Dental Wear
Conditions
Keywords
Dentistry
Brief summary
Evaluation of hybrid composite-nanoceramic on material characteristic and clinical use over tooth wear patients.
Detailed description
Composite resin is often used to restore patient's dental defficiency, and also the material to cover and protect weak tooth structure. In tooth wear patients, multiple factors attributing to destruct their teeth. The durability and strength of the resotrative material must be reinforced. Nanoceramic infiltrated in composite resin may enhance its mechanical characteristics. Therefore, hybrid composite-nanoceramic material may be effective for tooth wear patients.
Interventions
PROCEDUREHybrid composite nano-ceramic
Indirect bonding the hybrid composite nano-ceramic restoration to the tooth to be restored of worn dentition patients
Sponsors
Taipei Medical University Hospital
National Taiwan University Hospital
Study design
Allocation
NA
Intervention model
SINGLE_GROUP
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE
Eligibility
Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
20 Years to 100 Years
Healthy volunteers
Yes
Inclusion criteria
1. Tooth erosion/attrition/abrasion/abfraction patients 2. Age above 20 years old 3. Return at certain period during the trial 4. Full understanding of written and spoken language 5. Agree with the questionnaire
Design outcomes
Primary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Evaluation the change of hybrid composite-nanoceramic on material characteristic and clinical use over tooth wear patients. | 3months, 6months, 12months, 24months, 36months | Participants with worn dentition dentition (attrition, erosion, abrasion, abfraction) were enrolled in the present study. They were restored with hybrid composite-nanoceramic resin(Cerasmart, GC Corporation). During the follow up time, participants were examined with clinical photos, radiographic film, intraoral scans, and asked to fill in questionnaires. The questionnaires included subjective questionnaire with VAS scale and objective questionnaire according to FDI criteria. The restorations were evaluated by two observers at baseline and after 3, 6, 12, 24, 36 months according to the FDI criteria, which were categorized into three groups: esthetic parameters (four criteria), functional parameters (six criteria) and biological parameters (six criteria). Restorations were scored for clinical acceptability. Scores 4 and 5 were recorded as clinically unacceptable, and scores 5 was recorded for clinically failed. |
Countries
Taiwan
Contacts
Primary ContactYang Tsung-Chieh, PhD
Backup ContactShen Chun-Min, DDS
Outcome results
None listed