Cancer, Cancer, Bone, Cancer, Lung, Metastasis to Bone, Metastasis to Lung, Tumor, Solid
Conditions
Keywords
Radiation Oncology, Radiotherapy, Biology-Guided Radiotherapy (BgRT), RefleXion Medical, Radiation Therapy
Brief summary
The purpose of this study is to assess the performance and safety of Biology-Guided Radiotherapy (BgRT) using the RefleXion Medical Radiotherapy System (RMRS) via optimizing F18-Fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG) dosing, assessing the performance of the Positron Emission Tomography (PET) imaging subsystem for BgRT treatment planning and delivery, including its role as an interlock, and validating the dose delivery performance of the end-to-end BgRT workflow.
Detailed description
The performance and safety of BgRT using the RMRS will be studied by to sequential cohorts of patients with one targetable metastatic lesion in either the lungs or bone. Patients with multiple metastases can be accrued, but these investigations will focus on only one lesion per patient. Cohort I will seek to identify the Recommended RefleXion FDG dose (RRFD), which is the dose of administered FDG - within a range concordant with the American College of Radiology and Society of Pediatric Radiology Practice Parameter for Performing PET/CT in Oncology (ACR-SPR Practice Parameter) - that allows for functioning of the RefleXion system. Keeping ALARA (As Low As Reasonable Achievable) principles in mind, this phase of the investigation seeks to optimize the balance between minimizing patient exposure to the radiotracer and achieving satisfactory performance of the RMRS PET subsystem for BgRT. This cohort will also seek to assess RMRS PET imaging performance in comparison to a third-party diagnostic PET/CT. To that end, dose levels of 15 mCi and 20 mCi (if required) will be assessed sequentially in an escalation protocol. Patients with at least one known FDG avid tumor in the bone or lung will be enrolled into this cohort. These patients will undergo a CT simulation in an acceptable radiotherapy treatment position and with immobilization devices as needed. After acquisition of CT images, contours for targets, OARs, and BTZ will be generated by the investigator. Next, the patient will undergo back-to-back PET scans on the RefleXion device and a third-party diagnostic PET/CT device after a single injection of FDG at the studied FDG dose level. Quantitative metrics will be collected for each lesion in order to assess the performance of the RMRS PET subsystem at that dose. Up to 12 participant will be enrolled in Cohort I. Actual delivery of radiotherapy to the patient is not part of this investigation. The chief objective of Cohort II is to confirm that the machine-deliverable fluence generated by applying the BgRT firing filter to PET LTS images obtained at the time of a radiotherapy delivery does in fact result in an anatomic dose distribution that is consistent with the approved BgRT plan. A secondary objective is to extend this analysis by also confirming that the linear accelerator subsystem hardware is able to deliver the received machine instructions. Importantly, this investigation comprehensively emulates and assesses (without actually delivering the radiation therapy to the patient) the entire end-to-end BgRT workflow from simulation to treatment planning to, finally, dose delivery. This design also provides an opportunity to assess imaging, workflow, and the toxicity, if any, associated with multiple administrations of FDG. To do this, up to 22 subjects dispositioned to undergo conventional SBRT for a single bone tumor or a single lung tumor will be enrolled. As noted previously, patients with multiple metastases can be accrued but the investigation will focus only one targeted lesion per patient. For each patient, RMRS PET collections will be added to the SBRT workflow at 3 timepoints representing the steps when the RMRS PET subsystem would be utilized during the BgRT workflow. Specifically, these timepoints will include a RMRS PET imaging-only session prior to the start of SBRT delivery that will be used to create a BgRT plan as well as RMRS PET collections before the first and final fractions of their planned course of SBRT. A single comparison third-party diagnostic PET/CT image will also be obtained on the day of the final fraction.
Interventions
DEVICERMRS IDE Device
Participants will be injected with FDG at the studied dose and will undergo imaging sessions using the RMRS IDE device and a third-party Positron Emission Tomography (PET)/CT imaging device.
Sponsors
RefleXion Medical
Study design
Allocation
NON_RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
SEQUENTIAL
Primary purpose
OTHER
Masking
NONE
Intervention model description
This is an open-label, prospective study. The study is divided into two sequential cohorts of patients with one targetable primary or metastatic lesion in either the lungs or bone. Patients with multiple metastases can be accrued, but these investigations will focus on only one lesion per patient. Cohort I seeks to identify the Recommended RefleXion FDG dose (RRFD), which is the dose of administered FDG that allows for functioning of the RefleXion system. To that end, dose levels of 15 mCi and 20 mCi (if required) are assessed sequentially in an escalation protocol. The RRFD identified in Cohort I is utilized in Cohort II, to emulate and assess the dose delivery performance of the end-to-end BgRT workflow.
Eligibility
Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
22 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No
Inclusion criteria
1. Age greater than 21 years 2. A new or prior diagnosis of biopsy-proven cancer with a solid tumor (non-hematologic, non-lymphoma) 3. At least one active tumor in the bone or lung which is either the primary tumor or metastatic lesion determined either by biopsy or imaging suspicious of active disease 4. Target tumor size ≥2cm and ≤5cm 5. Target lesion in the bone or lung that is discrete and assessed by the investigator to be FDG-avid (i.e. SUVmax≥6 on third-party diagnostic PET/CT performed within 60 days with no intervening oncologic therapies) 6. ECOG Performance Status 0-3 7. Must have completed any other oncologic therapies at least 15 days prior to planned start of study procedures (preferably 30 days) and must have no plans to initiate systemic therapy until after study follow up is complete -OR- must be recorded by physician to have an active candidate lesion that is unresponsive to ongoing systemic therapy. 8. Females of childbearing potential should have negative urine or serum pregnancy test within 14 days prior to initiation of study scans. 9. Demonstrate adequate organ function: determined by ANC, platelets, hemoglobin, with no gross hematuria 10. For Cohort II only: Patient is dispositioned to undergo SBRT to a bone or lung tumor
Exclusion criteria
1. Clinically significant blood glucose abnormalities that preclude a satisfactory FDG PET/CT scan. 2. Previous history of external radiotherapy where prior radiotherapy fields are anticipated to overlap with the radiotherapy fields required for the present study 3. Diffuse metastatic process (leptomeningeal disease, peritoneal carcinomatosis, diffuse bone marrow involvement, etc.) 4. PET-avid structures not intended for radiation are within 2cm from target on third-party diagnostic PET/CT as assessed by investigator 5. Known allergy to FDG 6. Known psychiatric or substance abuse disorder that would interfere with conduct of the study 7. Pregnant, breast-feeding or expecting to conceive during the study 8. Patient weight exceeding the weight limit outlined per IFU. 9. For Cohort II only: Patients with pacemakers and other implantable devices who are deemed to be at high risk by the treating physician for complications secondary to radiotherapy. 10. For Cohort II only: Patients with bone lesions who are determined to be high risk by the treating physician for pathologic fracture prior to beginning radiotherapy. 11. For Cohort II only: Active inflammatory bowel disease, scleroderma, or other disorder deemed to be a risk factor for excess toxicity in the area of treatment by the treating physician.
Design outcomes
Primary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Cohort I Recommended RefleXion FDG Dose (RRFD) to Enable the Use of BgRT Planning. | During the RMRS imaging session | The primary endpoint determined the number of cases that received the lowest FDG dose of 15 mCi, completed the RMRS image session and established an adequate target activity concentration to enable Biology guided Radiotherapy planning. The starting dose was 15mCi which was determined based upon preliminary physics studies done prior to this study. A FDG dose escalation to 20 mCi was not required. |
| Cohort II: Delivery Emulation | After SBRT First Fraction (standard of care) and after SBRT Last Fraction (standard of care) | The number of scans/fractions where the emulated BgRT dose distribution in a phantom was consistent with the BgRT treatment plan (i.e., 95% of DVH Delivered points for the BTZ and OAR fall within bounded DVH of the approved BgRT plan). There were 9 first fractions and 8 last fractions that were analyzed. |
Secondary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Cohort I Endpoint 3: Biology Guided Radiotherapy (BgRT) Plan Generation | Immediately after RMRS imaging session | Secondary Endpoint 3 evaluated the percent of cases where X1 PET images generated an Acceptable BgRT plan. |
| Cohort I Endpoint 4: Percent of Cases Where the Intended Dose Distribution of BgRT Plan Was Achieved in the Physical Phantom. | Immediately after RMRS imaging session | Secondary Endpoint 4 determined the percent of cases where the generated BgRT plan achieved acceptable quality assurance metrics in a physical phantom. |
| Cohort II Endpoint 1 Percent of Fractions With Concordance Between Physical and Digital Phantoms | Assessed after SBRT First Fraction (standard of care) and after SBRT Last Fraction (standard of care), reported after SBRT Last Fraction. | Number of fractions where there is concordance between the physical and digital phantoms of emulated BgRT delivery derived from human subject PET emissions. Concordance is defined as a standard gamma index with a goal that 90% of pixels meet the 3mm/3% deviation standard. |
| Cohort II Endpoint 2 Localization Decision | Assessed After PET Pre-Scan 1 and after PET Pre-Scan 2, reported after PET Pre-Scan 2. | Number of Pre-scan images where there is agreement between a site investigator and the agreement standard for the BgRT PET PreScan localization decision (overall percent agreement). Positive percent agreement and negative percent agreement will also be reported. |
| Cohort I: Endpoint 1 Percent Agreement Between SI and AS for BgRT PET Imaging-only Session | Immediately after RMRS imaging session | This endpoint evaluated percent of cases where there was an agreement between the site investigator SI and an Agreement Standard (AS) for the PET modeling localization decision. Six image comparisons were performed. |
| Cohort II Endpoint 4 Toxicity Related to FDG Administrations | Assessed at 72±24 hours after final FDG injection | Number of Participants who experienced AEs related to bladder and bone marrow assessed by complete blood count, urinalysis and AEs specific to bladder and bone marrow determined by Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) v5 at 72±24 hours after final FDG injection. |
| Cohort II Endpoint 5 Workflow Characterization | a. Immediately after RMRS imaging-Only sessions b. After acceptable BgRT plan generation c. During BgRT physics Quality Assurance | Workflow characterization by 1. Number of participants with PET imaging-Only scans at RRFD that meet the Activity Concentration (AC) threshold for BgRT. 2. Number of participants with PET imaging-Only scans that generate an acceptable BgRT plans. 3. Number of participants with approved BgRT plans that Passed Physics Quality Assurance. |
| Cohort II Endpoint 5d Workflow Characterization: PET Evaluations That Elicited a Pass Signal | Assessed after PET Pre-Scan 1 prior to First Fraction delivery and after PET Pre-Scan 2 prior to Last Fraction delivery, reported after PET Pre-Scan 2 prior to Last Fraction. | Number of PET Pre-Scans on the Day of Fraction Delivery that Elicited a Pass Signal Fraction Delivery. |
| Cohort II Endpoint 3 Image Concordance (Cohort II) | Assessed after Last fraction Imaging-only PET scan and Third-party PET/CT scan and reported after Third-party PET/CT scan. | Number of Scans where there is concordance of a positive localization decision between the short-duration PET PreScan and a third-party diagnostic PET/CT scan (positive percent agreement). Overall percent agreement and negative percent agreement will also be reported. |
| Cohort I Endpoint 2: Percent of Cases X1 PET vs. Third-party Diagnostic PET/CT Image Comparison | Immediately after RMRS imaging session | This endpoint evaluated Percent of cases where there was concordance of the positive plan proceed decision between the BgRT PET Imaging-only session and a third-party diagnostic PET/CT. |
Countries
United States
Participant flow
Participants by arm
| Arm | Count |
|---|---|
| Cohort I: Recommended RefleXion FDG Dose (RRFD) Cohort Cohort I: Each participant (5 participants with bone tumor and 3 participants with lung tumor) underwent a CT simulation, then received a single injection of 15 mCi of FDG then underwent back-to-back RefleXion PET Imaging-Only session and third-party diagnostic PET/CT device. Each participant was then followed up at 72±24 hours after the imaging-only session. | 8 |
| Cohort II: Delivery Emulation Cohort Cohort II: The RRFD was determined in Cohort 1 as 15 mCi, aftter which enrollment began for Cohort II. In Cohort II each participant, (4 with bone tumor and 5 with lung tumor), underwent RefleXion PET image-only sessions at three different timepoints. Each participant received a FDG injection of 15 mCi, prior to each image acquisition:
The timepoints were as follows:
1\. At the time of enrollment: RefleXion PET image-only
2: At SBRT First Fraction (Standard of Care): RefleXion PET Prescan #1
3: At SBRT Last Fraction (Standard of Care): RefleXion PET Prescan #2 plus a Third-party PET/Scan.
The participants were then followed-up at 72 ± 24 hours after final FDG injection. | 9 |
| Total | 17 |
Withdrawals & dropouts
| Period | Reason | FG000 | FG001 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Overall Study | Incomplete RMRS image session | 2 | 0 |
| Overall Study | Screen Failure | 3 | 10 |
Baseline characteristics
| Characteristic | Cohort I: Recommended RefleXion FDG Dose (RRFD) Cohort | Cohort II: Delivery Emulation Cohort | Total |
|---|---|---|---|
| Age, Categorical <=18 years | 0 Participants | 0 Participants | 0 Participants |
| Age, Categorical >=65 years | 5 Participants | 6 Participants | 11 Participants |
| Age, Categorical Between 18 and 65 years | 3 Participants | 3 Participants | 6 Participants |
| Age, Continuous Cohort I & Cohort II | 68.01 years | 73.0 years | 70.5 years |
| Ethnicity (NIH/OMB) Hispanic or Latino | 0 Participants | 1 Participants | 1 Participants |
| Ethnicity (NIH/OMB) Not Hispanic or Latino | 8 Participants | 8 Participants | 16 Participants |
| Ethnicity (NIH/OMB) Unknown or Not Reported | 0 Participants | 0 Participants | 0 Participants |
| Race (NIH/OMB) American Indian or Alaska Native | 0 Participants | 1 Participants | 1 Participants |
| Race (NIH/OMB) Asian | 2 Participants | 0 Participants | 2 Participants |
| Race (NIH/OMB) Black or African American | 1 Participants | 3 Participants | 4 Participants |
| Race (NIH/OMB) More than one race | 0 Participants | 0 Participants | 0 Participants |
| Race (NIH/OMB) Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander | 0 Participants | 0 Participants | 0 Participants |
| Race (NIH/OMB) Unknown or Not Reported | 1 Participants | 0 Participants | 1 Participants |
| Race (NIH/OMB) White | 4 Participants | 5 Participants | 9 Participants |
| Sex: Female, Male Female | 1 Participants | 2 Participants | 3 Participants |
| Sex: Female, Male Male | 7 Participants | 7 Participants | 14 Participants |
Adverse events
| Event type | EG000 affected / at risk | EG001 affected / at risk |
|---|---|---|
| deaths Total, all-cause mortality | 0 / 8 | 0 / 9 |
| other Total, other adverse events | 5 / 8 | 5 / 9 |
| serious Total, serious adverse events | 0 / 8 | 0 / 9 |
Outcome results
Primary
Cohort II: Delivery Emulation
The number of scans/fractions where the emulated BgRT dose distribution in a phantom was consistent with the BgRT treatment plan (i.e., 95% of DVH Delivered points for the BTZ and OAR fall within bounded DVH of the approved BgRT plan). There were 9 first fractions and 8 last fractions that were analyzed.
Time frame: After SBRT First Fraction (standard of care) and after SBRT Last Fraction (standard of care)
Population: Cohort II - Emulated Delivery population evaluable scans
| Arm | Measure | Value (COUNT_OF_UNITS) |
|---|---|---|
| Cohort I: Recommended RefleXion FDG Dose (RRFD) | Cohort II: Delivery Emulation | 16 Evaluable Fractions |
Primary
Cohort I Recommended RefleXion FDG Dose (RRFD) to Enable the Use of BgRT Planning.
The primary endpoint determined the number of cases that received the lowest FDG dose of 15 mCi, completed the RMRS image session and established an adequate target activity concentration to enable Biology guided Radiotherapy planning. The starting dose was 15mCi which was determined based upon preliminary physics studies done prior to this study. A FDG dose escalation to 20 mCi was not required.
Time frame: During the RMRS imaging session
Population: The number of patients that received 15 mCi FDG dose and completed the RMRS image session.
| Arm | Measure | Value (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS) |
|---|---|---|
| Cohort I: Recommended RefleXion FDG Dose (RRFD) | Cohort I Recommended RefleXion FDG Dose (RRFD) to Enable the Use of BgRT Planning. | 6 Participants |
Comparison: Statistical analysis of the primary endpoint is not applicable to Cohort I. A modified 3+3 design was utilized wherein meeting the activity level threshold, not dose-limiting toxicity, is the endpoint. The RRFD is primarily based upon the lower FDG dose level where 5 to 6 out of 6 subjects have an Activity Concentration greater than 5 kBq/ml.
Secondary
Cohort I: Endpoint 1 Percent Agreement Between SI and AS for BgRT PET Imaging-only Session
This endpoint evaluated percent of cases where there was an agreement between the site investigator SI and an Agreement Standard (AS) for the PET modeling localization decision. Six image comparisons were performed.
Time frame: Immediately after RMRS imaging session
Population: The number of participants that received 15 mCi FDG dose injection and completed the RMRS image session.
| Arm | Measure | Value (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS) |
|---|---|---|
| Cohort I: Recommended RefleXion FDG Dose (RRFD) | Cohort I: Endpoint 1 Percent Agreement Between SI and AS for BgRT PET Imaging-only Session | 5 Participants |
Secondary
Cohort I Endpoint 2: Percent of Cases X1 PET vs. Third-party Diagnostic PET/CT Image Comparison
This endpoint evaluated Percent of cases where there was concordance of the positive plan proceed decision between the BgRT PET Imaging-only session and a third-party diagnostic PET/CT.
Time frame: Immediately after RMRS imaging session
| Arm | Measure | Value (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS) |
|---|---|---|
| Cohort I: Recommended RefleXion FDG Dose (RRFD) | Cohort I Endpoint 2: Percent of Cases X1 PET vs. Third-party Diagnostic PET/CT Image Comparison | 5 Participants |
Secondary
Cohort I Endpoint 3: Biology Guided Radiotherapy (BgRT) Plan Generation
Secondary Endpoint 3 evaluated the percent of cases where X1 PET images generated an Acceptable BgRT plan.
Time frame: Immediately after RMRS imaging session
| Arm | Measure | Value (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS) |
|---|---|---|
| Cohort I: Recommended RefleXion FDG Dose (RRFD) | Cohort I Endpoint 3: Biology Guided Radiotherapy (BgRT) Plan Generation | 4 Participants |
Secondary
Cohort I Endpoint 4: Percent of Cases Where the Intended Dose Distribution of BgRT Plan Was Achieved in the Physical Phantom.
Secondary Endpoint 4 determined the percent of cases where the generated BgRT plan achieved acceptable quality assurance metrics in a physical phantom.
Time frame: Immediately after RMRS imaging session
| Arm | Measure | Value (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS) |
|---|---|---|
| Cohort I: Recommended RefleXion FDG Dose (RRFD) | Cohort I Endpoint 4: Percent of Cases Where the Intended Dose Distribution of BgRT Plan Was Achieved in the Physical Phantom. | 6 Participants |
Secondary
Cohort II Endpoint 1 Percent of Fractions With Concordance Between Physical and Digital Phantoms
Number of fractions where there is concordance between the physical and digital phantoms of emulated BgRT delivery derived from human subject PET emissions. Concordance is defined as a standard gamma index with a goal that 90% of pixels meet the 3mm/3% deviation standard.
Time frame: Assessed after SBRT First Fraction (standard of care) and after SBRT Last Fraction (standard of care), reported after SBRT Last Fraction.
Population: 17 scans for nine (9) subjects were used to measure the percent of fraction concordance between physical and digital phantoms of emulated BgRT delivery
| Arm | Measure | Value (COUNT_OF_UNITS) |
|---|---|---|
| Cohort I: Recommended RefleXion FDG Dose (RRFD) | Cohort II Endpoint 1 Percent of Fractions With Concordance Between Physical and Digital Phantoms | 17 Fractions |
Secondary
Cohort II Endpoint 2 Localization Decision
Number of Pre-scan images where there is agreement between a site investigator and the agreement standard for the BgRT PET PreScan localization decision (overall percent agreement). Positive percent agreement and negative percent agreement will also be reported.
Time frame: Assessed After PET Pre-Scan 1 and after PET Pre-Scan 2, reported after PET Pre-Scan 2.
Population: Cohort II Inter-observer agreement for Localization decision on RMRS PET Pre-Scan image
| Arm | Measure | Value (COUNT_OF_UNITS) |
|---|---|---|
| Cohort I: Recommended RefleXion FDG Dose (RRFD) | Cohort II Endpoint 2 Localization Decision | 13 PET Pre-Scan Image |
Secondary
Cohort II Endpoint 3 Image Concordance (Cohort II)
Number of Scans where there is concordance of a positive localization decision between the short-duration PET PreScan and a third-party diagnostic PET/CT scan (positive percent agreement). Overall percent agreement and negative percent agreement will also be reported.
Time frame: Assessed after Last fraction Imaging-only PET scan and Third-party PET/CT scan and reported after Third-party PET/CT scan.
Population: Comparison of short-duration PET CRR01 vs. Third-party Pet/CT
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (COUNT_OF_UNITS) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Cohort I: Recommended RefleXion FDG Dose (RRFD) | Cohort II Endpoint 3 Image Concordance (Cohort II) | Positive Agreement | 7 Scans |
| Cohort I: Recommended RefleXion FDG Dose (RRFD) | Cohort II Endpoint 3 Image Concordance (Cohort II) | Overall agreement | 7 Scans |
Secondary
Cohort II Endpoint 4 Toxicity Related to FDG Administrations
Number of Participants who experienced AEs related to bladder and bone marrow assessed by complete blood count, urinalysis and AEs specific to bladder and bone marrow determined by Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) v5 at 72±24 hours after final FDG injection.
Time frame: Assessed at 72±24 hours after final FDG injection
Population: TEAE specific to Bladder or Bone Marrow
| Arm | Measure | Value (NUMBER) |
|---|---|---|
| Cohort I: Recommended RefleXion FDG Dose (RRFD) | Cohort II Endpoint 4 Toxicity Related to FDG Administrations | 0 participants |
Secondary
Cohort II Endpoint 5d Workflow Characterization: PET Evaluations That Elicited a Pass Signal
Number of PET Pre-Scans on the Day of Fraction Delivery that Elicited a Pass Signal Fraction Delivery.
Time frame: Assessed after PET Pre-Scan 1 prior to First Fraction delivery and after PET Pre-Scan 2 prior to Last Fraction delivery, reported after PET Pre-Scan 2 prior to Last Fraction.
Population: Cohort II (Emulated Delivery Cohort)
| Arm | Measure | Value (COUNT_OF_UNITS) |
|---|---|---|
| Cohort I: Recommended RefleXion FDG Dose (RRFD) | Cohort II Endpoint 5d Workflow Characterization: PET Evaluations That Elicited a Pass Signal | 17 Scans |
Secondary
Cohort II Endpoint 5 Workflow Characterization
Workflow characterization by 1. Number of participants with PET imaging-Only scans at RRFD that meet the Activity Concentration (AC) threshold for BgRT. 2. Number of participants with PET imaging-Only scans that generate an acceptable BgRT plans. 3. Number of participants with approved BgRT plans that Passed Physics Quality Assurance.
Time frame: a. Immediately after RMRS imaging-Only sessions b. After acceptable BgRT plan generation c. During BgRT physics Quality Assurance
Population: PET imaging-Only sessions at RRFD that meets BTZ activation concentration threshold for BgRT (5 kBq/ml)
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Cohort I: Recommended RefleXion FDG Dose (RRFD) | Cohort II Endpoint 5 Workflow Characterization | b. Number of participants PET imaging sessions which lead to acceptable BgRT plans. | 4 Participants |
| Cohort I: Recommended RefleXion FDG Dose (RRFD) | Cohort II Endpoint 5 Workflow Characterization | Number of participants with PET imaging-Only scans at RRFD meeting the AC threshold for BgRT. | 6 Participants |
| Cohort I: Recommended RefleXion FDG Dose (RRFD) | Cohort II Endpoint 5 Workflow Characterization | c. Number of participants approved BgRT plans that go on to pass physics quality assurance | 4 Participants |
| Cohort II: Delivery Emulation Cohort | Cohort II Endpoint 5 Workflow Characterization | b. Number of participants PET imaging sessions which lead to acceptable BgRT plans. | 9 Participants |
| Cohort II: Delivery Emulation Cohort | Cohort II Endpoint 5 Workflow Characterization | Number of participants with PET imaging-Only scans at RRFD meeting the AC threshold for BgRT. | 9 Participants |
| Cohort II: Delivery Emulation Cohort | Cohort II Endpoint 5 Workflow Characterization | c. Number of participants approved BgRT plans that go on to pass physics quality assurance | 9 Participants |
| Combined Cohort I + Cohort II | Cohort II Endpoint 5 Workflow Characterization | Number of participants with PET imaging-Only scans at RRFD meeting the AC threshold for BgRT. | 15 Participants |
| Combined Cohort I + Cohort II | Cohort II Endpoint 5 Workflow Characterization | c. Number of participants approved BgRT plans that go on to pass physics quality assurance | 13 Participants |
| Combined Cohort I + Cohort II | Cohort II Endpoint 5 Workflow Characterization | b. Number of participants PET imaging sessions which lead to acceptable BgRT plans. | 13 Participants |