Skip to content

Effect of Motor Imagery Training on Gait and Balance in Children With Spastic Hemiplegia

Effect of Motor Imagery Training on Gait and Balance in Children With Spastic Hemiplegia

Status
UNKNOWN
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT04765917
Enrollment
50
Registered
2021-02-23
Start date
2021-02-01
Completion date
2022-04-01
Last updated
2021-04-13

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Cerebral Palsy, Spastic

Brief summary

This study aims to: * Investigate the effect of motor imagery training on gait kinematics in children with spastic hemiplegia. * Determine the effect of motor imagery training on balance in children with spastic hemiplegia. * Assess the effect of motor imagery training on trunk endurance in children with spastic hemiplegia.

Detailed description

Children with spastic hemiplegia may experience a variety of concomitant health conditions including, movement difficulty, postural and balance instability, muscle spasticity, difficulty with motor planning and control, and cognitive impairments. Postural and balance disturbances occur due to the difficulty in maintaining the body segments aligned on narrow base of support and there is limitation in balance recovery in hemiplegic children contributing to delayed responses of ankle muscles, inappropriate sequencing, and increased coactivation of agonists/ antagonists muscles. Treatment will vary depending on the severity of impairments, level of activity, participation, and on the priorities highlighted by the patient. Walking is often identified as a main goal, and there is evidence that children with hemiplegia can take steps before regaining standing balance, which would support early walking. Many advanced treatment approaches are used to help improve motor function and gait in patients with hemiplegic CP. Rehabilitation techniques are predominantly focused on alleviating the compromised motor execution facet of action performance, and have not specifically targeted the motor preparation or planning processes. Motor imagery is proposed to be a backdoor mechanism to access the motor system. It being a theoretically feasible method to activate the immature networks involved in motor control. Therefore, for individuals with motor planning problems this cognitive MI training may be useful to improve motor skills. Although it has been shown to be beneficial in adult patients with stroke, and it still awaits empirical testing in young children with CP. Despite the potential benefits of motor imagery training, clinical use of motor imagery training for improving walking and balance abilities is not yet common compared with other conventional modalities in rehabilitation of children with hemiplegia. Consequently, more research and further confirmation are needed regarding the impact of motor imagery training on the gait performance, balance and trunk endurance in children with hemiplegia. Therefore, the purpose of this study to investigate the effect of motor imagery training on balance and kinematic parameters of gait in children with hemiplegia.

Interventions

OTHERSelected physical Therapy program

-Facilitation of balance reactions from standing position including: Standing on one leg, weight shifting from standing position, stoop and recover from standing, squat from standing, standing on balance board and pushing the child in different directions. * Facilitation of counterpoising mechanism through instructing the child to kick ball from standing position as well as catching and throwing ball with his hands. * Strengthening exercises for weakened muscles in upper and lower limbs muscle. * Strengthening exercises for back and abdominal muscles. * Stretching exercises for tight muscles in upper and lower limbs. * Gait training activities for correction of gait pattern including: walking on balance beam, walking on balance board, walking on uneven surface, walking using different obstacles (rolls, wedges, stepper) and walking up and down stairs. * Jumping in place and jumping a board.

OTHERMotor imagery training program

As a preparation each child will be shown a video of 5 minutes of normal movements. They will be positioned in a comfortable position. The screen is in the child's visual field. Children will be asked to close their eyes and imagine they will perform the physically practiced task for 10 minutes, similar to one shown in the video. Sequence of the task will be verbally explained to the child for better recalling of sensations in muscles during the movements. During the entire exercise schedule child's attention will be focused on the position, and movement of their body, on proprioceptive inputs coming from the leg muscles and on the tactile sensations of foot floor contact. Thereafter, the child will be asked to perform the sequence of tasks, rehearsed mentally for 20 minutes.

Sponsors

Cairo University
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
TRIPLE (Subject, Investigator, Outcomes Assessor)

Intervention model description

2 different groups receive different interventions at the same time during the study

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
7 Years to 10 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Their chronological age will be ranged from 7-10 years. * Their motor function will be at level I according to according to Gross Motor Function Classification System GMFCS (Palisano et al., 2008). * The degree of spasticity for these children will ranged from grade 1 to 1+ according to Modified Ashworth Scale (Bohannon and Smith, 1987). * They will be able to follow instructions during evaluation and treatment.

Exclusion criteria

Children will be excluded from the study if they have: * Cardiovascular or respiratory disorders. * Botulinium muscular injection in the last 6 months * Surgical interference in lower limbs. * Musculoskeletal problems or fixed deformities in the spine and/or lower extremities. * Seizures. * Visual or hearing impairment. * Mentally retarded children

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Assessing the change in Spatial parameters of gaitthrough study completion, an average of 3 monthsAnalysis of Spatial parameters of gait by using Kinovea software via 2D gait analysis in order to measure the changes in: stride length (cm), Step length (cm).
Assessing the change in cadencethrough study completion, an average of 3 monthsAnalysis of temporal parameters of gait by using Kinovea software via 2D gait analysis in order to measure the changes in: cadence (number of steps / minute).
Assessing the change in Angular displacement of joint in gait cyclethrough study completion, an average of 3 monthsAnalysis of Angular displacement of joint in gait cycle by using Kinovea software via 2D gait analysis in order to measure the changes in: Ankle dorsiflexion angle in initial contact, hip flexion angle at initial swing and knee extension at midstance. All of these parameters will be measured in degrees.
Assessing the change in Balancethrough study completion, an average of 3 monthsEvaluation of balance by using HUMAC balance system in order to measure the change in: modified clinical test of sensory integration test (score), limits of stability (score) and weight shift (score). The highest score is (100) and the lower score is (0). The higher scores means a better outcome.
Assessing the change in walking speedthrough study completion, an average of 3 monthsAnalysis of temporal parameters of gait by using Kinovea software via 2D gait analysis in order to measure the changes in: walking speed (meter / minute).

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Assessing the change in Trunk muscles endurancethrough study completion, an average of 3 monthsEvaluation of trunk muscles endurance by using 3 isometric endurance tests in order to measure the change in trunk muscle endurance via using: Trunk flexion endurance test (seconds), trunk extension endurance test (seconds) and lateral trunk endurance test (seconds)

Countries

Egypt

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026