Skip to content

Trial to Evaluate the Effectiveness of a Digital Therapeutics in Adults Diagnosed With Major Depressive Disorder

A Multi-center, Randomized, Controlled Trial to Evaluate the Effectiveness of a Digital Therapeutic (CT-152) as Adjunctive Therapy in Adult Subjects Diagnosed With Major Depressive Disorder

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT04770285
Acronym
MIRAI
Enrollment
386
Registered
2021-02-25
Start date
2021-02-25
Completion date
2022-10-26
Last updated
2024-10-16

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Major Depressive Disorder

Brief summary

This study compares the effectiveness of 2 digital therapeutics in adult participants diagnosed with major depressive disorder (MDD) who are on antidepressant therapy (ADT) monotherapy for the treatment of depression.

Detailed description

This is a pivotal, 13-week, multi-center, randomized, controlled trial to evaluate the effectiveness and safety of two digital therapeutics in adult participants diagnosed with MDD who are on antidepressant therapy (ADT) monotherapy for the treatment of depression. The trial consists of a 3-week screening period, a 6-week treatment period, and a 4-week extension. Trial visits will be conducted remotely either by video visit or telephone. The screening visit may be performed in person at the discretion of the investigator. Eligible participants will be randomized to 1 of 2 digital therapeutics within a mobile application that will reside on the participant's personal iPhone or smartphone. The trial population will include male and female participants between 22 and 64 years of age with a primary diagnosis of major depressive disorder (MDD) who are on an ADT for the treatment of depression. This trial will analyze data gathered from approximately 360 participants in the United States. An interim analysis will be conducted when a targeted sample of the first 180 participants has completed week 6 or discontinued the trial prior to week 6.

Interventions

DEVICECT-152 - Digital Therapeutic

CT-152 mobile app was used by the participants as per the schedule specified in the respective arm.

DEVICESham

Sham mobile app was used by the participants as per the schedule specified in the respective arm.

Sponsors

Click Therapeutics, Inc.
CollaboratorINDUSTRY
Otsuka Pharmaceutical Development & Commercialization, Inc.
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
QUADRUPLE (Subject, Caregiver, Investigator, Outcomes Assessor)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
22 Years to 64 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

Key Inclusion Criteria: * Participants with a current primary diagnosis of MDD. * Participants with a Hamilton Rating Scale for Depression, 17-item (HAM-D17) score ≥ 18 * Participants who are receiving treatment with an adequate dose and duration of an ADT and who are willing to maintain that same treatment regimen for the duration of this trial. * Participants who are the only users of an iPhone or an Android smartphone, and agree to download and use the digital mobile application as required by the protocol. Key

Exclusion criteria

* Participants with an inadequate response to \> 1 adequate trial of ADT for the current episode. * Participants who are receiving or have received psychotherapy within 90 days prior to screening. * Participants who are currently using a computer, web, or smartphone software-based application for mental health or depression. * Participants with a history of schizophrenia, schizoaffective disorder, other psychotic disorder, or Bipolar I/II disorder, or current posttraumatic stress disorder, panic disorder, obsessive-compulsive disorder, or personality disorder * General Anxiety Disorder/social anxiety can be present as long as they are not the main disorder requiring treatment.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Change From Baseline to Week 6 in the MADRS Total ScoreBaseline (Day 1) to Week 6The MADRS is used to assess depressive symptom severity. It consists of 10 items (apparent sadness, reported sadness, inner tension, reduced sleep, reduced appetite, concentration difficulties, lassitude, inability to feel, pessimistic thoughts and suicidal thoughts), each rated from 0 to 6 with zero being the best rating and 6 being the worst rating. The MADRS total score is the sum of ratings for all 10 items. The total score ranges from 0 to 60. A higher score on the MADRS represents a more severe level of depression. A negative change from baseline indicates improvement. Least square (LS) mean was estimated using Mixed Model Repeated Measures (MMRM) method.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Change From Baseline to Week 6 in the GAD-7 Total ScoreBaseline (Day 1) to Week 6The GAD-7 is self-reported questionnaire designed to assess anxiety in participants. The scale contains 7 items (anxiety symptoms) and each item was rated by the participants from 0 (not at all) to 3 (nearly every day) based on how much they were bothered by each symptom. The total score ranges from 0 to 21. A higher score on the GAD-7 represents greater anxiety symptomatology. A negative change from baseline indicates improvement. LS mean was estimated using MMRM method.

Other

MeasureTime frameDescription
MADRS Response Rate at Weeks 2, 4, and 6Baseline (Day 1), Weeks 2, 4 and 6The MADRS is used to assess depressive symptom severity. It consists of 10 items (apparent sadness, reported sadness, inner tension, reduced sleep, reduced appetite, concentration difficulties, lassitude, inability to feel, pessimistic thoughts and suicidal thoughts), each rated from 0 to 6 with zero being the best rating and 6 being the worst rating. The MADRS total score is the sum of ratings for all 10 items. The total score ranges from 0 to 60. A higher score on the MADRS represents a more severe level of depression. MADRS Response Rate was defined as the percentage of participants who achieved a reduction in the MADRS total score by 50% or more from baseline.
Change From Baseline to Weeks 2, 4 and 6 in the Clinical Global Impression - Severity of Illness (CGI-S) ScoreBaseline (Day 1) to Weeks 2, 4 and 6The CGI-S is a standardized, clinician-administered global rating scale that measures disease severity on a 7-point Likert scale To perform this assessment, the investigator (or designee) answered the following question: Considering your total clinical experience with this particular population, how mentally ill (as related to agitation) is the participant at this time? Response choices are 0 = not assessed; 1 = normal, not at all ill; 2 = borderline mentally ill; 3 = mildly ill; 4 = moderately ill; 5 = markedly ill; 6 = severely ill; and 7 = among the most extremely ill subjects. The score 0 (not assessed) will be set to missing. LS mean was estimated using MMRM method.
Change From Baseline to Week 6 in the World Health Organization Disability Assessment Schedule 2.0 (WHODAS 2.0) Total ScoreBaseline (Day 1) to Week 6The WHODAS 2.0 is a 36-item self-assessment scale to measure a participant's function and disability across 6 domains of life: cognition (understanding & communicating), mobility (moving & getting around), self-care (hygiene, dressing, eating, staying alone), getting along (interacting with others), life activities (domestic responsibilities, leisure, work & school), & participation (community & society). Each item is rated from 0 (none) to 4 (extreme or cannot do). The total score of the 36 items is converted into a metric ranging from 0 (no-disability) to 100 (full- disability) by dividing the total score by the maximum possible value of the total score, which is 144 for 36 items and multiplying by 100. LS Mean was estimated using ANCOVA method.
Change From Baseline to Weeks 2 and 4 in the MADRS Total ScoreBaseline (Day 1) to Weeks 2 and 4The MADRS is used to assess depressive symptom severity. It consists of 10 items (apparent sadness, reported sadness, inner tension, reduced sleep, reduced appetite, concentration difficulties, lassitude, inability to feel, pessimistic thoughts and suicidal thoughts), each rated from 0 to 6 with zero being the best rating and 6 being the worst rating. The MADRS total score is the sum of ratings for all 10 items. The total score ranges from 0 to 60. A higher score on the MADRS represents a more severe level of depression. A negative change from baseline indicates improvement. LS mean was estimated using MMRM method.
MADRS Partial Response at Weeks 2, 4 and 6Baseline (Day 1), Weeks 2, 4 and 6The MADRS is used to assess depressive symptom severity. It consists of 10 items (apparent sadness, reported sadness, inner tension, reduced sleep, reduced appetite, concentration difficulties, lassitude, inability to feel, pessimistic thoughts and suicidal thoughts), each rated from 0 to 6 with zero being the best rating and 6 being the worst rating. The MADRS total score is the sum of ratings for all 10 items. The total score ranges from 0 to 60. A higher score on the MADRS represents a more severe level of depression. MADRS partial response was defined as the percentage of participants who achieved a reduction in the MADRS total score by 30% or more and less than 50% from baseline.
MADRS Response Rate at Weeks 8 and 10Baseline (Day 1), Weeks 8 and 10The MADRS is used to assess depressive symptom severity. It consists of 10 items (apparent sadness, reported sadness, inner tension, reduced sleep, reduced appetite, concentration difficulties, lassitude, inability to feel, pessimistic thoughts and suicidal thoughts), each rated from 0 to 6 with zero being the best rating and 6 being the worst rating. The MADRS total score is the sum of ratings for all 10 items. The total score ranges from 0 to 60. A higher score on the MADRS represents a more severe level of depression. MADRS Response Rate (full or partial) was defined as the percentage of participants who achieved a reduction in the MADRS total score by 30% or more from baseline.
Change From Screening to Weeks 4 and 6 in the PHQ-9 Total Score.Screening to Weeks 4 and 6The PHQ-9 is a standardized, self-administered rating scale that assesses the severity of depressive symptoms. The scale consists of 9 items, representing the 9 criteria upon which the diagnosis of DSM-IV depressive disorders is based. Each item is rated from 0 (not at all) to 3 (nearly every day). The total score ranges from 0 to 27. A higher score on the PHQ-9 represents a higher severity of depressive symptoms. LS mean was estimated using MMRM method.
Change From Baseline to Weeks 2 and 4 in the GAD-7 Total ScoreBaseline (Day 1) to Weeks 2 and 4The GAD-7 is self-reported questionnaire designed to assess anxiety in participants. The scale contains 7 items (anxiety symptoms) and each item was rated by the participants from 0 (not at all) to 3 (nearly every day) based on how much they were bothered by each symptom. The total score ranges from 0 to 21. A higher score on the GAD-7 represents greater anxiety symptomatology. A negative change from baseline indicates improvement. LS mean was estimated using MMRM method.

Countries

United States

Participant flow

Recruitment details

Participants were enrolled at 37 investigative sites in the United States from 25 February 2021 to 26 October 2022.

Pre-assignment details

Participants with major depressive disorder were enrolled and randomized in a 1:1 ratio to 1 of the 2 digital mobile applications (CT-152 or sham) on Day 1.

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Digital Therapeutic A - CT-152
Participants received digital treatment session by using the CT-152 mobile app from Day 1 up to Week 6 of the treatment period. Each treatment session consisted of EFMT exercises and a psychotherapy lesson. From Week 7 up to Week 10 participants continued using the CT-152 app with optional psychotherapy lesson but did not receive any new EFMT exercises during this period. Participants continued receiving brief SMS messages during Weeks 7 to 10 as a reminder of the previously completed CT-152 treatment courses.
194
Digital Therapeutic B - Sham
Participants received digital treatment session by using a sham mobile app from Day 1 up to Week 6 of the treatment period. Each treatment session consisted of a SMT exercise only. From Week 7 up to Week 10 participants continued using the sham app but did not receive any new SMT exercises during this period. Participants continued receiving brief SMS messages during Weeks 7 to 10 as a reminder of the previously completed sham treatment courses.
192
Total386

Withdrawals & dropouts

PeriodReasonFG000FG001
Overall StudyLack of Efficacy01
Overall StudyLost to Follow-up118
Overall StudyNon-Compliance With Study Treatment33
Overall StudyProtocol Deviation66
Overall StudyReason Not Specified01
Overall StudyTechnical Problem01
Overall StudyWithdrawal by Subject98

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicDigital Therapeutic B - ShamTotalDigital Therapeutic A - CT-152
Age, Continuous42.2 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 12.1
42.6 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 12.1
43.0 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 12.1
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Hispanic or Latino
16 Participants36 Participants20 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Not Hispanic or Latino
174 Participants347 Participants173 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
2 Participants3 Participants1 Participants
Generalized Anxiety Disorder-7 (GAD-7) Total Score9.7 score on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 4.8
9.6 score on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 4.7
9.5 score on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 4.5
MADRS Total Score28.4 score on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 6
28.4 score on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 6
28.4 score on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 6
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
American Indian or Alaska Native
1 Participants6 Participants5 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Asian
4 Participants9 Participants5 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Black or African American
25 Participants61 Participants36 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Other
2 Participants9 Participants7 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
White
160 Participants301 Participants141 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
167 Participants332 Participants165 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
25 Participants54 Participants29 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
0 / 1870 / 186
other
Total, other adverse events
3 / 18710 / 186
serious
Total, serious adverse events
1 / 1870 / 186

Outcome results

Primary

Change From Baseline to Week 6 in the MADRS Total Score

The MADRS is used to assess depressive symptom severity. It consists of 10 items (apparent sadness, reported sadness, inner tension, reduced sleep, reduced appetite, concentration difficulties, lassitude, inability to feel, pessimistic thoughts and suicidal thoughts), each rated from 0 to 6 with zero being the best rating and 6 being the worst rating. The MADRS total score is the sum of ratings for all 10 items. The total score ranges from 0 to 60. A higher score on the MADRS represents a more severe level of depression. A negative change from baseline indicates improvement. Least square (LS) mean was estimated using Mixed Model Repeated Measures (MMRM) method.

Time frame: Baseline (Day 1) to Week 6

Population: FAS included all randomized participants who received at least 1 occurrence of either CT-152 or sham use and had baseline and at least 1 postbaseline assessment of MADRS total score. Overall number of participants analyzed is the number of participants with data available for analysis.

ArmMeasureValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)Dispersion
Digital Therapeutic A - CT-152Change From Baseline to Week 6 in the MADRS Total Score-9.03 score on a scaleStandard Error 0.73
Digital Therapeutic B - ShamChange From Baseline to Week 6 in the MADRS Total Score-7.25 score on a scaleStandard Error 0.73
p-value: 0.056895% CI: [-3.6, 0.05]MMRM
Secondary

Change From Baseline to Week 6 in the GAD-7 Total Score

The GAD-7 is self-reported questionnaire designed to assess anxiety in participants. The scale contains 7 items (anxiety symptoms) and each item was rated by the participants from 0 (not at all) to 3 (nearly every day) based on how much they were bothered by each symptom. The total score ranges from 0 to 21. A higher score on the GAD-7 represents greater anxiety symptomatology. A negative change from baseline indicates improvement. LS mean was estimated using MMRM method.

Time frame: Baseline (Day 1) to Week 6

Population: FAS included all randomized participants who received at least 1 occurrence of either CT-152 or sham use and had baseline and at least 1 postbaseline assessment of MADRS total score. Overall number of participants analyzed is the number of participants with data available for analysis.

ArmMeasureValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)Dispersion
Digital Therapeutic A - CT-152Change From Baseline to Week 6 in the GAD-7 Total Score-3.41 score on a scaleStandard Error 0.34
Digital Therapeutic B - ShamChange From Baseline to Week 6 in the GAD-7 Total Score-2.64 score on a scaleStandard Error 0.34
p-value: 0.070595% CI: [-1.61, 0.07]MMRM
Other Pre-specified

Change From Baseline to Week 6 in the World Health Organization Disability Assessment Schedule 2.0 (WHODAS 2.0) Total Score

The WHODAS 2.0 is a 36-item self-assessment scale to measure a participant's function and disability across 6 domains of life: cognition (understanding & communicating), mobility (moving & getting around), self-care (hygiene, dressing, eating, staying alone), getting along (interacting with others), life activities (domestic responsibilities, leisure, work & school), & participation (community & society). Each item is rated from 0 (none) to 4 (extreme or cannot do). The total score of the 36 items is converted into a metric ranging from 0 (no-disability) to 100 (full- disability) by dividing the total score by the maximum possible value of the total score, which is 144 for 36 items and multiplying by 100. LS Mean was estimated using ANCOVA method.

Time frame: Baseline (Day 1) to Week 6

Population: FAS included all randomized participants who received at least 1 occurrence of either CT-152 or sham use and had baseline and at least 1 postbaseline assessment of MADRS total score. Overall number of participants analyzed is the number of participants with data available for analysis.

ArmMeasureValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)Dispersion
Digital Therapeutic A - CT-152Change From Baseline to Week 6 in the World Health Organization Disability Assessment Schedule 2.0 (WHODAS 2.0) Total Score-5.58 score on a scaleStandard Error 1.15
Digital Therapeutic B - ShamChange From Baseline to Week 6 in the World Health Organization Disability Assessment Schedule 2.0 (WHODAS 2.0) Total Score-4.56 score on a scaleStandard Error 1.18
p-value: 0.446395% CI: [-3.66, 1.61]ANCOVA
Other Pre-specified

Change From Baseline to Weeks 2, 4 and 6 in the Clinical Global Impression - Severity of Illness (CGI-S) Score

The CGI-S is a standardized, clinician-administered global rating scale that measures disease severity on a 7-point Likert scale To perform this assessment, the investigator (or designee) answered the following question: Considering your total clinical experience with this particular population, how mentally ill (as related to agitation) is the participant at this time? Response choices are 0 = not assessed; 1 = normal, not at all ill; 2 = borderline mentally ill; 3 = mildly ill; 4 = moderately ill; 5 = markedly ill; 6 = severely ill; and 7 = among the most extremely ill subjects. The score 0 (not assessed) will be set to missing. LS mean was estimated using MMRM method.

Time frame: Baseline (Day 1) to Weeks 2, 4 and 6

Population: FAS included all randomized participants who received at least 1 occurrence of either CT-152 or sham use and had baseline and at least 1 postbaseline assessment of MADRS total score. Overall number of participants analyzed is the number of participants with data available for analysis. Number analyzed is the number of participants with data available for analysis at the specified timepoints.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)Dispersion
Digital Therapeutic A - CT-152Change From Baseline to Weeks 2, 4 and 6 in the Clinical Global Impression - Severity of Illness (CGI-S) ScoreWeek 4-0.84 score on a scaleStandard Error 0.07
Digital Therapeutic A - CT-152Change From Baseline to Weeks 2, 4 and 6 in the Clinical Global Impression - Severity of Illness (CGI-S) ScoreWeek 2-0.54 score on a scaleStandard Error 0.06
Digital Therapeutic A - CT-152Change From Baseline to Weeks 2, 4 and 6 in the Clinical Global Impression - Severity of Illness (CGI-S) ScoreWeek 6-1.06 score on a scaleStandard Error 0.08
Digital Therapeutic B - ShamChange From Baseline to Weeks 2, 4 and 6 in the Clinical Global Impression - Severity of Illness (CGI-S) ScoreWeek 2-0.34 score on a scaleStandard Error 0.06
Digital Therapeutic B - ShamChange From Baseline to Weeks 2, 4 and 6 in the Clinical Global Impression - Severity of Illness (CGI-S) ScoreWeek 4-0.52 score on a scaleStandard Error 0.07
Digital Therapeutic B - ShamChange From Baseline to Weeks 2, 4 and 6 in the Clinical Global Impression - Severity of Illness (CGI-S) ScoreWeek 6-0.80 score on a scaleStandard Error 0.08
Comparison: Week 2p-value: 0.003995% CI: [-0.32, -0.06]MMRM
Comparison: Week 4p-value: 0.000395% CI: [-0.5, -0.15]MMRM
Comparison: Week 6p-value: 0.009895% CI: [-0.46, -0.06]MMRM
Other Pre-specified

Change From Baseline to Weeks 2 and 4 in the GAD-7 Total Score

The GAD-7 is self-reported questionnaire designed to assess anxiety in participants. The scale contains 7 items (anxiety symptoms) and each item was rated by the participants from 0 (not at all) to 3 (nearly every day) based on how much they were bothered by each symptom. The total score ranges from 0 to 21. A higher score on the GAD-7 represents greater anxiety symptomatology. A negative change from baseline indicates improvement. LS mean was estimated using MMRM method.

Time frame: Baseline (Day 1) to Weeks 2 and 4

Population: FAS included all randomized participants who received at least 1 occurrence of either CT-152 or sham use and had baseline and at least 1 postbaseline assessment of MADRS total score. Overall number of participants analyzed is the number of participants with data available for analysis. Number analyzed is the number of participants with data available for analysis at the specified timepoints.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)Dispersion
Digital Therapeutic A - CT-152Change From Baseline to Weeks 2 and 4 in the GAD-7 Total ScoreWeek 2-1.22 score on a scaleStandard Error 0.3
Digital Therapeutic A - CT-152Change From Baseline to Weeks 2 and 4 in the GAD-7 Total ScoreWeek 4-2.22 score on a scaleStandard Error 0.33
Digital Therapeutic B - ShamChange From Baseline to Weeks 2 and 4 in the GAD-7 Total ScoreWeek 2-0.88 score on a scaleStandard Error 0.3
Digital Therapeutic B - ShamChange From Baseline to Weeks 2 and 4 in the GAD-7 Total ScoreWeek 4-1.93 score on a scaleStandard Error 0.33
Comparison: Week 2p-value: 0.354995% CI: [-1.06, 0.38]MMRM
Comparison: Week 4p-value: 0.494895% CI: [-1.09, 0.53]MMRM
Other Pre-specified

Change From Baseline to Weeks 2 and 4 in the MADRS Total Score

The MADRS is used to assess depressive symptom severity. It consists of 10 items (apparent sadness, reported sadness, inner tension, reduced sleep, reduced appetite, concentration difficulties, lassitude, inability to feel, pessimistic thoughts and suicidal thoughts), each rated from 0 to 6 with zero being the best rating and 6 being the worst rating. The MADRS total score is the sum of ratings for all 10 items. The total score ranges from 0 to 60. A higher score on the MADRS represents a more severe level of depression. A negative change from baseline indicates improvement. LS mean was estimated using MMRM method.

Time frame: Baseline (Day 1) to Weeks 2 and 4

Population: FAS included all randomized participants who received at least 1 occurrence of either CT-152 or sham use and had baseline and at least 1 postbaseline assessment of MADRS total score. Overall number of participants analyzed is the number of participants with data available for analysis. Number analyzed is the number of participants with data available for analysis at the specified timepoints.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)Dispersion
Digital Therapeutic A - CT-152Change From Baseline to Weeks 2 and 4 in the MADRS Total ScoreWeek 2-3.85 score on a scaleStandard Error 0.58
Digital Therapeutic A - CT-152Change From Baseline to Weeks 2 and 4 in the MADRS Total ScoreWeek 4-6.62 score on a scaleStandard Error 0.67
Digital Therapeutic B - ShamChange From Baseline to Weeks 2 and 4 in the MADRS Total ScoreWeek 2-3.23 score on a scaleStandard Error 0.59
Digital Therapeutic B - ShamChange From Baseline to Weeks 2 and 4 in the MADRS Total ScoreWeek 4-5.16 score on a scaleStandard Error 0.67
Comparison: Week 2p-value: 0.368795% CI: [-1.99, 0.74]MMRM
Comparison: Week 4p-value: 0.082895% CI: [-3.1, 0.19]MMRM
Other Pre-specified

Change From Screening to Weeks 4 and 6 in the PHQ-9 Total Score.

The PHQ-9 is a standardized, self-administered rating scale that assesses the severity of depressive symptoms. The scale consists of 9 items, representing the 9 criteria upon which the diagnosis of DSM-IV depressive disorders is based. Each item is rated from 0 (not at all) to 3 (nearly every day). The total score ranges from 0 to 27. A higher score on the PHQ-9 represents a higher severity of depressive symptoms. LS mean was estimated using MMRM method.

Time frame: Screening to Weeks 4 and 6

Population: FAS included all randomized participants who received at least 1 occurrence of either CT-152 or sham use and had baseline and at least 1 postbaseline assessment of MADRS total score. Overall number of participants analyzed is the number of participants with data available for analysis. Number analyzed is the number of participants with data available for analysis at the specified timepoints.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)Dispersion
Digital Therapeutic A - CT-152Change From Screening to Weeks 4 and 6 in the PHQ-9 Total Score.Week 6-6.68 score on a scaleStandard Error 0.45
Digital Therapeutic A - CT-152Change From Screening to Weeks 4 and 6 in the PHQ-9 Total Score.Week 4-5.14 score on a scaleStandard Error 0.43
Digital Therapeutic B - ShamChange From Screening to Weeks 4 and 6 in the PHQ-9 Total Score.Week 4-3.85 score on a scaleStandard Error 0.45
Digital Therapeutic B - ShamChange From Screening to Weeks 4 and 6 in the PHQ-9 Total Score.Week 6-5.10 score on a scaleStandard Error 0.46
Comparison: Week 4p-value: 0.010295% CI: [-2.28, -0.31]MMRM
Comparison: Week 6p-value: 0.002995% CI: [-2.62, -0.54]MMRM
Other Pre-specified

MADRS Partial Response at Weeks 2, 4 and 6

The MADRS is used to assess depressive symptom severity. It consists of 10 items (apparent sadness, reported sadness, inner tension, reduced sleep, reduced appetite, concentration difficulties, lassitude, inability to feel, pessimistic thoughts and suicidal thoughts), each rated from 0 to 6 with zero being the best rating and 6 being the worst rating. The MADRS total score is the sum of ratings for all 10 items. The total score ranges from 0 to 60. A higher score on the MADRS represents a more severe level of depression. MADRS partial response was defined as the percentage of participants who achieved a reduction in the MADRS total score by 30% or more and less than 50% from baseline.

Time frame: Baseline (Day 1), Weeks 2, 4 and 6

Population: FAS included all randomized participants who received at least 1 occurrence of either CT-152 or sham use and had baseline and at least 1 postbaseline assessment of MADRS total score. Overall number of participants analyzed is the number of participants with data available for analysis. Number analyzed is the number of participants with data available for analysis at the specified timepoints.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
Digital Therapeutic A - CT-152MADRS Partial Response at Weeks 2, 4 and 6Week 619.89 percentage of participants
Digital Therapeutic A - CT-152MADRS Partial Response at Weeks 2, 4 and 6Week 213.14 percentage of participants
Digital Therapeutic A - CT-152MADRS Partial Response at Weeks 2, 4 and 6Week 419.32 percentage of participants
Digital Therapeutic B - ShamMADRS Partial Response at Weeks 2, 4 and 6Week 416.48 percentage of participants
Digital Therapeutic B - ShamMADRS Partial Response at Weeks 2, 4 and 6Week 617.05 percentage of participants
Digital Therapeutic B - ShamMADRS Partial Response at Weeks 2, 4 and 6Week 211.11 percentage of participants
Comparison: Week 2p-value: 0.575795% CI: [0.65, 2.16]Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel
Comparison: Week 4p-value: 0.510295% CI: [0.75, 1.78]Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel
Comparison: Week 6p-value: 0.534295% CI: [0.74, 1.79]Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel
Other Pre-specified

MADRS Response Rate at Weeks 2, 4, and 6

The MADRS is used to assess depressive symptom severity. It consists of 10 items (apparent sadness, reported sadness, inner tension, reduced sleep, reduced appetite, concentration difficulties, lassitude, inability to feel, pessimistic thoughts and suicidal thoughts), each rated from 0 to 6 with zero being the best rating and 6 being the worst rating. The MADRS total score is the sum of ratings for all 10 items. The total score ranges from 0 to 60. A higher score on the MADRS represents a more severe level of depression. MADRS Response Rate was defined as the percentage of participants who achieved a reduction in the MADRS total score by 50% or more from baseline.

Time frame: Baseline (Day 1), Weeks 2, 4 and 6

Population: FAS included all randomized participants who received at least 1 occurrence of either CT-152 or sham use and had baseline and at least 1 postbaseline assessment of MADRS total score. Overall number of participants analyzed is the number of participants with data available for analysis. Number analyzed is the number of participants with data available for analysis at the specified timepoints.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
Digital Therapeutic A - CT-152MADRS Response Rate at Weeks 2, 4, and 6Week 628.41 percentage of participants
Digital Therapeutic A - CT-152MADRS Response Rate at Weeks 2, 4, and 6Week 210.86 percentage of participants
Digital Therapeutic A - CT-152MADRS Response Rate at Weeks 2, 4, and 6Week 418.18 percentage of participants
Digital Therapeutic B - ShamMADRS Response Rate at Weeks 2, 4, and 6Week 413.64 percentage of participants
Digital Therapeutic B - ShamMADRS Response Rate at Weeks 2, 4, and 6Week 620.45 percentage of participants
Digital Therapeutic B - ShamMADRS Response Rate at Weeks 2, 4, and 6Week 25.85 percentage of participants
Comparison: Week 2p-value: 0.14295% CI: [0.84, 3.34]Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel
Comparison: Week 4p-value: 0.293995% CI: [0.79, 2.16]Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel
Comparison: Week 6p-value: 0.088495% CI: [0.96, 1.99]Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel
Other Pre-specified

MADRS Response Rate at Weeks 8 and 10

The MADRS is used to assess depressive symptom severity. It consists of 10 items (apparent sadness, reported sadness, inner tension, reduced sleep, reduced appetite, concentration difficulties, lassitude, inability to feel, pessimistic thoughts and suicidal thoughts), each rated from 0 to 6 with zero being the best rating and 6 being the worst rating. The MADRS total score is the sum of ratings for all 10 items. The total score ranges from 0 to 60. A higher score on the MADRS represents a more severe level of depression. MADRS Response Rate (full or partial) was defined as the percentage of participants who achieved a reduction in the MADRS total score by 30% or more from baseline.

Time frame: Baseline (Day 1), Weeks 8 and 10

Population: FAS included all randomized participants who received at least 1 occurrence of either CT-152 or sham use and had baseline and at least 1 postbaseline assessment of MADRS total score. Overall number of participants analyzed is the number of participants with data available for analysis. Number analyzed is the number of participants with data available for analysis at the specified timepoints.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
Digital Therapeutic A - CT-152MADRS Response Rate at Weeks 8 and 10Week 854.88 percentage of participants
Digital Therapeutic A - CT-152MADRS Response Rate at Weeks 8 and 10Week 1060.71 percentage of participants
Digital Therapeutic B - ShamMADRS Response Rate at Weeks 8 and 10Week 854.84 percentage of participants
Digital Therapeutic B - ShamMADRS Response Rate at Weeks 8 and 10Week 1057.50 percentage of participants
Comparison: Week 895% CI: [0.82, 1.22]
Comparison: Week 1095% CI: [0.88, 1.25]

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 6, 2026