Skip to content

Act in Time -Implementation of Health Promotive Work-way in Primary Care Setting (AcTi)

Act in Time- Implementation of Health Promotive Work-way in Primary Care Setting - Evaluation of Effect- and Implementation Process (AcTi)

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT04799860
Acronym
AcTi
Enrollment
12000
Registered
2021-03-16
Start date
2021-03-30
Completion date
2024-12-31
Last updated
2025-12-16

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Health Knowledge, Attitudes, Practice

Keywords

implementation, primary care, process evaluation

Brief summary

The study will support implementation of a health promotive work-way in primary care setting by using external and internal facilitators, with the aim to identify effective implementation strategies and to evaluate intervention uptake. Data will be collected from multiple perspecitves.

Detailed description

Insufficient physical activity, hazardous use of alcohol, tobacco use and unhealthy eating habits increase the risk of cardiovascular diseases, cancer and type 2-diabetes. Health-promoting work reduces the disease risk and mortality and should thus be integrated in clinical care processes. Despite support by the National guideline for prevention and treatment of unhealthy life-style habits, there is a chasm to bridge when integrating evidence into clinical practise. Prerequisites for changing work-ways are often underestimated and left to the individual co-workers to full fill on their own. Too few patients are asked about life-style habits and too few receive evidence-based measures. The measures taken may also depend on sex, language, residence and caregiver's profession. The investigators strive to support the implementation of a health-promoting way of working that includes self-reporting of life-style habits before a visit and that takes measures for those with at least one unhealthy lifestyle habit. The aim is to identify effective implementation strategies for health-promoting efforts in the primary care. The perceptions of barriers and opportunities when changing way of working from the target groups (leaders, co-workers, patients) will be used to enhance the possibility of successful implementation. Strategies are enhanced by theories of leading change. External and internal facilitators support the implementation. The study will evaluate the effects and the implementation process at the level of leaders, patients, co-workers, facilitators and organisation in short (4-6 months) and long term (16-18 months). The project provides generalizable knowledge on strategies to overcome the gap between evidence and praxis, contributing to utilize an existing synthesized knowledgebase regarding health-promoting and preventative workways in a Swedish primary care setting. It is central for the health care system to identify successful implementation strategies in order to manage their future mission.

Interventions

BEHAVIORALhealth promotive work-way

Clinical intervention: The patient is asked to fill in a screening form with life-style related questions. The caregiver takes adequate measures according to the recommendations of the national guideline and the filled in screeing form. The caregiver documents the measures taken. Implementation intervention as described previously: using tailored strategies to support implementation of the gudieline-based recommendations

Sponsors

Region Örebro County
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
NON_RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
HEALTH_SERVICES_RESEARCH
Masking
NONE

Intervention model description

A pre-post-intervention design with control group will be used to evaluate intervention uptake and implementation process effectiveness from the perspective of managers, primary care professionals, patients, and organisation. Primary care settings in central Sweden will be supported in implementing a guideline-based health-promoting way of working including screening of life-style habits, measures taken according to evidence based recommendations and documentation. Strategies will include interactive education sessions, external and internal facilitators, audit and feedback, and tools from theories of leading change; tailored according to contextual and participant needs.

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

for co-workers: * being a caregiver meeting patients and/or * being assigned a role as internal or external facilitator in the project Inclusion criteria for patients filling in the study specific questionnaire: * 18 years or older * visiting primary care units a specific time pre- or post implementation support Inclusion criteria for personcentered processmapping: \* : having one or more unhealthy life-style habit 18 years or older Inclusion criterina for managers: \* being a manager at a primary care unit or at higher level

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Change and trend from baseline documented codes in medical recordsChange from baseline (6 months), through study completion up to 6 months after end of implementation supportspecific codes are used for measures related to the guideline recommendations for grade of advice for insufficient physical activity, unhealthy eating habits, hazardous use of alcohol and tobacco use and prescribed physical activity
Change in S-NoMAD score (Swedish translation of NoMADChange from baseline S-Nomad score up to 4 to 6 months after end of study completion23-item questionnaire covering the constructs coherence, cognitive participation, collective action and reflexive monitoring

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Change in perceived clincial intervention by a study specific questionnaireChange from baseline up to 4 to 6 months after end of implementation supportQuestions related to the patients' perception on receiving the clinical intervention or not
Change in perceived appropriateness (AIM), feasability (FIM) and acceptability (IAM) of the clinical intevention.Change from baseline in AIM,IAM and FIM up to 4 to 6 months after end of implementation supportAppropriateness, feasability, acceptability of the clinical intervention is rated on a 5-graded scale with 4 items per construct

Other

MeasureTime frameDescription
Interviews to tailor strategies and evaluate implementation processInterviews pre-intervention and up to 3 to 6 months after end of implementation supportSemi-structured interview guides directed to facilitators, co-workers and managers
Interviews to evaluate implementation support, clinical process and thoughts about up-scalingInterviews pre-intervention and up to 16 to18 months after end of implementation supportSemi-structured interview guides directed to facilitators, co-workers and managers
Person centered processmappingAt baselineStructured workshop with patient representatives
Study specific logbookThrough study completion, in average 16 monthsTo measure fidelity, dose and reach and changes at the unit that may affect the implementation process

Countries

Sweden

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Jul 22, 2026