Skip to content

Comparison Between Unihemispheric and Bihemispheric TCDS in Subacute Ischemic Stroke Patients

Comparison Between the Effect of Unihemispheric and Bihemispheric Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation on Spasticity and Motor Outcome in Subacute Ischemic Stroke Patients: as Add on Therapy

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT04770363
Enrollment
36
Registered
2021-02-25
Start date
2021-02-01
Completion date
2021-06-20
Last updated
2023-03-27

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Hemiparesis, Hemiplegia, Hemiplegic Gait, Motor Activity, Spastic, Spasticity, Muscle, Stroke, Acute, Stroke, Ischemic, Stroke, Lacunar

Brief summary

This is a randomized clinical trial to study the effect of tDCS in participants with subacute ischemic stroke, the study participants will be randomly assigned into three groups; bihemispheric, unihemispheric and sham group.

Detailed description

Despite the central origin of stroke affecting the primary motor cortex M1, majority of the rehabilitative techniques of physical therapy and occupational therapy practice depending peripheral methods for gaining motor functions. There is a great need to develop methods in order to improve the outcome of physical or medical rehabilitation and enhance long-term functional outcome. Many researches' work over the past several years have inspected the use of transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) to promote the advantageous effect of neurological rehabilitation. The aim of This study Is to compare between the effect of unihemispheric and bihemispheric tDCS on the motor outcome, and spasticity in sub-acute ischemic stroke patients. Thirty sub-acute ischemic stroke patients participated in the study, randomly assigned to one of three groups-tDCS bihemispheric or unihemispheric or sham group. Those patients had stroke in the last 3 months at maximum with NIH stroke score less than 25. ActivaDose tDCS (USA), the only FDA cleared device available for tDCS used in the clinical study to deliver noninvasive brain stimulation, consisted of 20 minutes of 2 mA in each session for twelve sessions three sessions per week. All participants received physiotherapy and rehabilitation therapy was tailored to meet all patients' deficits, and lasted a total of 45 minutes per day, 3 days per week for four weeks.

Interventions

DEVICETranscranial Direct Current Stimulation (tDCS)

Transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) is an emerging non-invasive brain stimulation technique which has been utilized in examining cortical function in healthy subjects and also showed significant outcome in neurological rehabilitation. A safe, portable, noninvasive painless, reversible, selective and focal brain stimulation technique, applied by sponge electrodes over the scalp. tDCS is capable of modulating the excitability of targeted brain zones through delivering a sustained direct current (DC), showed altering neuronal membrane potentials based on the polarity of the current. Researchers demonstrated modulating effects of anodal (increases cortical excitability) and cathodal (decreases cortical excitability) tDCS on brain tissue. The expected effects of tDCS brain stimulation exceeds the duration. Animal studies showed neuronal depolarization and increasing neuronal excitability of the anodal stimulation, and opposite results with cathodal stimulation.

Sponsors

Alexandria University
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
TRIPLE (Subject, Caregiver, Outcomes Assessor)

Masking description

Double (Participant, Outcomes Assessor) To make sure that no bias should enter the assessment of the results, neither the patient nor the external assessor will be aware whether active tDCS will be applicated to a particular case. The patients don't know if which group they are participated in, bihemispheric, unihemispheric, of sham group, external assessor was recruited to assess patients after the intervention ended.

Intervention model description

Participants will participate into the study, each patient will undergo a detailed neurological examination through filling out a medical sheet questionnaire and checking the most common risk factors of stroke and other parameters. ActivaDose tDCS (USA), the only FDA cleared device available for tDCS will be used in the clinical study. Thirty patients will be allocated randomly into three group.

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Those patients had stroke in the last 3-6 months. * Subcortical stroke of middle cerebral artery (MCA), caused unilateral hemiplegia. * National institute of health stroke scale (NIHSS) motor deficits section with score 2 to 15.

Exclusion criteria

* Patient with second onset of stroke or history of Transient ischemic attack (TIA) * Metallic Implant or heart pacemakers. * Primary cerebral or subarachnoid hemorrhagic stroke. * Seizure or epilepsy or history of epilepsy at the family. * Intracranial abscess or brain tumor. * Cardiovascular disease myocardial infarction, heart failure (unstable cardiac status). * Atrial Fibrillation or paroxysmal AF in the last 30 days. * Congenital heart diseases. * Presence of any other neurological or psychiatric disorder. * Cognitive/consciousness disorders. * Oher conditions should be excluded (e.g. tumor, cancer, rheumatologic, Lung disease related to infection, renal/ hepatic diseases, deep venous thrombosis and autoimmune diseases). * Speech disorders (Dysarthria & Aphasia). * NIH Stroke score above 25, will be excluded. * Patients who underwent thrombolytic therapy or any vascular interventions.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Fugl-Meyer Assessment (FMA)1 MonthTo assess the upper and lower extremities, motor and sensory recovery assessment. Maximal attainable score is 226, means a good and functional physical state.
Modified Ashworth Scale (MAS)1 MonthTo assess the spasticity within the upper and lower extremities, score ranges from 0-4 with 5 choices. 0 indicates no resistance and 4 indicates rigidity. Higher scores indicate worse outcome.
Brain-Derived Neurotrophic Factor (BDNF) concentration1 Monthis assessed pre and post-treatment for all of the participants using (ELISA) molecular test, the difference between pre and post-treatment will be only assessed, no normal range is quantified.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
The National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale, NIH Stroke Scale (NIHSS)Assessed for one time during participant recruitmentto objectively assess the impairment caused by a stroke, score ranges from 0-42. Higher scores indicate worse outcome and severity. 0 is normal state of any participant.
Berg Balance Scale1 MonthTo assess the body balance and rısk of fall within the upper and lower extremities, The test is scored using a 5-point ordinal scale (0-4) with detailed descriptors for each score. 0 indicates inability to obtain the task and 4 ability to fully obtain the task. Higher scores indicate good outcome. The total score ranges from 0 to 56.

Countries

Egypt

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026