Skip to content

Ultra-proactive Therapeutic Drug Monitoring in Inflammatory Bowel Disease

Ultra-proactive Therapeutic Drug Monitoring of Infliximab Based on Point-of-care-testing in Inflammatory Bowel Disease: a Pragmatic Trial

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 4
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT04775732
Enrollment
187
Registered
2021-03-01
Start date
2018-06-01
Completion date
2019-09-30
Last updated
2021-08-05

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Crohn Disease, Ulcerative Colitis

Keywords

therapeutic drug monitoring, inflammatory bowel disease, point of care testing, infliximab

Brief summary

This is a comparative pragmatic trial in patients with UC and CD on maintenance treatment with IFX. All IBD patients from cohort A with maintenance IFX treatment at a referral IBD clinic are prospectively included between June and August 2018. An ultra-proactive IFX TDM algorithm is applied as follows. All patients have an ELISA TL measurement at baseline, of which the result determined the follow-up pathway: (A) TL between 3-7μg/mL: continuation at same dose and interval; (B) TL \>7μg/mL: interval prolongation allowed; (C) TL \<3μg/mL: interval shortening with minimum 2 weeks, with the next IFX TL measured using a POCT. (i) If the POCT showed an IFX TL \<3μg/mL, dose was optimized ad hoc using a linear dosing formula (Dosen = (TL target \* Dose n-1) / TL measured), followed by a new POCT test at next visit with the same interval. (ii) If the POCT showed an IFX TL ≥3µg/mL, no additional dose was given and routine TL testing with ELISA was retaken at next visit. At every visit this algorithm was reapplied to all patients. The patients from cohort A will be compared with the patients from cohort B. The patients in cohort B receive maintenance IFX treatment at a referral IBD clinic during the same period. Dose adjustment are done based on standard of care reactive TDM of IFX and clinical symptoms. Data will be collected retrospectively to avoid treatment optimization bias.

Interventions

BIOLOGICALinfliximab therapeutic drug monitoring

dose optimization of infliximab based on a predefined dosing algorithm

Sponsors

Imelda GI Clinical Research Center
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Intervention model description

pragmatic cluster trial

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* all adult IBD patients treated for at least 14 weeks with infliximab were included

Exclusion criteria

* induction treatment with infliximab (\<14 weeks) * treatment with other biological for IBD

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
number of patients with infliximab failureone yearnumber of patients with infliximab failure after one year (infliximab failure = infliximab discontinuation, IBD related surgery, IBD related hospitalization, add-on IBD treatment, and allergic reaction to infliximab)

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
number of TL measurements per patient per yearone year
percentage of interval changes (shortening, prolongation, bidirectional)one year
number of patients with infliximab discontinuationone yearnumber of patients with discontinuation of infliximab
percentage of patients with sustained clinical remissionone yearnumber of patients with physician global assessment \<1 and all visits
number of patients with mucosal remissionone yearnumber of patients with mucosal remission after one year. (Mucosal remission = simple endoscopic score for CD \<3, Rutgeertscore \<i2 for, Mayo endoscopic subscore \<1 and faecal calprotectin \<250 µg/ml. Endoscopy and/or faecal calprotectin between 6 and 12 months after inclusion. If endoscopy and faecal calprotectin at the same moment, then endoscopy was dominant)

Countries

Belgium

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026