COVID-19
Conditions
Keywords
Invasive strategy, Non-invasive strategy, Continuous Positive Airway Pressure, High Flow Nasal Canula, Prone position
Brief summary
This retrospective monocentric study compares 2 ventilatory support strategies on outcomes (length of stay, intubation, mortality) in patients admitted in Intensive Care Unit with Covid-19 related pneumonia : invasive strategy used during the first period and non-invasive strategies (Continuous Positive Airway Pressure, High Flow Nasal Canula, Prone Position) used during the second period.
Interventions
Use of an invasive ventilatory support strategy
Use of non-invasive ventilatory support strategies
Sponsors
Study design
Eligibility
Inclusion criteria
* Patient with confirmed SARS COV2 infection * Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome * Patient more than 18 year old
Exclusion criteria
* Intensive Care Unit admission for extra pulmonary failure * Do Not Reanimated order * Patient from another Intensive Care Unit * Patient objection * Judicial protection
Design outcomes
Primary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Length of stay in ICU | At the moment of ICU discharge or death, up to 3 month | Number of days spent in ICU |
Secondary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Mortality | At the moment of ICU discharge or death, up to 3 month | Rate of patients alive at the moment of intensive care unit discharge |
| Complications | At the moment of ICU discharge or death, up to 3 month | Number of complications during intensive care unit stay |
Countries
France