Skip to content

Cognitive Fitness for Depression in Older Adults

Cognitive Remediation of Cognitive Control in Late-Life Depression

Status
Completed
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT04790630
Enrollment
38
Registered
2021-03-10
Start date
2020-11-15
Completion date
2024-10-15
Last updated
2026-04-29

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Depression Mild, Depressive Disorder, Major, Mild Cognitive Impairment

Brief summary

This research is being done to determine if computerized administered cognitive fitness activities will improve thinking and depression in older depressed adults who are being treated with antidepressants. The investigators are also interested in whether participating in the treatment will result in changes to brain activity measured with magnetic resonance imaging (MRI).

Detailed description

Major depression in the elderly is both challenging to treat and detrimental to the cognitive functioning of patients. Major depression increases the probability of a later dementia diagnosis. By targeting cognitive processes in treatment, the investigators hope to both find a more effective means to manage major depression in older adults, but also demonstrate how top-down processes (e.g., Executive Control Network) may be driving depression and cognitive decline in older adults. The investigators are recruiting older adults with and without mild cognitive impairment. All subjects must have at least mild depressive symptoms to be eligible to participate. Subjects will be randomly assigned to one of two different interventions. Results of this study will help the investigators understand the mechanisms that contribute to depressed mood and cognitive change in older adults with late life depression.

Interventions

OTHERComputerized Cognitive Remediation of Executive Functioning (CCR-EF)

computerized experimental brain-training treatment

OTHERActive Control

computerized intervention that follows recommendations for cognitive fitness

Sponsors

UConn Health
Lead SponsorOTHER
National Institute of Mental Health (NIMH)
CollaboratorNIH

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
TRIPLE (Subject, Caregiver, Outcomes Assessor)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
60 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* ability to read and write in English * current major or mild depression despite ongoing treatment * under the care of a physician who prescribes medication for depression * currently treated with an antidepressant for at least 8 weeks

Exclusion criteria

* psychosis * other psychiatric disorders (except personality \& generalized anxiety disorders) * substance use disorders in the prior year * clinical diagnosis of dementia * neurological disorders (e.g., stroke, epilepsy, brain injury with loss of consciousness \> 30 minutes, brain tumors, demyelinating diseases) * corrected visual acuity \< 20/70 or color blindness

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Trail Making Part B TestPre-treatment and six weeks later when treatment has endedtime to complete alpha-numeric sequencing measured with the Trail Making Test (Part B). Change score is Week 6 - baseline. This is a measure of cognitive processing speed and mental flexibility measured in seconds to complete the task. A participant with a (very) strong performance on this test would complete the test in 25-65 seconds. Completion time is capped at 5 minutes and participants who have not completed the test are assigned a value of 300.
Montgomery Asberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS)Pre-treatment and six weeks later when treatment has endedChange in depression symptom severity as measured with the MADRS depression rating scale. Change score defined as week 6 - baseline (negative values indicate depression has improved). The (MADRS) ranges from 0 to 60, with 10 items scored 0-6 each. Higher scores indicate greater severity. Common cutoff points are: 0-6 (normal/remission), 7-19 (mild), 20-34 (moderate), and 35-60 (severe). Minimal clinically important difference (MCID) measured on the MADRS range from 1.6-1.9.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
California Verbal Learning Test (CVLT) Total LearningPre-treatment and six weeks later when treatment has endedChange in verbal learning as measured with the CVLT total learning score. The CVLT learning test includes a 16-item wordlist that is read to the participant five times. So the total possible maximum score on this measure is 80 and the total possible minimum score is 0. The change score is defined as week 6 - baseline, so a positive score indicates improved performance at week 6 compared with baseline.
NIH Toolbox Pattern Comparison Speed TaskPre-treatment and six weeks later when treatment has endedA computerized test of speed of simple processing speed where participants look at two figures and respond as quickly as possible whether those figures are alike or different. Scores are demographic adjusted T scores (adjusted for age, sex, education). T scores have a mean of 50 and a standard deviation of 10. T scores less than 35 indicate impaired performance. A change Score is here defined as Week 6 - Baseline (positive T scores indicate improved performance over the trial). A mean performance of +10 would mean on average that group improved by an entire standard deviation.

Countries

United States

Contacts

PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATORKevin Manning, Ph.D.

UConn Health

Participant flow

Recruitment details

Recruitment of subjects was carried out by several mechanisms, including: A) Referral from the psychiatry outpatient clinic, the geriatric medicine clinic at UCHC, and geriatricians in the community. Additional recruitment methods included community talks where participation in the research study was offered; distribution of flyers to include community housing, churches, organizations, medical clinics, and community centers; and advertising in newspapers, magazines, etc.

Pre-assignment details

We used a comprehensive cognitive battery to classify patients as cognitively normal (CN), mild cognitive impairment (MCI), or excluded due to dementia.

Baseline characteristics

Characteristic
Age, Categorical
<=18 years
0 Participants
Age, Categorical
>=65 years
15 Participants
Age, Categorical
Between 18 and 65 years
4 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
American Indian or Alaska Native
0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Asian
0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Black or African American
1 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
More than one race
1 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander
0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
White
29 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
28 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
2 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
0 / 150 / 18
other
Total, other adverse events
0 / 150 / 18
serious
Total, serious adverse events
1 / 150 / 18

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Apr 30, 2026