Skip to content

Comparison the Effect of Uterine Closure Technique Difference on Uterine Niche After Caesarean Delivery.

Comparison the Effect of Uterine Closure Technique Difference on Uterine Niche After Caesarean Delivery.

Status
UNKNOWN
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT04799457
Enrollment
100
Registered
2021-03-16
Start date
2021-02-01
Completion date
2021-10-31
Last updated
2021-03-16

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Closure; Incomplete, Uterus, Uterine Niche

Keywords

niche, caesarean section, technique, uterine closure

Brief summary

Caesarean section scar may have result as isthmocele or scar detachment during pregnancy which is in few years after previous delivery. Uterine niche is the most effectively used measurement side of uterus to estimate for these detachment complications. The aim of this study is to support this niche site by supporting the classical uterine closure technique.

Detailed description

Cesarean delivery rate continues to increase in world in concern with uterine scar complications as placental invasion abnormalities, isthmocele or previous scar detachment during pregnancy (post surgical long term complications). Uterine niche is the presence of a hypoechoic area within the myometrium on the lower uterine segment, showing a defect of the myometrium at the site of a previous cesarean delivery. Some surgical techniques have been trying to support this area to prevent the post surgical long term complications. In this study the investigators have been trying to find out a new technique by applying supporting sutures during uterine closure in cesarean section. Three months after the surgery, the uterine niche measurement will be examined with ultrasonography for both study and classical groups and results will be compared between the groups.

Interventions

OTHERSuture technique

We wil apply additional sutures to classical caesarean procedure.

Sponsors

Kanuni Sultan Suleyman Training and Research Hospital
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
PREVENTION
Masking
TRIPLE (Subject, Caregiver, Investigator)

Masking description

One study control person is organizing the whole trial and provides blinding to both sides (participants and care provider).

Intervention model description

Double Blinded Randomised Controlled Trial

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
FEMALE
Age
18 Years to 40 Years
Healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

* Primigravid elective caesarian delivery candidates * The participants will have not any uterine contraction or cervical dilatation before delivery. * Having no systemic or obstetric illnesses * Participants who are accept to participate in this study with their written consent.

Exclusion criteria

* Previous caesarian delivery * Having uterine contraction or cervical dilatation * Smoking cigarettes * Having systemic or obstetric illnesses

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Number of participants for each group for studyUp to 9 monthsWe will try to reach fifty participants for each group (study group as classical cesarean with supporting suture and control group as classical cesarean) . When we reach to all participants we will stop to enroll the participants.

Countries

Turkey (Türkiye)

Contacts

Primary ContactErgul Demircivi Bor
drergul@yahoo.com+902166065200

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026