Skip to content

Does the Use of Fiasp vs. Asp Lead to the Prolonged TIR in Children With Type 1 Diabetes?

Does the Use of Faster Insulin Aspart vs. Aspart Lead to the Prolonged Glycemic Time in Range in Children Suffering From Type 1 Diabetes Who Use Continuous Glucose Monitoring?

Status
UNKNOWN
Phases
Phase 4
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT04772729
Enrollment
77
Registered
2021-02-26
Start date
2021-03-01
Completion date
2024-03-01
Last updated
2021-02-26

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Diabetes Mellitus, Type 1, Diabetes type1

Keywords

CGM, continuous glucose monitoring system, TIR, Time In Range, insulin aspart, insulin faster aspart

Brief summary

The aim of the study is to assess whether the implementation of faster insulin aspart in children with Type 1 diabetes treated with intensive insulin therapy with the use of an insulin pump and using Real Time Continuous Glucose Monitoring (RT-CGM) systems leads to prolonged time in range (TIR) compared to insulin aspart.

Interventions

DRUGInsulin faster aspart (Fiasp, Novo Nordisk)

Duration of the study: 10 weeks. It is assumed that the patients will attend 4 visits in Pediatric Diabetology Clinic, and 3 telephone consultations. W0: The study will start with a 2-week run-in period in order to normalize glycemia. W1: RT-CGM will be inserted. Subsequently, the participants will be randomly assigned to one of two groups (Fa-A or A-Fa), basing on which the order of insulin use will be determined. W2: after 2 weeks, diabetology telephone consultation (washout period). W3: after 2 weeks, diabetology consultation. Changing insulin type according to the allocation. W4: after 2 weeks, diabetology telephone consultation (washout period). W5: after 2 weeks, diabetology telephone consultation. W6: the results obtained throughout the study will be discussed with the patient and the parent.

Sponsors

Medical University of Warsaw
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
CROSSOVER
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Intervention model description

A cross-over, open-label, randomized study.

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
6 Years to 17 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* ≥1 year of a history of type 1 diabetes; * treatment with intensive insulin therapy with the use of an insulin pump (continuous subcutaneous insulin infusion, CSII) ≥3 months; * using continuous glucose monitoring system for at least 1 month; * HbA1c\<8%; * consent to participate in the study obtained from the parent and the patient (\>16 years of age).

Exclusion criteria

* diabetes treated with multiple insulin injections with insulin pens (Multiple Daily Injections, MDI); * concomitant medical problems which might significantly affect glucose levels; * the withdrawal of the consent to participate in the study.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
Glycaemia difference in time in range (TIR) 70-180mg/dlat week 4 of the study

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
Glycaemia difference in time above range (TAR)at weeks 4 and 8 of the study
Glycaemia difference in the coefficient of variation (CV)at weeks 4 and 8 of the study
Glycaemia difference in time below range (TBR)at weeks 4 and 8 of the study
Difference in Total Daily Dose (TDD) of insulinat weeks 4 and 8 of the study
Difference in the basal rate of insulinat weeks 4 and 8 of the study
Difference in the average glycemia levels + standard deviationat weeks 4 and 8 of the study

Contacts

Primary ContactEmilia Kowalczyk, MD
emilia.kowalczyk@uckwum.pl+48 223179538
Backup ContactAgnieszka Szypowska, Prof.
agnieszka.szypowska@uckwum.pl+48 223179539

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026