Skip to content

High Frequency Oscillatory Ventilation Versus High Frequency Jet Ventilation for Congenital Diaphragmatic Hernia

High Frequency Oscillatory Ventilation Versus High Frequency Jet Ventilation as Initial Mode of Ventilation for Congenital Diaphragmatic Hernia

Status
Recruiting
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT04774848
Enrollment
50
Registered
2021-03-01
Start date
2020-12-30
Completion date
2025-08-28
Last updated
2025-04-04

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Congenital Diaphragmatic Hernia

Brief summary

The purpose of this study is to conduct a prospective study of all congenital diaphragmatic hernia (CDH) neonates managed at the University of Utah newborn intensive care unit (NICU) and Primary Children's Hospital NICU that required mechanical ventilation at birth. As both high frequency jet ventilation (HFJV) and high frequency oscillatory ventilation (HFOV) are standard approaches to ventilatory support of all neonates including CDH, CDH infants will be randomized at the time of birth or admission to either HFJV or HFOV as initial ventilator mode, stratified by position of the liver in the abdomen or thorax (if known) by 24 hours of age. Measures of oxygenation, ventilation and hemodynamics of the CDH cohort managed on HFOV compared to those on HFJV.

Interventions

DEVICEHigh Frequency Jet Ventilator

HFJV provides short bursts of gas into the respiratory circuit at a rate of 240 to 600/min (4 to 11 Hz) and expiration is passive. It is used in conjunction with a conventional ventilator which provides positive end expiratory pressure (PEEP) and can also provide occasional sigh breaths.

DEVICEHigh Frequency Oscillatory Ventilator

HFOV uses a piston diaphragm to generate alternating positive and negative pressure changes to give breaths of 300 to 900/min (5-15 Hz) given over a set mean airway pressure. Both inhalation and exhalation are active.

Sponsors

University of Utah
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Intervention model description

Infants stratified by presence of intrathoracic liver (yes/no) and are randomized to either high frequency jet ventilator or high frequency oscillating ventilator in a sequential 1:1 manner

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
No minimum to 24 Hours
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

1. Admitted to either the University of Utah and/or Primary Children's Hospital NICU within 24 hours of birth 2. Requiring mechanical ventilation 3. Umbilical arterial line or peripheral arterial line in place 4. Obtained signed consent 5. Infant is ≤ 24 hours of age

Exclusion criteria

1. Severe anomaly 1. Chromosomal abnormalities 2. Major congenital anomalies, including cardiac, central nervous system and syndromes 2. Post-natal diagnosis \> 24 hours of life 3. Unable to obtain consent for participation 4. Unable to randomize within 24 hours of life

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Oxygenation Index (OI) at 24 hours of age24 hours of ageThe OI will be measured at 24 hours of age using a standard of care arterial blood gas and oxygen settings. These measurements will then be compared between the stratified groups

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
PF-PCO2 (PaO2/FiO2-PaCO2) measurementsup to one weekThese measurements will be determined at multiple time points for the first week of life. These measurements will be compared between groups.
PF ratio (PaO2/FiO2) measurementsup to one weekThese measurements will be determined at multiple time points for the first week of life. These measurements will be compared between groups.
PaCO2 measurementsup to one weekThese measurements will be determined at multiple time points for the first week of life. These measurements will be compared between groups.
Number of babies who received inhaled nitric oxide (iNO)up to one weekthe number of babies who received treatment of iNO will be compared amongst the different groups

Other

MeasureTime frameDescription
Number of days on mechanical ventilationup to one yearthe number of days each baby required intubation and mechanical ventilation by any type will be compared amongst the groups
Number of babies who required extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO)up to one yearthe number of babies who required ECMO will be compared amongst the groups
Number of babies who survive to dischargeup to one yearthe number of babies who survive and are discharged will be compared amongst the groups

Countries

United States

Contacts

Primary ContactMichelle Yang, MD
michelle.yang@hsc.utah.edu801-581-7052
Backup ContactCarrie Rau
carrie.rau@hsc.utah.edu801-213-3360

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026