Skip to content

Evaluation of ACUVUE OASYS® 1-Day for Astigmatism Lenses Produced on a New Manufacturing Line

Evaluation of ACUVUE OASYS® 1-Day for Astigmatism Lenses Produced on a New Manufacturing Line

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT04794270
Enrollment
72
Registered
2021-03-12
Start date
2021-03-02
Completion date
2021-04-13
Last updated
2022-05-18

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Visual Acuity

Brief summary

This is a bilateral, dispensing, randomized, controlled, double-masked, 2×2 cross-over study to evaluate the clinical performance of ACUVUE OASYS® 1-Day for Astigmatism contact lenses produced on a recently qualified manufacturing line.

Interventions

DEVICEACUVUE OASYS® 1-Day for Astigmatism - TAM 24

TEST

DEVICEACUVUE OASYS® 1-Day for Astigmatism

CONTROL

Sponsors

Johnson & Johnson Vision Care, Inc.
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
CROSSOVER
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
DOUBLE (Subject, Investigator)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 39 Years
Healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

\- Potential subjects must satisfy all of the following criteria to be enrolled in the study: The subject must: 1. Read, understand, and sign the STATEMENT OF INFORMED CONSENT and receive a fully executed copy of the form. 2. Appear able and willing to adhere to the instructions set forth in this clinical protocol. 3. Be between 18 and 39 (inclusive) years of age at the time of screening. 4. By self-report, habitually wear soft contact lenses in both eyes in a daily reusable or daily disposable wear modality (i.e. not extended wear modality). Habitual wear is defined as a minimum of 6 hours of wear per day, for a minimum of 2 days per week during the past month. 5. Possess a wearable pair of spectacles that provide correction for distance vision. 6. Have the spherical component of their vertex-corrected distance refraction must be between -0.875 to -4.625 DS (inclusive) in each eye. 7. Have the magnitude of the cylindrical component of their vertex-corrected distance refraction between 0.625 DC and 1.625 DC in both eyes. 8. Have the cylinder axis of their distance refraction between 165° and 15° (i.e., 180±15°, inclusive) or between 75° and 105° (i.e., 90±15°, inclusive) in each eye. 9. Have best corrected monocular distance visual acuity of 20/30 or better in each eye.

Exclusion criteria

\- Potential subjects who meet any of the following criteria will be excluded from participating in the study: The subject must not: 1. Be currently pregnant or lactating. 2. Be diabetic. 3. Be currently using any ocular medications or have any ocular infection of any type. 4. By self-report, have any ocular or systemic disease, allergies, infection, or use of medication that might contraindicate or interfere with contact lens wear, or otherwise compromise study endpoints, including infectious disease (e.g., hepatitis, tuberculosis), contagious immunosuppressive disease (e.g., Human Immunodeficiency Virus \[HIV\]), autoimmune disease (e.g. rheumatoid arthritis, Sjögren's syndrome), or history of serious mental illness or seizures. 5. Have habitually worn rigid gas permeable (RGP) lenses, orthokeratology lenses, or hybrid lenses (e.g. SynergEyes, SoftPerm) within the past 6 months. 6. Be currently wearing monovision or multifocal contact lenses. 7. Be currently wearing lenses in an extended wear modality. 8. Have a history of strabismus or amblyopia. 9. Be an employee (e.g., Investigator, Coordinator, Technician) or immediate family member of an employee (including partner, child, parent, grandparent, grandchild or sibling of the employee or their spouse) of the clinical site. 10. Have participated in a contact lens or lens care product clinical trial within 7 days prior to study enrollment. 11. Have clinically significant (grade 3 or higher on the FDA grading scale) slit lamp findings (e.g., corneal edema, neovascularization or staining, tarsal abnormalities or bulbar injection) or other corneal or ocular disease or abnormalities that contraindicate contact lens wear or may otherwise compromise study endpoints (including entropion, ectropion, chalazia, recurrent styes, glaucoma, history of recurrent corneal erosions, aphakia, moderate or above corneal distortion, herpetic keratitis). 12. Have fluctuations in vision due to clinically significant dry eye or other ocular conditions. 13. Have had or have planned (within the study period) any ocular or intraocular surgery (e.g., radial keratotomy, PRK, LASIK, iridotomy, retinal laser photocoagulation, etc.).

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
CLUE Comfort ScoreFitting, 1-Week Follow-upOverall comfort was assessed using the Contact Lens User Experience™ (CLUE) questionnaire. CLUE is a validated patient-reported outcomes (PRO) questionnaire to assess patient experience attributes of soft contact lenses (comfort, vision, handling, and packaging) in a contact-lens wearing population in the US, ages 18-65. Derived CLUE scores using Item Response Theory (IRT) follow a normal distribution with a population average score of 60 (SD 20), where higher scores indicate a more favorable/positive response with a range of 0-120.
CLUE Vision ScoreFitting, 1-Week Follow-upOverall vision was assessed using the Contact Lens User Experience™ (CLUE) questionnaire. CLUE is a validated patient-reported outcomes (PRO) questionnaire to assess patient experience attributes of soft contact lenses (comfort, vision, handling, and packaging) in a contact-lens wearing population in the US, ages 18-65. Derived CLUE scores using Item Response Theory (IRT) follow a normal distribution with a population average score of 60 (SD 20), where higher scores indicate a more favorable/positive response with a range of 0-120.
CLUE Handling ScoreFitting, 1-Week Follow-upOverall handling was assessed using the Contact Lens User Experience™ (CLUE) questionnaire. CLUE is a validated patient-reported outcomes (PRO) questionnaire to assess patient experience attributes of soft contact lenses (comfort, vision, handling, and packaging) in a contact-lens wearing population in the US, ages 18-65. Derived CLUE scores using Item Response Theory (IRT) follow a normal distribution with a population average score of 60 (SD 20), where higher scores indicate a more favorable/positive response with a range of 0-120.
Monocular Visual Performance (LogMAR)1-Week Follow-upVisual performance was calculated as monocular contact lens-corrected distance visual acuity using a Logarithm of Minimal Angle of Resolution (logMAR) visual acuity scale. This was evaluated under high luminance and high contrast conditions (HLHC) at 4 meters from Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study (ETDRS) charts at the 1-week follow-up visit. Lower visual performance values indicate better vision. Two measurements were performed for each eye. The average visual performance was reported for each lens type.
Lens RotationPost-Fitting at 1-minute, at 3-minuteLens rotation was recorded from direction and magnitude in degrees to the nearest degree at one and three minutes following lens insertion during settling period. All lenses in this study have scribe marks at 6 o'clock and 12 o'clock positions and rotation measurements were made relative to a vertical reference line.
Settled RotationFitting, 1-Week Follow-upMean settled rotation was calculated from all repeated measures of signed lens orientation upon settling for each subject/eye/lens.

Countries

United States

Participant flow

Recruitment details

A total of 72 subjects were enrolled in this study. Of those enrolled, a total of 71 subjects were assigned to one of two wear sequences; while one subject was a screen failure and/or not assigned. Of the total assigned subjects, 68 subjects completed the study while, 3 subjects were discontinued from the study.

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Dispensed Subject
All subjects dispensed a study article.
71
Total71

Withdrawals & dropouts

PeriodReasonFG000FG001
Period 1Adverse Event10
Period 1Non Compliance10
Period 2Unsatisfactory Lens Fitting due to Test Article10

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicDispensed Subject
Age, Continuous29.5 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 5.76
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Asian
1 participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Black or African American
2 participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Other
1 participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
White
67 participants
Region of Enrollment
United States
71 participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
47 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
24 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
0 / 710 / 71
other
Total, other adverse events
0 / 710 / 71
serious
Total, serious adverse events
0 / 710 / 71

Outcome results

Primary

CLUE Comfort Score

Overall comfort was assessed using the Contact Lens User Experience™ (CLUE) questionnaire. CLUE is a validated patient-reported outcomes (PRO) questionnaire to assess patient experience attributes of soft contact lenses (comfort, vision, handling, and packaging) in a contact-lens wearing population in the US, ages 18-65. Derived CLUE scores using Item Response Theory (IRT) follow a normal distribution with a population average score of 60 (SD 20), where higher scores indicate a more favorable/positive response with a range of 0-120.

Time frame: Fitting, 1-Week Follow-up

Population: Subjects that completed all study visits without a major protocol deviation.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
TestCLUE Comfort ScoreFitting65.95 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 18.645
TestCLUE Comfort Score1-Week Follow-up67.39 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 20.024
ControlCLUE Comfort ScoreFitting65.13 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 18.849
ControlCLUE Comfort Score1-Week Follow-up70.80 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 22.742
Primary

CLUE Handling Score

Overall handling was assessed using the Contact Lens User Experience™ (CLUE) questionnaire. CLUE is a validated patient-reported outcomes (PRO) questionnaire to assess patient experience attributes of soft contact lenses (comfort, vision, handling, and packaging) in a contact-lens wearing population in the US, ages 18-65. Derived CLUE scores using Item Response Theory (IRT) follow a normal distribution with a population average score of 60 (SD 20), where higher scores indicate a more favorable/positive response with a range of 0-120.

Time frame: Fitting, 1-Week Follow-up

Population: Subjects that completed all study visits without a major protocol deviation.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
TestCLUE Handling ScoreFitting73.56 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 19.057
TestCLUE Handling Score1--Week Follow-up70.61 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 21.048
ControlCLUE Handling ScoreFitting72.71 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 20.76
ControlCLUE Handling Score1--Week Follow-up71.83 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 19.74
Primary

CLUE Vision Score

Overall vision was assessed using the Contact Lens User Experience™ (CLUE) questionnaire. CLUE is a validated patient-reported outcomes (PRO) questionnaire to assess patient experience attributes of soft contact lenses (comfort, vision, handling, and packaging) in a contact-lens wearing population in the US, ages 18-65. Derived CLUE scores using Item Response Theory (IRT) follow a normal distribution with a population average score of 60 (SD 20), where higher scores indicate a more favorable/positive response with a range of 0-120.

Time frame: Fitting, 1-Week Follow-up

Population: Subjects that completed all study visits without a major protocol deviation.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
TestCLUE Vision ScoreFitting70.14 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 15.979
TestCLUE Vision Score1-Week Follow-up68.33 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 18.349
ControlCLUE Vision ScoreFitting69.64 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 15.767
ControlCLUE Vision Score1-Week Follow-up72.40 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 19.381
Primary

Lens Rotation

Lens rotation was recorded from direction and magnitude in degrees to the nearest degree at one and three minutes following lens insertion during settling period. All lenses in this study have scribe marks at 6 o'clock and 12 o'clock positions and rotation measurements were made relative to a vertical reference line.

Time frame: Post-Fitting at 1-minute, at 3-minute

Population: Subjects that completed all study visits without a major protocol deviation.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
TestLens RotationAt 1-minute-1.7 DegreesStandard Deviation 14.65
TestLens RotationAt 3-minute-1.1 DegreesStandard Deviation 4.55
ControlLens RotationAt 1-minute-2.0 DegreesStandard Deviation 14.94
ControlLens RotationAt 3-minute-0.8 DegreesStandard Deviation 4.88
Primary

Monocular Visual Performance (LogMAR)

Visual performance was calculated as monocular contact lens-corrected distance visual acuity using a Logarithm of Minimal Angle of Resolution (logMAR) visual acuity scale. This was evaluated under high luminance and high contrast conditions (HLHC) at 4 meters from Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study (ETDRS) charts at the 1-week follow-up visit. Lower visual performance values indicate better vision. Two measurements were performed for each eye. The average visual performance was reported for each lens type.

Time frame: 1-Week Follow-up

Population: Subjects that completed all study visits without a major protocol deviation.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
TestMonocular Visual Performance (LogMAR)-0.108 LogMARStandard Deviation 0.0703
ControlMonocular Visual Performance (LogMAR)-0.112 LogMARStandard Deviation 0.0679
Primary

Settled Rotation

Mean settled rotation was calculated from all repeated measures of signed lens orientation upon settling for each subject/eye/lens.

Time frame: Fitting, 1-Week Follow-up

Population: Subjects that completed all study visits without a major protocol deviation.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
TestSettled RotationFitting-0.9 DegreesStandard Deviation 2.69
TestSettled Rotation1-Week Follow-up-1.8 DegreesStandard Deviation 3.29
ControlSettled RotationFitting-1.3 DegreesStandard Deviation 2.8
ControlSettled Rotation1-Week Follow-up-1.6 DegreesStandard Deviation 3.26

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026