Skip to content

Effects of BIONESS in Rehabilitation of Stroke

Short-term Therapeutic Effects of Functional Electrical Stimulation Device Bioness L300 on the Somatosensory Cortical Representation in the Rehabilitation of Patients After Stroke

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT04767360
Acronym
EFES-BIO-SEP
Enrollment
32
Registered
2021-02-23
Start date
2021-02-10
Completion date
2022-12-12
Last updated
2023-03-15

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Stroke

Brief summary

A four-weeks randomized clinical two-period crossover-design study will be conducted. Each patient will be randomized in a two separate consecutive treatment periods (Parallel Group Design). Group A will be treated with functional electrical stimulation (FES) and a second Gruppe B will be treated without FES for two weeks. After this period Group A and Group B will switched.

Detailed description

Prediction of motor recovery in the upper-limb (UL) / lower-limb (LL) in patients with stroke is generally based on clinical examination. However, according to former studies neurophysiological measures may also have a predictive value. In the acute phase, the combination of the motor score and SEPs are best predictive of outcome. Neurophysiological measures alone are of limited value in predicting long term outcome. However, predictive accuracy is substantially improved through the combined use of both of these measures and clinical variables. A four-weeks randomized clinical two-period crossover-design study will be conducted. Each patient will be randomized in a two separate consecutive treatment periods (Parallel Group Design). Group A will be treated with functional electrical stimulation (FES) and a second Gruppe B will be treated without FES for two weeks. After this period Group A and Group B will switched.

Interventions

DEVICEBioness-300

Therapeutic treatment of foot drop with the electrical stimulation device Bioness L300.

Sponsors

Peter Young Neurological Clinic Medicalpark Bad Feilnbach, Germany
CollaboratorUNKNOWN
LMU Klinikum
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
NA
Intervention model
SEQUENTIAL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Intervention model description

clinical sequential two-period crossover-design study

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 75 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Adults between the ages of 18 and 75 * Inadequate ankle dorsiflexion during the swing phase of gait, resulting in inadequate limb clearance * Medically stable for at least one week following the last episode of stroke * Stable medication for four weeks * Adequate cognitive and communication function to give informed consent, understand the training instructions, use the device, and give adequate feedback * Ability to walk with or without an assistive device (except parallel bars) at least 10 meters

Exclusion criteria

* • Lower motor neuron injury with inadequate response to stimulation * History of falls greater than once a week * Severe cardiac disease such as myocardial infarction, congestive heart failure, or a demand pacemaker * Patients who have other electrical stimulation devices implemented * Patients with epilepsy and with autoimmune diseases

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
SEP measurement4 weeksin improving pathological latencies and / or amplitudes of somatosensory evoked potentials (SEPs) • N35, P40, N50 (lower limb / tibial nerve) amplitude of somatosensory evoked potential \[ Time Frame: Change from baseline at 4 weeks\]

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Motor score improvement4 weeks• Dorsal flexion/plantar extension of the ankle strength will be measured by Janda's classification of muscle imbalance patterns (Force produced by voluntary dorsiflexion). \[ Time Frame: Change from baseline at 4 weeks\]

Countries

Germany

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 10, 2026