Skip to content

Long-term Safety and Performance of the ARGOS-SC Suprachoroidal Pressure Sensor System in Patients With Glaucoma Underwent Non-penetrating Glaucoma Surgery

Follow-up of the First in Man, Prospective, Open-label, Single Arm, Multicenter Clinical Investigation to Assess the Long-term Safety and Performance of the ARGOS-SC Suprachoroidal Pressure Sensor System in Patients With Glaucoma Underwent Non-penetrating Glaucoma Surgery (Follow-up Month 12 - Month 36)

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT04773106
Enrollment
22
Registered
2021-02-26
Start date
2020-02-20
Completion date
2023-03-02
Last updated
2025-05-18

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Glaucoma, Open Angle Glaucoma

Keywords

Non-penetrating glaucoma surgery, Open angle glaucoma, Intraocular pressure measurements, Suprachoroidal pressure sensor, ARGOS-SC

Brief summary

The purpose of this study is to evaluate the long-term safety and performance of the ARGOS-SC system.

Detailed description

This study is designed as a prospective, open-label, multicenter, single-arm clinical investigation. This study is a follow-up study to the ARGOS-SC01 study (NCT03756662). Patients who have graduated the ARGOS-SC01 study after 12 month follow-up will be asked to enroll in this study for an additional 24 month follow-up (month 12-36 post implantation). This study will be solely observational, as only patients who had implanted the device within the earlier study will be invited to join this ARGOS-SC01\_FU study. The sensor was always implanted in one eye only which will be the study eye.

Interventions

The ARGOS-SC pressure sensor was additionally implanted during routine local intraocular pressure lowering procedures in patients with glaucoma undergoing non-penetrating glaucoma surgery in the earlier ARGOS-SC01 study.

Sponsors

CRO Dr. med Kottmann GmbH & Co. KG
CollaboratorINDUSTRY
Implandata Ophthalmic Products GmbH
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Allocation
NA
Intervention model
SINGLE_GROUP
Primary purpose
DIAGNOSTIC
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

\- Subjects of the ARGOS-SC01 study with an implanted ARGOS-SC suprachoroidal pressure sensor.

Exclusion criteria

* N/A

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Performance: Level of Agreement Between GAT and the ARGOS-SC SystemDay 360 to Day 1080 (V09 to V13)Level of Agreement between intraocular pressure (IOP) measurements made using GAT & the ARGOS-SC system (IOP in mmHg) following the Bland-Altman method.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Safety: Incidence, Nature, Severity and Seriousness of Observed Adverse Events (AEs) and Adverse Device Events (ADEs)Day 360 to Day 1080 (V09 to V13)Safety evaluation based on the incidence, nature, severity and seriousness of observed adverse events and adverse device events.
Performance: Percentage of Measurements Within +/- 5 mmHgDay 360 to Day 1080 (V09 to V13)Concordance of the ARGOS-SC\<\>GAT measurement. Method applied: The probability distribution of the difference in the measurements made using GAT & the ARGOS-SC system per visit (paired measurement) grouped within 1 mmHg was compared to the outcome measure of achieving 65% agreement of the total number of comparisons between +/-5 mmHg.
Safety: Number of Patients Experiencing a Device-related SAE (SADE)Day 360 to Day 1080 (V09 to V13)Number of patients experiencing a device-related SAE (SADE)
Usability: User Acceptance at the Investigational SiteDay 1080 (V13)User acceptance of the ARGOS-SC system at the investigational site by means of evaluation of Investigator's questionnaires on a scale of 1 to 7 how strongly they agree to given statements (1 = totally disagree, 7 = totally agree). Overall Number of Participants Analyzed represents the 8 physician investigators who completed the User Acceptance Questionnaire. The score 7 represents a greater user acceptance.
Usability: User Acceptance at HomeDay 1080 (V13)User acceptance of the ARGOS-SC system at home by means of evaluation of patient questionnaires on a scale of 1 to 7 how strongly they agree to given statements (1 = totally disagree, 7 = totally agree). The score 7 represents a greater user acceptance.
Performance: Device MalfunctionsDay 360 to Day 1080 (V09 to V13)The number of observed device malfunctions / deficiencies (DDs) related to the ARGOS-SC system, consisting of the ARGOS-SC implant and an external handheld reader device for the activation, power supply, and readout of the implanted sensor.

Countries

Germany, Switzerland

Participant flow

Recruitment details

Recruitment from December 2019 to February 2021 in medical clinics.

Pre-assignment details

Of the ARGOS-SC01 subjects, 22 patients consented to the ARGOS-SC01 follow-up study.

Participants by arm

ArmCount
ARGOS-SC Sensor
ARGOS-SC pressure sensor previously implanted in the ARGOS-SC01 study during routine local intraocular pressure lowering procedures in patients with glaucoma undergoing non-penetrating glaucoma surgery. ARGOS-SC system: An active implantable intraocular pressure sensor implanted in the suprachoriodal space of the human eye, in combination with non-penetrating glaucoma surgery.
22
Total22

Withdrawals & dropouts

PeriodReasonFG000
Overall StudyDeath1
Overall StudyWithdrawal by Subject3

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicARGOS-SC Sensor
Age, Categorical
<=18 years
0 Participants
Age, Categorical
>=65 years
13 Participants
Age, Categorical
Between 18 and 65 years
9 Participants
Age, Continuous65.0 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 10.6
Race (NIH/OMB)
American Indian or Alaska Native
0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Asian
1 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Black or African American
1 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
More than one race
0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander
0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
White
20 Participants
Region of Enrollment
Germany
18 participants
Region of Enrollment
Switzerland
4 participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
12 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
10 Participants
Type of Glaucoma
Ocular hypertension (OHT)/Glaucoma suspect
2 Participants
Type of Glaucoma
Other
3 Participants
Type of Glaucoma
Primary open-angle glaucoma (POAG)
15 Participants
Type of Glaucoma
Pseudoexfoliative (PEX) glauoma
2 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
1 / 22
other
Total, other adverse events
13 / 22
serious
Total, serious adverse events
7 / 22

Outcome results

Primary

Performance: Level of Agreement Between GAT and the ARGOS-SC System

Level of Agreement between intraocular pressure (IOP) measurements made using GAT & the ARGOS-SC system (IOP in mmHg) following the Bland-Altman method.

Time frame: Day 360 to Day 1080 (V09 to V13)

Population: All available GAT and ARGOS-SC measurements.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)
ARGOS-SC SensorPerformance: Level of Agreement Between GAT and the ARGOS-SC System-0.3 mmHg
Secondary

Performance: Device Malfunctions

The number of observed device malfunctions / deficiencies (DDs) related to the ARGOS-SC system, consisting of the ARGOS-SC implant and an external handheld reader device for the activation, power supply, and readout of the implanted sensor.

Time frame: Day 360 to Day 1080 (V09 to V13)

Population: Of the 22 patients, device deficiencies (all related to the Reader device (external handheld device)) have been documented for 10 patients, hence the 10 participants analyzed.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
ARGOS-SC SensorPerformance: Device Malfunctions13 DDs
Secondary

Performance: Percentage of Measurements Within +/- 5 mmHg

Concordance of the ARGOS-SC\<\>GAT measurement. Method applied: The probability distribution of the difference in the measurements made using GAT & the ARGOS-SC system per visit (paired measurement) grouped within 1 mmHg was compared to the outcome measure of achieving 65% agreement of the total number of comparisons between +/-5 mmHg.

Time frame: Day 360 to Day 1080 (V09 to V13)

Population: All available GAT\<\>ARGOS-SC comparisons.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
ARGOS-SC SensorPerformance: Percentage of Measurements Within +/- 5 mmHg94 percentage of comparisons
Secondary

Safety: Incidence, Nature, Severity and Seriousness of Observed Adverse Events (AEs) and Adverse Device Events (ADEs)

Safety evaluation based on the incidence, nature, severity and seriousness of observed adverse events and adverse device events.

Time frame: Day 360 to Day 1080 (V09 to V13)

Population: A total of 50 AEs in 16 patients were reported in the ARGOS-SC follow-up study. In overall 15 adverse events were documented in 14 patients affecting the study eye. 12 out of 50 AEs in 7 patients fulfilled at least one criterion for serious adverse event (SAE) and were reported as such. All of these SAEs were unrelated to the medical device.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
ARGOS-SC SensorSafety: Incidence, Nature, Severity and Seriousness of Observed Adverse Events (AEs) and Adverse Device Events (ADEs)Overall number of AEs/ADEs50 A(D)Es
ARGOS-SC SensorSafety: Incidence, Nature, Severity and Seriousness of Observed Adverse Events (AEs) and Adverse Device Events (ADEs)Overall number of AEs/ADEs affecting the study eye, of which15 A(D)Es
ARGOS-SC SensorSafety: Incidence, Nature, Severity and Seriousness of Observed Adverse Events (AEs) and Adverse Device Events (ADEs)AEs related to medical procedure and/or1 A(D)Es
ARGOS-SC SensorSafety: Incidence, Nature, Severity and Seriousness of Observed Adverse Events (AEs) and Adverse Device Events (ADEs)AEs related to medical device and/or1 A(D)Es
ARGOS-SC SensorSafety: Incidence, Nature, Severity and Seriousness of Observed Adverse Events (AEs) and Adverse Device Events (ADEs)AEs related to other7 A(D)Es
Secondary

Safety: Number of Patients Experiencing a Device-related SAE (SADE)

Number of patients experiencing a device-related SAE (SADE)

Time frame: Day 360 to Day 1080 (V09 to V13)

ArmMeasureValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
ARGOS-SC SensorSafety: Number of Patients Experiencing a Device-related SAE (SADE)0 Participants
Secondary

Usability: User Acceptance at Home

User acceptance of the ARGOS-SC system at home by means of evaluation of patient questionnaires on a scale of 1 to 7 how strongly they agree to given statements (1 = totally disagree, 7 = totally agree). The score 7 represents a greater user acceptance.

Time frame: Day 1080 (V13)

Population: Each patient was asked to provide feedback on the user acceptance of the ARGOS-SC system at home. A total of 15 patients provided feedback via a structured questionnaire

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
ARGOS-SC SensorUsability: User Acceptance at Home5.6 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 3.6
Secondary

Usability: User Acceptance at the Investigational Site

User acceptance of the ARGOS-SC system at the investigational site by means of evaluation of Investigator's questionnaires on a scale of 1 to 7 how strongly they agree to given statements (1 = totally disagree, 7 = totally agree). Overall Number of Participants Analyzed represents the 8 physician investigators who completed the User Acceptance Questionnaire. The score 7 represents a greater user acceptance.

Time frame: Day 1080 (V13)

Population: The user acceptance questionnaire for physicians was collected from 8 investigators.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
ARGOS-SC SensorUsability: User Acceptance at the Investigational Site4.7 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 3.9

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026