Skip to content

Pediatric Type III Supracondylar Humeral Fracture

How Many K Wires do we Need in the Surgical Treatment of Pediatric Type III Supracondylar Humeral Fracture?

Status
Completed
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Observational
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT04780308
Acronym
Fracture
Enrollment
100
Registered
2021-03-03
Start date
2010-01-01
Completion date
2015-02-20
Last updated
2021-03-03

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Pediatric Fractures, Supracondylar Humerus Fracture

Keywords

pediatric, supracondylar humeral fracture, k wires, closed reduction, pin configuration

Brief summary

The purpose of this study was to compare pin configuration effects on early secondary displacement in the surgical treatment of pediatric supracondylar humeral fractures (SCHF).

Detailed description

The study consisted of 100 (68M, 32F) children who underwent surgery between 2010 and 2013 for Gartland Type 3 (SCHF). The patients divided into five groups according to the top in configurations (crossed 1 lateral 1 medial, crossed 2 lateral 1 medial, crossed 1 lateral 2 medial, 2 lateral divergent, and 3 lateral divergent). The average age at the time of injury was 7.34 (between 2 and 14 years). Bauman angle (BA), Humerocapital angle (HCA), Anterior humeral line (AHL), flexion range, extension range, and Carrying angle (CA) were compared at preoperative, postoperative 1st-day, postoperative last control, and non-operated side. The mean follow-up time 24,96±11,06 with a range of 12-54 months.

Interventions

PROCEDUREPediatric Garthland Type 3 supracondylar humeral fractures fixed by K-wires

The effects of the different types of K-wire configuration on Pediatric Gartland Type 3 supracondylar humeral fractures were evaluated. Pediatric Gartland Type 3 supracondylar humeral fractures operated under general anesthesia with open or closed reduction. After reduction checked by fluoroscopy K-wires applied in different configurations.

Sponsors

Bakirkoy Dr. Sadi Konuk Research and Training Hospital
Lead SponsorOTHER_GOV

Study design

Observational model
CASE_CONTROL
Time perspective
OTHER

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
No minimum to 16 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Pediatric Gartland Type 3 supracondylar humeral fracture * Patients operated between 2010-2013 * Patients under 16 years old

Exclusion criteria

* Pathological fractures * Conservative treated supracondylar fractures * Less than the 1-year follow-up * Patients with incomplete postoperative follow-up * Patients older than 16 years * Pediatric Gartland Type 1 and 2 supracondylar humeral fracture

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Baumann Anglepostoperative 1. day, 1. month and 12. monthThis angle is formed by the humeral axis and a straight line through the epiphyseal plate of the capitellum. Preoperative and postoperative angle differences are measured in anteroposterior and lateral X rays. These differences are measured for reduction quality and these parameters shows the success of the surgery.
Anterior Humeral Linepostoperative 1. day, 1. month and 12. monthA line drawn down the anterior surface of the humerus should intersect the middle third of the capitellum. Preoperative and postoperative angle differences are measured in anteroposterior and lateral X rays. These differences are measured for reduction quality and these parameters shows the success of the surgery.
Humero-Capital Anglepostoperative 1. day, 1. month and 12. monthOn lateral X-ray angle between capitellum and humeral shaft. Preoperative and postoperative angle differences are measured in anteroposterior and lateral X rays. These differences are measured for reduction quality and these parameters shows the success of the surgery.

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026