Population) [ALCS-RA-17-11-EV]Change from Baseline (Week 12)-3.08 percent saturationStandard Deviation 2.252
Test 1Summary of Whole Blood COHb and Absolute Change From Baseline (% Saturation) by Study Group and Visit From Week 1 to Week 24 (mITT Population) [ALCS-RA-17-11-EV]Visit 5: Week 242.17 percent saturationStandard Deviation 0.635
Test 1Summary of Whole Blood COHb and Absolute Change From Baseline (% Saturation) by Study Group and Visit From Week 1 to Week 24 (mITT Population) [ALCS-RA-17-11-EV]Visit 3: Week 182.61 percent saturationStandard Deviation 0.759
Test 1Summary of Whole Blood COHb and Absolute Change From Baseline (% Saturation) by Study Group and Visit From Week 1 to Week 24 (mITT Population) [ALCS-RA-17-11-EV]Change from Baseline (Week 24)-3.13 percent saturationStandard Deviation 1.947
Test 1Summary of Whole Blood COHb and Absolute Change From Baseline (% Saturation) by Study Group and Visit From Week 1 to Week 24 (mITT Population) [ALCS-RA-17-11-EV]Change from Baseline (Week 18)-2.65 percent saturationStandard Deviation 1.94
Test 1Summary of Whole Blood COHb and Absolute Change From Baseline (% Saturation) by Study Group and Visit From Week 1 to Week 24 (mITT Population) [ALCS-RA-17-11-EV]Visit 1: Week 122.28 percent saturationStandard Deviation 0.786
Test 1Summary of Whole Blood COHb and Absolute Change From Baseline (% Saturation) by Study Group and Visit From Week 1 to Week 24 (mITT Population) [ALCS-RA-17-11-EV]Baseline: Week 15.36 percent saturationStandard Deviation 2.096
Test 2Summary of Whole Blood COHb and Absolute Change From Baseline (% Saturation) by Study Group and Visit From Week 1 to Week 24 (mITT Population) [ALCS-RA-17-11-EV]Change from Baseline (Week 18)-2.33 percent saturationStandard Deviation 1.994
Test 2Summary of Whole Blood COHb and Absolute Change From Baseline (% Saturation) by Study Group and Visit From Week 1 to Week 24 (mITT Population) [ALCS-RA-17-11-EV]Baseline: Week 15.27 percent saturationStandard Deviation 1.572
Test 2Summary of Whole Blood COHb and Absolute Change From Baseline (% Saturation) by Study Group and Visit From Week 1 to Week 24 (mITT Population) [ALCS-RA-17-11-EV]Visit 1: Week 122.52 percent saturationStandard Deviation 0.796
Test 2Summary of Whole Blood COHb and Absolute Change From Baseline (% Saturation) by Study Group and Visit From Week 1 to Week 24 (mITT Population) [ALCS-RA-17-11-EV]Visit 3: Week 182.92 percent saturationStandard Deviation 0.944
Test 2Summary of Whole Blood COHb and Absolute Change From Baseline (% Saturation) by Study Group and Visit From Week 1 to Week 24 (mITT Population) [ALCS-RA-17-11-EV]Visit 5: Week 242.34 percent saturationStandard Deviation 0.94
Test 2Summary of Whole Blood COHb and Absolute Change From Baseline (% Saturation) by Study Group and Visit From Week 1 to Week 24 (mITT Population) [ALCS-RA-17-11-EV]Change from Baseline (Week 12)-2.75 percent saturationStandard Deviation 1.863
Test 2Summary of Whole Blood COHb and Absolute Change From Baseline (% Saturation) by Study Group and Visit From Week 1 to Week 24 (mITT Population) [ALCS-RA-17-11-EV]Change from Baseline (Week 24)-2.89 percent saturationStandard Deviation 1.941
Test 1 + Test 2 GroupSummary of Whole Blood COHb and Absolute Change From Baseline (% Saturation) by Study Group and Visit From Week 1 to Week 24 (mITT Population) [ALCS-RA-17-11-EV]Visit 1: Week 122.40 percent saturationStandard Deviation 0.796
Test 1 + Test 2 GroupSummary of Whole Blood COHb and Absolute Change From Baseline (% Saturation) by Study Group and Visit From Week 1 to Week 24 (mITT Population) [ALCS-RA-17-11-EV]Change from Baseline (Week 18)-2.47 percent saturationStandard Deviation 1.966
Test 1 + Test 2 GroupSummary of Whole Blood COHb and Absolute Change From Baseline (% Saturation) by Study Group and Visit From Week 1 to Week 24 (mITT Population) [ALCS-RA-17-11-EV]Change from Baseline (Week 24)-3.00 percent saturationStandard Deviation 1.937
Test 1 + Test 2 GroupSummary of Whole Blood COHb and Absolute Change From Baseline (% Saturation) by Study Group and Visit From Week 1 to Week 24 (mITT Population) [ALCS-RA-17-11-EV]Baseline: Week 15.31 percent saturationStandard Deviation 1.835
Test 1 + Test 2 GroupSummary of Whole Blood COHb and Absolute Change From Baseline (% Saturation) by Study Group and Visit From Week 1 to Week 24 (mITT Population) [ALCS-RA-17-11-EV]Visit 3: Week 182.78 percent saturationStandard Deviation 0.876
Test 1 + Test 2 GroupSummary of Whole Blood COHb and Absolute Change From Baseline (% Saturation) by Study Group and Visit From Week 1 to Week 24 (mITT Population) [ALCS-RA-17-11-EV]Change from Baseline (Week 12)-2.91 percent saturationStandard Deviation 2.057
Test 1 + Test 2 GroupSummary of Whole Blood COHb and Absolute Change From Baseline (% Saturation) by Study Group and Visit From Week 1 to Week 24 (mITT Population) [ALCS-RA-17-11-EV]Visit 5: Week 242.26 percent saturationStandard Deviation 0.813
ControlSummary of Whole Blood COHb and Absolute Change From Baseline (% Saturation) by Study Group and Visit From Week 1 to Week 24 (mITT Population) [ALCS-RA-17-11-EV]Visit 1: Week 126.34 percent saturationStandard Deviation 2.052
ControlSummary of Whole Blood COHb and Absolute Change From Baseline (% Saturation) by Study Group and Visit From Week 1 to Week 24 (mITT Population) [ALCS-RA-17-11-EV]Visit 5: Week 245.59 percent saturationStandard Deviation 1.46
ControlSummary of Whole Blood COHb and Absolute Change From Baseline (% Saturation) by Study Group and Visit From Week 1 to Week 24 (mITT Population) [ALCS-RA-17-11-EV]Change from Baseline (Week 12)0.75 percent saturationStandard Deviation 2.019
ControlSummary of Whole Blood COHb and Absolute Change From Baseline (% Saturation) by Study Group and Visit From Week 1 to Week 24 (mITT Population) [ALCS-RA-17-11-EV]Baseline: Week 15.60 percent saturationStandard Deviation 1.607
ControlSummary of Whole Blood COHb and Absolute Change From Baseline (% Saturation) by Study Group and Visit From Week 1 to Week 24 (mITT Population) [ALCS-RA-17-11-EV]Change from Baseline (Week 18)1.18 percent saturationStandard Deviation 1.894
ControlSummary of Whole Blood COHb and Absolute Change From Baseline (% Saturation) by Study Group and Visit From Week 1 to Week 24 (mITT Population) [ALCS-RA-17-11-EV]Visit 3: Week 186.74 percent saturationStandard Deviation 1.971
ControlSummary of Whole Blood COHb and Absolute Change From Baseline (% Saturation) by Study Group and Visit From Week 1 to Week 24 (mITT Population) [ALCS-RA-17-11-EV]Change from Baseline (Week 24)0.04 percent saturationStandard Deviation 1.511
Comparison: Null hypothesis: Absolute change from Baseline for Whole Blood COHb (% Saturation) in Test 1 is equal to zero on Visit 1 (Week 12), relative to the start of the 12-week ALCS-RA-16-06-EV study. Alternate hypothesis: Absolute change from Baseline (Week 1) for Whole Blood COHb (% Saturation) in Test 1 is NOT equal to zero on Visit 1 (Week 12), relative to the start of the 12-week ALCS-RA-16-06-EV study. (MiTT Population)p-value: <0.000195% CI: [-3.502, -2.71]Mixed Models Analysis
Comparison: Null hypothesis: Absolute change from Baseline for Whole Blood COHb (% Saturation) in Test 1 is equal to zero on Visit 3 (Week 18), relative to the start of the 12-week ALCS-RA-16-06-EV study. Alternate hypothesis: Absolute change from Baseline (Week 1) for Whole Blood COHb (% Saturation) in Test 1 is NOT equal to zero on Visit 3 (Week 18), relative to the start of the 12-week ALCS-RA-16-06-EV study. (MiTT Population)p-value: <0.000195% CI: [-3.235, -2.414]Mixed Models Analysis
Comparison: Null hypothesis: Absolute change from Baseline for Whole Blood COHb (% Saturation) in Test 1 is equal to zero on Visit 5 (Week 24), relative to the start of the 12-week ALCS-RA-16-06-EV study. Alternate hypothesis: Absolute change from Baseline (Week 1) for Whole Blood COHb (% Saturation) in Test 1 is NOT equal to zero on Visit 5 (Week 24), relative to the start of the 12-week ALCS-RA-16-06-EV study. (MiTT Population)p-value: <0.000195% CI: [-3.553, -2.904]Mixed Models Analysis
Comparison: Null hypothesis: Absolute change from Baseline for Whole Blood COHb (% Saturation) in Test 2 is equal to zero on Visit 1 (Week 12), relative to the start of the 12-week ALCS-RA-16-06-EV study. Alternate hypothesis: Absolute change from Baseline (Week 1) for Whole Blood COHb (% Saturation) in Test 2 is NOT equal to zero on Visit 1 (Week 12), relative to the start of the 12-week ALCS-RA-16-06-EV study. (MiTT Population)p-value: <0.000195% CI: [-3.221, -2.457]Mixed Models Analysis
Comparison: Null hypothesis: Absolute change from Baseline for Whole Blood COHb (% Saturation) in Test 2 is equal to zero on Visit 3 (Week 18), relative to the start of the 12-week ALCS-RA-16-06-EV study. Alternate hypothesis: Absolute change from Baseline (Week 1) for Whole Blood COHb (% Saturation) in Test 2 is NOT equal to zero on Visit 3 (Week 18), relative to the start of the 12-week ALCS-RA-16-06-EV study. (MiTT Population)p-value: <0.000195% CI: [-2.828, -2.07]Mixed Models Analysis
Comparison: Null hypothesis: Absolute change from Baseline for Whole Blood COHb (% Saturation) in Test2 is equal to zero on Visit 5 (Week 24), relative to the start of the 12-week ALCS-RA-16-06-EV study. Alternate hypothesis: Absolute change from Baseline (Week 1) for Whole Blood COHb (% Saturation) in Test2 is NOT equal to zero on Visit 5 (Week 24), relative to the start of the 12-week ALCS-RA-16-06-EV study. (MiTT Population)p-value: <0.000195% CI: [-3.328, -2.718]Mixed Models Analysis
Comparison: Null hypothesis: Absolute change from Baseline for Whole Blood COHb (% Saturation) in Test 1 + Test 2 is equal to zero on Visit 5 (Week 24), relative to the start of the 12-week ALCS-RA-16-06-EV study. Alternate hypothesis: Absolute change from Baseline (Week 1) for Whole Blood COHb (% Saturation) in Test 1 + Test 2 is NOT equal to zero on Visit 5 (Week 24), relative to the start of the 12-week ALCS-RA-16-06-EV study. (MiTT Population)p-value: <0.000195% CI: [-3.354, -2.897]Mixed Models Analysis
Comparison: Null hypothesis: Absolute change from Baseline for Whole Blood COHb (% Saturation) in Control is equal to zero on Visit 1 (Week 12), relative to the start of the 12-week ALCS-RA-16-06-EV study. Alternate hypothesis: Absolute change from Baseline (Week 1) for Whole Blood COHb (% Saturation) in Control is NOT equal to zero on Visit 1 (Week 12), relative to the start of the 12-week ALCS-RA-16-06-EV study. (MiTT Population)p-value: <0.000195% CI: [0.518, 1.298]Mixed Models Analysis
Comparison: Null hypothesis: Absolute change from Baseline for Whole Blood COHb (% Saturation) in Control is equal to zero on Visit 3 (Week 18), relative to the start of the 12-week ALCS-RA-16-06-EV study. Alternate hypothesis: Absolute change from Baseline (Week 1) for Whole Blood COHb (% Saturation) in Control is NOT equal to zero on Visit 3 (Week 18), relative to the start of the 12-week ALCS-RA-16-06-EV study. (MiTT Population)p-value: <0.000195% CI: [0.902, 1.679]Mixed Models Analysis
Comparison: Null hypothesis: Absolute change from Baseline for Whole Blood COHb (% Saturation) in Control is equal to zero on Visit 5 (Week 24), relative to the start of the 12-week ALCS-RA-16-06-EV study. Alternate hypothesis: Absolute change from Baseline (Week 1) for Whole Blood COHb (% Saturation) in Control is NOT equal to zero on Visit 5 (Week 24), relative to the start of the 12-week ALCS-RA-16-06-EV study. (MiTT Population)p-value: 0.277295% CI: [-0.142, 0.49]Mixed Models Analysis
Comparison: Null hypothesis: Absolute change from Baseline for Whole Blood COHb (% Saturation) in Test 1 is equal to Control on Visit 1 (Week 12), relative to the start of the 12-week ALCS-RA-16-06-EV study. Alternate hypothesis: Absolute change from Baseline (Week 1) for Whole Blood COHb (% Saturation) in Test 1 is NOT equal to Control on Visit 1 (Week 12), relative to the start of the 12-week ALCS-RA-16-06-EV study. (MiTT Population)p-value: <0.000195% CI: [-4.75, -3.278]Mixed Models Analysis
Comparison: Null hypothesis: Absolute change from Baseline for Whole Blood COHb (% Saturation) in Test 1 is equal to Control on Visit 3 (Week 18), relative to the start of the 12-week ALCS-RA-16-06-EV study. Alternate hypothesis: Absolute change from Baseline (Week 1) for Whole Blood COHb (% Saturation) in Test 1 is NOT equal to Control on Visit 3 (Week 18), relative to the start of the 12-week ALCS-RA-16-06-EV study. (MiTT Population)p-value: <0.000195% CI: [-4.865, -3.365]Mixed Models Analysis
Comparison: Null hypothesis: Absolute change from Baseline for Whole Blood COHb (% Saturation) in Test 1 is equal to Control on Visit 5 (Week 24), relative to the start of the 12-week ALCS-RA-16-06-EV study. Alternate hypothesis: Absolute change from Baseline (Week 1) for Whole Blood COHb (% Saturation) in Test 1 is NOT equal to Control on Visit 5 (Week 24), relative to the start of the 12-week ALCS-RA-16-06-EV study. (MiTT Population)p-value: <0.000195% CI: [-4.005, -2.801]Mixed Models Analysis
Comparison: Null hypothesis: Absolute change from Baseline for Whole Blood COHb (% Saturation) in Test 2 is equal to Control on Visit 1 (Week 12), relative to the start of the 12-week ALCS-RA-16-06-EV study. Alternate hypothesis: Absolute change from Baseline (Week 1) for Whole Blood COHb (% Saturation) in Test 2 is NOT equal to Control on Visit 1 (Week 12), relative to the start of the 12-week ALCS-RA-16-06-EV study. (MiTT Population)p-value: <0.000195% CI: [-4.473, -3.02]Mixed Models Analysis
Comparison: Null hypothesis: Absolute change from Baseline for Whole Blood COHb (% Saturation) in Test 2 is equal to Control on Visit 3 (Week 18), relative to the start of the 12-week ALCS-RA-16-06-EV study. Alternate hypothesis: Absolute change from Baseline (Week 1) for Whole Blood COHb (% Saturation) in Test 2 is NOT equal to Control on Visit 3 (Week 18), relative to the start of the 12-week ALCS-RA-16-06-EV study. (MiTT Population)p-value: <0.000195% CI: [-4.461, -3.018]Mixed Models Analysis
Comparison: Null hypothesis: Absolute change from Baseline for Whole Blood COHb (% Saturation) in Test 2 is equal to Control on Visit 5 (Week 24), relative to the start of the 12-week ALCS-RA-16-06-EV study. Alternate hypothesis: Absolute change from Baseline (Week 1) for Whole Blood COHb (% Saturation) in Test 2 is NOT equal to Control on Visit 5 (Week 24), relative to the start of the 12-week ALCS-RA-16-06-EV study. (MiTT Population)p-value: <0.000195% CI: [-3.784, -2.61]Mixed Models Analysis
Comparison: Null hypothesis: Absolute change from Baseline for Whole Blood COHb (% Saturation) in Test 1 + Test 2 is equal to Control on Visit 5 (Week 24), relative to the start of the 12-week ALCS-RA-16-06-EV study. Alternate hypothesis: Absolute change from Baseline (Week 1) for Whole Blood COHb (% Saturation) in Test 1 + Test 2 is NOT equal to Control on Visit 5 (Week 24), relative to the start of the 12-week ALCS-RA-16-06-EV study. (MiTT Population)p-value: <0.000195% CI: [-3.678, -2.921]Mixed Models Analysis
Comparison: Null hypothesis: Absolute change from Baseline for Whole Blood COHb (% Saturation) in Test 2 is equal to Test 1 on Visit 5 (Week 24), relative to the start of the 12-week ALCS-RA-16-06-EV study. Alternate hypothesis: Absolute change from Baseline (Week 1) for Whole Blood COHb (% Saturation) in Test 2 is NOT equal to Test 1 on Visit 5 (Week 24), relative to the start of the 12-week ALCS-RA-16-06-EV study. (MiTT Population)p-value: 0.34895% CI: [-0.638, 0.226]Mixed Models Analysis
Primary

Summary of Whole Blood WBC Absolute Change From Baseline (10^3 Cells/uL) by Study Group From Week 1 to Week 12 (mITT Population With Outliers Excluded) [ALCS-RA-16-06-EV]

Summary of whole blood WBC absolute change from Baseline in Week 12 is presented (Study ALCS-RA-16-06-EV). Blood samples were collected via direct venipuncture at Visits 3 and 7 and analyzed for the biomarker. Data outliers were examined through Proc Mixed model residual diagnosis (+/- 4 studentized residuals). A sensitivity analysis excluding outliers was performed for Visit 7 (Week 12). Absolute change from baseline = Post Product Use Value - Baseline Value Baseline / Visit 3 (Week 1) = Day 1 Visit 7 (Week 12) = Day 84 ± 3

Time frame: Week 1 (Baseline) and Week 12 for a total of of 12 weeks from randomization

Population: Modified ITT Population with Outliers Excluded: All subjects were randomized according to the randomization schedule; who used at least one study products after randomization was recorded and for whom there was a valid (within ±3 days of the planned measurement day) baseline and at least one post-baseline biomarker. Data outliers, defined as any observation with a studentized residual that is greater than +/- 4, were excluded from the analysis.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Test 1Summary of Whole Blood WBC Absolute Change From Baseline (10^3 Cells/uL) by Study Group From Week 1 to Week 12 (mITT Population With Outliers Excluded) [ALCS-RA-16-06-EV]-0.564 10^3 cells/uLStandard Deviation 1.8111
Test 2Summary of Whole Blood WBC Absolute Change From Baseline (10^3 Cells/uL) by Study Group From Week 1 to Week 12 (mITT Population With Outliers Excluded) [ALCS-RA-16-06-EV]-0.389 10^3 cells/uLStandard Deviation 1.7261
Test 1 + Test 2 GroupSummary of Whole Blood WBC Absolute Change From Baseline (10^3 Cells/uL) by Study Group From Week 1 to Week 12 (mITT Population With Outliers Excluded) [ALCS-RA-16-06-EV]0.227 10^3 cells/uLStandard Deviation 1.6425
Comparison: Null hypothesis: Absolute change from Baseline (Week 1) for Whole Blood WBC (x 10\^3/uL) in Test 1 is equal to Control on Visit 7 (Week 12). Alternate hypothesis: Absolute change from Baseline (Week 1) for Whole Blood WBC (x 10\^3/uL) in Test 1 is NOT equal to Control on Visit 7 (Week 12). (mITT Population with Outliers Excluded)p-value: 0.000295% CI: [-1.228, -0.309]Mixed Models Analysis
Comparison: Null hypothesis: Absolute change from Baseline (Week 1) for Whole Blood WBC (x 10\^3/uL) in Test 2 is equal to Control on Visit 7 (Week 12). Alternate hypothesis: Absolute change from Baseline (Week 1) for Whole Blood WBC (x 10\^3/uL) in Test 2 is NOT equal to Control on Visit 7 (Week 12). (mITT Population with Outliers Excluded)p-value: 0.017595% CI: [-0.972, -0.068]Mixed Models Analysis
Primary

Summary of Whole Blood WBC Count and Absolute Change From Baseline (10^3 Cells/uL) by Study Group and Visit From Week 1 to Week 12 (mITT Population) [ALCS-RA-16-06-EV]

Summary of whole blood white blood cell (WBC) count (10\^3 cells/uL) and absolute change from Baseline in Weeks 6 and 12 are presented (Study ALCS-RA-16-06-EV). Blood samples were collected via direct venipuncture at Visits 3, 5, and 7. Absolute change from baseline = Post Product Use Value - Baseline Value Baseline / Visit 3 (Week 1) = Day 1 Visit 5 (Week 6) = Day 42 ± 3 Visit 7 (Week 12) = Day 84 ± 3

Time frame: 12 weeks total with measurement timepoints at Week 1/Baseline, Week 6 and Week 12

Population: Modified ITT: All subjects were randomized according to the randomization schedule; who used at least one study products after randomization was recorded and for whom there was a valid (within ±3 days of the planned measurement day) baseline and at least one post-baseline biomarker.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Test 1Summary of Whole Blood WBC Count and Absolute Change From Baseline (10^3 Cells/uL) by Study Group and Visit From Week 1 to Week 12 (mITT Population) [ALCS-RA-16-06-EV]Visit 5: Week 66.292 10^3 cells/uLStandard Deviation 1.6619
Test 1Summary of Whole Blood WBC Count and Absolute Change From Baseline (10^3 Cells/uL) by Study Group and Visit From Week 1 to Week 12 (mITT Population) [ALCS-RA-16-06-EV]Visit 3 (Baseline): Week 17.003 10^3 cells/uLStandard Deviation 2.3185
Test 1Summary of Whole Blood WBC Count and Absolute Change From Baseline (10^3 Cells/uL) by Study Group and Visit From Week 1 to Week 12 (mITT Population) [ALCS-RA-16-06-EV]Change from Baseline (Week 12)-0.564 10^3 cells/uLStandard Deviation 1.8111
Test 1Summary of Whole Blood WBC Count and Absolute Change From Baseline (10^3 Cells/uL) by Study Group and Visit From Week 1 to Week 12 (mITT Population) [ALCS-RA-16-06-EV]Visit 7: Week 126.363 10^3 cells/uLStandard Deviation 1.6203
Test 1Summary of Whole Blood WBC Count and Absolute Change From Baseline (10^3 Cells/uL) by Study Group and Visit From Week 1 to Week 12 (mITT Population) [ALCS-RA-16-06-EV]Change from Baseline (Week 6)-0.656 10^3 cells/uLStandard Deviation 1.785
Test 2Summary of Whole Blood WBC Count and Absolute Change From Baseline (10^3 Cells/uL) by Study Group and Visit From Week 1 to Week 12 (mITT Population) [ALCS-RA-16-06-EV]Visit 7: Week 126.583 10^3 cells/uLStandard Deviation 1.8742
Test 2Summary of Whole Blood WBC Count and Absolute Change From Baseline (10^3 Cells/uL) by Study Group and Visit From Week 1 to Week 12 (mITT Population) [ALCS-RA-16-06-EV]Change from Baseline (Week 6)-0.490 10^3 cells/uLStandard Deviation 1.4902
Test 2Summary of Whole Blood WBC Count and Absolute Change From Baseline (10^3 Cells/uL) by Study Group and Visit From Week 1 to Week 12 (mITT Population) [ALCS-RA-16-06-EV]Change from Baseline (Week 12)-0.325 10^3 cells/uLStandard Deviation 1.858
Test 2Summary of Whole Blood WBC Count and Absolute Change From Baseline (10^3 Cells/uL) by Study Group and Visit From Week 1 to Week 12 (mITT Population) [ALCS-RA-16-06-EV]Visit 3 (Baseline): Week 16.947 10^3 cells/uLStandard Deviation 1.9468
Test 2Summary of Whole Blood WBC Count and Absolute Change From Baseline (10^3 Cells/uL) by Study Group and Visit From Week 1 to Week 12 (mITT Population) [ALCS-RA-16-06-EV]Visit 5: Week 66.490 10^3 cells/uLStandard Deviation 1.678
Test 1 + Test 2 GroupSummary of Whole Blood WBC Count and Absolute Change From Baseline (10^3 Cells/uL) by Study Group and Visit From Week 1 to Week 12 (mITT Population) [ALCS-RA-16-06-EV]Visit 7: Week 126.477 10^3 cells/uLStandard Deviation 1.7565
Test 1 + Test 2 GroupSummary of Whole Blood WBC Count and Absolute Change From Baseline (10^3 Cells/uL) by Study Group and Visit From Week 1 to Week 12 (mITT Population) [ALCS-RA-16-06-EV]Visit 3 (Baseline): Week 16.974 10^3 cells/uLStandard Deviation 2.1346
Test 1 + Test 2 GroupSummary of Whole Blood WBC Count and Absolute Change From Baseline (10^3 Cells/uL) by Study Group and Visit From Week 1 to Week 12 (mITT Population) [ALCS-RA-16-06-EV]Visit 5: Week 66.391 10^3 cells/uLStandard Deviation 1.6696
Test 1 + Test 2 GroupSummary of Whole Blood WBC Count and Absolute Change From Baseline (10^3 Cells/uL) by Study Group and Visit From Week 1 to Week 12 (mITT Population) [ALCS-RA-16-06-EV]Change from Baseline (Week 6)-0.573 10^3 cells/uLStandard Deviation 1.6424
Test 1 + Test 2 GroupSummary of Whole Blood WBC Count and Absolute Change From Baseline (10^3 Cells/uL) by Study Group and Visit From Week 1 to Week 12 (mITT Population) [ALCS-RA-16-06-EV]Change from Baseline (Week 12)-0.440 10^3 cells/uLStandard Deviation 1.8356
ControlSummary of Whole Blood WBC Count and Absolute Change From Baseline (10^3 Cells/uL) by Study Group and Visit From Week 1 to Week 12 (mITT Population) [ALCS-RA-16-06-EV]Change from Baseline (Week 6)-0.098 10^3 cells/uLStandard Deviation 1.4878
ControlSummary of Whole Blood WBC Count and Absolute Change From Baseline (10^3 Cells/uL) by Study Group and Visit From Week 1 to Week 12 (mITT Population) [ALCS-RA-16-06-EV]Visit 5: Week 66.672 10^3 cells/uLStandard Deviation 1.8449
ControlSummary of Whole Blood WBC Count and Absolute Change From Baseline (10^3 Cells/uL) by Study Group and Visit From Week 1 to Week 12 (mITT Population) [ALCS-RA-16-06-EV]Visit 3 (Baseline): Week 16.788 10^3 cells/uLStandard Deviation 1.9267
ControlSummary of Whole Blood WBC Count and Absolute Change From Baseline (10^3 Cells/uL) by Study Group and Visit From Week 1 to Week 12 (mITT Population) [ALCS-RA-16-06-EV]Visit 7: Week 126.997 10^3 cells/uLStandard Deviation 2.0107
ControlSummary of Whole Blood WBC Count and Absolute Change From Baseline (10^3 Cells/uL) by Study Group and Visit From Week 1 to Week 12 (mITT Population) [ALCS-RA-16-06-EV]Change from Baseline (Week 12)0.227 10^3 cells/uLStandard Deviation 1.6425
Comparison: Null hypothesis: Whole Blood WBC (x 10\^3/uL) in Test 1 is equal to zero on Visit 5. Alternate hypothesis: Whole Blood WBC (x 10\^3/uL) in Test 1 is NOT equal to zero on Visit 5. (mITT Population)p-value: <0.000195% CI: [-0.951, -0.481]Mixed Models Analysis
Comparison: Null hypothesis: Whole Blood WBC (x 10\^3/uL) in Test 1 is equal to zero on Visit 7. Alternate hypothesis: Whole Blood WBC (x 10\^3/uL) in Test 1 is NOT equal to zero on Visit 7. (mITT Population)p-value: <0.000195% CI: [-0.966, -0.406]Mixed Models Analysis
Comparison: Null hypothesis: Whole Blood WBC (x 10\^3/uL) in Test 2 is equal to zero on Visit 5. Alternate hypothesis: Whole Blood WBC (x 10\^3/uL) in Test 2 is NOT equal to zero on Visit 5. (mITT Population)p-value: <0.000195% CI: [-0.755, -0.288]Mixed Models Analysis
Comparison: Null hypothesis: Whole Blood WBC (x 10\^3/uL) in Test 2 is equal to zero on Visit 7. Alternate hypothesis: Whole Blood WBC (x 10\^3/uL) in Test 2 is NOT equal to zero on Visit 7. (mITT Population)p-value: 0.013195% CI: [-0.612, -0.072]Mixed Models Analysis
Comparison: Null hypothesis: Whole Blood WBC (x 10\^3/uL) in Test 1 + Test 2 is equal to zero on Visit 7. Alternate hypothesis: Whole Blood WBC (x 10\^3/uL) in Test 1 + Test 2 is NOT equal to zero on Visit 7. (mITT Population)p-value: <0.000195% CI: [-0.712, -0.316]Mixed Models Analysis
Comparison: Null hypothesis: Whole Blood WBC (x 10\^3/uL) in Control is equal to zero on Visit 5. Alternate hypothesis: Whole Blood WBC (x 10\^3/uL) in Control is NOT equal to zero on Visit 5. (mITT Population)p-value: 0.043595% CI: [-0.455, -0.007]Mixed Models Analysis
Comparison: Null hypothesis: Whole Blood WBC (x 10\^3/uL) in Control is equal to zero on Visit 7. Alternate hypothesis: Whole Blood WBC (x 10\^3/uL) in Control is NOT equal to zero on Visit 7. (mITT Population)p-value: 0.401295% CI: [-0.149, 0.371]Mixed Models Analysis
Comparison: Null hypothesis: Whole Blood WBC (x 10\^3/uL) in Test 1 is equal to Control on Visit 5. Alternate hypothesis: Whole Blood WBC (x 10\^3/uL) in Test 1 is NOT equal to Control on Visit 5. (mITT Population)p-value: 0.013395% CI: [-0.895, -0.074]Mixed Models Analysis
Comparison: Null hypothesis: Whole Blood WBC (x 10\^3/uL) in Test 1 is equal to Control on Visit 7. Alternate hypothesis: Whole Blood WBC (x 10\^3/uL) in Test 1 is NOT equal to Control on Visit 7. (mITT Population)p-value: 0.000295% CI: [-1.277, -0.317]Mixed Models Analysis
Comparison: Null hypothesis: Whole Blood WBC (x 10\^3/uL) in Test 2 is equal to Control on Visit 5. Alternate hypothesis: Whole Blood WBC (x 10\^3/uL) in Test 2 is NOT equal to Control on Visit 5. (mITT Population)p-value: 0.264195% CI: [-0.699, 0.119]Mixed Models Analysis
Comparison: Null hypothesis: Whole Blood WBC (x 10\^3/uL) in Test 2 is equal to Control on Visit 7. Alternate hypothesis: Whole Blood WBC (x 10\^3/uL) in Test 2 is NOT equal to Control on Visit 7. (mITT Population)p-value: 0.063995% CI: [-0.924, 0.018]Mixed Models Analysis
Comparison: Null hypothesis: Whole Blood WBC (x 10\^3/uL) in Test 1 + Test 2 is equal to Control on Visit 7. Alternate hypothesis: Whole Blood WBC (x 10\^3/uL) in Test 1 + Test 2 is NOT equal to Control on Visit 7. (mITT Population)p-value: 0.000195% CI: [-0.945, -0.305]Mixed Models Analysis
Comparison: Null hypothesis: Whole Blood WBC (x 10\^3/uL) in Test 1 is equal to Test 2 on Visit 7. Alternate hypothesis: Whole Blood WBC (x 10\^3/uL) in Test 1 is NOT equal to Test 2 on Visit 7. (mITT Population)p-value: 0.077695% CI: [-0.725, 0.038]Mixed Models Analysis
Primary

Summary of Whole Blood WBC Count and Absolute Change From Baseline (10^3 Cells/uL) by Study Group and Visit From Week 1 to Week 24 (mITT Population) [ALCS-RA-17-11-EV]

Summary of Whole Blood WBC Count (10\^3 cells/uL) and absolute change from Baseline in Weeks 12, 18 and 24 are presented (Study ALCS-RA-17-11-EV). Blood samples were collected via direct venipuncture on Visits 1, 3 and 5 of the ALCS-RA-17-11-EV study. Baseline samples were collected Week 1 of the ALCS-RA-16-06-EV study. Change from Baseline was calculated as follows: Absolute change from baseline = Post Product Use Value - Baseline Value, where Baseline = values reported on Day 1 (Week 1) of the 12-week ALCS-RA-16-06-EV study Baseline = Day 1 (Week 1), Visit 1 = Week 12 (Day 84 ± 3), Visit 3 = Week 18 (Day 126 ± 3), and Visit 5 = Week 24 (Day 168 ± 3), relative to the start of the 12-week ALCS-RA-16-06-EV study

Time frame: 24 weeks total with measurement timepoints at Week 1/Baseline [ALCS-RA-16-06-EV study]), and Week 12, Week 18 and Week 24 [ALCS-RA-17-11-EV study]

Population: Modified ITT: All subjects were randomized according to the randomization schedule; who used at least one study products after randomization was recorded and for whom there was a valid (within ±3 days of the planned measurement day) baseline and at least one post-baseline biomarker.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Test 1Summary of Whole Blood WBC Count and Absolute Change From Baseline (10^3 Cells/uL) by Study Group and Visit From Week 1 to Week 24 (mITT Population) [ALCS-RA-17-11-EV]Baseline: Week 16.547 10^3 cells/uLStandard Deviation 1.6295
Test 1Summary of Whole Blood WBC Count and Absolute Change From Baseline (10^3 Cells/uL) by Study Group and Visit From Week 1 to Week 24 (mITT Population) [ALCS-RA-17-11-EV]Change from Baseline (Week 18)-0.521 10^3 cells/uLStandard Deviation 1.2722
Test 1Summary of Whole Blood WBC Count and Absolute Change From Baseline (10^3 Cells/uL) by Study Group and Visit From Week 1 to Week 24 (mITT Population) [ALCS-RA-17-11-EV]Change from Baseline (Week 12)-0.340 10^3 cells/uLStandard Deviation 1.3015
Test 1Summary of Whole Blood WBC Count and Absolute Change From Baseline (10^3 Cells/uL) by Study Group and Visit From Week 1 to Week 24 (mITT Population) [ALCS-RA-17-11-EV]Visit 1: Week 126.207 10^3 cells/uLStandard Deviation 1.6
Test 1Summary of Whole Blood WBC Count and Absolute Change From Baseline (10^3 Cells/uL) by Study Group and Visit From Week 1 to Week 24 (mITT Population) [ALCS-RA-17-11-EV]Change from Baseline (Week 24)-0.622 10^3 cells/uLStandard Deviation 1.5029
Test 1Summary of Whole Blood WBC Count and Absolute Change From Baseline (10^3 Cells/uL) by Study Group and Visit From Week 1 to Week 24 (mITT Population) [ALCS-RA-17-11-EV]Visit 3: Week 185.986 10^3 cells/uLStandard Deviation 1.2707
Test 1Summary of Whole Blood WBC Count and Absolute Change From Baseline (10^3 Cells/uL) by Study Group and Visit From Week 1 to Week 24 (mITT Population) [ALCS-RA-17-11-EV]Visit 5: Week 245.972 10^3 cells/uLStandard Deviation 1.275
Test 2Summary of Whole Blood WBC Count and Absolute Change From Baseline (10^3 Cells/uL) by Study Group and Visit From Week 1 to Week 24 (mITT Population) [ALCS-RA-17-11-EV]Change from Baseline (Week 18)-0.224 10^3 cells/uLStandard Deviation 1.9141
Test 2Summary of Whole Blood WBC Count and Absolute Change From Baseline (10^3 Cells/uL) by Study Group and Visit From Week 1 to Week 24 (mITT Population) [ALCS-RA-17-11-EV]Visit 5: Week 246.152 10^3 cells/uLStandard Deviation 1.4051
Test 2Summary of Whole Blood WBC Count and Absolute Change From Baseline (10^3 Cells/uL) by Study Group and Visit From Week 1 to Week 24 (mITT Population) [ALCS-RA-17-11-EV]Visit 3: Week 186.642 10^3 cells/uLStandard Deviation 1.7254
Test 2Summary of Whole Blood WBC Count and Absolute Change From Baseline (10^3 Cells/uL) by Study Group and Visit From Week 1 to Week 24 (mITT Population) [ALCS-RA-17-11-EV]Change from Baseline (Week 12)-0.402 10^3 cells/uLStandard Deviation 1.7483
Test 2Summary of Whole Blood WBC Count and Absolute Change From Baseline (10^3 Cells/uL) by Study Group and Visit From Week 1 to Week 24 (mITT Population) [ALCS-RA-17-11-EV]Change from Baseline (Week 24)-0.762 10^3 cells/uLStandard Deviation 1.5132
Test 2Summary of Whole Blood WBC Count and Absolute Change From Baseline (10^3 Cells/uL) by Study Group and Visit From Week 1 to Week 24 (mITT Population) [ALCS-RA-17-11-EV]Visit 1: Week 126.450 10^3 cells/uLStandard Deviation 1.7554
Test 2Summary of Whole Blood WBC Count and Absolute Change From Baseline (10^3 Cells/uL) by Study Group and Visit From Week 1 to Week 24 (mITT Population) [ALCS-RA-17-11-EV]Baseline: Week 16.851 10^3 cells/uLStandard Deviation 1.8432
Test 1 + Test 2 GroupSummary of Whole Blood WBC Count and Absolute Change From Baseline (10^3 Cells/uL) by Study Group and Visit From Week 1 to Week 24 (mITT Population) [ALCS-RA-17-11-EV]Visit 5: Week 246.067 10^3 cells/uLStandard Deviation 1.3408
Test 1 + Test 2 GroupSummary of Whole Blood WBC Count and Absolute Change From Baseline (10^3 Cells/uL) by Study Group and Visit From Week 1 to Week 24 (mITT Population) [ALCS-RA-17-11-EV]Baseline: Week 16.704 10^3 cells/uLStandard Deviation 1.7406
Test 1 + Test 2 GroupSummary of Whole Blood WBC Count and Absolute Change From Baseline (10^3 Cells/uL) by Study Group and Visit From Week 1 to Week 24 (mITT Population) [ALCS-RA-17-11-EV]Visit 1: Week 126.332 10^3 cells/uLStandard Deviation 1.6776
Test 1 + Test 2 GroupSummary of Whole Blood WBC Count and Absolute Change From Baseline (10^3 Cells/uL) by Study Group and Visit From Week 1 to Week 24 (mITT Population) [ALCS-RA-17-11-EV]Visit 3: Week 186.347 10^3 cells/uLStandard Deviation 1.5643
Test 1 + Test 2 GroupSummary of Whole Blood WBC Count and Absolute Change From Baseline (10^3 Cells/uL) by Study Group and Visit From Week 1 to Week 24 (mITT Population) [ALCS-RA-17-11-EV]Change from Baseline (Week 12)-0.372 10^3 cells/uLStandard Deviation 1.5404
Test 1 + Test 2 GroupSummary of Whole Blood WBC Count and Absolute Change From Baseline (10^3 Cells/uL) by Study Group and Visit From Week 1 to Week 24 (mITT Population) [ALCS-RA-17-11-EV]Change from Baseline (Week 18)-0.357 10^3 cells/uLStandard Deviation 1.6547
Test 1 + Test 2 GroupSummary of Whole Blood WBC Count and Absolute Change From Baseline (10^3 Cells/uL) by Study Group and Visit From Week 1 to Week 24 (mITT Population) [ALCS-RA-17-11-EV]Change from Baseline (Week 24)-0.696 10^3 cells/uLStandard Deviation 1.5014
ControlSummary of Whole Blood WBC Count and Absolute Change From Baseline (10^3 Cells/uL) by Study Group and Visit From Week 1 to Week 24 (mITT Population) [ALCS-RA-17-11-EV]Visit 3: Week 187.073 10^3 cells/uLStandard Deviation 2.0805
ControlSummary of Whole Blood WBC Count and Absolute Change From Baseline (10^3 Cells/uL) by Study Group and Visit From Week 1 to Week 24 (mITT Population) [ALCS-RA-17-11-EV]Change from Baseline (Week 24)0.202 10^3 cells/uLStandard Deviation 1.5842
ControlSummary of Whole Blood WBC Count and Absolute Change From Baseline (10^3 Cells/uL) by Study Group and Visit From Week 1 to Week 24 (mITT Population) [ALCS-RA-17-11-EV]Change from Baseline (Week 18)0.035 10^3 cells/uLStandard Deviation 1.9567
ControlSummary of Whole Blood WBC Count and Absolute Change From Baseline (10^3 Cells/uL) by Study Group and Visit From Week 1 to Week 24 (mITT Population) [ALCS-RA-17-11-EV]Visit 1: Week 127.230 10^3 cells/uLStandard Deviation 1.9184
ControlSummary of Whole Blood WBC Count and Absolute Change From Baseline (10^3 Cells/uL) by Study Group and Visit From Week 1 to Week 24 (mITT Population) [ALCS-RA-17-11-EV]Baseline: Week 17.082 10^3 cells/uLStandard Deviation 1.9593
ControlSummary of Whole Blood WBC Count and Absolute Change From Baseline (10^3 Cells/uL) by Study Group and Visit From Week 1 to Week 24 (mITT Population) [ALCS-RA-17-11-EV]Change from Baseline (Week 12)0.174 10^3 cells/uLStandard Deviation 1.9309
ControlSummary of Whole Blood WBC Count and Absolute Change From Baseline (10^3 Cells/uL) by Study Group and Visit From Week 1 to Week 24 (mITT Population) [ALCS-RA-17-11-EV]Visit 5: Week 247.401 10^3 cells/uLStandard Deviation 1.6116
Comparison: Null hypothesis: Absolute change from Baseline for Whole Blood WBC (x 10\^3/uL) in Test 1 is equal to zero on Visit 1 (Week 12), relative to the start of the 12-week ALCS-RA-16-06-EV study. Alternate hypothesis: Absolute change from Baseline (Week 1) for Whole Blood WBC (x 10\^3/uL) in Test 1 is NOT equal to zero on Visit 1 (Week 12), relative to the start of the 12-week ALCS-RA-16-06-EV study. (mITT Population)p-value: 0.005595% CI: [-1.055, -0.186]Mixed Models Analysis
Comparison: Null hypothesis: Absolute change from Baseline for Whole Blood WBC (x 10\^3/uL) in Test 1 is equal to zero on Visit 3 (Week 18), relative to the start of the 12-week ALCS-RA-16-06-EV study. Alternate hypothesis: Absolute change from Baseline (Week 1) for Whole Blood WBC (x 10\^3/uL) in Test 1 is NOT equal to zero on Visit 3 (Week 18), relative to the start of the 12-week ALCS-RA-16-06-EV study. (mITT Population)p-value: 0.001195% CI: [-1.24, -0.316]Mixed Models Analysis
Comparison: Null hypothesis: Absolute change from Baseline for Whole Blood WBC (x 10\^3/uL) in Test 1 is equal to zero on Visit 5 (Week 24), relative to the start of the 12-week ALCS-RA-16-06-EV study. Alternate hypothesis: Absolute change from Baseline (Week 1) for Whole Blood WBC (x 10\^3/uL) in Test 1 is NOT equal to zero on Visit 5 (Week 24), relative to the start of the 12-week ALCS-RA-16-06-EV study. (mITT Population)p-value: <0.000195% CI: [-1.26, -0.54]Mixed Models Analysis
Comparison: Null hypothesis: Absolute change from Baseline for Whole Blood WBC (x 10\^3/uL) in Test 2 is equal to zero on Visit 1 (Week 12), relative to the start of the 12-week ALCS-RA-16-06-EV study. Alternate hypothesis: Absolute change from Baseline (Week 1) for Whole Blood WBC (x 10\^3/uL) in Test 2 is NOT equal to zero on Visit 1 (Week 12), relative to the start of the 12-week ALCS-RA-16-06-EV study. (mITT Population)p-value: 0.01595% CI: [-0.938, -0.103]Mixed Models Analysis
Comparison: Null hypothesis: Absolute change from Baseline for Whole Blood WBC (x 10\^3/uL) in Test 2 is equal to zero on Visit 3 (Week 18), relative to the start of the 12-week ALCS-RA-16-06-EV study. Alternate hypothesis: Absolute change from Baseline (Week 1) for Whole Blood WBC (x 10\^3/uL) in Test 2 is NOT equal to zero on Visit 3 (Week 18), relative to the start of the 12-week ALCS-RA-16-06-EV study. (mITT Population)p-value: 0.104895% CI: [-0.771, 0.074]Mixed Models Analysis
Comparison: Null hypothesis: Absolute change from Baseline for Whole Blood WBC (x 10\^3/uL) in Test2 is equal to zero on Visit 5 (Week 24), relative to the start of the 12-week ALCS-RA-16-06-EV study. Alternate hypothesis: Absolute change from Baseline (Week 1) for Whole Blood WBC (x 10\^3/uL) in Test2 is NOT equal to zero on Visit 5 (Week 24), relative to the start of the 12-week ALCS-RA-16-06-EV study. (mITT Population)p-value: <0.000195% CI: [-1.185, -0.507]Mixed Models Analysis
Comparison: Null hypothesis: Absolute change from Baseline for Whole Blood WBC (x 10\^3/uL) in Test 1 + Test 2 is equal to zero on Visit 5 (Week 24), relative to the start of the 12-week ALCS-RA-16-06-EV study. Alternate hypothesis: Absolute change from Baseline (Week 1) for Whole Blood WBC (x 10\^3/uL) in Test 1 + Test 2 is NOT equal to zero on Visit 5 (Week 24), relative to the start of the 12-week ALCS-RA-16-06-EV study. (mITT Population)p-value: <0.000195% CI: [-1.127, -0.619]Mixed Models Analysis
Comparison: Null hypothesis: Absolute change from Baseline for Whole Blood WBC (x 10\^3/uL) in Control is equal to zero on Visit 1 (Week 12), relative to the start of the 12-week ALCS-RA-16-06-EV study. Alternate hypothesis: Absolute change from Baseline (Week 1) for Whole Blood WBC (x 10\^3/uL) in Control is NOT equal to zero on Visit 1 (Week 12), relative to the start of the 12-week ALCS-RA-16-06-EV study. (mITT Population)p-value: 0.252595% CI: [-0.178, 0.671]Mixed Models Analysis
Comparison: Null hypothesis: Absolute change from Baseline for Whole Blood WBC (x 10\^3/uL) in Control is equal to zero on Visit 3 (Week 18), relative to the start of the 12-week ALCS-RA-16-06-EV study. Alternate hypothesis: Absolute change from Baseline (Week 1) for Whole Blood WBC (x 10\^3/uL) in Control is NOT equal to zero on Visit 3 (Week 18), relative to the start of the 12-week ALCS-RA-16-06-EV study. (mITT Population)p-value: 0.650395% CI: [-0.33, 0.527]Mixed Models Analysis
Comparison: Null hypothesis: Absolute change from Baseline for Whole Blood WBC (x 10\^3/uL) in Control is equal to zero on Visit 5 (Week 24), relative to the start of the 12-week ALCS-RA-16-06-EV study. Alternate hypothesis: Absolute change from Baseline (Week 1) for Whole Blood WBC (x 10\^3/uL) in Control is NOT equal to zero on Visit 5 (Week 24), relative to the start of the 12-week ALCS-RA-16-06-EV study. (mITT Population)p-value: 0.175995% CI: [-0.109, 0.588]Mixed Models Analysis
Comparison: Null hypothesis: Absolute change from Baseline for Whole Blood WBC (x 10\^3/uL) in Test 1 is equal to Control on Visit 1 (Week 12), relative to the start of the 12-week ALCS-RA-16-06-EV study. Alternate hypothesis: Absolute change from Baseline (Week 1) for Whole Blood WBC (x 10\^3/uL) in Test 1 is NOT equal to Control on Visit 1 (Week 12), relative to the start of the 12-week ALCS-RA-16-06-EV study. (mITT Population)p-value: 0.029395% CI: [-1.674, -0.06]Mixed Models Analysis
Comparison: Null hypothesis: Absolute change from Baseline for Whole Blood WBC (x 10\^3/uL) in Test 1 is equal to Control on Visit 3 (Week 18), relative to the start of the 12-week ALCS-RA-16-06-EV study. Alternate hypothesis: Absolute change from Baseline (Week 1) for Whole Blood WBC (x 10\^3/uL) in Test 1 is NOT equal to Control on Visit 3 (Week 18), relative to the start of the 12-week ALCS-RA-16-06-EV study. (mITT Population)p-value: 0.036295% CI: [-1.714, -0.038]Mixed Models Analysis
Comparison: Null hypothesis: Absolute change from Baseline for Whole Blood WBC (x 10\^3/uL) in Test 1 is equal to Control on Visit 5 (Week 24), relative to the start of the 12-week ALCS-RA-16-06-EV study. Alternate hypothesis: Absolute change from Baseline (Week 1) for Whole Blood WBC (x 10\^3/uL) in Test 1 is NOT equal to Control on Visit 5 (Week 24), relative to the start of the 12-week ALCS-RA-16-06-EV study. (mITT Population)p-value: <0.000195% CI: [-1.809, -0.469]Mixed Models Analysis
Comparison: Null hypothesis: Absolute change from Baseline for Whole Blood WBC (x 10\^3/uL) in Test 2 is equal to Control on Visit 1 (Week 12), relative to the start of the 12-week ALCS-RA-16-06-EV study. Alternate hypothesis: Absolute change from Baseline (Week 1) for Whole Blood WBC (x 10\^3/uL) in Test 2 is NOT equal to Control on Visit 1 (Week 12), relative to the start of the 12-week ALCS-RA-16-06-EV study. (mITT Population)p-value: 0.062195% CI: [-1.559, 0.025]Mixed Models Analysis
Comparison: Null hypothesis: Absolute change from Baseline for Whole Blood WBC (x 10\^3/uL) in Test 2 is equal to Control on Visit 3 (Week 18), relative to the start of the 12-week ALCS-RA-16-06-EV study. Alternate hypothesis: Absolute change from Baseline (Week 1) for Whole Blood WBC (x 10\^3/uL) in Test 2 is NOT equal to Control on Visit 3 (Week 18), relative to the start of the 12-week ALCS-RA-16-06-EV study. (mITT Population)p-value: 0.525995% CI: [-1.246, 0.352]Mixed Models Analysis
Comparison: Null hypothesis: Absolute change from Baseline for Whole Blood WBC (x 10\^3/uL) in Test 2 is equal to Control on Visit 5 (Week 24), relative to the start of the 12-week ALCS-RA-16-06-EV study. Alternate hypothesis: Absolute change from Baseline (Week 1) for Whole Blood WBC (x 10\^3/uL) in Test 2 is NOT equal to Control on Visit 5 (Week 24), relative to the start of the 12-week ALCS-RA-16-06-EV study. (mITT Population)p-value: <0.000195% CI: [-1.736, -0.435]Mixed Models Analysis
Comparison: Null hypothesis: Absolute change from Baseline for Whole Blood WBC (x 10\^3/uL) in Test 1 + Test 2 is equal to Control on Visit 5 (Week 24), relative to the start of the 12-week ALCS-RA-16-06-EV study. Alternate hypothesis: Absolute change from Baseline (Week 1) for Whole Blood WBC (x 10\^3/uL) in Test 1 + Test 2 is NOT equal to Control on Visit 5 (Week 24), relative to the start of the 12-week ALCS-RA-16-06-EV study. (mITT Population)p-value: <0.000195% CI: [-1.532, -0.693]Mixed Models Analysis
Comparison: Null hypothesis: Absolute change from Baseline for Whole Blood WBC (x 10\^3/uL) in Test 2 is equal to Test 1 on Visit 5 (Week 24), relative to the start of the 12-week ALCS-RA-16-06-EV study. Alternate hypothesis: Absolute change from Baseline (Week 1) for Whole Blood WBC (x 10\^3/uL) in Test 2 is NOT equal to Test 1 on Visit 5 (Week 24), relative to the start of the 12-week ALCS-RA-16-06-EV study. (mITT Population)p-value: 0.824895% CI: [-0.535, 0.427]Mixed Models Analysis
Secondary

Frequency of eCO as Compliance Indicator, Weeks 12 (Study ALCS-RA-16-06-EV) and 24 (Study ALCS-RA-17-11-EV)

Participant compliance for the abstention of any type of tobacco/nicotine product for the duration of the study was assessed by measuring the participant's exhaled carbon monoxide (eCO, ppm). According to their eCO measurements at Weeks 12 (study ALCS-RA-16-06-EV) and Week 24 (study ALCS-RA-17-11-EV), participants were categorized into 1 of 3 categories: 'eCO ≤ 5', 'eCO \< 5 - ≤ 8', or 'eCO \> 8'. Lower eCO values represent lower smoking exposure and increased compliance, with the 'eCO ≤ 5' category indicating that the participant abstained from smoking, the 'eCO \< 5 - ≤ 8' category indicating low smoking exposure to the participant, and the 'eCO \> 8' category indicating non-compliance with the study criteria that the participant refrain from smoking during the study.

Time frame: Weeks 12 (Study ALCS-RA-16-06-EV) and Week 24 (Study ALCS-RA-17-11-EV) from randomization

Population: Modified ITT: All subjects were randomized according to the randomization schedule; who used at least one study products after randomization was recorded and for whom there was a valid (within ±3 days of the planned measurement day) baseline and at least one post-baseline biomarker.

ArmMeasureGroupCategoryValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Test 1Frequency of eCO as Compliance Indicator, Weeks 12 (Study ALCS-RA-16-06-EV) and 24 (Study ALCS-RA-17-11-EV)Exhaled CO at Week 12eCO ≤ 576 Participants
Test 1Frequency of eCO as Compliance Indicator, Weeks 12 (Study ALCS-RA-16-06-EV) and 24 (Study ALCS-RA-17-11-EV)Exhaled CO at Week 12eCO < 5 - ≤ 813 Participants
Test 1Frequency of eCO as Compliance Indicator, Weeks 12 (Study ALCS-RA-16-06-EV) and 24 (Study ALCS-RA-17-11-EV)Exhaled CO at Week 12eCO > 823 Participants
Test 1Frequency of eCO as Compliance Indicator, Weeks 12 (Study ALCS-RA-16-06-EV) and 24 (Study ALCS-RA-17-11-EV)Exhaled CO at Week 24eCO ≤ 535 Participants
Test 1Frequency of eCO as Compliance Indicator, Weeks 12 (Study ALCS-RA-16-06-EV) and 24 (Study ALCS-RA-17-11-EV)Exhaled CO at Week 24eCO > 82 Participants
Test 1Frequency of eCO as Compliance Indicator, Weeks 12 (Study ALCS-RA-16-06-EV) and 24 (Study ALCS-RA-17-11-EV)Exhaled CO at Week 24eCO < 5 - ≤ 85 Participants
Test 2Frequency of eCO as Compliance Indicator, Weeks 12 (Study ALCS-RA-16-06-EV) and 24 (Study ALCS-RA-17-11-EV)Exhaled CO at Week 24eCO < 5 - ≤ 84 Participants
Test 2Frequency of eCO as Compliance Indicator, Weeks 12 (Study ALCS-RA-16-06-EV) and 24 (Study ALCS-RA-17-11-EV)Exhaled CO at Week 12eCO ≤ 577 Participants
Test 2Frequency of eCO as Compliance Indicator, Weeks 12 (Study ALCS-RA-16-06-EV) and 24 (Study ALCS-RA-17-11-EV)Exhaled CO at Week 24eCO ≤ 540 Participants
Test 2Frequency of eCO as Compliance Indicator, Weeks 12 (Study ALCS-RA-16-06-EV) and 24 (Study ALCS-RA-17-11-EV)Exhaled CO at Week 24eCO > 84 Participants
Test 2Frequency of eCO as Compliance Indicator, Weeks 12 (Study ALCS-RA-16-06-EV) and 24 (Study ALCS-RA-17-11-EV)Exhaled CO at Week 12eCO > 823 Participants
Test 2Frequency of eCO as Compliance Indicator, Weeks 12 (Study ALCS-RA-16-06-EV) and 24 (Study ALCS-RA-17-11-EV)Exhaled CO at Week 12eCO < 5 - ≤ 821 Participants
Secondary

Percentage of Predicted FEV1 and Absolute Change From Baseline to Week 12 by Study Group (mITT Population) [ALCS-RA-16-06-EV]

Percentage of predicted forced expiratory volume in the first second (FEV1) and absolute change from Baseline to Week 12 by Study Group is presented (Study ALCS-RA-16-06-EV). Baseline / Screening = Day -28 to Day -5 Visit 7 (Week 12) = Day 84 ± 3 Absolute change from baseline = Post Product Use Value - Baseline Value FEV1 = Forced Expiratory Volume in 1 Second

Time frame: Assessments at Screening (Day -28 to Day -5) and Week 12 (Day 84 +/- 3 )

Population: Modified ITT: All subjects were randomized according to the randomization schedule; who used at least one study products after randomization was recorded and for whom there was a valid (within ±3 days of the planned measurement day) baseline and at least one post-baseline biomarker.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Test 1Percentage of Predicted FEV1 and Absolute Change From Baseline to Week 12 by Study Group (mITT Population) [ALCS-RA-16-06-EV]Screening (Baseline)91.059 percentage of predicted FEV1Standard Deviation 13.9979
Test 1Percentage of Predicted FEV1 and Absolute Change From Baseline to Week 12 by Study Group (mITT Population) [ALCS-RA-16-06-EV]Change from Baseline at Week 12-1.070 percentage of predicted FEV1Standard Deviation 6.5798
Test 1Percentage of Predicted FEV1 and Absolute Change From Baseline to Week 12 by Study Group (mITT Population) [ALCS-RA-16-06-EV]Week 1289.989 percentage of predicted FEV1Standard Deviation 13.714
Test 2Percentage of Predicted FEV1 and Absolute Change From Baseline to Week 12 by Study Group (mITT Population) [ALCS-RA-16-06-EV]Screening (Baseline)91.335 percentage of predicted FEV1Standard Deviation 12.8396
Test 2Percentage of Predicted FEV1 and Absolute Change From Baseline to Week 12 by Study Group (mITT Population) [ALCS-RA-16-06-EV]Change from Baseline at Week 12-0.416 percentage of predicted FEV1Standard Deviation 5.4848
Test 2Percentage of Predicted FEV1 and Absolute Change From Baseline to Week 12 by Study Group (mITT Population) [ALCS-RA-16-06-EV]Week 1290.918 percentage of predicted FEV1Standard Deviation 13.3174
Test 1 + Test 2 GroupPercentage of Predicted FEV1 and Absolute Change From Baseline to Week 12 by Study Group (mITT Population) [ALCS-RA-16-06-EV]Week 1290.480 percentage of predicted FEV1Standard Deviation 13.4818
Test 1 + Test 2 GroupPercentage of Predicted FEV1 and Absolute Change From Baseline to Week 12 by Study Group (mITT Population) [ALCS-RA-16-06-EV]Screening (Baseline)91.205 percentage of predicted FEV1Standard Deviation 13.3671
Test 1 + Test 2 GroupPercentage of Predicted FEV1 and Absolute Change From Baseline to Week 12 by Study Group (mITT Population) [ALCS-RA-16-06-EV]Change from Baseline at Week 12-0.725 percentage of predicted FEV1Standard Deviation 6.0205
ControlPercentage of Predicted FEV1 and Absolute Change From Baseline to Week 12 by Study Group (mITT Population) [ALCS-RA-16-06-EV]Screening (Baseline)90.139 percentage of predicted FEV1Standard Deviation 13.4146
ControlPercentage of Predicted FEV1 and Absolute Change From Baseline to Week 12 by Study Group (mITT Population) [ALCS-RA-16-06-EV]Change from Baseline at Week 12-2.396 percentage of predicted FEV1Standard Deviation 6.2471
ControlPercentage of Predicted FEV1 and Absolute Change From Baseline to Week 12 by Study Group (mITT Population) [ALCS-RA-16-06-EV]Week 1287.743 percentage of predicted FEV1Standard Deviation 13.4729
Comparison: Null hypothesis: Absolute change from Baseline (Screening) for Percentage of Predicted FEV1 (%) in Test 1 is equal to Control on Visit 7 (Week 12). Alternate hypothesis: Absolute change from Baseline (Screening) for Percentage of Predicted FEV1 (%) in Test 1 is NOT equal to Control on Visit 7 (Week 12). (mITT Population)p-value: 0.083995% CI: [-0.19, 3.04]ANCOVA
Comparison: Null hypothesis: Absolute change from Baseline (Screening) for Percentage of Predicted FEV1 (%) in Test 2 is equal to Control on Visit 7 (Week 12). Alternate hypothesis: Absolute change from Baseline (Screening) for Percentage of Predicted FEV1 (%) in Test 2 is NOT equal to Control on Visit 7 (Week 12). (mITT Population)p-value: 0.008995% CI: [0.53, 3.66]ANCOVA
Secondary

Percentage of Predicted FEV1/FVC and Absolute Change From Baseline to Week 12 by Study Group (mITT Population) [ALCS-RA-16-06-EV]

Percentage of predicted FEV1/FVC and absolute change from Baseline to Week 12 by Study Group is presented (Study ALCS-RA-16-06-EV). Baseline / Screening = Day -28 to Day -5 Visit 7 (Week 12) = Day 84 ± 3 Absolute change from baseline = Post Product Use Value - Baseline Value FEV1 = Forced Expiratory Volume in 1 Second, FVC = Forced Vital Capacity.

Time frame: Assessments at Screening (Day -28 to Day -5) and Week 12 (Day 84 +/- 3 )

Population: Modified ITT: All subjects were randomized according to the randomization schedule; who used at least one study products after randomization was recorded and for whom there was a valid (within ±3 days of the planned measurement day) baseline and at least one post-baseline biomarker.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Test 1Percentage of Predicted FEV1/FVC and Absolute Change From Baseline to Week 12 by Study Group (mITT Population) [ALCS-RA-16-06-EV]Change from Baseline at Week 120.017 percentage of predicted FEV1/FVCStandard Deviation 4.4796
Test 1Percentage of Predicted FEV1/FVC and Absolute Change From Baseline to Week 12 by Study Group (mITT Population) [ALCS-RA-16-06-EV]Week 1298.219 percentage of predicted FEV1/FVCStandard Deviation 7.7279
Test 1Percentage of Predicted FEV1/FVC and Absolute Change From Baseline to Week 12 by Study Group (mITT Population) [ALCS-RA-16-06-EV]Screening (Baseline)98.202 percentage of predicted FEV1/FVCStandard Deviation 7.5989
Test 2Percentage of Predicted FEV1/FVC and Absolute Change From Baseline to Week 12 by Study Group (mITT Population) [ALCS-RA-16-06-EV]Change from Baseline at Week 120.600 percentage of predicted FEV1/FVCStandard Deviation 3.3508
Test 2Percentage of Predicted FEV1/FVC and Absolute Change From Baseline to Week 12 by Study Group (mITT Population) [ALCS-RA-16-06-EV]Screening (Baseline)97.535 percentage of predicted FEV1/FVCStandard Deviation 7.9699
Test 2Percentage of Predicted FEV1/FVC and Absolute Change From Baseline to Week 12 by Study Group (mITT Population) [ALCS-RA-16-06-EV]Week 1298.135 percentage of predicted FEV1/FVCStandard Deviation 7.3706
Test 1 + Test 2 GroupPercentage of Predicted FEV1/FVC and Absolute Change From Baseline to Week 12 by Study Group (mITT Population) [ALCS-RA-16-06-EV]Change from Baseline at Week 120.325 percentage of predicted FEV1/FVCStandard Deviation 3.9251
Test 1 + Test 2 GroupPercentage of Predicted FEV1/FVC and Absolute Change From Baseline to Week 12 by Study Group (mITT Population) [ALCS-RA-16-06-EV]Week 1298.175 percentage of predicted FEV1/FVCStandard Deviation 7.5234
Test 1 + Test 2 GroupPercentage of Predicted FEV1/FVC and Absolute Change From Baseline to Week 12 by Study Group (mITT Population) [ALCS-RA-16-06-EV]Screening (Baseline)97.849 percentage of predicted FEV1/FVCStandard Deviation 7.7859
ControlPercentage of Predicted FEV1/FVC and Absolute Change From Baseline to Week 12 by Study Group (mITT Population) [ALCS-RA-16-06-EV]Change from Baseline at Week 12-1.285 percentage of predicted FEV1/FVCStandard Deviation 5.5994
ControlPercentage of Predicted FEV1/FVC and Absolute Change From Baseline to Week 12 by Study Group (mITT Population) [ALCS-RA-16-06-EV]Week 1295.959 percentage of predicted FEV1/FVCStandard Deviation 8.1492
ControlPercentage of Predicted FEV1/FVC and Absolute Change From Baseline to Week 12 by Study Group (mITT Population) [ALCS-RA-16-06-EV]Screening (Baseline)97.243 percentage of predicted FEV1/FVCStandard Deviation 8.1131
Comparison: Null hypothesis: Absolute change from Baseline (Screening) for Percentage of Predicted FEV1/FVC (%) in Test 1 is equal to Control on Visit 7 (Week 12). Alternate hypothesis: Absolute change from Baseline (Screening) for Percentage of Predicted FEV1/FVC (%) in Test 1 is NOT equal to Control on Visit 7 (Week 12). (mITT Population)p-value: 0.013695% CI: [0.31, 2.66]ANCOVA
Comparison: Null hypothesis: Absolute change from Baseline (Screening) for Percentage of Predicted FEV1/FVC (%) in Test 2 is equal to Control on Visit 7 (Week 12). Alternate hypothesis: Absolute change from Baseline (Screening) for Percentage of Predicted FEV1/FVC (%) in Test 2 is NOT equal to Control on Visit 7 (Week 12). (mITT Population)p-value: 0.000995% CI: [0.8, 3.08]ANCOVA
Secondary

Percentage of Predicted FVC and Absolute Change From Baseline to Week 12 by Study Group (mITT Population) [ALCS-RA-16-06-EV]

Percentage of predicted forced vital capacity (FVC) and absolute change from Baseline to Week 12 by Study Group is presented (Study ALCS-RA-16-06-EV). Baseline / Screening = Day -28 to Day -5 Visit 7 (Week 12) = Day 84 ± 3 Absolute change from baseline = Post Product Use Value - Baseline Value FVC = Forced Vital Capacity

Time frame: Assessments at Screening (Day -28 to Day -5) and Week 12 (Day 84 +/- 3 )

Population: Modified ITT: All subjects were randomized according to the randomization schedule; who used at least one study products after randomization was recorded and for whom there was a valid (within ±3 days of the planned measurement day) baseline and at least one post-baseline biomarker.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Test 1Percentage of Predicted FVC and Absolute Change From Baseline to Week 12 by Study Group (mITT Population) [ALCS-RA-16-06-EV]Screening (Baseline)92.709 percentage of predicted FVCStandard Deviation 12.7747
Test 1Percentage of Predicted FVC and Absolute Change From Baseline to Week 12 by Study Group (mITT Population) [ALCS-RA-16-06-EV]Change from Baseline at Week 12-0.976 percentage of predicted FVCStandard Deviation 5.1281
Test 1Percentage of Predicted FVC and Absolute Change From Baseline to Week 12 by Study Group (mITT Population) [ALCS-RA-16-06-EV]Week 1291.733 percentage of predicted FVCStandard Deviation 13.3234
Test 2Percentage of Predicted FVC and Absolute Change From Baseline to Week 12 by Study Group (mITT Population) [ALCS-RA-16-06-EV]Change from Baseline at Week 12-1.059 percentage of predicted FVCStandard Deviation 5.3244
Test 2Percentage of Predicted FVC and Absolute Change From Baseline to Week 12 by Study Group (mITT Population) [ALCS-RA-16-06-EV]Screening (Baseline)93.789 percentage of predicted FVCStandard Deviation 11.7222
Test 2Percentage of Predicted FVC and Absolute Change From Baseline to Week 12 by Study Group (mITT Population) [ALCS-RA-16-06-EV]Week 1292.730 percentage of predicted FVCStandard Deviation 11.9222
Test 1 + Test 2 GroupPercentage of Predicted FVC and Absolute Change From Baseline to Week 12 by Study Group (mITT Population) [ALCS-RA-16-06-EV]Change from Baseline at Week 12-1.020 percentage of predicted FVCStandard Deviation 5.2205
Test 1 + Test 2 GroupPercentage of Predicted FVC and Absolute Change From Baseline to Week 12 by Study Group (mITT Population) [ALCS-RA-16-06-EV]Screening (Baseline)93.280 percentage of predicted FVCStandard Deviation 12.2126
Test 1 + Test 2 GroupPercentage of Predicted FVC and Absolute Change From Baseline to Week 12 by Study Group (mITT Population) [ALCS-RA-16-06-EV]Week 1292.260 percentage of predicted FVCStandard Deviation 12.5822
ControlPercentage of Predicted FVC and Absolute Change From Baseline to Week 12 by Study Group (mITT Population) [ALCS-RA-16-06-EV]Screening (Baseline)92.809 percentage of predicted FVCStandard Deviation 12.2784
ControlPercentage of Predicted FVC and Absolute Change From Baseline to Week 12 by Study Group (mITT Population) [ALCS-RA-16-06-EV]Change from Baseline at Week 12-1.257 percentage of predicted FVCStandard Deviation 5.1665
ControlPercentage of Predicted FVC and Absolute Change From Baseline to Week 12 by Study Group (mITT Population) [ALCS-RA-16-06-EV]Week 1291.552 percentage of predicted FVCStandard Deviation 12.7403
Comparison: Null hypothesis: Absolute change from Baseline (Screening) for Percentage of Predicted FVC (%) in Test 1 is equal to Control on Visit 7 (Week 12). Alternate hypothesis: Absolute change from Baseline (Screening) for Percentage of Predicted FVC (%) in Test 1 is NOT equal to Control on Visit 7 (Week 12). (mITT Population)p-value: 0.710195% CI: [-1.13, 1.66]ANCOVA
Comparison: Null hypothesis: Absolute change from Baseline (Screening) for Percentage of Predicted FVC (%) in Test 2 is equal to Control on Visit 7 (Week 12). Alternate hypothesis: Absolute change from Baseline (Screening) for Percentage of Predicted FVC (%) in Test 2 is NOT equal to Control on Visit 7 (Week 12). (mITT Population)p-value: 0.732595% CI: [-1.12, 1.59]ANCOVA
Other Pre-specified

Summary of Urine Nicotine Equivalents and Absolute Change From Baseline (mg/g) by Study Group and Visit From Week 1 to Week 12 (mITT Population) [ALCS-RA-16-06-EV]

Summary of urine Nicotine Equivalents (mg/g) and absolute change from Baseline in Weeks 6 and 12 are presented (Study ALCS-RA-16-06-EV). The first urine void of the day was collected at Visits 3, 5 and 7. Nicotine equivalents (μg/mL) = (nicotine \[ng/mL\]/162.23 \[mg/mmol\] + nicotinegluc (ng/mL)/338.36 \[mg/mmol\] + cotinine \[ng/mL\]/176.22 \[mg/mmol\] + cotininegluc \[ng/mL\]/352.34 \[mg/mmol\] + trans-3'-hydroxycotinine \[ng/mL\]/192.22 \[mg/mmol\] + trans-3'-hydroxycotinine-gluc \[ng/mL\]/368.34 \[mg/mmol\]) x 162.23 (mg/mmol) x 1 μg/1000 ng Urine creatinine concentration was measured in the urine collection and used to adjust the urine biomarker concentration value as follows: Urine biomarker (ng/g creatinine) = urine biomarker (pg/mL) x 100 / creatinine (mg/dL) Absolute change from baseline = Post Product Use Value - Baseline Value Baseline / Visit 3 (Week 1) = Day 1 Visit 5 (Week 6) = Day 42 ± 3 Visit 7 (Week 12) = Day 84 ± 3

Time frame: 12 weeks total with measurement timepoints at Week 1/Baseline, Week 6 and Week 12

Population: Modified ITT: All subjects were randomized according to the randomization schedule; who used at least one study products after randomization was recorded and for whom there was a valid (within ±3 days of the planned measurement day) baseline and at least one post-baseline biomarker.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Test 1Summary of Urine Nicotine Equivalents and Absolute Change From Baseline (mg/g) by Study Group and Visit From Week 1 to Week 12 (mITT Population) [ALCS-RA-16-06-EV]Visit 5: Week 610.666 mg/gStandard Deviation 7.4649
Test 1Summary of Urine Nicotine Equivalents and Absolute Change From Baseline (mg/g) by Study Group and Visit From Week 1 to Week 12 (mITT Population) [ALCS-RA-16-06-EV]Change from Baseline (Week 12)0.219 mg/gStandard Deviation 5.2922
Test 1Summary of Urine Nicotine Equivalents and Absolute Change From Baseline (mg/g) by Study Group and Visit From Week 1 to Week 12 (mITT Population) [ALCS-RA-16-06-EV]Visit 7: Week 1210.869 mg/gStandard Deviation 7.5555
Test 1Summary of Urine Nicotine Equivalents and Absolute Change From Baseline (mg/g) by Study Group and Visit From Week 1 to Week 12 (mITT Population) [ALCS-RA-16-06-EV]Visit 3 (Baseline): Week 110.865 mg/gStandard Deviation 5.6124
Test 1Summary of Urine Nicotine Equivalents and Absolute Change From Baseline (mg/g) by Study Group and Visit From Week 1 to Week 12 (mITT Population) [ALCS-RA-16-06-EV]Change from Baseline (Week 6)-0.109 mg/gStandard Deviation 5.7252
Test 2Summary of Urine Nicotine Equivalents and Absolute Change From Baseline (mg/g) by Study Group and Visit From Week 1 to Week 12 (mITT Population) [ALCS-RA-16-06-EV]Change from Baseline (Week 6)-0.600 mg/gStandard Deviation 5.0695
Test 2Summary of Urine Nicotine Equivalents and Absolute Change From Baseline (mg/g) by Study Group and Visit From Week 1 to Week 12 (mITT Population) [ALCS-RA-16-06-EV]Change from Baseline (Week 12)0.435 mg/gStandard Deviation 4.9935
Test 2Summary of Urine Nicotine Equivalents and Absolute Change From Baseline (mg/g) by Study Group and Visit From Week 1 to Week 12 (mITT Population) [ALCS-RA-16-06-EV]Visit 7: Week 1211.054 mg/gStandard Deviation 7.0353
Test 2Summary of Urine Nicotine Equivalents and Absolute Change From Baseline (mg/g) by Study Group and Visit From Week 1 to Week 12 (mITT Population) [ALCS-RA-16-06-EV]Visit 5: Week 610.026 mg/gStandard Deviation 7.0465
Test 2Summary of Urine Nicotine Equivalents and Absolute Change From Baseline (mg/g) by Study Group and Visit From Week 1 to Week 12 (mITT Population) [ALCS-RA-16-06-EV]Visit 3 (Baseline): Week 110.629 mg/gStandard Deviation 5.5776
Test 1 + Test 2 GroupSummary of Urine Nicotine Equivalents and Absolute Change From Baseline (mg/g) by Study Group and Visit From Week 1 to Week 12 (mITT Population) [ALCS-RA-16-06-EV]Visit 7: Week 1210.965 mg/gStandard Deviation 7.2768
Test 1 + Test 2 GroupSummary of Urine Nicotine Equivalents and Absolute Change From Baseline (mg/g) by Study Group and Visit From Week 1 to Week 12 (mITT Population) [ALCS-RA-16-06-EV]Visit 5: Week 610.347 mg/gStandard Deviation 7.2519
Test 1 + Test 2 GroupSummary of Urine Nicotine Equivalents and Absolute Change From Baseline (mg/g) by Study Group and Visit From Week 1 to Week 12 (mITT Population) [ALCS-RA-16-06-EV]Change from Baseline (Week 6)-0.353 mg/gStandard Deviation 5.4032
Test 1 + Test 2 GroupSummary of Urine Nicotine Equivalents and Absolute Change From Baseline (mg/g) by Study Group and Visit From Week 1 to Week 12 (mITT Population) [ALCS-RA-16-06-EV]Change from Baseline (Week 12)0.330 mg/gStandard Deviation 5.1304
Test 1 + Test 2 GroupSummary of Urine Nicotine Equivalents and Absolute Change From Baseline (mg/g) by Study Group and Visit From Week 1 to Week 12 (mITT Population) [ALCS-RA-16-06-EV]Visit 3 (Baseline): Week 110.745 mg/gStandard Deviation 5.5851
ControlSummary of Urine Nicotine Equivalents and Absolute Change From Baseline (mg/g) by Study Group and Visit From Week 1 to Week 12 (mITT Population) [ALCS-RA-16-06-EV]Change from Baseline (Week 12)-0.943 mg/gStandard Deviation 3.4975
ControlSummary of Urine Nicotine Equivalents and Absolute Change From Baseline (mg/g) by Study Group and Visit From Week 1 to Week 12 (mITT Population) [ALCS-RA-16-06-EV]Visit 7: Week 1210.268 mg/gStandard Deviation 5.5748
ControlSummary of Urine Nicotine Equivalents and Absolute Change From Baseline (mg/g) by Study Group and Visit From Week 1 to Week 12 (mITT Population) [ALCS-RA-16-06-EV]Visit 5: Week 610.766 mg/gStandard Deviation 5.3662
ControlSummary of Urine Nicotine Equivalents and Absolute Change From Baseline (mg/g) by Study Group and Visit From Week 1 to Week 12 (mITT Population) [ALCS-RA-16-06-EV]Change from Baseline (Week 6)-0.499 mg/gStandard Deviation 3.4735
ControlSummary of Urine Nicotine Equivalents and Absolute Change From Baseline (mg/g) by Study Group and Visit From Week 1 to Week 12 (mITT Population) [ALCS-RA-16-06-EV]Visit 3 (Baseline): Week 111.126 mg/gStandard Deviation 5.5647
Comparison: Null hypothesis: Absolute change from Baseline (Week 1) for Urine Nicotine Equivalents (mg/g creatinine) in Test 1 is equal to zero on Visit 5 (Week 6). Alternate hypothesis: Absolute change from Baseline (Week 1) for Urine Nicotine Equivalents (mg/g creatinine) in Test 1 is NOT equal to zero on Visit 5 (Week 6). (mITT Population)p-value: 0.929495% CI: [-0.795, 0.87]Mixed Models Analysis
Comparison: Null hypothesis: Absolute change from Baseline (Week 1) for Urine Nicotine Equivalents (mg/g creatinine) in Test 1 is equal to zero on Visit 7 (Week 12). Alternate hypothesis: Absolute change from Baseline (Week 1) for Urine Nicotine Equivalents (mg/g creatinine) in Test 1 is NOT equal to zero on Visit 7 (Week 12). (mITT Population)p-value: 0.52995% CI: [-0.587, 1.142]Mixed Models Analysis
Comparison: Null hypothesis: Absolute change from Baseline (Week 1) for Urine Nicotine Equivalents (mg/g creatinine) in Test 2 is equal to zero on Visit 5 (Week 6). Alternate hypothesis: Absolute change from Baseline (Week 1) for Urine Nicotine Equivalents (mg/g creatinine) in Test 2 is NOT equal to zero on Visit 5 (Week 6). (mITT Population)p-value: 0.229195% CI: [-1.337, 0.321]Mixed Models Analysis
Comparison: Null hypothesis: Absolute change from Baseline (Week 1) for Urine Nicotine Equivalents (mg/g creatinine) in Test 2 is equal to zero on Visit 7 (Week 12). Alternate hypothesis: Absolute change from Baseline (Week 1) for Urine Nicotine Equivalents (mg/g creatinine) in Test 2 is NOT equal to zero on Visit 7 (Week 12). (mITT Population)p-value: 0.217995% CI: [-0.311, 1.361]Mixed Models Analysis
Comparison: Null hypothesis: Absolute change from Baseline (Week 1) for Urine Nicotine Equivalents (mg/g creatinine) in Test 1 + Test 2 is equal to zero on Visit 7 (Week 12). Alternate hypothesis: Absolute change from Baseline (Week 1) for Urine Nicotine Equivalents (mg/g creatinine) in Test 1 + Test 2 is NOT equal to zero on Visit 7 (Week 12). (mITT Population)p-value: 0.200295% CI: [-0.213, 1.016]Mixed Models Analysis
Comparison: Null hypothesis: Absolute change from Baseline (Week 1) for Urine Nicotine Equivalents (mg/g creatinine) in Control is equal to zero on Visit 5 (Week 6). Alternate hypothesis: Absolute change from Baseline (Week 1) for Urine Nicotine Equivalents (mg/g creatinine) in Control is NOT equal to zero on Visit 5 (Week 6). (mITT Population)p-value: 0.47695% CI: [-1.089, 0.509]Mixed Models Analysis
Comparison: Null hypothesis: Absolute change from Baseline (Week 1) for Urine Nicotine Equivalents (mg/g creatinine) in Control is equal to zero on Visit 7 (Week 12). Alternate hypothesis: Absolute change from Baseline (Week 1) for Urine Nicotine Equivalents (mg/g creatinine) in Control is NOT equal to zero on Visit 7 (Week 12). (mITT Population)p-value: 0.091495% CI: [-1.512, 0.113]Mixed Models Analysis
Comparison: Null hypothesis: Absolute change from Baseline (Week 1) for Urine Nicotine Equivalents (mg/g creatinine) in Test 1 is equal to Control on Visit 5 (Week 6). Alternate hypothesis: Absolute change from Baseline (Week 1) for Urine Nicotine Equivalents (mg/g creatinine) in Test 1 is NOT equal to Control on Visit 5 (Week 6). (mITT Population)p-value: 0.970595% CI: [-1.122, 1.777]Mixed Models Analysis
Comparison: Null hypothesis: Absolute change from Baseline (Week 1) for Urine Nicotine Equivalents (mg/g creatinine) in Test 1 is equal to Control on Visit 7 (Week 12). Alternate hypothesis: Absolute change from Baseline (Week 1) for Urine Nicotine Equivalents (mg/g creatinine) in Test 1 is NOT equal to Control on Visit 7 (Week 12). (mITT Population)p-value: 0.32895% CI: [-0.512, 2.465]Mixed Models Analysis
Comparison: Null hypothesis: Absolute change from Baseline (Week 1) for Urine Nicotine Equivalents (mg/g creatinine) in Test 2 is equal to Control on Visit 5 (Week 6). Alternate hypothesis: Absolute change from Baseline (Week 1) for Urine Nicotine Equivalents (mg/g creatinine) in Test 2 is NOT equal to Control on Visit 5 (Week 6). (mITT Population)p-value: 0.995195% CI: [-1.667, 1.23]Mixed Models Analysis
Comparison: Null hypothesis: Absolute change from Baseline (Week 1) for Urine Nicotine Equivalents (mg/g creatinine) in Test 2 is equal to Control on Visit 7 (Week 12). Alternate hypothesis: Absolute change from Baseline (Week 1) for Urine Nicotine Equivalents (mg/g creatinine) in Test 2 is NOT equal to Control on Visit 7 (Week 12). (mITT Population)p-value: 0.136795% CI: [-0.244, 2.693]Mixed Models Analysis
Comparison: Null hypothesis: Absolute change from Baseline (Week 1) for Urine Nicotine Equivalents (mg/g creatinine) in Test 1 + Test 2 is equal to Control on Visit 7 (Week 12). Alternate hypothesis: Absolute change from Baseline (Week 1) for Urine Nicotine Equivalents (mg/g creatinine) in Test 1 + Test 2 is NOT equal to Control on Visit 7 (Week 12). (mITT Population)p-value: 0.029495% CI: [0.111, 2.091]Mixed Models Analysis
Comparison: Null hypothesis: Absolute change from Baseline (Week 1) for Urine Nicotine Equivalents (mg/g creatinine) in Test 1 is equal to Test 2 on Visit 7 (Week 12). Alternate hypothesis: Absolute change from Baseline (Week 1) for Urine Nicotine Equivalents (mg/g creatinine) in Test 1 is NOT equal to Test 2 on Visit 7 (Week 12). (mITT Population)p-value: 0.679295% CI: [-1.424, 0.928]Mixed Models Analysis
Other Pre-specified

Summary of Urine Nicotine Equivalents and Absolute Change From Baseline (mg/g) by Study Group and Visit From Week 1 to Week 24 (mITT Population) [ALCS-RA-17-11-EV]

Summary of urine nicotine equivalents (mg/g Cr) and absolute change from Baseline in Weeks 12, 18 and 24 are presented (Study ALCS-RA-17-11-EV). The first urine void of the day was collected at Visits 1, 3 and 5 of the ALCS-RA-17-11-EV study. Baseline samples were collected Week 1 of the ALCS-RA-16-06-EV study. Nicotine equivalents (μg/mL) = (nicotine \[ng/mL\]/162.23 \[mg/mmol\] + nicotinegluc (ng/mL)/338.36 \[mg/mmol\] + cotinine \[ng/mL\]/176.22 \[mg/mmol\] + cotininegluc \[ng/mL\]/352.34 \[mg/mmol\] + trans-3'-hydroxycotinine \[ng/mL\]/192.22 \[mg/mmol\] + trans-3'-hydroxycotinine-gluc \[ng/mL\]/368.34 \[mg/mmol\]) x 162.23 (mg/mmol) x 1 μg/1000 ng Urine creatinine concentration was measured in the urine collection and used to adjust the urine biomarker concentration value as follows: Urine biomarker (ng/g creatinine) = urine biomarker (pg/mL) x 100 / creatinine (mg/dL) Change from Baseline was calculated as follows: Absolute change from baseline = Post Product Use Value - Baseline Val

Time frame: 24 weeks total with measurement timepoints at Week 1/Baseline [ALCS-RA-16-06-EV study]), and Week 12, Week 18 and Week 24 [ALCS-RA-17-11-EV study]

Population: Modified ITT: All subjects were randomized according to the randomization schedule; who used at least one study products after randomization was recorded and for whom there was a valid (within ±3 days of the planned measurement day) baseline and at least one post-baseline biomarker.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Test 1Summary of Urine Nicotine Equivalents and Absolute Change From Baseline (mg/g) by Study Group and Visit From Week 1 to Week 24 (mITT Population) [ALCS-RA-17-11-EV]Baseline: Week 110.107 mg/gStandard Deviation 4.9952
Test 1Summary of Urine Nicotine Equivalents and Absolute Change From Baseline (mg/g) by Study Group and Visit From Week 1 to Week 24 (mITT Population) [ALCS-RA-17-11-EV]Visit 1: Week 1210.412 mg/gStandard Deviation 7.7828
Test 1Summary of Urine Nicotine Equivalents and Absolute Change From Baseline (mg/g) by Study Group and Visit From Week 1 to Week 24 (mITT Population) [ALCS-RA-17-11-EV]Visit 3: Week 1812.421 mg/gStandard Deviation 9.6385
Test 1Summary of Urine Nicotine Equivalents and Absolute Change From Baseline (mg/g) by Study Group and Visit From Week 1 to Week 24 (mITT Population) [ALCS-RA-17-11-EV]Visit 5: Week 2410.621 mg/gStandard Deviation 8.5013
Test 1Summary of Urine Nicotine Equivalents and Absolute Change From Baseline (mg/g) by Study Group and Visit From Week 1 to Week 24 (mITT Population) [ALCS-RA-17-11-EV]Change from Baseline (Week 12)0.305 mg/gStandard Deviation 5.4615
Test 1Summary of Urine Nicotine Equivalents and Absolute Change From Baseline (mg/g) by Study Group and Visit From Week 1 to Week 24 (mITT Population) [ALCS-RA-17-11-EV]Change from Baseline (Week 18)2.360 mg/gStandard Deviation 6.9077
Test 1Summary of Urine Nicotine Equivalents and Absolute Change From Baseline (mg/g) by Study Group and Visit From Week 1 to Week 24 (mITT Population) [ALCS-RA-17-11-EV]Change from Baseline (Week 24)0.680 mg/gStandard Deviation 5.902
Test 2Summary of Urine Nicotine Equivalents and Absolute Change From Baseline (mg/g) by Study Group and Visit From Week 1 to Week 24 (mITT Population) [ALCS-RA-17-11-EV]Change from Baseline (Week 24)2.103 mg/gStandard Deviation 7.0107
Test 2Summary of Urine Nicotine Equivalents and Absolute Change From Baseline (mg/g) by Study Group and Visit From Week 1 to Week 24 (mITT Population) [ALCS-RA-17-11-EV]Change from Baseline (Week 12)1.266 mg/gStandard Deviation 5.516
Test 2Summary of Urine Nicotine Equivalents and Absolute Change From Baseline (mg/g) by Study Group and Visit From Week 1 to Week 24 (mITT Population) [ALCS-RA-17-11-EV]Baseline: Week 110.684 mg/gStandard Deviation 5.2636
Test 2Summary of Urine Nicotine Equivalents and Absolute Change From Baseline (mg/g) by Study Group and Visit From Week 1 to Week 24 (mITT Population) [ALCS-RA-17-11-EV]Visit 3: Week 1811.634 mg/gStandard Deviation 7.8863
Test 2Summary of Urine Nicotine Equivalents and Absolute Change From Baseline (mg/g) by Study Group and Visit From Week 1 to Week 24 (mITT Population) [ALCS-RA-17-11-EV]Visit 5: Week 2412.782 mg/gStandard Deviation 7.1436
Test 2Summary of Urine Nicotine Equivalents and Absolute Change From Baseline (mg/g) by Study Group and Visit From Week 1 to Week 24 (mITT Population) [ALCS-RA-17-11-EV]Visit 1: Week 1211.949 mg/gStandard Deviation 7.0536
Test 2Summary of Urine Nicotine Equivalents and Absolute Change From Baseline (mg/g) by Study Group and Visit From Week 1 to Week 24 (mITT Population) [ALCS-RA-17-11-EV]Change from Baseline (Week 18)1.281 mg/gStandard Deviation 6.3017
Test 1 + Test 2 GroupSummary of Urine Nicotine Equivalents and Absolute Change From Baseline (mg/g) by Study Group and Visit From Week 1 to Week 24 (mITT Population) [ALCS-RA-17-11-EV]Visit 1: Week 1211.205 mg/gStandard Deviation 7.4173
Test 1 + Test 2 GroupSummary of Urine Nicotine Equivalents and Absolute Change From Baseline (mg/g) by Study Group and Visit From Week 1 to Week 24 (mITT Population) [ALCS-RA-17-11-EV]Visit 5: Week 2411.773 mg/gStandard Deviation 7.837
Test 1 + Test 2 GroupSummary of Urine Nicotine Equivalents and Absolute Change From Baseline (mg/g) by Study Group and Visit From Week 1 to Week 24 (mITT Population) [ALCS-RA-17-11-EV]Change from Baseline (Week 12)0.800 mg/gStandard Deviation 5.4823
Test 1 + Test 2 GroupSummary of Urine Nicotine Equivalents and Absolute Change From Baseline (mg/g) by Study Group and Visit From Week 1 to Week 24 (mITT Population) [ALCS-RA-17-11-EV]Change from Baseline (Week 18)1.771 mg/gStandard Deviation 6.5677
Test 1 + Test 2 GroupSummary of Urine Nicotine Equivalents and Absolute Change From Baseline (mg/g) by Study Group and Visit From Week 1 to Week 24 (mITT Population) [ALCS-RA-17-11-EV]Visit 3: Week 1811.992 mg/gStandard Deviation 8.6833
Test 1 + Test 2 GroupSummary of Urine Nicotine Equivalents and Absolute Change From Baseline (mg/g) by Study Group and Visit From Week 1 to Week 24 (mITT Population) [ALCS-RA-17-11-EV]Baseline: Week 110.404 mg/gStandard Deviation 5.1168
Test 1 + Test 2 GroupSummary of Urine Nicotine Equivalents and Absolute Change From Baseline (mg/g) by Study Group and Visit From Week 1 to Week 24 (mITT Population) [ALCS-RA-17-11-EV]Change from Baseline (Week 24)1.439 mg/gStandard Deviation 6.5202
ControlSummary of Urine Nicotine Equivalents and Absolute Change From Baseline (mg/g) by Study Group and Visit From Week 1 to Week 24 (mITT Population) [ALCS-RA-17-11-EV]Change from Baseline (Week 12)-0.713 mg/gStandard Deviation 3.9573
ControlSummary of Urine Nicotine Equivalents and Absolute Change From Baseline (mg/g) by Study Group and Visit From Week 1 to Week 24 (mITT Population) [ALCS-RA-17-11-EV]Visit 3: Week 1810.841 mg/gStandard Deviation 5.4127
ControlSummary of Urine Nicotine Equivalents and Absolute Change From Baseline (mg/g) by Study Group and Visit From Week 1 to Week 24 (mITT Population) [ALCS-RA-17-11-EV]Change from Baseline (Week 18)-0.976 mg/gStandard Deviation 4.4242
ControlSummary of Urine Nicotine Equivalents and Absolute Change From Baseline (mg/g) by Study Group and Visit From Week 1 to Week 24 (mITT Population) [ALCS-RA-17-11-EV]Visit 5: Week 2410.442 mg/gStandard Deviation 4.5456
ControlSummary of Urine Nicotine Equivalents and Absolute Change From Baseline (mg/g) by Study Group and Visit From Week 1 to Week 24 (mITT Population) [ALCS-RA-17-11-EV]Baseline: Week 111.813 mg/gStandard Deviation 5.4517
ControlSummary of Urine Nicotine Equivalents and Absolute Change From Baseline (mg/g) by Study Group and Visit From Week 1 to Week 24 (mITT Population) [ALCS-RA-17-11-EV]Change from Baseline (Week 24)-1.372 mg/gStandard Deviation 4.1783
ControlSummary of Urine Nicotine Equivalents and Absolute Change From Baseline (mg/g) by Study Group and Visit From Week 1 to Week 24 (mITT Population) [ALCS-RA-17-11-EV]Visit 1: Week 1211.101 mg/gStandard Deviation 5.7563
Comparison: Null hypothesis: Absolute change from Baseline for Urine Nicotine Equivalents (mg/g creatinine) in Test 1 is equal to zero on Visit 1 (Week 12), relative to the start of the 12-week ALCS-RA-16-06-EV study. Alternate hypothesis: Absolute change from Baseline (Week 1) for Urine Nicotine Equivalents (mg/g creatinine) in Test 1 is NOT equal to zero on Visit 1 (Week 12), relative to the start of the 12-week ALCS-RA-16-06-EV study. (mITT Population)p-value: 0.401295% CI: [-0.86, 2.137]Mixed Models Analysis
Comparison: Null hypothesis: Absolute change from Baseline for Urine Nicotine Equivalents (mg/g creatinine) in Test 1 is equal to zero on Visit 3 (Week 18), relative to the start of the 12-week ALCS-RA-16-06-EV study. Alternate hypothesis: Absolute change from Baseline (Week 1) for Urine Nicotine Equivalents (mg/g creatinine) in Test 1 is NOT equal to zero on Visit 3 (Week 18), relative to the start of the 12-week ALCS-RA-16-06-EV study. (mITT Population)p-value: 0.020195% CI: [0.343, 3.983]Mixed Models Analysis
Comparison: Null hypothesis: Absolute change from Baseline for Urine Nicotine Equivalents (mg/g creatinine) in Test 1 is equal to zero on Visit 5 (Week 24), relative to the start of the 12-week ALCS-RA-16-06-EV study. Alternate hypothesis: Absolute change from Baseline (Week 1) for Urine Nicotine Equivalents (mg/g creatinine) in Test 1 is NOT equal to zero on Visit 5 (Week 24), relative to the start of the 12-week ALCS-RA-16-06-EV study. (mITT Population)p-value: 0.170995% CI: [-0.528, 2.948]Mixed Models Analysis
Comparison: Null hypothesis: Absolute change from Baseline for Urine Nicotine Equivalents (mg/g creatinine) in Test 2 is equal to zero on Visit 1 (Week 12), relative to the start of the 12-week ALCS-RA-16-06-EV study. Alternate hypothesis: Absolute change from Baseline (Week 1) for Urine Nicotine Equivalents (mg/g creatinine) in Test 2 is NOT equal to zero on Visit 1 (Week 12), relative to the start of the 12-week ALCS-RA-16-06-EV study. (mITT Population)p-value: 0.030795% CI: [0.15, 3.035]Mixed Models Analysis
Comparison: Null hypothesis: Absolute change from Baseline for Urine Nicotine Equivalents (mg/g creatinine) in Test 2 is equal to zero on Visit 3 (Week 18), relative to the start of the 12-week ALCS-RA-16-06-EV study. Alternate hypothesis: Absolute change from Baseline (Week 1) for Urine Nicotine Equivalents (mg/g creatinine) in Test 2 is NOT equal to zero on Visit 3 (Week 18), relative to the start of the 12-week ALCS-RA-16-06-EV study. (mITT Population)p-value: 0.069195% CI: [-0.126, 3.302]Mixed Models Analysis
Comparison: Null hypothesis: Absolute change from Baseline for Urine Nicotine Equivalents (mg/g creatinine) in Test2 is equal to zero on Visit 5 (Week 24), relative to the start of the 12-week ALCS-RA-16-06-EV study. Alternate hypothesis: Absolute change from Baseline (Week 1) for Urine Nicotine Equivalents (mg/g creatinine) in Test2 is NOT equal to zero on Visit 5 (Week 24), relative to the start of the 12-week ALCS-RA-16-06-EV study. (mITT Population)p-value: 0.003495% CI: [0.838, 4.137]Mixed Models Analysis
Comparison: Null hypothesis: Absolute change from Baseline for Urine Nicotine Equivalents (mg/g creatinine) in Test 1 + Test 2 is equal to zero on Visit 5 (Week 24), relative to the start of the 12-week ALCS-RA-16-06-EV study. Alternate hypothesis: Absolute change from Baseline (Week 1) for Urine Nicotine Equivalents (mg/g creatinine) in Test 1 + Test 2 is NOT equal to zero on Visit 5 (Week 24), relative to the start of the 12-week ALCS-RA-16-06-EV study. (mITT Population)p-value: 0.003495% CI: [0.622, 3.075]Mixed Models Analysis
Comparison: Null hypothesis: Absolute change from Baseline for Urine Nicotine Equivalents (mg/g creatinine) in Control is equal to zero on Visit 1 (Week 12), relative to the start of the 12-week ALCS-RA-16-06-EV study. Alternate hypothesis: Absolute change from Baseline (Week 1) for Urine Nicotine Equivalents (mg/g creatinine) in Control is NOT equal to zero on Visit 1 (Week 12), relative to the start of the 12-week ALCS-RA-16-06-EV study. (mITT Population)p-value: 0.812395% CI: [-1.654, 1.299]Mixed Models Analysis
Comparison: Null hypothesis: Absolute change from Baseline for Urine Nicotine Equivalents (mg/g creatinine) in Control is equal to zero on Visit 3 (Week 18), relative to the start of the 12-week ALCS-RA-16-06-EV study. Alternate hypothesis: Absolute change from Baseline (Week 1) for Urine Nicotine Equivalents (mg/g creatinine) in Control is NOT equal to zero on Visit 3 (Week 18), relative to the start of the 12-week ALCS-RA-16-06-EV study. (mITT Population)p-value: 0.587995% CI: [-2.226, 1.267]Mixed Models Analysis
Comparison: Null hypothesis: Absolute change from Baseline for Urine Nicotine Equivalents (mg/g creatinine) in Control is equal to zero on Visit 5 (Week 24), relative to the start of the 12-week ALCS-RA-16-06-EV study. Alternate hypothesis: Absolute change from Baseline (Week 1) for Urine Nicotine Equivalents (mg/g creatinine) in Control is NOT equal to zero on Visit 5 (Week 24), relative to the start of the 12-week ALCS-RA-16-06-EV study. (mITT Population)p-value: 0.49195% CI: [-2.304, 1.111]Mixed Models Analysis
Comparison: Null hypothesis: Absolute change from Baseline for Urine Nicotine Equivalents (mg/g creatinine) in Test 1 is equal to Control on Visit 1 (Week 12), relative to the start of the 12-week ALCS-RA-16-06-EV study. Alternate hypothesis: Absolute change from Baseline (Week 1) for Urine Nicotine Equivalents (mg/g creatinine) in Test 1 is NOT equal to Control on Visit 1 (Week 12), relative to the start of the 12-week ALCS-RA-16-06-EV study. (mITT Population)p-value: 0.967395% CI: [-1.967, 3.599]Mixed Models Analysis
Comparison: Null hypothesis: Absolute change from Baseline for Urine Nicotine Equivalents (mg/g creatinine) in Test 1 is equal to Control on Visit 3 (Week 18), relative to the start of the 12-week ALCS-RA-16-06-EV study. Alternate hypothesis: Absolute change from Baseline (Week 1) for Urine Nicotine Equivalents (mg/g creatinine) in Test 1 is NOT equal to Control on Visit 3 (Week 18), relative to the start of the 12-week ALCS-RA-16-06-EV study. (mITT Population)p-value: 0.178795% CI: [-0.683, 5.968]Mixed Models Analysis
Comparison: Null hypothesis: Absolute change from Baseline for Urine Nicotine Equivalents (mg/g creatinine) in Test 1 is equal to Control on Visit 5 (Week 24), relative to the start of the 12-week ALCS-RA-16-06-EV study. Alternate hypothesis: Absolute change from Baseline (Week 1) for Urine Nicotine Equivalents (mg/g creatinine) in Test 1 is NOT equal to Control on Visit 5 (Week 24), relative to the start of the 12-week ALCS-RA-16-06-EV study. (mITT Population)p-value: 0.524395% CI: [-1.406, 5.018]Mixed Models Analysis
Comparison: Null hypothesis: Absolute change from Baseline for Urine Nicotine Equivalents (mg/g creatinine) in Test 2 is equal to Control on Visit 1 (Week 12), relative to the start of the 12-week ALCS-RA-16-06-EV study. Alternate hypothesis: Absolute change from Baseline (Week 1) for Urine Nicotine Equivalents (mg/g creatinine) in Test 2 is NOT equal to Control on Visit 1 (Week 12), relative to the start of the 12-week ALCS-RA-16-06-EV study. (mITT Population)p-value: 0.395695% CI: [-0.966, 4.507]Mixed Models Analysis
Comparison: Null hypothesis: Absolute change from Baseline for Urine Nicotine Equivalents (mg/g creatinine) in Test 2 is equal to Control on Visit 3 (Week 18), relative to the start of the 12-week ALCS-RA-16-06-EV study. Alternate hypothesis: Absolute change from Baseline (Week 1) for Urine Nicotine Equivalents (mg/g creatinine) in Test 2 is NOT equal to Control on Visit 3 (Week 18), relative to the start of the 12-week ALCS-RA-16-06-EV study. (mITT Population)p-value: 0.38195% CI: [-1.16, 5.295]Mixed Models Analysis
Comparison: Null hypothesis: Absolute change from Baseline for Urine Nicotine Equivalents (mg/g creatinine) in Test 2 is equal to Control on Visit 5 (Week 24), relative to the start of the 12-week ALCS-RA-16-06-EV study. Alternate hypothesis: Absolute change from Baseline (Week 1) for Urine Nicotine Equivalents (mg/g creatinine) in Test 2 is NOT equal to Control on Visit 5 (Week 24), relative to the start of the 12-week ALCS-RA-16-06-EV study. (mITT Population)p-value: 0.055795% CI: [-0.049, 6.216]Mixed Models Analysis
Comparison: Null hypothesis: Absolute change from Baseline for Urine Nicotine Equivalents (mg/g creatinine) in Test 1 + Test 2 is equal to Control on Visit 5 (Week 24), relative to the start of the 12-week ALCS-RA-16-06-EV study. Alternate hypothesis: Absolute change from Baseline (Week 1) for Urine Nicotine Equivalents (mg/g creatinine) in Test 1 + Test 2 is NOT equal to Control on Visit 5 (Week 24), relative to the start of the 12-week ALCS-RA-16-06-EV study. (mITT Population)p-value: 0.019595% CI: [0.4, 4.49]Mixed Models Analysis
Comparison: Null hypothesis: Absolute change from Baseline for Urine Nicotine Equivalents (mg/g creatinine) in Test 2 is equal to Test 1 on Visit 5 (Week 24), relative to the start of the 12-week ALCS-RA-16-06-EV study. Alternate hypothesis: Absolute change from Baseline (Week 1) for Urine Nicotine Equivalents (mg/g creatinine) in Test 2 is NOT equal to Test 1 on Visit 5 (Week 24), relative to the start of the 12-week ALCS-RA-16-06-EV study. (mITT Population)p-value: 0.281795% CI: [-3.615, 1.06]Mixed Models Analysis

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026