Skip to content

Ending the HIV Epidemic Through Point-of-Care Technologies (EHPOC)

Ending the HIV Epidemic Through Point-of-Care Technologies (EHPOC): Performance Evaluation of Novel POC HIV Tests in Baltimore

Status
Completed
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT04793750
Acronym
EHPOC
Enrollment
224
Registered
2021-03-11
Start date
2021-08-18
Completion date
2025-03-31
Last updated
2026-04-23

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

HIV Infections, Syphilis

Keywords

HIV, point-of-care, standard-of-care, POC, SOC, Syphilis, Viral load, VL, ART, antiretroviral therapy, PrEP, pre-exposure prophylaxis, PEP, post-exposure prophylaxis, Ending the HIV epidemic, EHE, human immunodeficiency virus, POC VL, sexually transmitted diseases (STDs), sexually transmitted infections (STIs), STD, STI

Brief summary

This study proposes to investigate the performance of existing and new technologies for HIV diagnosis, one of the key strategies for Ending the HIV Epidemic in the U.S. Current, Standard-of-Care (SOC) diagnostic techniques have extended turn-around-times (TATs) that result in loss of patients to follow up due to delays in laboratory procedures. In this scenario, patients that are at a high-risk for HIV have the potential to continue transmission, making it difficult to end the epidemic. Rapid, Point-of-Care (POC) HIV viral load (VL) testing alleviates this problem by reducing TATs that allow providers to test for HIV infection and link patients to antiretroviral therapy (ART) or pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) during the same clinical visit, and subsequently, suppress VL, prevent HIV infection, and reduce its transmission among high-risk populations. The study proposes that evaluating the performance of new and existing POC technologies is needed to provide updated information to HIV test providers operating in different populations and settings and improve linkage to HIV treatment and prevention services. The study hypothesizes that: A. Determining the performance characteristics of HIV POC tests will inform optimal testing strategies in different populations and settings B. The use of HIV RNA POC tests will improve linkage to HIV treatment and prevention services: i. Improve early diagnosis of HIV ii. Reduce the time to ART initiation iii. Facilitate timely and appropriate referral for prevention services

Detailed description

The strategy for Ending the HIV Epidemic (EHE) includes four key strategies that together can end the HIV epidemic in the United States (US): Diagnose, Treat, Prevent, and Respond. Diagnosis is the gateway to all other interventions; it is the cornerstone of EHE. In 2019/20 it was estimated that more than 160,000 Americans are unaware of living with HIV. Early diagnosis coupled with rapid linkage to care is critical and can lead to improved individual and community health outcomes. Achieving this goal will require improved, more accessible, and routine HIV testing; immediately connecting people with HIV to care services; and connecting those without HIV to appropriate HIV prevention services. Maryland was ranked 6th among states and territories in adult/adolescent HIV diagnosis rates (per 100,000) in 2018, tied with Mississippi. Among people living with HIV in Maryland in 2019, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) estimated that 89.2% had been diagnosed and that \ 3,830 people with HIV are undiagnosed. Evaluation of existing and new POC HIV tests is needed to inform testing guidelines and provide updated information to HIV test providers. Characterizing the performance of POC tests can provide estimates for the window period for HIV detection (i.e., the time from HIV acquisition to the time that a diagnostic test becomes positive). The window period provides key information needed to interpret an initial positive test result and assess the risk of transmission to others. It may also help guide decisions about repeat testing and initiation of ART in those with HIV and prevention interventions, including PrEP and post-exposure prophylaxis (PEP) (in those without HIV). During the window period for an HIV Antigen/Antibody (Ag/Ab) test, infected individuals may have non-reactive test results, falsely reassuring patients and providers. HIV RNA \[or 'viral load' (VL)\] assays have window periods that are approximately 10 days shorter than most HIV Ag/Ab tests, providing greater sensitivity for detection of early HIV infection. The use of HIV RNA detection platforms for HIV screening facilitates earlier diagnosis and more effective implementation of ART and PrEP. This may be especially useful in settings where the infection is acquired in persons using PrEP, since PrEP agents may suppress viral replication and delay antibody production. The following hypotheses underpin the planned study: A. Determining the performance characteristics of HIV POC tests will inform optimal testing strategies in different populations and settings. B. Use of HIV RNA POC tests will improve linkage to HIV treatment and prevention services. The implications of this CDC-sponsored research are important since this research could improve early diagnosis of HIV, reduce the time to ART initiation, and facilitate timely and appropriate referral for prevention services. Additionally, if someone is infected while using long-acting PrEP, or initiated PrEP while infected, the risk of resistance and side effects can be minimized; if the infection is missed. These are critical issues for EHE success.

Interventions

DIAGNOSTIC_TESTCepheid GeneXpert HIV-1 Qual POC HIV VL test

POC Nucleic acid-based test for HIV RNA.

DIAGNOSTIC_TESTDPP HIV-Syphilis test system

POC Tests for antibodies to HIV 1/2 and Treponema pallidum.

DIAGNOSTIC_TESTOraQuick

POC oral fluid swab test for HIV 1/2 antibodies.

Sponsors

Johns Hopkins University
Lead SponsorOTHER
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention
CollaboratorFED
Roche Molecular Systems, Inc
CollaboratorINDUSTRY
Cepheid
CollaboratorINDUSTRY

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
DIAGNOSTIC
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

* Aged 18 years or older * Living with or at high risk for HIV (MSM/transgender; injection drug use (IDU); known STI or being screened for STI; part of a high STI prevalence network \[e.g., in the Sexual Health clinic\]) * Willing to undergo phlebotomy and collection of oral fluid samples * Willing to complete a questionnaire * Willing to have laboratory results shared with the clinician(s) associated with their care * Willing to attend follow-up visits * Willing for samples to be transferred to the CDC for analysis and storage

Exclusion criteria

* Aged \<18 years * Unwilling to undergo study procedures * Any other reason deemed pertinent by the study team

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Participants Linked Either to Care (PrEP or ART)12 WeeksThe primary outcome of the study was linkage to care rate, defined as having at least one in-person or telehealth interaction with a clinical team about HIV ART or PrEP within the study follow-up period.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
HIV: Time to Linkage to Either PrEP or ART12 Weeks
Participants Reporting Condom-less SexDay 0 and Week 12This will be used to assess HIV 'knowledge' - behavioral change (awareness/risk behavior change).

Countries

United States

Contacts

PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATORMatthew Hamill, MBChB, Ph.D

Johns Hopkins University

Baseline characteristics

Characteristic
Age, Customized
Age group
25 - 40
97 Participants
Age, Customized
Age group
Less than 25
18 Participants
Age, Customized
Age group
More than 40
109 Participants
Linked to care
Linked to care
50 Participants
Linked to care
Not linked to care
62 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Race
Black or African American or Another Race
74 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Race
White
37 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
50 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
73 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
0 / 1130 / 111
other
Total, other adverse events
16 / 11325 / 111
serious
Total, serious adverse events
0 / 1130 / 111

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Apr 24, 2026