Skip to content

Assessment of a Fruit and Vegetable Prescription Program for Children

Innovative Nutrition Practices in Pediatric Health Care: Assessment of a Fruit and Vegetable Prescription Program for Children in Need

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT04767282
Enrollment
1400
Registered
2021-02-23
Start date
2021-02-23
Completion date
2024-06-25
Last updated
2025-10-16

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Exposure to Fruit and Vegetable Prescription Program

Brief summary

The objective of this study is to address gaps in knowledge related to the influence of pediatric fruit and vegetable prescription programs on food security, child dietary patterns, and weight status. To do this, we will compare demographically similar pediatric patient groups from three large clinics in a low-income urban city based on their exposure to a fruit and vegetable prescription program (FVPP) that provides one $15 prescription for fresh fruits and vegetable to every child at every office visit. Three clusters will be identified based on child exposure to the pediatric FVPP at baseline: high exposure (\>24 months), moderate exposure (12-24 months), and no previous exposure. We will then introduce the FVPP to never exposed patients and collect, record, and compare changes in dietary intake, food security, and weight status over time. We will test the hypothesis that exposure to the FVPP is associated with higher intake of fruits and vegetables, better food security, and lower rates of obesity among children. The first aim will compare baseline dietary intake, food security, and weight status between high exposure, moderate exposure, no exposure groups. The second aim will measure changes in diet, food security, and weight status at 6-, 12-, 18-, and 24-months among children newly exposed to the FVPP. The third aim will compare follow-up measures of dietary intake, food security, and weight status in the initial no exposure group to baseline measures in the high exposure group.

Detailed description

This study will evaluate a Fruit and Vegetable Prescription Program (FVPP). The program provides one $15 prescription for fresh produce to every child at every office visit. Prescriptions are redeemable at a local farmers' market and mobile market. To determine whether exposure to the FVPP is associated with improvements in dietary intake, food security, and health status, we will compare demographically similar pediatric patient groups with varying levels of exposure to the FVPP at baseline: high exposure (\>24 months), moderate exposure (12-24 months), and no previous exposure. We will then introduce the FVPP to never exposed patients and collect, record, and compare changes in dietary intake, food security, and weight status over time. The central hypothesis is that exposure to the FVPP is associated with higher intake of fruits and vegetables, better food security, and lower rates of childhood obesity over time. We propose the following three specific aims to test our hypothesis: Aim 1 - Compare baseline dietary intake, food security, and weight status between pediatric patients with varying levels of exposure to the FVPP. Aim 2 - Measure changes in diet, food security, and weight status when never exposed children are introduced to the FVPP. Aim 3 - Compare mean follow-up measures of dietary intake, food security, and weight status in the initial no exposure group to baseline measures in the high exposure group.

Interventions

$15 voucher for fruit and vegetables

Sponsors

Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development (NICHD)
CollaboratorNIH
Hurley Medical Center
CollaboratorOTHER
Akpinar Children's Clinic
CollaboratorUNKNOWN
Mott Children's Health Center
CollaboratorOTHER
Hurley Children's Center
CollaboratorUNKNOWN
Michigan State University
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
NA
Intervention model
SINGLE_GROUP
Primary purpose
PREVENTION
Masking
NONE

Intervention model description

A fruit and vegetable prescription is written by pediatricians to exchange for $15 of fresh produce. Prescriptions are redeemable at a local farmers' market and mobile market.

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
8 Years to 16 Years
Healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

* Child between age 8 and 16 years and their caregiver; * Child active patient at clinic; * Child received at least one fruit and vegetable prescription; * Child and caregiver English-speaking

Exclusion criteria

* Caregiver or child not English speaking; * Legal guardian not present at enrollment; * Child assent refused; * Sibling previously enrolled (one caregiver and one child per household); * Movement between participating clinics

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Odds Ratio Evaluating the Longitudinal Trend of High Food Security for the Household at 6, 12, 18 and 24 Months Relative to Baseline Among Caregivers Newly Introduced to the FVPPBaseline, 6 months, 12 months, 18 months, 24 monthsHousehold food security was assessed using the US Household Food Security Module: Six Item Short Form (National Center for Health Statistics) via caregiver report. The sum of affirmative responses to six questions served as the household's raw score. Food security status was assigned based on a calculated raw score (0-1=high/marginal food security; 2-4=low food security; 5-6 very low food security). High food security (outcome analyzed) was assigned to those with raw scores less than or equal to 1.
Odds Ratio Evaluating the Longitudinal Trend of High Food Security for the Household at 6 and 12 Months Relative to Baseline Among Caregivers Newly Introduced to the FVPPBaseline, 6 months,12 monthsHousehold food security was assessed using the US Household Food Security Module: Six Item Short Form (National Center for Health Statistics) via caregiver report. The sum of affirmative responses to six questions served as the household's raw score. Food security status was assigned based on a calculated raw score (0-1=high/marginal food security; 2-4=low food security; 5-6 very low food security). High food security (outcome analyzed) was assigned to those with raw scores less than or equal to 1.
Odds Ratio Evaluating the Longitudinal Trend of High Food Security at 6 and 12 Months Relative to Baseline Among Youth 12 Years of Age and Older Who Were Newly Introduced to the FVPP.Baseline, 6 months,12 monthsChild food security status was assessed via the Self-Administered Food Security Survey Module for Youth only with children aged 12 years and older based on prior research recommendations. The sum of affirmative responses (a lot or sometimes) to nine questions represented the respondent's raw score on the scale. Food security status was assigned by raw score (0-1=high/marginal food security; 2-5=low food security; 6-9=very low food security). High food security (outcome analyzed) was assigned to those with raw scores less than or equal to 1.
Odds Ratio Evaluating the Longitudinal Trend of High Food Security at 6, 12, 18 and 24 Months Relative to Baseline Among Youth 12 Years of Age and Older at Newly Introduced to the FVPPBaseline, 6 months, 12 months, 18 months, 24 monthsChild food security status was assessed via the Self-Administered Food Security Survey Module for Youth only with children aged 12 years and older based on prior research recommendations. The sum of affirmative responses (a lot or sometimes) to nine questions represented the respondent's raw score on the scale. Food security status was assigned by raw score (0-1=high/marginal food security; 2-5=low food security; 6-9=very low food security). High food security (outcome analyzed) was assigned to those with raw scores less than or equal to 1.
Change From Baseline Child-reported Mean Daily Intake of Fruits and Vegetables at 6, 12, 18 and 24 Months Among Youth Participants Newly Introduced to the FVPPBaseline, 6 months, 12 months, 18 months, 24 monthsEating behaviors reported here were assessed via child-report using the 41-item Block Kids Food Screener (BKFS), chosen for low respondent burden and acceptable psychometric values. Dietary analysis, using Block Online Analysis System, provided nutrient estimates and number of servings by food groups. This data was used to determine mean daily intake (in cup equivalents) of total vegetables, total fruits, and whole fruits.
Change From Baseline Child-reported Mean Daily Intake of Fruits and Vegetables at 6 and 12 Months Among Youth Participants Newly Introduced to the FVPPBaseline, 6 months,12 monthsEating behaviors reported here were assessed via child-report using the 41-item Block Kids Food Screener (BKFS), chosen for low respondent burden and acceptable psychometric values. Dietary analysis, using Block Online Analysis System, provided nutrient estimates and number of servings by food groups. This data was used to determine mean daily intake (in cup equivalents) of total vegetables, total fruits, and whole fruits.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Change From Baseline BMI at 6, 12, 18 and 24 Months Among Youth Participants Newly Introduced to the FVPPBaseline, 6 months, 12 months, 18 months, 24 monthsBody mass index (BMI) was calculated from child weight and height (weight (kg)/\[height (m)\]2). BMI was then categorized into percentiles by sex and age to serve as an indicator of overweight and obesity. Child overweight and obesity status were categorized as follows: overweight (95th percentile for age and sex \> BMI ≥ 85th percentile for age and sex), obese (BMI ≥ 95th percentile for age and sex). Because achievement of healthy weight in youth (85th percentile for age and sex ≥ BMI \> 5th percentile for age and sex) was a secondary objective, a negative change in BMI percentile represents a desirable outcome.
Change From Caregiver-reported Baseline Mean Daily Intake of Fruits and Vegetables at 6 and 12 Months Among Caregivers Newly Introduced to the FVPPBaseline, 6 months, 12 monthsTo investigate whether exposure to the pediatric fruit and vegetable prescription program is associated with increased fruit and vegetable consumption among caregivers, dietary data from caregivers was collected using the National Cancer Institute Fruit & Vegetable Intake All Day Screener which asks frequency and portion size questions about nine food items. This will be used to calculate mean daily intake of vegetables and total fruits.
Change From Caregiver-reported Baseline Mean Daily Intake of Fruits and Vegetables at 6, 12, 18 and 24 Months Among Caregivers Newly Introduced to the FVPPBaseline, 6 months, 12 months, 18 months, 24 monthsTo investigate whether exposure to the pediatric fruit and vegetable prescription program is associated with increased fruit and vegetable consumption among caregivers, dietary data from caregivers was collected using the National Cancer Institute Fruit & Vegetable Intake All Day Screener which asks frequency and portion size questions about nine food items. This will be used to calculate mean daily intake of vegetables and total fruits.
Change From Baseline Child BMI at 6 and 12 Months Among Youth Participants Newly Introduced to the FVPPBaseline, 6 months,12 monthsBody mass index (BMI) was calculated from child weight and height (weight (kg)/\[height (m)\]2). BMI was then categorized into percentiles by sex and age to serve as an indicator of overweight and obesity. Child overweight and obesity status were categorized as follows: overweight (95th percentile for age and sex \> BMI ≥ 85th percentile for age and sex), obese (BMI ≥ 95th percentile for age and sex). Because achievement of healthy weight in youth (85th percentile for age and sex ≥ BMI \> 5th percentile for age and sex) was a secondary objective, a negative change in BMI percentile represents a desirable outcome.

Countries

United States

Participant flow

Recruitment details

Caregiver-child dyads were recruited from February 2021 through June 2022 at pediatric clinics in Flint, Michigan. The high exposure clinic is a large pediatric clinic that introduced Michigan's first pediatric fruit and vegetable prescription program in February 2016. The moderate exposure clinic is one of the largest private-practice pediatric clinics in Flint serving over 3,000 patients. The no/low exposure clinic is the largest pediatric clinic in Flint.

Pre-assignment details

Exposure to the pediatric fruit and vegetable prescription program was based on length of time a child was a patient at one of three partnering clinics that offered the fruit and vegetable prescription program. Number of participants started represents the number of individual participants (caregivers and children).

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Moderate Exposure to the FVPP
Participants with Moderate Exposure to the FVPP
350
High Exposure to the FVPP
Participants with High Exposure to the FVPP
402
No/Low Expsoure to the FVPP
Participants with No/Low Exposure to the FVPP
608
Total1,360

Withdrawals & dropouts

PeriodReasonFG000FG001FG002
Overall StudyDuplicate household previously enrolled208
Overall StudyRefused or did not begin surveys622
Overall StudySurvey comprehension challenges400
Overall StudyUnable to confirm legal guardian028
Overall StudyWithdrawal by Subject006

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicModerate Exposure to the FVPPHigh Exposure to the FVPPNo/Low Expsoure to the FVPPTotal
Age, Categorical
<=18 years
175 Participants201 Participants300 Participants676 Participants
Age, Categorical
>=65 years
6 Participants3 Participants8 Participants17 Participants
Age, Categorical
Between 18 and 65 years
167 Participants198 Participants291 Participants656 Participants
Age, Continuous
Age
26.99 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 15.61
25.92 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 14.87
25.72 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 15.54
26.11 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 15.36
Age of Study Participants
Age of adult participants
41.22 Years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 9.02
39.74 Years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 8.53
39.51 Years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 9.89
39.91 Years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 9.3
Age of Study Participants
Age of youth participants
12.93 Years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 2.34
12.47 Years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 2.63
11.98 Years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 2.39
12.37 Years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 2.48
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Caregivers
Hispanic or Latino
3 Participants1 Participants7 Participants11 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Caregivers
Not Hispanic or Latino
169 Participants200 Participants290 Participants659 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Caregivers
Unknown or Not Reported
3 Participants0 Participants7 Participants10 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Children
Hispanic or Latino
2 Participants0 Participants5 Participants7 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Children
Not Hispanic or Latino
172 Participants201 Participants289 Participants662 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Children
Unknown or Not Reported
1 Participants0 Participants10 Participants11 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Total
Hispanic or Latino
5 Participants1 Participants12 Participants18 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Total
Not Hispanic or Latino
341 Participants401 Participants579 Participants1321 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Total
Unknown or Not Reported
4 Participants0 Participants17 Participants21 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Caregivers
American Indian or Alaska Native
2 Participants2 Participants1 Participants5 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Caregivers
Asian
0 Participants1 Participants3 Participants4 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Caregivers
Black or African American
125 Participants165 Participants202 Participants492 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Caregivers
More than one race
4 Participants4 Participants11 Participants19 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Caregivers
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander
0 Participants0 Participants1 Participants1 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Caregivers
Unknown or Not Reported
3 Participants0 Participants7 Participants10 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Caregivers
White
38 Participants28 Participants72 Participants138 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Children
American Indian or Alaska Native
1 Participants3 Participants2 Participants6 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Children
Asian
1 Participants1 Participants1 Participants3 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Children
Black or African American
128 Participants165 Participants212 Participants505 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Children
More than one race
11 Participants13 Participants16 Participants40 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Children
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander
1 Participants0 Participants1 Participants2 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Children
Unknown or Not Reported
1 Participants0 Participants10 Participants11 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Children
White
30 Participants19 Participants57 Participants106 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Total
American Indian or Alaska Native
3 Participants5 Participants3 Participants11 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Total
Asian
1 Participants2 Participants4 Participants7 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Total
Black or African American
253 Participants330 Participants414 Participants997 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Total
More than one race
15 Participants17 Participants27 Participants59 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Total
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander
1 Participants0 Participants2 Participants3 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Total
Unknown or Not Reported
4 Participants0 Participants17 Participants21 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Total
White
68 Participants47 Participants129 Participants244 Participants
Region of Enrollment
United States
350 participants402 participants608 participants1360 participants
Sex: Female, Male
Caregivers
Female
159 Participants179 Participants269 Participants607 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Caregivers
Male
16 Participants22 Participants31 Participants69 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Children
Female
91 Participants103 Participants159 Participants353 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Children
Male
84 Participants98 Participants145 Participants327 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Total
Female
250 Participants282 Participants428 Participants960 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Total
Male
100 Participants120 Participants176 Participants396 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
EG002
affected / at risk
EG003
affected / at risk
EG004
affected / at risk
EG005
affected / at risk
EG006
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
0 / 1,3600 / 2010 / 2010 / 1750 / 1750 / 3040 / 304
other
Total, other adverse events
0 / 1,3600 / 2010 / 2010 / 1750 / 1750 / 3040 / 304
serious
Total, serious adverse events
0 / 1,3600 / 2010 / 2010 / 1750 / 1750 / 3040 / 304

Outcome results

Primary

Change From Baseline Child-reported Mean Daily Intake of Fruits and Vegetables at 6, 12, 18 and 24 Months Among Youth Participants Newly Introduced to the FVPP

Eating behaviors reported here were assessed via child-report using the 41-item Block Kids Food Screener (BKFS), chosen for low respondent burden and acceptable psychometric values. Dietary analysis, using Block Online Analysis System, provided nutrient estimates and number of servings by food groups. This data was used to determine mean daily intake (in cup equivalents) of total vegetables, total fruits, and whole fruits.

Time frame: Baseline, 6 months, 12 months, 18 months, 24 months

Population: This outcome measure was pre-specified to only assess participants in the low/no exposure to FVPP groups. Analysis includes data from youth participants who were newly introduced to the FVPP and completed the Block Kids Food Screener.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)
No/Low ExposureChange From Baseline Child-reported Mean Daily Intake of Fruits and Vegetables at 6, 12, 18 and 24 Months Among Youth Participants Newly Introduced to the FVPPChange in mean daily intake of total fruits (6 months versus baseline)0.21 cup equivalents per day
No/Low ExposureChange From Baseline Child-reported Mean Daily Intake of Fruits and Vegetables at 6, 12, 18 and 24 Months Among Youth Participants Newly Introduced to the FVPPChange in mean daily intake of total fruits (12 months versus baseline)0.17 cup equivalents per day
No/Low ExposureChange From Baseline Child-reported Mean Daily Intake of Fruits and Vegetables at 6, 12, 18 and 24 Months Among Youth Participants Newly Introduced to the FVPPChange in mean daily intake of total fruits (18 months versus baseline)0.37 cup equivalents per day
No/Low ExposureChange From Baseline Child-reported Mean Daily Intake of Fruits and Vegetables at 6, 12, 18 and 24 Months Among Youth Participants Newly Introduced to the FVPPChange in mean daily intake of total fruits (24 months versus baseline)0.09 cup equivalents per day
No/Low ExposureChange From Baseline Child-reported Mean Daily Intake of Fruits and Vegetables at 6, 12, 18 and 24 Months Among Youth Participants Newly Introduced to the FVPPChange in mean daily intake of whole fruits (6 months versus baseline)0.14 cup equivalents per day
No/Low ExposureChange From Baseline Child-reported Mean Daily Intake of Fruits and Vegetables at 6, 12, 18 and 24 Months Among Youth Participants Newly Introduced to the FVPPChange in mean daily intake of whole fruits (12 months versus baseline)0.05 cup equivalents per day
No/Low ExposureChange From Baseline Child-reported Mean Daily Intake of Fruits and Vegetables at 6, 12, 18 and 24 Months Among Youth Participants Newly Introduced to the FVPPChange in mean daily intake of whole fruits (18 months versus baseline)0.20 cup equivalents per day
No/Low ExposureChange From Baseline Child-reported Mean Daily Intake of Fruits and Vegetables at 6, 12, 18 and 24 Months Among Youth Participants Newly Introduced to the FVPPChange in mean daily intake of whole fruits (24 months versus baseline)0.12 cup equivalents per day
No/Low ExposureChange From Baseline Child-reported Mean Daily Intake of Fruits and Vegetables at 6, 12, 18 and 24 Months Among Youth Participants Newly Introduced to the FVPPChange in mean daily intake of total vegetables (6 months versus baseline)0.11 cup equivalents per day
No/Low ExposureChange From Baseline Child-reported Mean Daily Intake of Fruits and Vegetables at 6, 12, 18 and 24 Months Among Youth Participants Newly Introduced to the FVPPChange in mean daily intake of total vegetables (12 months versus baseline)-0.01 cup equivalents per day
No/Low ExposureChange From Baseline Child-reported Mean Daily Intake of Fruits and Vegetables at 6, 12, 18 and 24 Months Among Youth Participants Newly Introduced to the FVPPChange in mean daily intake of total vegetables (18 months versus baseline)0.19 cup equivalents per day
No/Low ExposureChange From Baseline Child-reported Mean Daily Intake of Fruits and Vegetables at 6, 12, 18 and 24 Months Among Youth Participants Newly Introduced to the FVPPChange in mean daily intake of total vegetables (24 months versus baseline)-0.02 cup equivalents per day
Primary

Change From Baseline Child-reported Mean Daily Intake of Fruits and Vegetables at 6 and 12 Months Among Youth Participants Newly Introduced to the FVPP

Eating behaviors reported here were assessed via child-report using the 41-item Block Kids Food Screener (BKFS), chosen for low respondent burden and acceptable psychometric values. Dietary analysis, using Block Online Analysis System, provided nutrient estimates and number of servings by food groups. This data was used to determine mean daily intake (in cup equivalents) of total vegetables, total fruits, and whole fruits.

Time frame: Baseline, 6 months,12 months

Population: This outcome measure was pre-specified to only assess participants in the low/no exposure to FVPP group. Analysis includes data from youth participants with no/low exposure to the FVPP at baseline who completed the Block Kids Food Screener.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)
No/Low ExposureChange From Baseline Child-reported Mean Daily Intake of Fruits and Vegetables at 6 and 12 Months Among Youth Participants Newly Introduced to the FVPPChange in mean daily intake of total fruits (6 months versus baseline)0.21 cup equivalents per day
No/Low ExposureChange From Baseline Child-reported Mean Daily Intake of Fruits and Vegetables at 6 and 12 Months Among Youth Participants Newly Introduced to the FVPPChange in mean daily intake of total fruits (12 months versus baseline)0.17 cup equivalents per day
No/Low ExposureChange From Baseline Child-reported Mean Daily Intake of Fruits and Vegetables at 6 and 12 Months Among Youth Participants Newly Introduced to the FVPPChange in mean daily intake of whole fruits (6 months versus baseline)0.14 cup equivalents per day
No/Low ExposureChange From Baseline Child-reported Mean Daily Intake of Fruits and Vegetables at 6 and 12 Months Among Youth Participants Newly Introduced to the FVPPChange in mean daily intake of whole fruits (12 months versus baseline)0.05 cup equivalents per day
No/Low ExposureChange From Baseline Child-reported Mean Daily Intake of Fruits and Vegetables at 6 and 12 Months Among Youth Participants Newly Introduced to the FVPPChange in mean daily intake of total vegetables (6 months versus baseline)0.11 cup equivalents per day
No/Low ExposureChange From Baseline Child-reported Mean Daily Intake of Fruits and Vegetables at 6 and 12 Months Among Youth Participants Newly Introduced to the FVPPChange in mean daily intake of total vegetables (12 months versus baseline)-0.01 cup equivalents per day
Primary

Odds Ratio Evaluating the Longitudinal Trend of High Food Security at 6, 12, 18 and 24 Months Relative to Baseline Among Youth 12 Years of Age and Older at Newly Introduced to the FVPP

Child food security status was assessed via the Self-Administered Food Security Survey Module for Youth only with children aged 12 years and older based on prior research recommendations. The sum of affirmative responses (a lot or sometimes) to nine questions represented the respondent's raw score on the scale. Food security status was assigned by raw score (0-1=high/marginal food security; 2-5=low food security; 6-9=very low food security). High food security (outcome analyzed) was assigned to those with raw scores less than or equal to 1.

Time frame: Baseline, 6 months, 12 months, 18 months, 24 months

Population: This outcome measure was pre-specified to only assess participants in the low/no exposure to FVPP group. Analysis includes data from youth 12 years of age and older who were newly introduced to the FVPP and completed the Self-Administered Food Security Survey Module for Youth.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
No/Low ExposureOdds Ratio Evaluating the Longitudinal Trend of High Food Security at 6, 12, 18 and 24 Months Relative to Baseline Among Youth 12 Years of Age and Older at Newly Introduced to the FVPPOdds ratios for higher food security (6 months versus baseline)0.86 High Food Security Odds Ratio
No/Low ExposureOdds Ratio Evaluating the Longitudinal Trend of High Food Security at 6, 12, 18 and 24 Months Relative to Baseline Among Youth 12 Years of Age and Older at Newly Introduced to the FVPPOdds ratios for higher food security (12 months versus baseline)0.64 High Food Security Odds Ratio
No/Low ExposureOdds Ratio Evaluating the Longitudinal Trend of High Food Security at 6, 12, 18 and 24 Months Relative to Baseline Among Youth 12 Years of Age and Older at Newly Introduced to the FVPPOdds ratios for higher food security (18 months versus baseline)0.48 High Food Security Odds Ratio
No/Low ExposureOdds Ratio Evaluating the Longitudinal Trend of High Food Security at 6, 12, 18 and 24 Months Relative to Baseline Among Youth 12 Years of Age and Older at Newly Introduced to the FVPPOdds ratios for higher food security (24 months versus baseline)0.39 High Food Security Odds Ratio
Primary

Odds Ratio Evaluating the Longitudinal Trend of High Food Security at 6 and 12 Months Relative to Baseline Among Youth 12 Years of Age and Older Who Were Newly Introduced to the FVPP.

Child food security status was assessed via the Self-Administered Food Security Survey Module for Youth only with children aged 12 years and older based on prior research recommendations. The sum of affirmative responses (a lot or sometimes) to nine questions represented the respondent's raw score on the scale. Food security status was assigned by raw score (0-1=high/marginal food security; 2-5=low food security; 6-9=very low food security). High food security (outcome analyzed) was assigned to those with raw scores less than or equal to 1.

Time frame: Baseline, 6 months,12 months

Population: This outcome measure was pre-specified to only assess participants in the low/no exposure to FVPP group. Analysis includes data from youth 12 years of age and older who were newly introduced to the FVPP and completed the Self-Administered Food Security Survey Module for Youth.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
No/Low ExposureOdds Ratio Evaluating the Longitudinal Trend of High Food Security at 6 and 12 Months Relative to Baseline Among Youth 12 Years of Age and Older Who Were Newly Introduced to the FVPP.Odds ratios for higher food security (6 months versus baseline)0.86 High Food Security Odds Ratio
No/Low ExposureOdds Ratio Evaluating the Longitudinal Trend of High Food Security at 6 and 12 Months Relative to Baseline Among Youth 12 Years of Age and Older Who Were Newly Introduced to the FVPP.Odds ratios for higher food security (12 months versus baseline)0.64 High Food Security Odds Ratio
Primary

Odds Ratio Evaluating the Longitudinal Trend of High Food Security for the Household at 6, 12, 18 and 24 Months Relative to Baseline Among Caregivers Newly Introduced to the FVPP

Household food security was assessed using the US Household Food Security Module: Six Item Short Form (National Center for Health Statistics) via caregiver report. The sum of affirmative responses to six questions served as the household's raw score. Food security status was assigned based on a calculated raw score (0-1=high/marginal food security; 2-4=low food security; 5-6 very low food security). High food security (outcome analyzed) was assigned to those with raw scores less than or equal to 1.

Time frame: Baseline, 6 months, 12 months, 18 months, 24 months

Population: This outcome measure was pre-specified to only assess participants in the low/no exposure to FVPP group. Analysis includes data from caregivers newly introduced to the FVPP who completed the US Household Food Security Module.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
No/Low ExposureOdds Ratio Evaluating the Longitudinal Trend of High Food Security for the Household at 6, 12, 18 and 24 Months Relative to Baseline Among Caregivers Newly Introduced to the FVPPOdds ratios for higher food security (6 months versus baseline)0.87 High Food Security Odds Ratio
No/Low ExposureOdds Ratio Evaluating the Longitudinal Trend of High Food Security for the Household at 6, 12, 18 and 24 Months Relative to Baseline Among Caregivers Newly Introduced to the FVPPOdds ratios for higher food security (12 months versus baseline)0.92 High Food Security Odds Ratio
No/Low ExposureOdds Ratio Evaluating the Longitudinal Trend of High Food Security for the Household at 6, 12, 18 and 24 Months Relative to Baseline Among Caregivers Newly Introduced to the FVPPOdds ratios for higher food security (18 months versus baseline)0.71 High Food Security Odds Ratio
No/Low ExposureOdds Ratio Evaluating the Longitudinal Trend of High Food Security for the Household at 6, 12, 18 and 24 Months Relative to Baseline Among Caregivers Newly Introduced to the FVPPOdds ratios for higher food security (24 months versus baseline)0.92 High Food Security Odds Ratio
Primary

Odds Ratio Evaluating the Longitudinal Trend of High Food Security for the Household at 6 and 12 Months Relative to Baseline Among Caregivers Newly Introduced to the FVPP

Household food security was assessed using the US Household Food Security Module: Six Item Short Form (National Center for Health Statistics) via caregiver report. The sum of affirmative responses to six questions served as the household's raw score. Food security status was assigned based on a calculated raw score (0-1=high/marginal food security; 2-4=low food security; 5-6 very low food security). High food security (outcome analyzed) was assigned to those with raw scores less than or equal to 1.

Time frame: Baseline, 6 months,12 months

Population: This outcome measure was pre-specified to only assess participants in the low/no exposure to FVPP group. Analysis includes data from caregivers with no/low exposure to th FVPP at baseline who completed the entire US Household Food Security Module.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
No/Low ExposureOdds Ratio Evaluating the Longitudinal Trend of High Food Security for the Household at 6 and 12 Months Relative to Baseline Among Caregivers Newly Introduced to the FVPPOdds ratios for higher food security (6 months versus baseline)0.87 High Food Security Odds Ratio
No/Low ExposureOdds Ratio Evaluating the Longitudinal Trend of High Food Security for the Household at 6 and 12 Months Relative to Baseline Among Caregivers Newly Introduced to the FVPPOdds ratios for higher food security (12 months versus baseline)0.92 High Food Security Odds Ratio
Secondary

Change From Baseline BMI at 6, 12, 18 and 24 Months Among Youth Participants Newly Introduced to the FVPP

Body mass index (BMI) was calculated from child weight and height (weight (kg)/\[height (m)\]2). BMI was then categorized into percentiles by sex and age to serve as an indicator of overweight and obesity. Child overweight and obesity status were categorized as follows: overweight (95th percentile for age and sex \> BMI ≥ 85th percentile for age and sex), obese (BMI ≥ 95th percentile for age and sex). Because achievement of healthy weight in youth (85th percentile for age and sex ≥ BMI \> 5th percentile for age and sex) was a secondary objective, a negative change in BMI percentile represents a desirable outcome.

Time frame: Baseline, 6 months, 12 months, 18 months, 24 months

Population: This outcome measure was pre-specified to only assess participants in the low/no exposure to FVPP group. Pediatric patients with recorded height and weight measurements.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)
No/Low ExposureChange From Baseline BMI at 6, 12, 18 and 24 Months Among Youth Participants Newly Introduced to the FVPPChange in BMI percentile (6 months versus baseline)-0.48 BMI percentile
No/Low ExposureChange From Baseline BMI at 6, 12, 18 and 24 Months Among Youth Participants Newly Introduced to the FVPPChange in BMI percentile (12 months versus baseline)-1.93 BMI percentile
No/Low ExposureChange From Baseline BMI at 6, 12, 18 and 24 Months Among Youth Participants Newly Introduced to the FVPPChange in BMI percentile (18 months versus baseline)-1.98 BMI percentile
No/Low ExposureChange From Baseline BMI at 6, 12, 18 and 24 Months Among Youth Participants Newly Introduced to the FVPPChange in BMI percentile (24 months versus baseline)-3.43 BMI percentile
Secondary

Change From Baseline Child BMI at 6 and 12 Months Among Youth Participants Newly Introduced to the FVPP

Body mass index (BMI) was calculated from child weight and height (weight (kg)/\[height (m)\]2). BMI was then categorized into percentiles by sex and age to serve as an indicator of overweight and obesity. Child overweight and obesity status were categorized as follows: overweight (95th percentile for age and sex \> BMI ≥ 85th percentile for age and sex), obese (BMI ≥ 95th percentile for age and sex). Because achievement of healthy weight in youth (85th percentile for age and sex ≥ BMI \> 5th percentile for age and sex) was a secondary objective, a negative change in BMI percentile represents a desirable outcome.

Time frame: Baseline, 6 months,12 months

Population: This outcome measure was pre-specified to only assess participants in the low/no exposure to FVPP group. Pediatric patients with recorded height and weight measurements.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)
No/Low ExposureChange From Baseline Child BMI at 6 and 12 Months Among Youth Participants Newly Introduced to the FVPPChange in BMI percentiles (6 months versus baseline)-0.48 BMI percentile
No/Low ExposureChange From Baseline Child BMI at 6 and 12 Months Among Youth Participants Newly Introduced to the FVPPChange in BMI percentile (12 months versus baseline)-1.93 BMI percentile
Secondary

Change From Caregiver-reported Baseline Mean Daily Intake of Fruits and Vegetables at 6, 12, 18 and 24 Months Among Caregivers Newly Introduced to the FVPP

To investigate whether exposure to the pediatric fruit and vegetable prescription program is associated with increased fruit and vegetable consumption among caregivers, dietary data from caregivers was collected using the National Cancer Institute Fruit & Vegetable Intake All Day Screener which asks frequency and portion size questions about nine food items. This will be used to calculate mean daily intake of vegetables and total fruits.

Time frame: Baseline, 6 months, 12 months, 18 months, 24 months

Population: This outcome measure was pre-specified to only assess participants in the low/no exposure to FVPP group. Analysis includes data from caregivers newly introduced to the FVPP who completed the NCI All Day Screener.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)
No/Low ExposureChange From Caregiver-reported Baseline Mean Daily Intake of Fruits and Vegetables at 6, 12, 18 and 24 Months Among Caregivers Newly Introduced to the FVPPChange in mean daily intake of fruits and vegetables (6 months versus baseline)-0.21 cup equivalents per day
No/Low ExposureChange From Caregiver-reported Baseline Mean Daily Intake of Fruits and Vegetables at 6, 12, 18 and 24 Months Among Caregivers Newly Introduced to the FVPPChange in mean daily intake of fruits and vegetables (12 months versus baseline)-0.56 cup equivalents per day
No/Low ExposureChange From Caregiver-reported Baseline Mean Daily Intake of Fruits and Vegetables at 6, 12, 18 and 24 Months Among Caregivers Newly Introduced to the FVPPChange in mean daily intake of fruits and vegetables (18 months versus baseline)-0.90 cup equivalents per day
No/Low ExposureChange From Caregiver-reported Baseline Mean Daily Intake of Fruits and Vegetables at 6, 12, 18 and 24 Months Among Caregivers Newly Introduced to the FVPPChange in mean daily intake of fruits and vegetables (24 months versus baseline)-0.50 cup equivalents per day
Secondary

Change From Caregiver-reported Baseline Mean Daily Intake of Fruits and Vegetables at 6 and 12 Months Among Caregivers Newly Introduced to the FVPP

To investigate whether exposure to the pediatric fruit and vegetable prescription program is associated with increased fruit and vegetable consumption among caregivers, dietary data from caregivers was collected using the National Cancer Institute Fruit & Vegetable Intake All Day Screener which asks frequency and portion size questions about nine food items. This will be used to calculate mean daily intake of vegetables and total fruits.

Time frame: Baseline, 6 months, 12 months

Population: This outcome measure was pre-specified to only assess participants in the low/no exposure to FVPP group. Analysis includes data from caregivers newly introduced to the FVPP who completed the NCI All Day Screener.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)
No/Low ExposureChange From Caregiver-reported Baseline Mean Daily Intake of Fruits and Vegetables at 6 and 12 Months Among Caregivers Newly Introduced to the FVPPChange in mean daily intake of fruits and vegetables (6 months versus baseline)-0.21 cup equivalents per day
No/Low ExposureChange From Caregiver-reported Baseline Mean Daily Intake of Fruits and Vegetables at 6 and 12 Months Among Caregivers Newly Introduced to the FVPPChange in mean daily intake of fruits and vegetables (12 months versus baseline)-0.56 cup equivalents per day

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 19, 2026