Skip to content

Effect of High-Dose NAC on Patients With DPN

Effect of High-Dose N-acetyl Cysteine (NAC) on the Inflammatory Markers and Clinical Outcome of Patients With Diabetic Peripheral Neuropathy (DPN)

Status
UNKNOWN
Phases
Phase 4
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT04766450
Acronym
NAC
Enrollment
30
Registered
2021-02-23
Start date
2021-12-01
Completion date
2022-12-01
Last updated
2022-08-08

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Diabetic Neuropathies

Brief summary

The aim of the current study is to evaluate the efficacy and safety of high dose oral NAC (2400 mg/day divided into two doses) as an adjunct therapy on oxidative stress, inflammatory markers and clinical outcome in patients with type 2 diabetes suffering from diabetic peripheral neuropathy.

Detailed description

Patient written informed consent will be taken prior to study conductance * Lab assessment will be done at baseline and at the end of the study by withdrawing 7 ml of whole blood for assessment of following parameters: HbA1c, Liver & renal functions * Inflammatory markers including: Human Nuclear factor erythroid 2-related factor (NRF2) & Tumor necrosis factor alpha (TNF-α) using ELISA Kit * Oxidative stress markers: Glutathione Peroxidase using ELISA Kit Inflammatory and oxidative stress marker samples will be stored at -80 for further evaluation using ELISA kit at the end of the study

Interventions

NAC exhibits potent anti-oxidant activity in the cell through augmentation of intracellular GSH, which is a major component of the pathways by which cells are protected from OTS, and its direct scavenging activity of free radicals by providing sulfhydryl groups. Additionally, NAC treatment exhibits anti-inflammatory effects via inhibition of NF-κB activation and reducing subsequent cytokine production . Mitochondria-protective mechanisms of NAC may also be related to its anti-oxidant and anti-inflammatory properties

Sponsors

Ain Shams University
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Intervention model description

Randomized controlled clinical trial

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 50 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

1. Males or females aged 18-50 years diagnosed with Type 2 Diabetes taking oral hypoglycemic with controlled at HbA1c (6%-7%.) 2. Patients diagnosed with Diabetic Neuropathy (by pinprick, temperature probe, ankle reflex, and vibration perception (128-Hz tuning fork) or pressure sensation (10 g monofilament test).

Exclusion criteria

1. Patients with acute and chronic inflammatory conditions, consuming any antioxidant supplements or anti-inflammatory medicines. 2. Pregnancy or lactation or expecting to get pregnant during the study. 3. Medical, psychological, or pharmacological factors interfering with the collection or interpretation of study data. 4. Cancer patients. 5. Anyone having hypersensitivity to N-acetylcysteine. 6. Anyone already taking N-acetylcysteine.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Concentration of Human Nuclear factor erythroid 2-related factor (NRF2)change from baseline Human Nuclear factor erythroid 2-related factor at 3 monthsInflammatory marker
Concentration of Tumor necrosis factor alphaChange from baseline tumor necrosis factor alpha at 3 monthsInflammatory marker
Concentration of Glutathione peroxidaseChange from baseline glutathione peroxidase at 3 monthsOxidative stress markers

Other

MeasureTime frameDescription
Michigan neuropathy screening instrument.At baseline and after 3 monthsQuestionnaire of 15 yes or no questions. score of 13 or more means more neuropathic symptoms
Toronto clinical scoring systemAt baseline and after 3 monthsQuestionnaire. as score increase means symptoms increase

Countries

Egypt

Contacts

Primary ContactSherien Emara, TA
sherienemara@hotmail.com01154089169
Backup ContactSara Farid Mohamed, Lecturer

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 5, 2026