Skip to content

Efficacy and Safety of Remimazolam Besylate Versus Propofol for Sedation in Mechanically Ventilated ICU Patients

Efficacy and Safety of Remimazolam Besylate Versus Propofol for Sedation in Mechanically Ventilated ICU Patients: a Pilot Study

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 2
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT04790734
Enrollment
60
Registered
2021-03-10
Start date
2021-05-10
Completion date
2022-05-12
Last updated
2022-09-15

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Critical Illness

Keywords

Remimazolam besylate, Propofol, Intensive care unit, Mechanical ventilation

Brief summary

The purpose of this study is to evaluate the efficacy and safety of remimazolam compared to propofol for sedation in mechanically ventilated ICU patients.

Detailed description

This is a single-center, prospective, randomized, controlled pilot study using remimazolam and propofol for sedation in mechanically ventilated ICU patients. Subjects are randomized to remimazolam group and propofol group in a 1:1 ratio. Remifentanil is administered as the analgesic. Efficacy and safety profiles of remimazolam besylate are to be evaluated.

Interventions

DRUGSedation drugs

Different sedation drugs

Sponsors

Union Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
SINGLE (Subject)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 75 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Age ≥ 18 and ≤ 75 years; * Intubated and mechanically ventilated ≤96 hours before enrollment; * Expected to require continuous invasive ventilation and sedation ≥24 hours; * Requirement for light to moderate sedation (a RASS score of -3 to 0).

Exclusion criteria

* Body mass index (BMI) \<18 or \>30 kg/m2; * Acute severe neurological disorder and any other condition interfering with RASS assessment; * Systolic blood pressure less than 90 mm Hg after appropriate intravenous volume replacement and continuous infusions of 2 vasopressors; * Heart rate less than 50 beats/min; * Second- or third-degree heart block in the absence of a pacemaker; * Unstable angina; * Acute myocardial infarction; * Left ventricular ejection fraction less than 30%; * Contraindicate or allergic to study drugs; * Moribund state; * Acute hepatitis or serious hepatic dysfunction (Child-Pugh class C); * Chronic kidney disease with glomerular filtration rate (GFR) \< 60 ml/min/1.73m2; * Alcohol abuse; * Myasthenia gravis; * Pregnancy or lactation.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
The percentage of time in the target sedation range without rescue sedationFrom the beginning of using study sedatives until being extubated, being discharged from our ICU, the study drug was stopped for 24 hours by physicians, or 7 days after enrollment, whichever came firstThe percentage of time in the target sedation range without rescue sedation

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Length of ICU stayFrom start of study to 28 daysLength of ICU stay
28-day mortalityFrom start of study to 28 days28-day mortality
7-day ventitlator free timeFrom start of study to 7 days7-day ventitlator free time

Countries

China

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026