Skip to content

Treatment of Keloids With Fractional Erbium Laser-Assisted 5-Fluorouracil Versus Laser-Assisted Corticosteroid

A Prospective Triple-Blinded Single-Center Study of Laser-Assisted 5-Fluorouracil Versus Laser-Assisted Corticosteroid Treatment for Keloids

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 4
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT04786210
Enrollment
20
Registered
2021-03-08
Start date
2021-01-30
Completion date
2022-12-16
Last updated
2024-03-26

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Keloid Scar

Brief summary

This is a split-scar study with a target sample size of 20. There are two interventions: fractional erbium:YAG-assisted drug delivery of 5-fluorouracil and fractional erbium:YAG-assisted drug delivery of triamcinolone acetonide. Patients will undergo treatments in a series of 4 treatments at approximately 4 week ± 1 week intervals. Investigators will monitor for safety and continued benefit after the end of the interventional treatment.

Interventions

COMBINATION_PRODUCTFractional erbium:YAG-assisted drug delivery of 5-fluorouracil

Split-scar fractional ablative erbium laser-assisted delivery of 50mg/mL of 5-fluorouracil solution to one half of the scar (4 treatments)

COMBINATION_PRODUCTFractional erbium:YAG-assisted drug delivery of triamcinolone acetonide

Split-scar fractional ablative erbium laser-assisted delivery of 10 mg/mL of triamcinolone acetonide solution to the other half of the scar (4 treatments)

Sponsors

NYU Langone Health
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
TRIPLE (Subject, Investigator, Outcomes Assessor)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 89 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

1. Age 18-89 2. Has one large keloid scar or at least two similar but separate keloid scars 3. Keloid present for at least 1 year

Exclusion criteria

1. Currently pregnant 2. Currently breastfeeding 3. Have taken oral retinoids within 6 months of study initiation 4. Has had keloid treatment within 1 month of study initiation 5. Has active infection at treatment site 6. Has active malignancy 7. Presence of pedunculated keloid(s) or keloid(s) that are judged to be best treated with surgical excision first 8. Hypertrophic scars 9. Known hypersensitivity to TAC or 5-FU 10. Chronic systemic corticosteroid or immunosuppressive medication use 11. Has intolerance to anesthesia 12. Has known connective tissue disease 13. Has known infectious disease

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Change in Patient and Observer Scar Assessment Scale (POSAS) Score From Baseline to Final VisitBaseline, Week 16POSAS has two components, the observer (physician) portion and the patient portion. The observer grades on a scale of 1 to 10, 10 being the worst scar imaginable, six measures: vascularity, pigmentation, thickness, relief, pliability and surface area. The patient answers six questions regarding the characteristics of the scar, with each question being on a scale of 1 to 10. The scores of each category are summed to get the total POSAS score, with 120 being the highest score and representing the worst scar and 12 being the lowest score.
Change in Modified Hamilton ScoreBaseline, Week 16The Hamilton scale consists of 4 items with a score range of 0 to 14, where 14 represents more severe scarring.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Change in Scar Measurement From Baseline to Final VisitBaseline, Week 16Scar measurement will be calculated as the total volume (length x width x height) in cm3 of the scar, or (length x width) in cm2 if the scars are flush with the surrounding skin scar surface.

Countries

United States

Participant flow

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Overall Study Population
One half of keloid scarring (Site A of keloid scar) on a single subject will be assigned to 5-FU: Split-scar fractional ablative erbium laser-assisted delivery of 50mg/mL of 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) solution to one half of the scar (4 treatments) The other half of keloid scarring (Site B of keloid scar) on a single subject will be assigned to TAC: Split-scar fractional ablative erbium laser-assisted delivery of 10 mg/mL of triamcinolone acetonide (TAC) solution to the other half of the scar (4 treatments).
15
Total15

Withdrawals & dropouts

PeriodReasonFG000
Overall StudyLost to Follow-up2
Overall StudyWithdrawal by Subject4

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicOverall Study Population
Age, Continuous36 years
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Hispanic or Latino
0 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Not Hispanic or Latino
15 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
American Indian or Alaska Native
0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Asian
7 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Black or African American
5 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
More than one race
0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander
0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
White
3 Participants
Region of Enrollment
United States
15 participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
9 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
6 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
0 / 00 / 0
other
Total, other adverse events
12 / 1912 / 19
serious
Total, serious adverse events
0 / 190 / 19

Outcome results

Primary

Change in Modified Hamilton Score

The Hamilton scale consists of 4 items with a score range of 0 to 14, where 14 represents more severe scarring.

Time frame: Baseline, Week 16

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Site A of Keloid Scar - 5-FUChange in Modified Hamilton Score-0.88 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.79
Site B of Keloid Scar - TACChange in Modified Hamilton Score-1.36 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.21
Primary

Change in Patient and Observer Scar Assessment Scale (POSAS) Score From Baseline to Final Visit

POSAS has two components, the observer (physician) portion and the patient portion. The observer grades on a scale of 1 to 10, 10 being the worst scar imaginable, six measures: vascularity, pigmentation, thickness, relief, pliability and surface area. The patient answers six questions regarding the characteristics of the scar, with each question being on a scale of 1 to 10. The scores of each category are summed to get the total POSAS score, with 120 being the highest score and representing the worst scar and 12 being the lowest score.

Time frame: Baseline, Week 16

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Site A of Keloid Scar - 5-FUChange in Patient and Observer Scar Assessment Scale (POSAS) Score From Baseline to Final Visit-20 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 8
Site B of Keloid Scar - TACChange in Patient and Observer Scar Assessment Scale (POSAS) Score From Baseline to Final Visit-20.6 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 13.1
Secondary

Change in Scar Measurement From Baseline to Final Visit

Scar measurement will be calculated as the total volume (length x width x height) in cm3 of the scar, or (length x width) in cm2 if the scars are flush with the surrounding skin scar surface.

Time frame: Baseline, Week 16

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Site A of Keloid Scar - 5-FUChange in Scar Measurement From Baseline to Final Visit-368.7 cm^3Standard Deviation 692.9
Site B of Keloid Scar - TACChange in Scar Measurement From Baseline to Final Visit-310.7 cm^3Standard Deviation 626.7

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026