Skip to content

A Pilot Randomized Controlled Trial for Hand Osteoarthritis

A Pilot Randomized Controlled Trial for Hand Osteoarthritis

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT04784065
Enrollment
33
Registered
2021-03-05
Start date
2021-02-11
Completion date
2024-04-01
Last updated
2025-08-28

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Hand Osteoarthritis

Brief summary

This is a study involving people receiving care at the Michael E. DeBakey VA Medical Center, Houston Texas. We are studying people who have hand osteoarthritis (the most common form of arthritis that involves the hand) and testing treatments for the condition with the hope that we can help to improve hand pain as well as limit the damage that occurs related to the arthritis. People who choose to participate, are randomly assigned to one of two treatments, both expected to be helpful.

Detailed description

The research will be conducted at the following location(s): Baylor College of Medicine, Baylor St. Luke's Medical Center (BSLMC), and Michael E. DeBakey Veterans Affairs Medical Center. Participants of this study are consented for the study, randomized into one of two treatment groups for hand osteoarthritis, both expected to improve hand symptoms. At the beginning of the study, many questionnaires, a physical exam, photographs of the hands, some x-rays, on a limited few people, and MRI will be obtained. Then the participants will be provided treatments for hand osteoarthritis based on the group wo which they were randomly assigned. One aspect of one of the treatments is viewed as experimental but the risks related to the treatment are considered to be low, so the risk-benefit ratio for participation in this study are good. We see patients in follow up more frequently during the first month, and then at 3 months and then 6 months of follow up. At the final visit, we will repeat the xrays and the MRIs.

Interventions

DEVICEHand orthosis

An orthosis applied to a hand affected by osteoarthritis with the expectation that it will improve symptoms and possibly structural progression.

Sponsors

National Institute of Arthritis and Musculoskeletal and Skin Diseases (NIAMS)
CollaboratorNIH
Baylor College of Medicine
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
TRIPLE (Subject, Investigator, Outcomes Assessor)

Masking description

The occupational therapists fabricating the orthoses used the study are the only ones not blinded in this study. The participants, principal investigator, and research assistants are all blinded to the treatment allocation.

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Enrolled to receive medical care at the Michael E. DeBakey VA Medical Center * At least 3 joints affected by distal interphalangeal (DIP) nodal hand OA * DIP nodal hand OA will be defined as Heberden's nodes on physical exam. * Sufficiently severe frequent pain of at least one DIP * Frequent pain: pain on most days of the month for at least one month in the last year. * Minimum VAS pain severity of 40 on a 0 - 100 scale

Exclusion criteria

* History or current inflammatory arthritides (examples: gout, psoriatic arthritis, and rheumatoid arthritis) * Prior surgery on the DIP joints * Planned surgery for the DIP joints * Pregnancy

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Visual Analog Scale (VAS) for Pain in the More Symptomatic Hand That Includes the Most Symptomatic DIP Joint by 24 Weeks of Use of Traction Therapy With Standard of Care Treatment for Hand OA to Establish Efficacy of Traction Therapy.24 week follow upAn assessment of pain intensity in a given hand. - high values are worse outcomes. Minimum score = 0 Maximum score = 100
The Primary Structure Endpoint Will be Change in Sum of the Kellgren and Lawrence Score of All Distal InterPhalangeal Joints in the Hand That Was Placed in an Orthosis Over 24 Weeks.24 week follow upAn assessment of radiographic OA severity. (high values are worse outcomes) Minimum score = 0 Maximum score = 16

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
The Functional Index for Hand Osteoarthritis (FIHOA)24 week follow upAn assessment of hand function. (high values are worse outcomes) Minumum score = 0 Maximum score = 30
The Disabilities of Arm Shoulder and Hand (DASH)24 week follow upAn assessment of hand disability. (high values are worse outcomes) Minimum score = 30 Maximum score = 150
Functional Dexterity Test24 week follow upAn assessment of hand functional dexterity. (high values are worse outcomes) Measure of the number of seconds it takes for the participant to complete a series of activities. Penalty scores are assigned if the quality of the activity performed is imperfect. Minimum score = 0 Maximum score = indefinite
Grip Strength24 week follow upAn assessment of the amount of force that can be applied with grip. (low values are worse outcomes)
Pinch Strength24 week follow upAn assessment of the amount of force that can be applied with pinching between thumb and the 2nd and 3rd fingers. (low values are worse outcomes)
The Number of DIP Joints That Exhibit Tenderness in the Study Hand24 week follow upThe number of DIP joints that exhibit tenderness (dichotomously assessed - yes/no) in the study hand. (high values are worse outcomes) Minimum score = 0 Maximum score = 4

Countries

United States

Participant flow

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Treatment Arm With Control Orthosis
Identical resting hand orthosis to what the traction arm received without the finger trap modifications. The participants were asked to continue the orthosis schedule for the full 24 weeks of the study. Besides the resting hand orthosis, the SOC treatment included a thermal modality, activity modification/ joint protection education, and range of motion exercises.
17
Treatment Arm With Experimental Orthosis
A resting orthosis that was modified to allow for convenient application of finger traps. A finger trap was customized to the most symptomatic DIP and any other digit that the participant requested. The participants were asked to continue the orthosis schedule for the full 24 weeks of the study. Besides the resting hand orthosis, the SOC treatment included a thermal modality, activity modification/ joint protection education, and range of motion exercises.
16
Total33

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicTreatment Arm With Experimental OrthosisTotalTreatment Arm With Control Orthosis
Age, Continuous65.2 Years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 6.6
65.8 Years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 6.7
66.5 Years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 7.1
Race (NIH/OMB)
American Indian or Alaska Native
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Asian
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Black or African American
10 Participants17 Participants7 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
More than one race
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
1 Participants2 Participants1 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
White
5 Participants14 Participants9 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
6 Participants16 Participants10 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
10 Participants17 Participants7 Participants
Study Hand VAS59.4 Units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 20
64.5 Units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 19.8
69.3 Units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 18.9

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
0 / 170 / 16
other
Total, other adverse events
8 / 178 / 16
serious
Total, serious adverse events
0 / 170 / 16

Outcome results

Primary

The Primary Structure Endpoint Will be Change in Sum of the Kellgren and Lawrence Score of All Distal InterPhalangeal Joints in the Hand That Was Placed in an Orthosis Over 24 Weeks.

An assessment of radiographic OA severity. (high values are worse outcomes) Minimum score = 0 Maximum score = 16

Time frame: 24 week follow up

Population: Those participants at the Houston site who were randomized.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Treatment Arm With Control OrthosisThe Primary Structure Endpoint Will be Change in Sum of the Kellgren and Lawrence Score of All Distal InterPhalangeal Joints in the Hand That Was Placed in an Orthosis Over 24 Weeks.0 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0
Treatment Arm With Experimental OrthosisThe Primary Structure Endpoint Will be Change in Sum of the Kellgren and Lawrence Score of All Distal InterPhalangeal Joints in the Hand That Was Placed in an Orthosis Over 24 Weeks.0 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0
Primary

Visual Analog Scale (VAS) for Pain in the More Symptomatic Hand That Includes the Most Symptomatic DIP Joint by 24 Weeks of Use of Traction Therapy With Standard of Care Treatment for Hand OA to Establish Efficacy of Traction Therapy.

An assessment of pain intensity in a given hand. - high values are worse outcomes. Minimum score = 0 Maximum score = 100

Time frame: 24 week follow up

Population: All randomized participants

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)
Treatment Arm With Control OrthosisVisual Analog Scale (VAS) for Pain in the More Symptomatic Hand That Includes the Most Symptomatic DIP Joint by 24 Weeks of Use of Traction Therapy With Standard of Care Treatment for Hand OA to Establish Efficacy of Traction Therapy.-16.1 units on a scale
Treatment Arm With Experimental OrthosisVisual Analog Scale (VAS) for Pain in the More Symptomatic Hand That Includes the Most Symptomatic DIP Joint by 24 Weeks of Use of Traction Therapy With Standard of Care Treatment for Hand OA to Establish Efficacy of Traction Therapy.-15.7 units on a scale
Secondary

Functional Dexterity Test

An assessment of hand functional dexterity. (high values are worse outcomes) Measure of the number of seconds it takes for the participant to complete a series of activities. Penalty scores are assigned if the quality of the activity performed is imperfect. Minimum score = 0 Maximum score = indefinite

Time frame: 24 week follow up

Population: All participants who were randomized.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)
Treatment Arm With Control OrthosisFunctional Dexterity Test-3.8 seconds
Treatment Arm With Experimental OrthosisFunctional Dexterity Test-6.4 seconds
Secondary

Grip Strength

An assessment of the amount of force that can be applied with grip. (low values are worse outcomes)

Time frame: 24 week follow up

Population: All randomized.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)
Treatment Arm With Control OrthosisGrip Strength3.1 pounds
Treatment Arm With Experimental OrthosisGrip Strength5.3 pounds
Secondary

Pinch Strength

An assessment of the amount of force that can be applied with pinching between thumb and the 2nd and 3rd fingers. (low values are worse outcomes)

Time frame: 24 week follow up

Population: All randomized.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)
Treatment Arm With Control OrthosisPinch Strength0.4 pounds
Treatment Arm With Experimental OrthosisPinch Strength0.2 pounds
Secondary

The Disabilities of Arm Shoulder and Hand (DASH)

An assessment of hand disability. (high values are worse outcomes) Minimum score = 30 Maximum score = 150

Time frame: 24 week follow up

Population: All those randomized.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)
Treatment Arm With Control OrthosisThe Disabilities of Arm Shoulder and Hand (DASH)0.9 units on a scale
Treatment Arm With Experimental OrthosisThe Disabilities of Arm Shoulder and Hand (DASH)-9.9 units on a scale
Secondary

The Functional Index for Hand Osteoarthritis (FIHOA)

An assessment of hand function. (high values are worse outcomes) Minumum score = 0 Maximum score = 30

Time frame: 24 week follow up

Population: All those randomized.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)
Treatment Arm With Control OrthosisThe Functional Index for Hand Osteoarthritis (FIHOA)0.6 units on a scale
Treatment Arm With Experimental OrthosisThe Functional Index for Hand Osteoarthritis (FIHOA)-2.6 units on a scale
Secondary

The Number of DIP Joints That Exhibit Tenderness in the Study Hand

The number of DIP joints that exhibit tenderness (dichotomously assessed - yes/no) in the study hand. (high values are worse outcomes) Minimum score = 0 Maximum score = 4

Time frame: 24 week follow up

Population: All randomized

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)
Treatment Arm With Control OrthosisThe Number of DIP Joints That Exhibit Tenderness in the Study Hand-0.2 score on a scale
Treatment Arm With Experimental OrthosisThe Number of DIP Joints That Exhibit Tenderness in the Study Hand-0.4 score on a scale

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026