Skip to content

Evaluating the Effect of SOLIUS UV Light Source in Improving Vitamin D Status

Evaluating the Effect of SOLIUS UV Light Source in Improving Serum Levels of 25-hydroxyvitamin D in Vitamin D Deficient/ Insufficient Adults of Various Skin Types

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT04780776
Enrollment
69
Registered
2021-03-04
Start date
2022-02-23
Completion date
2023-11-02
Last updated
2024-10-22

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Vitamin D Deficiency, Vitamin D Insufficiency

Keywords

Vitamin D, Ultraviolet B radiation, SOLIUS System

Brief summary

The aim of this study is to evaluate the safety and effectiveness of the SOLIUS System in improving serum levels of 25-hydroxyvitamin D in vitamin D deficient/ insufficient adults of various skin types. The investigators will conduct a double-blinded randomized clinical trial in 100 adults to compare the changes in serum 25-hydroxyvitamin D levels between subjects who received and do not receive weekly exposures to Ultraviolet B Radiation (UVB) generated by the SOLIUS System for 16 weeks.

Detailed description

Study enrollment Approximately 100 healthy adults will be enrolled ages 22 or older; both sexes, for vitamin D deficiency screening in order to enroll 80 adults with vitamin D deficiency/insufficiency (serum 25-hydroxyvitamin D \<30 ng/mL). Participants will be randomized 1:1 into two groups: 40 adults for treatment arm who will receive weekly exposures of ultraviolet radiation generated by the SOLIUS System, and 40 adults for sham comparator arm. Study procedure The treatment group that will be exposed to the SOLIUS System will first undergo an evaluation of each individual's sensitivity to the SOLIUS System UVB using the device titration system for the first 5 weeks. Once the UVB dose is determined during the 5 weeks, the subjects will be enrolled in a 16-week study where they will be exposed to their individualized dose. For the sham comparator group, they will undergo the procedures as the treated group with the exception that the SOLIUS System will only be turned on to emit visible radiation. At these visits, each subject assigned into both groups will be asked questions about consumption of vitamin D, sun exposure, and whether he/she has had any adverse changes in his/her health. Serum 25-hydroxyvitamin D levels will be measured at baseline and monthly, and the levels will be analyzed to compare between those who receive and who do not receive the UVB radiation intervention for baseline and during the 16-week treatment period. After the 16-week intervention, participants will be asked to return to the study site weekly for measurement of serum 25-hydroxyvitamin D for 4 weeks. Serum 25(OH)D levels will be determined using the Liquid Chromatography with tandem mass spectrometry (LC/MS/MS) method. Safety will be monitored by interviewing the participants after each UVB exposure for any adverse events, including erythema or any other skin reactions.

Interventions

5 weeks of UVB titration to determine individual's UVB sensitivity followed by 16 weeks of UVB exposure intervention

DEVICESham comparator

5+16 weeks of visible light exposure

Sponsors

Boston University
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
TRIPLE (Subject, Caregiver, Investigator)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
22 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

1. Age at least 22 years old 2. Male or Female 3. Skin Type I-VI 4. Women of child bearing potential must be on birth control and not pregnant based on a negative pregnancy test at baseline. 5. Ability and Willingness to give informed consent and comply to protocol requirements 6. Serum total 25(OH)D \< 30 ng/mL at the screening

Exclusion criteria

1. Ongoing treatment with supplemental or pharmacological doses of vitamin D, vitamin D metabolites or analogues 2. Pregnant 3. History of underlying photosensitivity 4. Use of medications that cause a photosensitivity reaction (including but not limited to): tetracycline, tretinoin, amiodarone, doxycycline, naproxen, diphenhydramine, methotrexate, and hydrochlorothiazide 5. History of skin cancer 6. Plan to received significant sun exposure below the 33rd parallel during study 7. Used tanning or phototherapy devices within the last 30 days 8. Vitamin D supplement use of more than 600 IUs daily 9. Systemic steroids use 10. H1 antihistamine use in the last 7 days 11. Diagnosed with light allergies (including but not limited to): actinic prurigo, polymorphous light eruption, or solar urticaria 12. Diagnosed with light sensitivities (including but not limited to): protoporphyria, photodermatitis, xeroderma pigmentosum, lupus erythematosus, chronic actinic dermatitis, or UV-sensitive syndrome

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Change in Serum 25-Hydroxyvitamin D [25(OH)D]Week 1, Week 21This outcome measures the change in serum 25-hydroxyvitamin D \[25(OH)D\] concentrations in participants from Week 1 to the end of the intervention period Week 21.
Distribution of Participants by Vitamin D Deficiency Categories at Week 1Week 1The three vitamin D categories are defined as: Deficient - \<20 ng/mL 25(OH)D, Insufficient - 21-29 ng/mL 25(OH)D, Sufficient - 30-100 ng/mL 25(OH)D.
Distribution of Participants by Vitamin D Deficiency Categories at Week 21Week 21The three vitamin D categories are defined as: Deficient - \<20 ng/mL 25(OH)D, Insufficient - 21-29 ng/mL 25(OH)D, Sufficient - 30-100 ng/mL 25(OH)D.

Countries

United States

Participant flow

Recruitment details

Screened adults with vitamin D deficiency or insufficiency were selected for the study and randomized into the two study arms.

Participants by arm

ArmCount
UVB Treatment Arm
Participants receive ultraviolet B radiation (UVB) exposure from the SOLIUS System.
35
Sham Comparator Arm
Participants receive blue/violet light exposure from the SOLIUS System.
34
Total69

Withdrawals & dropouts

PeriodReasonFG000FG001
Follow up Week 22-25Lost to Follow-up22
Titration Week 1-5Lost to Follow-up28
Treatment Week 6-21Lost to Follow-up44

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicTotalUVB Treatment ArmSham Comparator Arm
Age, Continuous34.26 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 11.01
34.09 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 10.78
34.44 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 11.4
Fitzpatrick Skin Type
Skin Type II/III
60 Participants30 Participants30 Participants
Fitzpatrick Skin Type
Skin Type IV/V
9 Participants5 Participants4 Participants
Race and Ethnicity Not Collected0 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Asian
11 Participants8 Participants3 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Black
19 Participants6 Participants13 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Black- Cape Verde
1 Participants1 Participants0 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Black- Hispanic
1 Participants1 Participants0 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Black- Multirace
1 Participants0 Participants1 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Hispanic
8 Participants4 Participants4 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Hispanic- Multirace
1 Participants1 Participants0 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Hispanic- White
1 Participants1 Participants0 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Multirace
1 Participants0 Participants1 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
White
25 Participants13 Participants12 Participants
Region of Enrollment
United States
69 participants35 participants34 participants
Screening 25(OH)D Levels20.41 ng/mL
STANDARD_DEVIATION 5.21
20.57 ng/mL
STANDARD_DEVIATION 5.3
19.71 ng/mL
STANDARD_DEVIATION 5.16
Sex: Female, Male
Female
44 Participants23 Participants21 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
25 Participants12 Participants13 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
0 / 350 / 34
other
Total, other adverse events
23 / 3513 / 34
serious
Total, serious adverse events
0 / 350 / 34

Outcome results

Primary

Change in Serum 25-Hydroxyvitamin D [25(OH)D]

This outcome measures the change in serum 25-hydroxyvitamin D \[25(OH)D\] concentrations in participants from Week 1 to the end of the intervention period Week 21.

Time frame: Week 1, Week 21

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
UVB Treatment ArmChange in Serum 25-Hydroxyvitamin D [25(OH)D]10.14 ng/mLStandard Deviation 7.5
Sham Comparator ArmChange in Serum 25-Hydroxyvitamin D [25(OH)D]-2.3 ng/mLStandard Deviation 4.9
Primary

Distribution of Participants by Vitamin D Deficiency Categories at Week 1

The three vitamin D categories are defined as: Deficient - \<20 ng/mL 25(OH)D, Insufficient - 21-29 ng/mL 25(OH)D, Sufficient - 30-100 ng/mL 25(OH)D.

Time frame: Week 1

Population: Only participants who completed the treatment are analyzed (27 in the treatment and 20 in the control arm).

ArmMeasureGroupValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
UVB Treatment ArmDistribution of Participants by Vitamin D Deficiency Categories at Week 1Deficient19 Participants
UVB Treatment ArmDistribution of Participants by Vitamin D Deficiency Categories at Week 1Insufficient6 Participants
UVB Treatment ArmDistribution of Participants by Vitamin D Deficiency Categories at Week 1Sufficient2 Participants
Sham Comparator ArmDistribution of Participants by Vitamin D Deficiency Categories at Week 1Deficient9 Participants
Sham Comparator ArmDistribution of Participants by Vitamin D Deficiency Categories at Week 1Insufficient10 Participants
Sham Comparator ArmDistribution of Participants by Vitamin D Deficiency Categories at Week 1Sufficient1 Participants
Primary

Distribution of Participants by Vitamin D Deficiency Categories at Week 21

The three vitamin D categories are defined as: Deficient - \<20 ng/mL 25(OH)D, Insufficient - 21-29 ng/mL 25(OH)D, Sufficient - 30-100 ng/mL 25(OH)D.

Time frame: Week 21

Population: Only participants who completed the treatment are analyzed (27 in the treatment and 20 in the control arm).

ArmMeasureGroupValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
UVB Treatment ArmDistribution of Participants by Vitamin D Deficiency Categories at Week 21Sufficient11 Participants
UVB Treatment ArmDistribution of Participants by Vitamin D Deficiency Categories at Week 21Deficient3 Participants
UVB Treatment ArmDistribution of Participants by Vitamin D Deficiency Categories at Week 21Insufficient13 Participants
Sham Comparator ArmDistribution of Participants by Vitamin D Deficiency Categories at Week 21Deficient16 Participants
Sham Comparator ArmDistribution of Participants by Vitamin D Deficiency Categories at Week 21Insufficient4 Participants
Sham Comparator ArmDistribution of Participants by Vitamin D Deficiency Categories at Week 21Sufficient0 Participants

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026