Down Syndrome
Conditions
Keywords
Down Syndrome, Electroencephalography, Neural oscillations, Endocannabinoids, Gamma Intertrial Coherence
Brief summary
Background: It has been proposed that a hyperactivity of the endocannabinoids system could be involved in the cognitive deficits involved in Down Syndrome (DS). Hyperactivation of the type-1 cannabinoid (CB1) receptor by exogenous cannabinoids, such as the active principle of cannabis tetrahydrocannabinol (THC), induces several modifications of the electroencephalogram (EEG). The goal of this study is to compare those CB1-dependent EEG parameters in subjects with DS and age-matched typically developing subjects (TD, control group). These investigations can increase our knowledge of the involvement of the CB1 receptor in DS cognitive deficits and potentially identify biomarkers of target engagement of new therapies of this condition. Hypothesis: It was recently showed in pre-clinical DS models that the endocannabinoid system is hyperactivated in the brain and that human adult subjects with DS showed higher plasma concentrations of the main endocannabinoids 2-arachidonoylglycerol (2-AG) and anandamide (N-arachidonoylethanolamine, 2-AEA) as compared with those found in typically developing subjects. Alterations of neural oscillations induced by the consumption of THC preparations are well established and it is hypothesized that they would be similar to those found in subjects with DS. Objectives: To assess different neural markers using electroencephalography (EEG) in typically developing subjects and in subjects with DS in resting state and while conducting selected cognitive tasks. Methods: Non-interventional, cross-sectional, monocenter study in male and female adult subjects with DS and typically developing subjects (total n=48).
Interventions
OTHERElectroencephalography
EEG evaluation Composed by three consecutive tests 1. Resting state EEG, with either eyes open or closed 2. Auditory steady-state response (ASSR) 3. Auditory evoked potential
Sponsors
Aelis Farma
Starlab
Parc de Salut Mar
Study design
Observational model
CASE_CONTROL
Time perspective
CROSS_SECTIONAL
Eligibility
Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 35 Years
Healthy volunteers
Yes
Inclusion criteria
Common Inclusion Criteria: * Weight ≥ 50 kg and ≤ 100 kg * Body mass index (BMI) ≥ 18.5 and ≤ 30 TD group additional Inclusion Criteria: * Abstinence for alcohol 72h prior to the screening * Able to read Spanish and adhere to study requirements. * Signed informed consent prior to any study-mandated procedure. DS group additional Inclusion Criteria: * Clinical diagnosis of Down syndrome (full trisomy 21 and translocations) documented by chromosomal analysis (karyotyping). * Subject understands and accepts the trial procedures. * Subject assenting and/or willing to participate. * Signed informed consent by subject and legal representative prior to any study-mandated procedure. * Subject independently mobile and have sufficient vision and hearing to participate in study evaluations. * Abstinence for alcohol 72h prior to the screening. * Clinical Evaluation of Language Fundamentals Preschool-2 (CELF Preschool-2) test score ≥ 7. * Subjects must have a parent, or other reliable caregiver who agrees to accompany the subject to all clinic visits, provide information about the subject as required by the protocol, and ensure compliance with study tests. * Subjects are expected to complete all procedures scheduled during the study visits. They must be able to be understood most of the time and must not use other forms of communication, signs, symbol boards or devices as their primary form of communication. TD group
Exclusion criteria
* Substance use disorders except for mild alcohol use disorder and/or mild or moderate nicotine use disorder. * Testing positive for drugs of abuse in urine at screening or the observation day. * Lifetime clinically significant cardiovascular, renal, pulmonary, hepatic, onco-hematological, endocrine, gastrointestinal, mental or neurological disease. * Any other diseases or conditions that in the judgment of the investigator would interfere with the subject's ability to comply with study procedures or requirements and/or study results interpretation. * Any clinically significant findings in physical examination including vital signs. * Any prescription or over the counter drug (except occasional use of paracetamol) in the last 2 weeks before Day 1 of each period. * Patient included in a clinical study with drugs in the last three months. DS group
Design outcomes
Primary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Differences in gamma intertrial coherence and power between DS and TD group | During EEG | Variations in gamma intertrial coherence (ITC) and power during an auditory steady-state response (ASSR) at 40Hz in DS compared to TD subjects. |
| Differences in power of neural oscillations between DS and TD group | During resting state eyes-closed EEG | Variations in power of neural oscillations in resting state eyes-closed EEG (alpha, delta, theta, beta, gamma) in DS compared to TD subjects. |
| Differences in amplitude and latency of various EEG waves between DS and TD group | During EEG while performing a three-stimulus auditory oddball task | Variations in amplitude and latency of the P300a and P300b, P300, N100 and N200 waves assessed by a three-stimulus auditory oddball task in DS compared to TD subjects. |
| Differences in EEG complexity between DS and TD group | During EEG | Variations in EEG complexity measured by the Lempel-Ziv complexity in DS compared to TD subjects. |
| Differences in EEG brain connectivity, interhemispheric and frontoparietal connectivity, characteristic path and clustering coefficient between DS and TD group | During resting state eyes-closed and eyes-open EEG | Variations in EEG brain connectivity, interhemispheric and frontoparietal connectivity (measured by band coherence, synchronicity likelihood, phase lag index), characteristic path and clustering coefficient (band coherence, synchronicity likelihood) in resting state (eyes-closed/open) in resting state eyes-closed/open EEG in DS compared to TD subjects. |
| Differences in cross-frequency coupling between DS and TD group | During resting state EEG, and while performing the auditory and the cognitive tasks | Variations in cross-frequency coupling (theta-gamma coupling) during the resting state, the auditory and the cognitive tasks in DS compared to TD subjects. |
| Differences in Higuchi fractal dimension, small-world, characteristic path, and clustering coefficient between DS and TD group | During resting state eyes-closed and eyes-open EEG | Variations in Higuchi fractal dimension, small-world, characteristic path, and clustering coefficient in DS compared to TD subjects. |
| Differences in plasma concentrations of endocannabinoids between DS and TD group | At baseline | Variations in plasma concentrations of endocannabinoids (AEA and 2AG) in DS compared to TD subjects. |
| Differences in plasma concentrations of the neurosteroid pregnenolone between DS and TD group | At baseline | Variations in plasma concentrations of the neurosteroid pregnenolone in DS compared to TD subjects. |
Countries
Spain
Contacts
Primary ContactRafael de la Torre Fornell, PharmD, PhD
Backup ContactAna M Aldea Perona, MD, PhD
Outcome results
None listed