Skip to content

Mindfulness Meditation Versus Clinical Hypnosis for Acute, Experimental Pain

An Experimental, Randomized Trial Comparing Mindfulness Meditation Versus Clinical Hypnosis for Acute Pain: a Test of Effects and Mechanisms

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 2
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT04786405
Enrollment
105
Registered
2021-03-08
Start date
2021-03-15
Completion date
2023-11-29
Last updated
2023-12-04

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Clinical Hypnosis, Mindfulness Meditation

Keywords

Mindfulness Meditation, Hypnosis, Acute Pain, Experimental Pain, Mechanisms

Brief summary

This trial aims to determine the effects and mechanisms (mediators and moderators) of brief training in mindfulness meditation versus clinical hypnosis on acute, experimental pain.

Detailed description

Participants (N=200 with complete data) will be healthy undergraduate students or community-based individuals. An experimental, randomised trial will be implemented, with participants randomly assigned to either five daily, 20-minute mindfulness meditation sessions or clinical hypnosis sessions. Repeated measures and experimental pain manipulation will be implemented. Aim 1 is to examine the effects of these two treatments on experimental pain outcomes. Aim 2 is to examine the moderators of these effects. Aim 3 is to determine the mediators underlying improved experimental pain outcomes. Results will refine theory and will inform the future streamlining of treatments to target those mechanisms shown to be of most critical importance.

Interventions

BEHAVIORALMindfulness meditation

Participants in the mindfulness meditation condition will practice a breath and body focused meditation.

Participants in clinical hypnosis will be guided in a hypnosis practice with suggestions tailored towards shifting pain appraisals.

Sponsors

The University of Queensland
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
SINGLE (Outcomes Assessor)

Masking description

The experimenter will remain blind to participant condition.

Intervention model description

Single-blind, two-arm, parallel-group randomized design.

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

* 18 years of age or older; * Able to read, speak and understand English.

Exclusion criteria

* Pregnancy, heart or vascular disease, Raynaud's disease, sickle cell disease, seizure disorder, high blood pressure, or diabetes; * Experience of recurrent fainting spells; * Report of a chronic pain condition; * Use of alcohol and/or pain medication in the last 24-hours; * Currently receiving psychiatric care; * Problems with allergic skin reactions or excessive bruising; * Previous participation in a cold pressor experiment. * All participants will be asked to consume a fruit box drink prior to the cold pressor to prevent vasovagal reactions. These

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Pain unpleasantnessChange from Experimental Session 1 (Day 1) to Experimental Session 5 (Day 5)Numerical rating scale in response to exposure to a cold pressor task.
Pain intensityChange from Experimental Session 1 (Day 1) to Experimental Session 5 (Day 5)Numerical rating scale in response to exposure to a cold pressor task.
Pain toleranceChange from Experimental Session 1 (Day 1) to Experimental Session 5 (Day 5)How long (in seconds) participants tolerate the cold pressor task with the time starting at the point of immersion and stopping when the hand, wrist and forearm were withdrawn from the refrigerated water.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Mechanism: MindfulnessChange from Experimental Session 1 (Day 1) to Experimental Session 5 (Day 5)Five Facet Mindfulness Questionnaire-Short Form
Mechanism: Pain catastrophizingChange from Experimental Session 1 (Day 1) to Experimental Session 5 (Day 5)Pain Catastrophizing Scale
Mechanism: Pain appraisalsChange from Experimental Session 1 (Day 1) to Experimental Session 5 (Day 5)Pain Appraisal Inventory
Physiological response to pain stimulusChange from Experimental Session 1 (Day 1) to Experimental Session 5 (Day 5)Heart rate data
Mechanism: HypnotizabilityBaseline score at Experimental Session 1 (Day 1)Stanford Clinical Hypnotizability Scale
Mechanism: Pre-treatment expectanciesBaseline score at Experimental Session 1 (Day 1)Treatment Expectations Questionnaire
Mechanism: Pain-Related Cognitive ProcessesChange from Experimental Session 1 (Day 1) to Experimental Session 5 (Day 5)Pain-Related Cognitive Process Questionnaire34
Mechanism: Attention Network TaskChange from Experimental Session 1 (Day 1) to Experimental Session 5 (Day 5)A computer based task that has been developed to allow assessment of the functioning of the three major attentional networks; alerting, orienting, and executive attention.
Mechanism: Mind Wandering TaskChange from Experimental Session 1 (Day 1) to Experimental Session 5 (Day 5)A computer based task that has been developed to allow assessment of three types of mind wandering.

Countries

Australia

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026