Colon Mucous, Colonoscopy
Conditions
Keywords
Colonoscopy, Colon Mucus, Water Exchange, Saline
Brief summary
This is a study to compare the left colon mucus production between carbon dioxide (CO2) insufflation and water exchange (WE) colonoscopy in patients that require a routine or repeat colonoscopy. There will be four arms in this study: CO2 insufflation (control group 1), WE with water infusion (control group 2), WE with 50% saline infusion (study group 1), and WE with 25% saline infusion (study group 2). The patient will prepare himself/herself for the colonoscopy as per normal instructions and he/she will be given the information for the study at that time so that he/she can make a decision to participate in the study. The WE control group will use sterile water filling during colonoscope insertion. The study method will use saline filling during colonoscopy insertion. This study will confirm if using the saline infusion is a better method in reducing mucus production when WE colonoscopy is used.
Detailed description
This will be a single-site (Evergreen General Hospital, Taoyuan, Taiwan), blinded investigators, prospective randomized controlled trial (RCT). Felix W. Leung (from Sepulveda Ambulatory Care Center, Veterans Affairs Greater Los Angeles Healthcare System, North Hills, CA) will be involved in the study design, data analysis, and report preparation, but not in patient enrollment. Randomization (CO2, WE with water, WE with 50% saline, WE with 25% saline) will be based on computer generated random numbers placed inside opaque sealed envelopes. The envelope (in pre-arranged order) will be opened to reveal the code when the colonoscopist is ready to insert the endoscope to begin the examination. This will be a comparison of two different insertion methods with four arms (CO2 insufflation, WE with water, WE with 50% saline, WE with 25% saline) to see which solution used in WE is better in reducing mucus production. Patients who are willing to participate will sign an informed consent before starting the colonoscopy procedure. Randomization will be stratified by investigators and indication of colonoscopy (screening, surveillance, or positive fecal immunochemical test). All participating patients will receive conscious sedation during the colonoscopic examination. Randomization (prepared by statistics consultant) will be carried out by the method of random permuted block design (based on computer generated random numbers) with variable block of 3 and 6. Control method: One arm of the study will include colonoscopy with water infusion during insertion as the control method. Residual air in the colon will be removed and sterile water will be infused to guide insertion through an airless lumen. Infused water will be removed by suction, along with residual fecal debris, predominantly during insertion. Another arm of the study will include colonoscopy with CO2 insufflation during insertion as an additional control method. Study method: Two arms of the study will include colonoscopy with saline infusion of different strength, i.e., 50% saline and 25% saline, during insertion. Residual air in the colon will be removed and saline solution will be infused to guide insertion through an airless lumen. Infused saline will be removed by suction, along with residual fecal debris, predominantly during insertion.
Interventions
using CO2 insufflation to help insertion
using water instead of traditional gas to help insertion
using 50% saline solution instead of traditional gas to help insertion
using 25% saline solution instead of traditional gas to help insertion
Sponsors
Study design
Eligibility
Inclusion criteria
* Male and female 20-75 years of age * Positive screening for Fecal Immunochemical Test (FIT) * Subjects willing to undergo routine screening and surveillance colonoscopy
Exclusion criteria
* Patients who decline to provide informed consent * Patients known to have colonic obstruction, active inflammatory bowel disease, or active GI bleeding requiring interventions * Patients known to have prior history of colonic resection * Patients with genetic colorectal syndromes * Patients who are scheduled for therapeutic colonoscopy (e.g., hemostasis, removal of large polyp) * Patients with American Society of Anesthesiology classification of physical status grade 3 or higher
Design outcomes
Primary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Left Colon Mucus Score | 2 hours (data collected during colonoscopy procedure) | The amount of residual mucus in the left colon (descending colon, sigmoid colon, rectum) is scaled by a mucus score (5-point scale): score 0: no visible mucus; score 1: minimal amounts of clear mucus in thin streaks or strands; score 2: mild opaque mucus in thin strands; score 3: moderate opaque mucus in thicker clumps covering one side of surface; score 4: more opaque mucus in thicker clumps covering more views of lumen. |
Secondary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Adenoma Detection Rate | one week (data analyzed after the pathology results were available) | The percentage of individuals undergoing a complete screening colonoscopy who have one or more adenomas detected according to the pathology reports. |
| Number of Participants With Cecal Intubation | 2 hours (data collected during colonoscopy procedure) | Number of participants who had a colonoscopy images confirming visualization of ileocecal valve/appendix orifice and the medial wall of the cecum with colonoscope tip touching floor of cecum |
| Boston Bowel Preparation Scale Score | 2 hours (data collected during colonoscopy procedure) | Three iindividual segments (right colon, transverse colon, left colon), each with score of 0 to 3 (poor to excellent) will be evlauated separately using the Boston Bowel Preparation Scale. A tota Boston Bowel Preparation Scale score, sum of three-segmental score (range 0-9), will be reported. |
| Cecal Intubation Time | 2 hours (data collected during colonoscopy procedure) | Total time from insertion into the anus to arrival in the cecum |
| Withdrawal Inspection Time | 2 hours (data collected during colonoscopy procedure) | Total inspection time during withdrawal from the cecum to the anus |
Countries
Taiwan
Participant flow
Participants by arm
| Arm | Count |
|---|---|
| CO2 Insufflation Colonoscopy will be performed in the traditional fashion, with minimal insufflation required to aid insertion. Cleaning in the CO2 group will be performed entirely during withdrawal.
CO2: using CO2 insufflation to help insertion | 70 |
| WE With Water Residual air in the colon will be removed, water will be infused to guide insertion through an airless lumen. Infused water will be removed by suction, along with residual decal debris, predominantly during insertion.
Water: using water instead of traditional gas to help insertion | 75 |
| WE With 50% Saline Residual air in the colon will be removed, 50% salline (1:1 mixture of saline and water) will be infused to guide insertion through an airless lumen. Infused saline will be removed by suction, along with residual decal debris, predominantly during insertion.
50% saline: using 50% saline solution instead of traditional gas to help insertion | 76 |
| WE With 25% Saline Residual air in the colon will be removed, 25% saline (1:3 mixture of saline and water) will be infused to guide insertion through an airless lumen. Infused saline will be removed by suction, along with residual decal debris, predominantly during insertion.
25% saline: using 25% saline solution instead of traditional gas to help insertion | 75 |
| Total | 296 |
Withdrawals & dropouts
| Period | Reason | FG000 | FG001 | FG002 | FG003 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Overall Study | Colorectal cancer obstruction | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Overall Study | Failed cecal intubation | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Overall Study | Poor bowel preparation | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
Baseline characteristics
| Characteristic | WE With Water | WE With 50% Saline | WE With 25% Saline | Total | CO2 Insufflation |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Age, Continuous | 51.4 years STANDARD_DEVIATION 10.7 | 53.0 years STANDARD_DEVIATION 11.5 | 52.0 years STANDARD_DEVIATION 10.9 | 51.9 years STANDARD_DEVIATION 10.9 | 51.2 years STANDARD_DEVIATION 10 |
| Race and Ethnicity Not Collected | — | — | — | 0 Participants | — |
| Region of Enrollment Taiwan | 75 Participants | 76 Participants | 75 Participants | 296 Participants | 70 Participants |
| Sex: Female, Male Female | 32 Participants | 43 Participants | 38 Participants | 150 Participants | 37 Participants |
| Sex: Female, Male Male | 43 Participants | 33 Participants | 37 Participants | 146 Participants | 33 Participants |
Adverse events
| Event type | EG000 affected / at risk | EG001 affected / at risk | EG002 affected / at risk | EG003 affected / at risk |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| deaths Total, all-cause mortality | 0 / 70 | 0 / 75 | 0 / 76 | 0 / 75 |
| other Total, other adverse events | 0 / 70 | 0 / 75 | 0 / 76 | 0 / 75 |
| serious Total, serious adverse events | 0 / 70 | 0 / 75 | 0 / 76 | 0 / 75 |
Outcome results
Left Colon Mucus Score
The amount of residual mucus in the left colon (descending colon, sigmoid colon, rectum) is scaled by a mucus score (5-point scale): score 0: no visible mucus; score 1: minimal amounts of clear mucus in thin streaks or strands; score 2: mild opaque mucus in thin strands; score 3: moderate opaque mucus in thicker clumps covering one side of surface; score 4: more opaque mucus in thicker clumps covering more views of lumen.
Time frame: 2 hours (data collected during colonoscopy procedure)
| Arm | Measure | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|
| CO2 Insufflation | Left Colon Mucus Score | 0.2 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 0.38 |
| WE With Water | Left Colon Mucus Score | 1.4 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 0.84 |
| WE With 50% Saline | Left Colon Mucus Score | 0.5 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 0.5 |
| WE With 25% Saline | Left Colon Mucus Score | 0.7 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 0.63 |
Adenoma Detection Rate
The percentage of individuals undergoing a complete screening colonoscopy who have one or more adenomas detected according to the pathology reports.
Time frame: one week (data analyzed after the pathology results were available)
| Arm | Measure | Value (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS) |
|---|---|---|
| CO2 Insufflation | Adenoma Detection Rate | 35 Participants |
| WE With Water | Adenoma Detection Rate | 31 Participants |
| WE With 50% Saline | Adenoma Detection Rate | 41 Participants |
| WE With 25% Saline | Adenoma Detection Rate | 35 Participants |
Boston Bowel Preparation Scale Score
Three iindividual segments (right colon, transverse colon, left colon), each with score of 0 to 3 (poor to excellent) will be evlauated separately using the Boston Bowel Preparation Scale. A tota Boston Bowel Preparation Scale score, sum of three-segmental score (range 0-9), will be reported.
Time frame: 2 hours (data collected during colonoscopy procedure)
| Arm | Measure | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|
| CO2 Insufflation | Boston Bowel Preparation Scale Score | 7.0 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 0.5 |
| WE With Water | Boston Bowel Preparation Scale Score | 7.1 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 0.7 |
| WE With 50% Saline | Boston Bowel Preparation Scale Score | 7.8 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 0.7 |
| WE With 25% Saline | Boston Bowel Preparation Scale Score | 7.6 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 0.7 |
Cecal Intubation Time
Total time from insertion into the anus to arrival in the cecum
Time frame: 2 hours (data collected during colonoscopy procedure)
| Arm | Measure | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|
| CO2 Insufflation | Cecal Intubation Time | 10.0 minutes | Standard Deviation 6 |
| WE With Water | Cecal Intubation Time | 18.0 minutes | Standard Deviation 6.2 |
| WE With 50% Saline | Cecal Intubation Time | 18.4 minutes | Standard Deviation 7.1 |
| WE With 25% Saline | Cecal Intubation Time | 18.6 minutes | Standard Deviation 9.1 |
Number of Participants With Cecal Intubation
Number of participants who had a colonoscopy images confirming visualization of ileocecal valve/appendix orifice and the medial wall of the cecum with colonoscope tip touching floor of cecum
Time frame: 2 hours (data collected during colonoscopy procedure)
| Arm | Measure | Value (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS) |
|---|---|---|
| CO2 Insufflation | Number of Participants With Cecal Intubation | 70 Participants |
| WE With Water | Number of Participants With Cecal Intubation | 75 Participants |
| WE With 50% Saline | Number of Participants With Cecal Intubation | 76 Participants |
| WE With 25% Saline | Number of Participants With Cecal Intubation | 75 Participants |
Withdrawal Inspection Time
Total inspection time during withdrawal from the cecum to the anus
Time frame: 2 hours (data collected during colonoscopy procedure)
| Arm | Measure | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|
| CO2 Insufflation | Withdrawal Inspection Time | 20.2 minutes | Standard Deviation 6.4 |
| WE With Water | Withdrawal Inspection Time | 17.1 minutes | Standard Deviation 5.4 |
| WE With 50% Saline | Withdrawal Inspection Time | 17.2 minutes | Standard Deviation 5.3 |
| WE With 25% Saline | Withdrawal Inspection Time | 16.6 minutes | Standard Deviation 5.4 |