Skip to content

Respiratory Protection Effect of Ear-loop-type KF94 Mask

Respiratory Protection Effect of Ear-loop-type KF94 Filtering Facepiece Respirators According to the Wearing Method: A Randomized, Open-label Study

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT04794556
Enrollment
30
Registered
2021-03-12
Start date
2021-01-01
Completion date
2021-03-10
Last updated
2021-03-15

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Infection

Keywords

Respiratory protective devices, quantitative fit test, N95 filtering facepiece respirators, infection control, KF94 mask

Brief summary

Ear-loop-type Korean Filter 94 masks (KF94 masks, equivalent to the N95 and FFP2) are broadly used in health care settings in Korea for the COVID-19 pandemic. However, no studies have assessed the adequacy of respiratory protection. In this prospective randomized open-label study, the investigators aimed to evaluate the fitting performance of ear-loop-type KF94 masks by the quantitative fit test according to the occupational safety and health administration (OSHA) protocol. In addition, by quantitatively comparing the tight-fitting method using a clip and the general-fitting method, the investigators tried to evaluate whether the tight-wearing method improves the fitting performance of KF94 masks.

Detailed description

Sample size: The sample size was calculated based on a pilot study of 10 participants, which examined the FF of general-fitting. The mean FF was 20.3, and the log-transformed FFs were assessed due to skewed data, which was 1.98 (standard deviation 1.34). We assumed that the FF for tight-fitting would increase by 50%, with an α value of .05, and a β error of .10 (power = 90%) for two-sided hypothesis testing. The estimated sample size calculation revealed a required sample of 24 participants. Therefore, 30 participants were enrolled to account for a 20% dropout rate. Data analyses: Repeated-measures analysis of variance or generalized estimating equations were used to compare the FFs or passing rate of the QNFTs for the three mask types according to the wearing method. Paired t-tests or Wilcoxon signed-rank tests were used to compare the FFs according to the wearing method for each mask type. McNemar's test was used to compare the passing rate of the QNFT according to the wearing method. Bonferroni's correction was performed for all results of each subgroup analysis. SAS ver. 9.4 software (SAS Institute, Cary, NC) was used to perform all statistical analyses.

Interventions

DEVICEtight-fitting of KF94 mask with clip

The general-fitting method involved wearing a mask with ear loops, and the tight-fitting method involved wearing a clip that connected ear loops on the occiput after wearing a mask according to the general method

Sponsors

Samsung Medical Center
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
PREVENTION
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 65 Years
Healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

* healthcare workers with experience in wearing filtering facepiece respirator working in the hospital

Exclusion criteria

* Individuals with expected difficulties in wearing masks or undergoing OSHA fit tests because of factors such as a facial anomaly, lung disease, or lower back disorder

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
total fit factors(FFs) of the quantitative fit tests (QNFT) according to the wearing method of the three types of KF94 masksthrough study completion, an average of 1 year

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
passing rate of the QNFT according to the wearing methodthrough study completion, an average of 1 year
total FFs after user-seal-check and real-time adjustmentthrough study completion, an average of 1 year

Countries

South Korea

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 16, 2026