Acute Myeloid Leukemia, Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia
Conditions
Brief summary
This trial studies the effect of a digital health coaching program on self-efficacy and patient reported outcomes of patients with acute myeloid leukemia or chronic lymphocytic leukemia that is newly diagnosed. A digital health coaching program may help leukemia patients report information about their health while receiving treatment, which may lead to improvement in overall health.
Detailed description
PRIMARY OBJECTIVE: I. To evaluate the effect of digital health coaching on self-efficacy among two cohorts of individuals with acute myeloid leukemia (AML) and chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL), respectively, as measured by the Cancer Behavior Inventory (CBI version \[v.\] 3). SECONDARY OBJECTIVES: I. To evaluate the relationship between self-efficacy and patient reported outcomes among individuals with and without digital health coaching, specifically: Ia. The physiologic and psychosocial outcomes of individuals with AML and CLL as measured by the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-Leukemia Questionnaire (FACT-Leu). Ib. The symptom experience of individuals with AML and CLL as measured by the MD Anderson Symptom Inventory (MDASI). Ic. The financial toxicity of individuals with AML and CLL as measured by the Comprehensive Score for Financial Toxicity (COST). OUTLINE: Patients are randomized to 1 of 2 groups. GROUP I: Patients receive the PACK Health digital health coaching program over 3 months consisting of communication initiated by either the PACK Health coach or the patient through either text, e-mail, or phone call, to provide education and support related to a specific topic such as fatigue, nutrition, or exercise. GROUP II: Patients receive standard of care support services consisting of a telephone triage line that patients may call when experiencing physical or psychological concerns, or with any other questions related to their disease or treatment.
Interventions
OTHEREducational Intervention
Receive digital health coaching program
OTHERQuestionnaire Administration
Ancillary studies
OTHERSupportive Care
Receive standard of care support services
Sponsors
M.D. Anderson Cancer Center
Study design
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
SUPPORTIVE_CARE
Masking
NONE
Eligibility
Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No
Inclusion criteria
* Able to read, speak and consent in English * Individuals newly diagnosed with either acute myelogenous (AML) or chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL), defined as within three months of diagnosis * Internet access via smart phone, tablet, a computer, or another device with the capacity to receive calls, texts, or e-mails, as well as the electronic study assessments * Individuals with a prior history of myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS) will be allowed to enroll
Exclusion criteria
* Individuals who are terminally ill, defined as individuals identified by their physician as likely having 6 months or less to live, or those individuals transitioned to comfort measures only (meaning only supportive care measures without curative focused treatment) * Individuals who have undergone treatment for previous diagnoses of leukemia * Individuals for whom there is documentation of inability to provide consent in the medical record
Design outcomes
Primary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Change in Cancer Behavior Inventory (CBI) score | Baseline to 3 months | The Cancer Behavior Inventory (CBI) is 27-item instrument that measures self-efficacy in coping with cancer across 7 domains. These include: Seeking and Understanding Medical Information, Emotion Regulation, Coping with Treatment Related Side Effects, Accepting Cancer/ Maintaining a Positive Attitude, Seeking Social Support, and Using Spiritual Coping. The instrument utilizes a 7-point response scale ranging from 1 Not at all confident to 7 Confident (higher score equals greater efficacy for coping). * Minimum Score-27, max- 189 * Will be calculated along with 95% confidence intervals. |
Secondary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Physiologic and psychosocial outcomes | Up to 3 months | Linear mixed models (LMMs) will be created to assess the correlation between self-efficacy, using the Cancer behavior inventory (CBI), and physiologic and psychosocial outcomes (as measured by the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-Leukemia Questionnaire). The Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy with Leukemia Questionnaire (FACT-Leu) is a 44-item measure of quality of life associated with leukemia treatment. It consists of 4 defined domains: physical, social, emotional, and functional, as well as 17 items related to additional disease and treatment related concerns. Responses are measured on a five-point scale ranging from 0 (not at all) to 4 (very much). • Minimum Score -0, Maximum Score - 176 |
| Symptom experience | Up to 3 months | Linear mixed models will be created to assess the correlation between self-efficacy (CBI) and symptom experience (as measured by the MD Anderson Symptom Inventory). The MD Anderson Symptom Inventory (MDASI) is a multiple-symptom measure of the severity of cancer-related symptoms and the functional interference caused by symptoms that is sensitive to disease and treatment changes. Patients rate the severity of 13 physical, affective, and cognitive symptoms on 0-10 numeric scales, ranging from not present to as bad as you can imagine. The MDASI also assesses 6 items related to symptom interference with functioning, also a 0-10 numeric scale ranging from did not interfere to interfere completely. The MDASI takes less than five minutes to complete. • Minimum Score - 0, Maximum Score - 190 |
| Perceived financial toxicity | Up to 3 months | LMMs will be created to assess the correlation between self-efficacy (CBI) and perceived financial toxicity (as measured by the Comprehensive Score for Financial Toxicity). Comprehensive Score for Financial Toxicity (COST) is an 11-item instrument used to measure the financial toxicity of cancer treatment, which has been demonstrated to be highly correlated with HRQoL. The instrument consists of 11 items, utilizing a five-point ordinal scale ranging from (0- Not at all) to (4- Very much). • Minimum Score - 12, Maximum Score - 28 |
Countries
United States
Outcome results
None listed