Skip to content

Single Anastomosis Versus Standard Duodenal Switch

Single Anastomosis Versus Standard Duodenal Switch - a Prospective Randomized Single-blinded Trial

Status
Recruiting
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT04767490
Acronym
SADI
Enrollment
120
Registered
2021-02-23
Start date
2015-09-01
Completion date
2026-09-01
Last updated
2024-08-09

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Morbid Obesity, Obesity

Keywords

bariatric surgery

Brief summary

Bilio-Pancreatic diversion with Duodenal Switch (BPD-DS) is the most effective bariatric procedure in terms of long-term weight loss and remission rate of Type 2 Diabetes. However, its technical difficulty and increased risk of long-term nutritional deficiencies have been a major hindrance to its diffusion. Recently, a simplified technique of Duodenal-Switch has been proposed by Sanchez-Pernaute et al. This technique involves the creation of a Sleeve Gastrectomy, transection of the first duodenum, and connection of the duodenum to an omega-loop of small bowel instead of a terminal intestinal loop used in standard BPD-DS. The overall objective of this study is to assess in a prospective randomized blinded trial, the outcomes of this new procedure, using a comprehensive clinical evaluation and follow-up method. This could potentially change the clinical practice and surgical approach in our Institution.

Detailed description

Bilio-Pancreatic diversion with Duodenal Switch (BPD-DS) is the most effective bariatric procedure in terms of long-term weight loss and remission rate of Type 2 Diabetes. However, its technical difficulty and increased risk of long-term nutritional deficiencies have been a major hindrance to its diffusion. Our team, with more than 4000 BPD-DS performed since the early 1990's, is recognized internationally for its expertise with this specific procedure. Recently, a simplified technique of Duodenal-Switch has been proposed by Sanchez-Pernaute et al. This technique involves the creation of a Sleeve Gastrectomy, transection of the first duodenum, and connection of the duodenum to an omega-loop of small bowel instead of a terminal intestinal loop used in standard BPD-DS. This new procedure, called Single Anastomosis Duodenal Switch has the potential benefit of decreasing the complexity of the standard BPD-DS by avoiding one of the two intestinal anastomoses usually needed. This could potentially decrease the rate of peri-operative complications and increase access to this type of surgery. However, the length of the common channel (250cm) is more than doubled compared to standard BPD-DS, which could also change significantly the outcomes of the procedure itself. Indeed, the length of the common channel conditions the absorption of fat and fat-soluble vitamins. Currently, the scientific literature regarding this procedure is scarce, with only one author who published his 2-years outcomes, in a cohort study of 100 patients. In addition, this report presents major limitations. In example, the length of the omega loop was increased from 200 to 250cm during the course of the study, in order to decrease the rate of protein deficiency and reoperation for malnutrition. This and other limitations make it hard to assess the actual results of the technique. The overall objective of this study is to assess in a stronger study design (i.e. a prospective randomized single blinded trial), the outcomes of this new procedure, using a comprehensive clinical evaluation and follow-up method. This could potentially change the clinical practice and surgical approach in our Institution.

Interventions

PROCEDURESingle Anastomosis Duodenal Switch

Sponsors

Institut universitaire de cardiologie et de pneumologie de Québec, University Laval
CollaboratorOTHER
Laval University
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
DOUBLE (Subject, Outcomes Assessor)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 60 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Age ≥18 years and ≤60 years * Fulfill criteria for bariatric surgery as coined by National Institutes of Health BMI≥35 * Give written informed consent

Exclusion criteria

Participants who meet any of the following criteria at the time of the baseline visit are excluded from the study: * Presence of the following baseline comorbidities: * Inflammatory bowel disease (IBD), * Cirrhosis * History of gastric or duodenal ulcers * Preoperative hypoalbuminemia (\<35 g/L) * History of severe renal, hepatic, cardiac or pulmonary disease * Past esophageal, gastric or bariatric surgery * Type 1 Diabetes * Pregnancy * Evidence of psychological problem that may affect the capacity to understand the project and to comply with the medical recommendations * History of drug use or alcohol abuse in the last 6 months * History of gastro-intestinal inflammatory diseases

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Excess weight loss2 yearsExcess weight loss at 2 years of follow-up %EWL (Excess weight loss based on an ideal BMI = 25.) and change in BMI as compared to preoperative reference values
Rate of protein deficiency or insufficiencyfrom baseline up to 60 monthsRate of protein deficiency (\<35gr/l) or insufficiency (\<30gr/l)
Mortality ratefrom baseline up to 60 monthsRate of mortality
BMI2 yearschange in BMI at 2 years follow-up as compared to preoperative reference values

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Change in quality of lifefrom baseline up to 60 months36-item short form survey score from 0 to 100
Complication ratefrom baseline up to 60 monthsoverall and surgery-specific complications
Change in gatroesophageal reflux symptomfrom baseline to 60 monthsGastroEsophageal Reflus Disease Score from 0 to 72
Cure rate of comorbiditiesfrom baseline up to 60 monthsRemission rate for comorbidities, including T2D, Hypertension, dyslipidemia, sleep apnea
Rate of minerals and vitamin deficienciesfrom baseline up to 60 monthsRate of deficiency and insufficiency in mineral and vitamins
Body composition by bioimpedance measuresfrom baseline up to 60 monthsbody fat composition (%) assessed by biompedance

Countries

Canada

Contacts

Primary ContactSuzy Laroche
suzy_laroche@ssss.gouv.qc.ca418-656-8711
Backup ContactMélanie Nadeau, MSc
melanie.nadeau@criucpq.ulaval.ca418-656-8711

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026