Skip to content

Bruxism Xeomin® Intervention Trial

Effects of Botulinum Toxin Type A (Xeomin®) Injections Into Bilateral Masseter Muscles for Management of Bruxism and Associated Symptoms: Single Center Open Label Longitudinal Pilot Study

Status
UNKNOWN
Phases
Phase 4
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT04792398
Acronym
BRUX-XIT
Enrollment
6
Registered
2021-03-11
Start date
2021-05-01
Completion date
2023-06-30
Last updated
2021-03-11

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Sleep Bruxism, Adult

Brief summary

The purpose of this study is to test whether severe masticatory muscle spasms during sleep (e.g. teeth clenching and grinding, known as bruxism in technical jargon) demonstrably decrease after application of botulinum toxin type A (Xeomin®). Xeomin® has so far been used to relieve spasms of other muscles and is an approved drug in Switzerland. This study is now intended to test the suitability of this drug for relaxation of the masseter muscle.

Detailed description

Bruxism is a prevalent condition that differentially burdens individuals. The overall objective of this pilot study is to measure the effects of BTX-A (Xeomin®) injections into bilateral masseter muscles for the management of sleep bruxism and associated symptoms. The hypothesis is that BTX-A reduces masticatory muscle activity. The aim of this study is to instrumentally monitor subjects closely over an extended time period of three months before and after application of BTX-A. Botulinum toxin type A ( BTX A; Xeomin ® ) temporarily blocks neuromuscular synapses. It is successfully and safely used therapeutically in various types of movement disorders and in chronic migraineurs. The mechanism of action of this treatment is related to a reduction of neurotransmitter release leading to reduced muscle activity. The following Null hypothesis will be tested: Injections of Xeomin® into the masseter muscles bilaterally (25 Units per muscle applied with 2 injections in each muscle) have no effect on bruxism measured by A) Masticatory muscle activity (1° objective) B) Subjects' well-being (2° objective) C) Sensitivity of masticatory muscles and jaw joints (2° objective) D) Anxiety over tooth wear (2° objective) E) Disturbed sleep by bed partner (2° objective) Following instruments will be used: 1. WISE questionnaires. A comprehensive web-based interdisciplinary symptom evaluation tool. 2. Algometer for sensitivity measure of masticatory muscles and jaw joints. 3. Bio-signal recorder. Parallel to the Electromyography (EMG) of the masseter muscles, other bio-signals such as a number of electroencephalographic (EEG) derivations, electrooculogram (EOG ) as well as an electrocardiogram (ECG) will be recorded, in order to detect sleep stages and better identify bruxism episodes. The device used in this study has been approved for projects NIH #2R01DE016417-05A1 and #1 R01DE028548-01. 4. Ultrasound for masseter muscle thickness measure 5. Dual-color chewing gum for chewing efficiency measure.

Interventions

DRUGIncobotulinumtoxin A (BTX A) Xeomin®

Injections into the masseter muscles bilaterally (25 Units per muscle applied with 2 injections in each muscle)

Sponsors

Merz Pharmaceuticals
CollaboratorINDUSTRY
Dominik Ettlin
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
NA
Intervention model
SINGLE_GROUP
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Intervention model description

Observational study

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 90 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Age 18-90 years; * patients complaining of bruxism and/or bruxism-related symptoms. * Sufficient knowledge of German to understand the patient information and the trial arrangement.

Exclusion criteria

* Contraindications for Xeomin® treatment such as generalized disorders of muscle activity (myasthenia gravis, Lambert-Eaton-Rooke syndrome); * documented hypersensitivity to one of the components, * local infection of the injection sites; * intake of anticoagulants or muscle relaxing medications; * recreational drugs.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Change of maximum EMG amplitudesdays 1-14, days 29-42Change of average of maximum EMG amplitudes of all bruxism events per night between days 1-14 (baseline) and days 29-42.
Verbal Rating Scale of Global impression of changeday 154Verbal Rating Scale (VRS) containing the following levels much worse, slightly worse, no change, slightly improved, much improved of global impression of change at the end of the study (day 154)

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
number of masseter contraction episodes per hour (N/h)days 1-14, days 15-28, days 85-98, days 141-154number of masseter contraction episodes per hour calculated from EMG signal amplitude normalized on MVC \[N/h\]
duration of masseter contraction episodes (Dur)days 1-14, days 15-28, days 85-98, days 141-154duration of masseter contraction episodes in \[sec\] calculated from EMG signal amplitude normalized on MVC
EMG-Indexdays 1-14, days 15-28, days 85-98, days 141-154EMG-Index = 0.5 x N/h + Dur
EMG Duty Factordays 1-14, days 15-28, days 85-98, days 141-154EMG duty factor = % duration of muscle activity/total recording time
Sensitivity of masticatory muscles and jaw jointsday 1, 14, 28, 42, 98, 154Sensitivity of masticatory muscles and jaw joints in \[N\]
Change of maximum EMG amplitudedays 1-14, days 15-28, days 85-98, days 141-154Change of average of maximum EMG amplitudes of all bruxism events per night between days 1-14 (baseline) and days 15-28, 85-98, and 141-154.
Numerical Rating Scale masseter muscle painday 1, 14, 28, 42, 98, 154Numerical Rating Scale (NRS) (0-10) with 0 = no pain and 10 = worst imaginable pain
Numerical Rating Scale report of spontaneous facial painday 1, 14, 28, 42, 98, 154Numerical Rating Scale (NRS) (0-10) with 0 = no pain and 10 = worst imaginable pain
Numerical Rating Scale report of jaw movement related facial painday 1, 14, 28, 42, 98, 154Numerical Rating Scale (NRS) (0- 10) with 0 = no pain and 10 = worst imaginable pain
Numerical Rating Scale report of anxiety over tooth wearday 1, 14, 28, 42, 98, 154Numerical Rating Scale (NRS) (0-10) with 0 = no anxiety and 10 = worst imaginable anxiety
Numerical Rating Scale disturbed sleep of bed partnerday 1, 14, 28, 42, 98, 154Numerical Rating Scale (NRS) (0-10) with 0 = no disturbed sleep and 10 = worst imaginable sleep
Self-report of bruxismday 1, 14, 28, 42, 98, 154Yes/No answer to direct question
EMG amplitude at maximum voluntary contractiondays 1-14, days 15-28, days 85-98, days 141-154EMG signal amplitude (RMS) at maximum voluntary contraction (MVC) in \[V\]

Countries

Switzerland

Contacts

Primary ContactDominik A Ettlin, MD, DMD
dominik.ettlin@zzm.uzh.ch+41 44 6343254

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026