A Comparison of the Accuracy of Toric Intraocular Lens Formulas

A Comparison of the Accuracy of Many Different Toric Intraocular Lens Formulas

Status

Completed

Phases

Unknown

Study type

Observational

Source

ClinicalTrials.gov

Registry ID

NCT04776603

Enrollment

172

Registered

2021-03-01

Start date

2015-01-31

Completion date

2020-01-31

Last updated

2021-03-01

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Astigmatism

Keywords

calculators, cataract, intraocular lens power, toric

Brief summary

Detailed description

To compare the accuracy of the Abulafia-Koch, the Barrett, the Barrett Post ,the EVO , the new Holladay with total surgical-induced astigmatism, the Kane and and the Næser-Savini toric intraocular lens (IOL) power formulas using a large database of toric IOL refractive outcomes.Retrospective consecutive case series.One hundred seventy-two eyes of 172 patients who had a toric IOL inserted during surgery.One eligible eye from patients having uncomplicated cataract surgery with insertion of an Alcon SN6AT(2-9) IOL (Alcon Laboratories, Inc, Fort Worth, TX) from 1 surgeon were included in the study. pre-operative were measured using either the IOLMaster 500 or 700 (Carl Zeiss Meditec AG, Jena, Germany). Using vector calculation, the predicted postoperative refractive astigmatism was calculated for each formula. This was compared with the actual postoperative refractive astigmatism to give the prediction error.

Interventions

None listed

Study design

Observational model

CASE_ONLY

Time perspective

RETROSPECTIVE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender

ALL

Age

21 Years to 90 Years

Inclusion criteria

* uncomplicated cataract surgery with a temporal clear corneal incision,with preoperative biometry using either the IOLMaster 500 (softwareversions 5.5 and 7.7) or 700 (software version 1.50; Carl Zeiss Meditec AG, Jena, Germany) * subjective manifest refraction performed by any of the orthoptists in the practice and measurement of the actual postoperative axis of the IOL alignment performed in the same visit an average of 1 or 3months after surgery.

Exclusion criteria

* any corneal disease (keratoconus, other ectasia, pterygium, or previous trauma); * previous ophthalmic operations, including laser vision correction, vitrectomy, pterygium surgery, penetrating glaucoma surgery, or scleral buckling procedures * intraoperative or postoperative complications * postoperative corrected distance visual acuity worse than 6/9

Design outcomes

Primary

Measure	Time frame	Description
A Comparison of the Accuracy of Toric Intraocular Lens Formulas	5 years	percentage of eyes with a prediction error within ±0.50 diopter (D)

Countries

China

Outcome results