Skip to content

A Study to Test Performance of Needle Placements for Neuraxial Procedures Using Tactile Imaging vs Control

An Open-Label, Parallel, Randomized Study to Evaluate the Performance of Needle Placements for Diagnostic and Therapeutic Neuraxial Procedures, Using a Handheld Tactile Imaging-based Method Versus Palpation

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT04796935
Enrollment
95
Registered
2021-03-15
Start date
2021-04-04
Completion date
2021-11-24
Last updated
2024-06-11

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Cancer, Central Nervous System Infections, Neurological Disorder, Obstetric Procedure Pain, Orthopedic Procedure Pain, Post-Dural Puncture Headache, Pseudotumor Cerebri

Keywords

Diagnostic spinal puncture, Therapeutic spinal puncture, Lumbar puncture, Epidural, Neuraxial anesthesia, Blood patch, ESI

Brief summary

This study will compare the VerTouch device to the conventional palpation technique for performing diagnostic and therapeutic neuraxial procedures.

Detailed description

Neuraxial procedures, in which a needle is inserted into the spinal canal through a gap in the vertebrae, are performed at a rate of nearly 13 million per year in the US, across a myriad of diagnostic and therapeutic clinical scenarios. The standard of care involves manual palpation of the patient's back to detect the spinous processes (SPs) and estimate the location of the interspinous needle insertion site. While providers are trained to perform these procedures with meticulous precision and attention to detail, this technique remains highly inaccurate, often requiring multiple insertion attempts to properly place the needle. These attempts lead to patient pain and complications, such as traumatic taps and post-dural puncture (PDPH) headaches; unpredictable procedure times; and poor facility throughput. The VerTouch device uses tactile imaging to offer a non-invasive, untethered, non radiation-producing solution for visualizing spinal anatomy in order to identify an ideal location for needle placement in a neuraxial procedure. The device can be used to mark the identified site with a surgical marker, or to begin placement of a needle or introducer at that site. Study participants will be recruited in two parallel cohorts: the control (palpation) group or the tactile imaging (VerTouch) group, further stratified by procedure setting, including emergency medicine, neurology, and anesthesiology. Once an insertion site is marked with a marker or shallow placement of a needle or introducer, the procedure will continue in the usual manner for subjects in both groups.

Interventions

DEVICETactile Imaging (VerTouch)

VerTouch device used to identify and mark, or begin placement of a needle at an insertion site. After the device is taken off the back, the procedure will continue in the usual manner.

OTHERControl (palpation)

Control, palpation used to identify and mark an insertion site.

Sponsors

ICON plc
CollaboratorINDUSTRY
IntuiTap Medical, Inc
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
OTHER
Masking
NONE

Intervention model description

An open-label, parallel, randomized study design

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

1. Males and females aged 18 years and above, inclusive 2. Subjects scheduled for one of the following procedures: * Diagnostic LP (collection of CSF and/or measurement of ICP to diagnose hemorrhaging or neurological infections) * Therapeutic LP (intrathecal injection of therapeutic agents; drainage of CSF to treat pseudotumor cerebri) * Planned orthopedic or obstetric procedure, such as labor/induction, cesarean section, hysterectomy, or total hip/knee replacement, with neuraxial anesthesia (injection of anesthetic into spinal and/or epidural space to reduce pain during procedure) * Epidural blood patch (use of autologous blood to close holes in the dura mater and relieve PDPH) 3. Subjects having a BMI ≤42kg/m2

Exclusion criteria

1. Patient does not provide informed consent 2. Skin or soft tissue infection near the puncture site 3. Allergy to local anesthetic 4. Uncorrected coagulopathy 5. Acute spinal cord trauma 6. History of lumbar spinal surgery 7. Prior known failed neuraxial anesthesia 8. Diagnosed scoliosis, thoracic kyphosis, lumbar lordosis, scleroderma, or ankylosing spondylitis, or lumbar spinal stenosis 9. Incarcerated subjects

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Number of Insertion AttemptsEnd of procedure, 1 per participantAny forward movement of the needle following puncture of the skin, counted until confirmation of spinal canal access can be assessed.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Number of RedirectionsEnd of procedure, 1 per subjectAny forward movement of the needle in a new direction not preceded by withdrawal from the skin, counted until confirmation of spinal canal access can be assessed.
Number of PassesEnd of procedure, 1 per subjectAny forward movement of the needle, calculated as the sum of insertions and redirections.
Incidence of First-insertion SuccessEnd of procedure, 1 per subjectA case that does not require any reinsertions, but can include any number of redirections.
Subject Discomfort During LandmarkingEnd of procedure, 1 per subjectEvaluated using a 10-point Numeric Pain Rating Scale, where 1 is equivalent to no pain and 10 is equivalent to the worst possible pain.
Provider Confidence With the Identified Insertion SiteEnd of procedure, 1 per subjectEvaluated using a 1-5 point Numeric Rating Scale where 1 is equivalent to not at all confident and 5 equivalent to completely confident.
Incidence of First-pass SuccessEnd of procedure, 1 per subjectA case that does not require reinsertions or redirections.

Other

MeasureTime frameDescription
Incidence of Referral to RadiologyEnd of procedure, 1 per subjectA case in which the provider cannot perform the procedure at the bedside and refers the subject to radiology for the procedure to be completed under fluoroscopic guidance.
Localization TimeEnd of procedure, 1 per subjectTime from first touch of draped patient to identification of an insertion site; for VerTouch, this is the time from VerTouch device placement to movement of the applicator to the identified insertion site.
Incidence of Post-dural Puncture HeadacheFollow up, 3±2 days after procedure, 1 per subjectA case that results in the patient experiencing one or more headache of any level of severity after the procedure and/or at follow-up.
Incidence of Conversion From Spinal to EpiduralEnd of procedure, 1 per subjectA case that the provider opts to complete using epidural anesthesia instead of spinal anesthesia.
Insertion TimeEnd of procedure, 1 per subjectTime from retrieval of marker or local-anesthetic assembly until no further needle advancements are made.
Total Procedure TimeEnd of procedure, 1 per subjectFrom positioning of the patient to removal of the drape from the subject's back.
Bone ContactsEnd of procedure, 1 per subjectNumber of times the needle contacts bone, counted until confirmation of spinal canal access can be assessed.
Incidence of Unintended Dural PunctureEnd of procedure, 1 per subjectA case that results in puncture of the dura when it is not intended (i.e., in an epidural procedure).
Incidence of Paresthesia During Needle InsertionEnd of procedure, 1 per subjectA case in which paresthesia is experienced during needle insertion.
Incidence of Traumatic TapEnd of procedure, 1 per subjectA case that results in visible blood aspiration.

Countries

United States

Participant flow

Pre-assignment details

After enrollment, subjects meeting eligibility criteria were randomized; the rest were considered screen failures.

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Experimental Group 1: Tactile Imaging (VerTouch)
VerTouch used to identify and mark, or begin placement of a needle, at an insertion site. Tactile Imaging (VerTouch): VerTouch device used to identify and mark, or begin placement of a needle at an insertion site. After the device is taken off the back, the procedure will continue in the usual manner.
42
Group 2: Control (Palpation)
Palpation used to identify and mark an insertion site. Control (palpation): Control, palpation used to identify and mark an insertion site.
48
Total90

Withdrawals & dropouts

PeriodReasonFG000FG001
Overall StudyDevice not available10
Overall StudyPhysician Decision01
Overall StudyTrained provider not available10
Overall StudyWithdrawal by Subject01

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicTotalGroup 2: Control (Palpation)Experimental Group 1: Tactile Imaging (VerTouch)
Age, Continuous
ITT
42.0 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 18.07
40.5 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 18.47
43.8 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 17.67
Age, Continuous
PP
40.1 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 16.8
39.3 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 17.78
41.4 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 15.55
Age, Customized
ITT
Adolescent (<22)
5 Participants3 Participants2 Participants
Age, Customized
ITT
Middle-aged Adult (41-65)
25 Participants10 Participants15 Participants
Age, Customized
ITT
Older Adult (>65)
13 Participants7 Participants6 Participants
Age, Customized
ITT
Young Adult (22-40)
47 Participants28 Participants19 Participants
Age, Customized
PP
Adolescent (<22)
4 Participants3 Participants1 Participants
Age, Customized
PP
Middle-aged Adult (41-65)
18 Participants8 Participants10 Participants
Age, Customized
PP
Older Adult (>65)
7 Participants5 Participants2 Participants
Age, Customized
PP
Young Adult (22-40)
37 Participants25 Participants12 Participants
BMI
ITT
29.5 kg/m^2
STANDARD_DEVIATION 6.24
29.4 kg/m^2
STANDARD_DEVIATION 6.56
29.6 kg/m^2
STANDARD_DEVIATION 5.94
BMI
PP
29.3 kg/m^2
STANDARD_DEVIATION 6.37
29.5 kg/m^2
STANDARD_DEVIATION 6.37
29.0 kg/m^2
STANDARD_DEVIATION 6.1
BMI, categorical
ITT
Class 1 Obesity (30-34.9)
25 Participants12 Participants13 Participants
BMI, categorical
ITT
Class 2-3 Obesity (≥35)
18 Participants10 Participants8 Participants
BMI, categorical
ITT
Normal (18.5-24.9)
25 Participants15 Participants10 Participants
BMI, categorical
ITT
Overweight (25-29.9)
20 Participants9 Participants11 Participants
BMI, categorical
ITT
Underweight (<18.5)
1 Participants1 Participants0 Participants
BMI, categorical
PP
Class 1 Obesity (30-34.9)
15 Participants10 Participants5 Participants
BMI, categorical
PP
Class 2-3 Obesity (≥35)
14 Participants9 Participants5 Participants
BMI, categorical
PP
Normal (18.5-24.9)
18 Participants12 Participants6 Participants
BMI, categorical
PP
Overweight (25-29.9)
18 Participants9 Participants9 Participants
BMI, categorical
PP
Underweight (<18.5)
1 Participants1 Participants0 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
ITT
Hispanic or Latino
23 Participants14 Participants9 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
ITT
Not Hispanic or Latino
66 Participants33 Participants33 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
ITT
Unknown or Not Reported
1 Participants1 Participants0 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
PP
Hispanic or Latino
18 Participants12 Participants6 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
PP
Not Hispanic or Latino
47 Participants28 Participants19 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
PP
Unknown or Not Reported
1 Participants1 Participants0 Participants
Height
ITT
165.5 cm
STANDARD_DEVIATION 9.93
165.3 cm
STANDARD_DEVIATION 10.36
165.7 cm
STANDARD_DEVIATION 9.53
Height
PP
164.3 cm
STANDARD_DEVIATION 9.79
164.8 cm
STANDARD_DEVIATION 10.45
163.5 cm
STANDARD_DEVIATION 8.74
Race (NIH/OMB)
ITT
American Indian or Alaska Native
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
ITT
Asian
3 Participants1 Participants2 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
ITT
Black or African American
18 Participants10 Participants8 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
ITT
More than one race
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
ITT
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander
2 Participants1 Participants1 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
ITT
Unknown or Not Reported
8 Participants4 Participants4 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
ITT
White
59 Participants32 Participants27 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
PP
American Indian or Alaska Native
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
PP
Asian
2 Participants1 Participants1 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
PP
Black or African American
13 Participants7 Participants6 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
PP
More than one race
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
PP
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander
2 Participants1 Participants1 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
PP
Unknown or Not Reported
4 Participants3 Participants1 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
PP
White
45 Participants29 Participants16 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
ITT
Female
65 Participants36 Participants29 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
ITT
Male
25 Participants12 Participants13 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
PP
Female
53 Participants32 Participants21 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
PP
Male
13 Participants9 Participants4 Participants
Weight
ITT
81.0 kg
STANDARD_DEVIATION 18.42
80.6 kg
STANDARD_DEVIATION 17.71
81.6 kg
STANDARD_DEVIATION 19.4
Weight
PP
79.0 kg
STANDARD_DEVIATION 17.97
79.9 kg
STANDARD_DEVIATION 17.86
77.6 kg
STANDARD_DEVIATION 18.44

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
0 / 420 / 48
other
Total, other adverse events
2 / 421 / 48
serious
Total, serious adverse events
0 / 420 / 48

Outcome results

Primary

Number of Insertion Attempts

Any forward movement of the needle following puncture of the skin, counted until confirmation of spinal canal access can be assessed.

Time frame: End of procedure, 1 per participant

Population: Intent-to-Treat (ITT) includes all randomized subjects. Per-Protocol (PP) excludes subjects that did not receive the randomized method and/or achieve a procedure success. Number analyzed in each population refers to the subjects with data collected for the specific outcome measure.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Experimental Group 1: Tactile Imaging (VerTouch)Number of Insertion AttemptsITT1.8 insertionsStandard Deviation 0.26
Experimental Group 1: Tactile Imaging (VerTouch)Number of Insertion AttemptsPP1.2 insertionsStandard Deviation 0.66
Group 2: Control (Palpation)Number of Insertion AttemptsITT2.2 insertionsStandard Deviation 0.3
Group 2: Control (Palpation)Number of Insertion AttemptsPP2.1 insertionsStandard Deviation 2.1
Secondary

Incidence of First-insertion Success

A case that does not require any reinsertions, but can include any number of redirections.

Time frame: End of procedure, 1 per subject

Population: ITT includes all randomized subjects. PP excludes subjects that did not receive the randomized method and/or achieve a procedure success. Number analyzed in each population refers to the subjects with data recorded for the related outcome measure (insertions).

ArmMeasureGroupValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Experimental Group 1: Tactile Imaging (VerTouch)Incidence of First-insertion SuccessITT25 Participants
Experimental Group 1: Tactile Imaging (VerTouch)Incidence of First-insertion SuccessPP21 Participants
Group 2: Control (Palpation)Incidence of First-insertion SuccessITT25 Participants
Group 2: Control (Palpation)Incidence of First-insertion SuccessPP25 Participants
Secondary

Incidence of First-pass Success

A case that does not require reinsertions or redirections.

Time frame: End of procedure, 1 per subject

Population: ITT includes all randomized subjects. PP excludes subjects that did not receive the randomized method and/or achieve a procedure success. Number analyzed in each population refers to the subjects with data collected for the related outcome measures (insertions, redirections).

ArmMeasureGroupValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Experimental Group 1: Tactile Imaging (VerTouch)Incidence of First-pass SuccessITT10 Participants
Experimental Group 1: Tactile Imaging (VerTouch)Incidence of First-pass SuccessPP9 Participants
Group 2: Control (Palpation)Incidence of First-pass SuccessITT9 Participants
Group 2: Control (Palpation)Incidence of First-pass SuccessPP9 Participants
Secondary

Number of Passes

Any forward movement of the needle, calculated as the sum of insertions and redirections.

Time frame: End of procedure, 1 per subject

Population: ITT includes all randomized subjects. PP excludes subjects that did not receive the randomized method and/or achieve a procedure success. Number analyzed in each population refers to the subjects with data collected for the related outcome measures (insertions and redirections).

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Experimental Group 1: Tactile Imaging (VerTouch)Number of PassesITT6.4 passesStandard Deviation 6.66
Experimental Group 1: Tactile Imaging (VerTouch)Number of PassesPP3.8 passesStandard Deviation 3.49
Group 2: Control (Palpation)Number of PassesITT8.0 passesStandard Deviation 9.78
Group 2: Control (Palpation)Number of PassesPP7.3 passesStandard Deviation 9.62
Secondary

Number of Redirections

Any forward movement of the needle in a new direction not preceded by withdrawal from the skin, counted until confirmation of spinal canal access can be assessed.

Time frame: End of procedure, 1 per subject

Population: ITT includes all randomized subjects. PP excludes subjects that did not receive the randomized method and/or achieve a procedure success. Number analyzed in each population refers to the subjects with data collected for the specific outcome measure.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Experimental Group 1: Tactile Imaging (VerTouch)Number of RedirectionsITT4.5 redirectionsStandard Deviation 5.6
Experimental Group 1: Tactile Imaging (VerTouch)Number of RedirectionsPP2.5 redirectionsStandard Deviation 3.14
Group 2: Control (Palpation)Number of RedirectionsITT5.8 redirectionsStandard Deviation 8.44
Group 2: Control (Palpation)Number of RedirectionsPP5.2 redirectionsStandard Deviation 8.31
Secondary

Provider Confidence With the Identified Insertion Site

Evaluated using a 1-5 point Numeric Rating Scale where 1 is equivalent to not at all confident and 5 equivalent to completely confident.

Time frame: End of procedure, 1 per subject

Population: ITT includes all randomized subjects. PP excludes subjects that did not receive the randomized method and/or achieve a procedure success. Number analyzed in each population refers to the subjects with data collected for the specific outcome measure.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Experimental Group 1: Tactile Imaging (VerTouch)Provider Confidence With the Identified Insertion SiteITT3.6 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.43
Experimental Group 1: Tactile Imaging (VerTouch)Provider Confidence With the Identified Insertion SitePP4.0 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.24
Group 2: Control (Palpation)Provider Confidence With the Identified Insertion SiteITT4.2 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.97
Group 2: Control (Palpation)Provider Confidence With the Identified Insertion SitePP4.2 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.97
Secondary

Subject Discomfort During Landmarking

Evaluated using a 10-point Numeric Pain Rating Scale, where 1 is equivalent to no pain and 10 is equivalent to the worst possible pain.

Time frame: End of procedure, 1 per subject

Population: ITT includes all randomized subjects. PP excludes subjects that did not receive the randomized method and/or achieve a procedure success. Number analyzed in each population refers to the subjects with data collected for the specific outcome measure.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Experimental Group 1: Tactile Imaging (VerTouch)Subject Discomfort During LandmarkingITT2.0 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.17
Experimental Group 1: Tactile Imaging (VerTouch)Subject Discomfort During LandmarkingPP1.5 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.66
Group 2: Control (Palpation)Subject Discomfort During LandmarkingITT1.9 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.43
Group 2: Control (Palpation)Subject Discomfort During LandmarkingPP1.5 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.89
Other Pre-specified

Bone Contacts

Number of times the needle contacts bone, counted until confirmation of spinal canal access can be assessed.

Time frame: End of procedure, 1 per subject

Population: PP excludes subjects that did not receive the randomized method and/or achieve a procedure success.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Experimental Group 1: Tactile Imaging (VerTouch)Bone Contacts2.0 contactsStandard Deviation 6.04
Group 2: Control (Palpation)Bone Contacts2.9 contactsStandard Deviation 4.81
Other Pre-specified

Incidence of Conversion From Spinal to Epidural

A case that the provider opts to complete using epidural anesthesia instead of spinal anesthesia.

Time frame: End of procedure, 1 per subject

Population: All randomized subjects with data for the safety endpoint.

ArmMeasureValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Experimental Group 1: Tactile Imaging (VerTouch)Incidence of Conversion From Spinal to Epidural0 Participants
Group 2: Control (Palpation)Incidence of Conversion From Spinal to Epidural0 Participants
Other Pre-specified

Incidence of Paresthesia During Needle Insertion

A case in which paresthesia is experienced during needle insertion.

Time frame: End of procedure, 1 per subject

Population: All randomized subjects with data for the safety endpoint.

ArmMeasureValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Experimental Group 1: Tactile Imaging (VerTouch)Incidence of Paresthesia During Needle Insertion8 Participants
Group 2: Control (Palpation)Incidence of Paresthesia During Needle Insertion9 Participants
Other Pre-specified

Incidence of Post-dural Puncture Headache

A case that results in the patient experiencing one or more headache of any level of severity after the procedure and/or at follow-up.

Time frame: Follow up, 3±2 days after procedure, 1 per subject

Population: All randomized subjects with data for the safety endpoint.

ArmMeasureValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Experimental Group 1: Tactile Imaging (VerTouch)Incidence of Post-dural Puncture Headache9 Participants
Group 2: Control (Palpation)Incidence of Post-dural Puncture Headache16 Participants
Other Pre-specified

Incidence of Referral to Radiology

A case in which the provider cannot perform the procedure at the bedside and refers the subject to radiology for the procedure to be completed under fluoroscopic guidance.

Time frame: End of procedure, 1 per subject

Population: All randomized subjects with data for the safety endpoint.

ArmMeasureValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Experimental Group 1: Tactile Imaging (VerTouch)Incidence of Referral to Radiology4 Participants
Group 2: Control (Palpation)Incidence of Referral to Radiology2 Participants
Other Pre-specified

Incidence of Traumatic Tap

A case that results in visible blood aspiration.

Time frame: End of procedure, 1 per subject

Population: All randomized subjects with data for the safety endpoint.

ArmMeasureValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Experimental Group 1: Tactile Imaging (VerTouch)Incidence of Traumatic Tap1 Participants
Group 2: Control (Palpation)Incidence of Traumatic Tap4 Participants
Other Pre-specified

Incidence of Unintended Dural Puncture

A case that results in puncture of the dura when it is not intended (i.e., in an epidural procedure).

Time frame: End of procedure, 1 per subject

Population: All randomized subjects with data for the safety endpoint.

ArmMeasureValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Experimental Group 1: Tactile Imaging (VerTouch)Incidence of Unintended Dural Puncture0 Participants
Group 2: Control (Palpation)Incidence of Unintended Dural Puncture0 Participants
Other Pre-specified

Insertion Time

Time from retrieval of marker or local-anesthetic assembly until no further needle advancements are made.

Time frame: End of procedure, 1 per subject

Population: PP excludes subjects that did not receive the randomized method and/or achieve a procedure success.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Experimental Group 1: Tactile Imaging (VerTouch)Insertion Time303.5 secondsStandard Deviation 600.79
Group 2: Control (Palpation)Insertion Time301.8 secondsStandard Deviation 390.73
Other Pre-specified

Localization Time

Time from first touch of draped patient to identification of an insertion site; for VerTouch, this is the time from VerTouch device placement to movement of the applicator to the identified insertion site.

Time frame: End of procedure, 1 per subject

Population: PP excludes subjects that did not receive the randomized method and/or achieve a procedure success.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Experimental Group 1: Tactile Imaging (VerTouch)Localization Time197.3 secondsStandard Deviation 247.03
Group 2: Control (Palpation)Localization Time170.3 secondsStandard Deviation 300.12
Other Pre-specified

Total Procedure Time

From positioning of the patient to removal of the drape from the subject's back.

Time frame: End of procedure, 1 per subject

Population: PP excludes subjects that did not receive the randomized method and/or achieve a procedure success.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Experimental Group 1: Tactile Imaging (VerTouch)Total Procedure Time19.3 minutesStandard Deviation 16.43
Group 2: Control (Palpation)Total Procedure Time20.5 minutesStandard Deviation 28.03

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026