Skip to content

Efficacy of Liraglutide Therapy in Patients With IPAA

Efficacy of Liraglutide Therapy in Patients With an Ileal -Pouch Anal Anastomosis (IPAA) and Chronic High Bowel Frequency

Status
Terminated
Phases
Phase 2
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT04763564
Enrollment
8
Registered
2021-02-21
Start date
2022-03-22
Completion date
2023-10-16
Last updated
2024-07-23

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Pouchitis, Irritable Pouch Syndrome

Brief summary

Patients with an ileal pouch-anal anastomosis(IPAA; pouch) due to refractory inflammatory bowel disease and increased bowel frequency in the absence of significant pouch inflammation will be randomized to liraglutide or placebo in a prospective cross over study.

Detailed description

Randomized, double-blind, 2-period, placebo- controlled, crossover proof of concept study. Ten patients with increased bowel frequency defined as bowel frequency \> 8 bowel movements in 24 hours on at least 4 of 7 days/week and presence of high bowel frequency \> 4 weeks despite adequate therapy for acute pouchitis or Crohn's like disease of the pouch will be randomized to either liraglutide or placebo treatment for 6 weeks (Period 1). Subjects will be randomized 1:1 to 1 of 2 treatment sequences, liraglutide-placebo or placebo-liraglutide, and receive either liraglutide or volume-matched placebo. After a wash-out period of at least 5 days (the half-life of liraglutide is 11-12 hours, thus the minimal washout period of 5 days is equal to 10 half-life's) patients will be crossed over to the other treatment arm (Period 2). Since high bowel frequency can result in significant malaise and dehydration, patients not responding to the respective therapies in period 1 may be crossed over after 4 weeks of therapy or in period 2 can be terminated early at week 4. The rationale behind the early termination is based on 2 open-label cohorts reporting the efficacy of liraglutide or exenatide in patients with high output ileostomies (the patient group the most comparable to the pouch patient population). Glucagon-like peptide- 1 (GLP-1) receptor agonist therapy even at the lowest dose showed an almost immediate effect reducing the ostomy output after 1-3 days in most patients.Thus, patients not responding to a 4-week therapy with a GLP-1receptor agonist are highly unlikely to respond if the therapy would be continued.

Interventions

Treatment will be initiated at 0.6 mg per day for one week. The patient will be instructed to increase the dose to 1.2/day and 1.8 mg /day in week 2 and in week 3, respectively. From week 3 after the start of the drug until week 6 the patient will apply 1.8 mg/day liraglutide. In case of intolerance (e.g. occurrence of refractory nausea) at a higher dose (e.g. 1.8 mg daily, the highest dose in this trial) liraglutide can be reduced to the previous level.

DRUGPlacebo Pen Injector

Matching placebo pens used to administer normal saline in the same fashion as for liraglutide

Sponsors

Novo Nordisk A/S
CollaboratorINDUSTRY
University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
CROSSOVER
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
QUADRUPLE (Subject, Caregiver, Investigator, Outcomes Assessor)

Intervention model description

Randomized, double-blind, 2-period, placebo-controlled, crossover proof of concept study.

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Informed consent will be obtained before any trial-related procedures * Age \> 18 years * Patients with IPAA and bowel frequency \> 8 bowel movements in 24 hours on at least 4 of 7 days/week and presence of high bowel frequency \> 4 weeks despite adequate therapy for acute pouchitis or Crohn's like disease of the pouch

Exclusion criteria

* Significant pouch inflammation defined as an endoscopic pouch disease activity index (PDAI ) ≥ 4 * Known stricture of the ileo-anal anastomosis or afferent limb stricture * New onset of high bowel frequency in the setting of acute pouchitis * IPAA since \< 6 months * Known Clostridium difficile pouchitis * Known clinically significant chronic nausea and/or vomiting in the past * Known type 1 or type 2 diabetes * History of or active neoplasia * Personal or family history of medullary thyroid carcinoma or Multiple Endocrine Neoplasia syndrome type 2 * Renal impairment defined as glomerular filtration rate (glomerular filtration rate \< 30) * Clinically significant decompensated liver disease defined as elevation of aspartate aminotransferase , alanine transaminase or bilirubin \> 2-fold the upper limits of normal (Primary Sclerosing Cholangitis with liver function tests (LFT's) \<1.5 upper limits of normal can be included) * New York Heart Association class 3 or greater heart failure or recent (within 6 months) cardiovascular event * Prior history of pancreatitis * Prior treatment with a GLP-1receptor agonist * Known hypersensitivity to liraglutide or any product components * Female who is pregnant, breast-feeding or intends to become pregnant or is of child-bearing potential and not using a highly effective contraceptive method. * Participation in any clinical trial of an approved or non-approved investigational medicinal product within 30 days before screening. * Any disorder, which in the investigator's opinion might jeopardize patient's safety or compliance with the protocol.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Mean % Reduction of Bowel Frequency in Percent of the Mean 7-day Bowel Frequency After 4 Weeks of Therapy on Liraglutide vs Placebo Compared to Baseline .Baseline, Week 4 (treatment period 1) and week 10 (treatment period 2)Mean percentage reduction of 7-day bowel frequency after 4 weeks of therapy on Liraglutide vs placebo compared to baseline (baseline is defined as the mean 7-day bowel frequency in a 7-day period during the screening period before week 0). Due to the cross-over design, the outcome is reported depending on randomization in treatment period 1 at week 4 and treatment period 2 at week 10 vs baseline.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Change in the 7 Day Mean Number of Day and Night Bowel Frequency at Week 4 and 6 vs Baseline on Liraglutide vs PlaceboBaseline, Week 4 and week 6 (treatment period 1) and week 10 and week 12 (treatment period 2)Bowel frequency during the day and night was recorded on a daily basis. The 7-day mean number of bowel movements during the day (from getting up until bedtime) and during the night (during sleep) at baseline and at weeks 4 and 6 on liraglutide or placebo therapy is depicted. Baseline, week 4 and week 6 (treatment period 1) and week 10 and week 12 (treatment period 2)
Discontinuation of Therapy in Each Treatment Armtreatment period 1 before week 6 or treatment period 2 before week 12Number of patients discontinuing Liraglutide therapy in treatment or placebo arm due to intolerance in treatment period 1 before week 6 or treatment period 2 before week 12
Mean % Reduction of Bowel Frequency in Percent of the Mean 7-day Bowel Frequency After 6 Weeks of Therapy on Liraglutide vs Placebo Compared to Baseline.Baseline, week 6 (treatment period 1) and week 12 (treatment period 2)Mean percentage reduction of 7-day bowel frequency after 6 weeks of therapy on Liraglutide vs placebo compared to baseline (baseline is defined as the mean 7-day bowel frequency in a 7-day period during the screening period before week 0). Due to the cross-over design, the outcome is reported depending on randomization in treatment period 1 at week 6 or treatment period 2 at week 12 vs baseline.

Countries

United States

Participant flow

Recruitment details

Due to an interruption in drug supply, the study was terminated after 8 of 10 patients were included.

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Liraglutide Then Placebo
Participants will be randomly assigned to 6-week Liraglutide treatment. Then after a 5-day washout, treatment will continue with 6 weeks of placebo. Liraglutide Pen Injector: Treatment will be initiated at 0.6 mg per day for one week. The patient will be instructed to increase the dose to 1.2/day and 1.8 mg /day in week 2 and in week 3, respectively. From week 3 after the start of the drug until week 6 the patient will apply 1.8 mg/day liraglutide. In case of intolerance (e.g. occurrence of refractory nausea) at a higher dose (e.g. 1.8 mg daily, the highest dose in this trial) liraglutide can be reduced to the previous level. Placebo Pen Injector: Matching placebo pens used to administer normal saline in the same fashion as for liraglutide
3
Placebo Then Liraglutide
Participants will be randomly assigned to 6-week placebo treatment. Then after a 5-day washout, treatment will continue with 6 weeks of Liraglutide. Liraglutide Pen Injector: Treatment will be initiated at 0.6 mg per day for one week. The patient will be instructed to increase the dose to 1.2/day and 1.8 mg /day in week 2 and in week 3, respectively. From week 3 after the start of the drug until week 6 the patient will apply 1.8 mg/day liraglutide. In case of intolerance (e.g. occurrence of refractory nausea) at a higher dose (e.g. 1.8 mg daily, the highest dose in this trial) liraglutide can be reduced to the previous level. Placebo Pen Injector: Matching placebo pens used to administer normal saline in the same fashion as for liraglutide
5
Total8

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicLiraglutide Then PlaceboPlacebo Then LiraglutideTotal
Age, Categorical
<=18 years
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Age, Categorical
>=65 years
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Age, Categorical
Between 18 and 65 years
3 Participants5 Participants8 Participants
Age, Continuous49 years52 years51 years
Daily bowel frequency10.9 bowel movements/day
STANDARD_DEVIATION 2.1
12.8 bowel movements/day
STANDARD_DEVIATION 2
12.1 bowel movements/day
STANDARD_DEVIATION 3.1
Race (NIH/OMB)
American Indian or Alaska Native
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Asian
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Black or African American
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
More than one race
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
White
3 Participants5 Participants8 Participants
Region of Enrollment
United States
3 Participants5 Participants8 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
2 Participants4 Participants6 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
1 Participants1 Participants2 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
0 / 80 / 8
other
Total, other adverse events
8 / 86 / 8
serious
Total, serious adverse events
0 / 80 / 8

Outcome results

Primary

Mean % Reduction of Bowel Frequency in Percent of the Mean 7-day Bowel Frequency After 4 Weeks of Therapy on Liraglutide vs Placebo Compared to Baseline .

Mean percentage reduction of 7-day bowel frequency after 4 weeks of therapy on Liraglutide vs placebo compared to baseline (baseline is defined as the mean 7-day bowel frequency in a 7-day period during the screening period before week 0). Due to the cross-over design, the outcome is reported depending on randomization in treatment period 1 at week 4 and treatment period 2 at week 10 vs baseline.

Time frame: Baseline, Week 4 (treatment period 1) and week 10 (treatment period 2)

Population: Analyses were performed according to treatment with Liraglutide vs Placebo (not according to arm/sequence).

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
LiraglutideMean % Reduction of Bowel Frequency in Percent of the Mean 7-day Bowel Frequency After 4 Weeks of Therapy on Liraglutide vs Placebo Compared to Baseline .36.3 percentage reduction of bowel frequencyStandard Deviation 19.8
PlaceboMean % Reduction of Bowel Frequency in Percent of the Mean 7-day Bowel Frequency After 4 Weeks of Therapy on Liraglutide vs Placebo Compared to Baseline .17.3 percentage reduction of bowel frequencyStandard Deviation 15.7
Comparison: The 2 treatment modalities, Liraglutide and Placebo, were compared. A repeated-measures mixed model was fitted to the data, with treatment (liraglutide or placebo), period, and treatment sequence as fixed effects and the repeated measures within the subject as a random effect.p-value: <0.03Mixed Models Analysis
Secondary

Change in the 7 Day Mean Number of Day and Night Bowel Frequency at Week 4 and 6 vs Baseline on Liraglutide vs Placebo

Bowel frequency during the day and night was recorded on a daily basis. The 7-day mean number of bowel movements during the day (from getting up until bedtime) and during the night (during sleep) at baseline and at weeks 4 and 6 on liraglutide or placebo therapy is depicted. Baseline, week 4 and week 6 (treatment period 1) and week 10 and week 12 (treatment period 2)

Time frame: Baseline, Week 4 and week 6 (treatment period 1) and week 10 and week 12 (treatment period 2)

Population: Analyses were performed according to treatment with Liraglutide vs Placebo (not according to arm/sequence).

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
LiraglutideChange in the 7 Day Mean Number of Day and Night Bowel Frequency at Week 4 and 6 vs Baseline on Liraglutide vs PlaceboBaseline Bowel Frequency Day8.8 Bowel movements / day or nightStandard Deviation 2.3
LiraglutideChange in the 7 Day Mean Number of Day and Night Bowel Frequency at Week 4 and 6 vs Baseline on Liraglutide vs PlaceboBaseline Bowel Frequency Night3.3 Bowel movements / day or nightStandard Deviation 1.7
LiraglutideChange in the 7 Day Mean Number of Day and Night Bowel Frequency at Week 4 and 6 vs Baseline on Liraglutide vs PlaceboWeek 4 Day5.3 Bowel movements / day or nightStandard Deviation 2.2
LiraglutideChange in the 7 Day Mean Number of Day and Night Bowel Frequency at Week 4 and 6 vs Baseline on Liraglutide vs PlaceboWeek 4 Night2.3 Bowel movements / day or nightStandard Deviation 1.1
LiraglutideChange in the 7 Day Mean Number of Day and Night Bowel Frequency at Week 4 and 6 vs Baseline on Liraglutide vs PlaceboWeek 6 Day5.4 Bowel movements / day or nightStandard Deviation 1.9
LiraglutideChange in the 7 Day Mean Number of Day and Night Bowel Frequency at Week 4 and 6 vs Baseline on Liraglutide vs PlaceboWeek 6 Night Placebo week 62.1 Bowel movements / day or nightStandard Deviation 1
PlaceboChange in the 7 Day Mean Number of Day and Night Bowel Frequency at Week 4 and 6 vs Baseline on Liraglutide vs PlaceboWeek 6 Day7.0 Bowel movements / day or nightStandard Deviation 2
PlaceboChange in the 7 Day Mean Number of Day and Night Bowel Frequency at Week 4 and 6 vs Baseline on Liraglutide vs PlaceboBaseline Bowel Frequency Day8.8 Bowel movements / day or nightStandard Deviation 2.3
PlaceboChange in the 7 Day Mean Number of Day and Night Bowel Frequency at Week 4 and 6 vs Baseline on Liraglutide vs PlaceboWeek 4 Night3.1 Bowel movements / day or nightStandard Deviation 1.6
PlaceboChange in the 7 Day Mean Number of Day and Night Bowel Frequency at Week 4 and 6 vs Baseline on Liraglutide vs PlaceboBaseline Bowel Frequency Night8.8 Bowel movements / day or nightStandard Deviation 2.3
PlaceboChange in the 7 Day Mean Number of Day and Night Bowel Frequency at Week 4 and 6 vs Baseline on Liraglutide vs PlaceboWeek 6 Night Placebo week 63.1 Bowel movements / day or nightStandard Deviation 1.8
PlaceboChange in the 7 Day Mean Number of Day and Night Bowel Frequency at Week 4 and 6 vs Baseline on Liraglutide vs PlaceboWeek 4 Day6.9 Bowel movements / day or nightStandard Deviation 2.2
Secondary

Discontinuation of Therapy in Each Treatment Arm

Number of patients discontinuing Liraglutide therapy in treatment or placebo arm due to intolerance in treatment period 1 before week 6 or treatment period 2 before week 12

Time frame: treatment period 1 before week 6 or treatment period 2 before week 12

Population: Analyses were performed according to treatment with Liraglutide vs Placebo (not according to arm/sequence).

ArmMeasureValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
LiraglutideDiscontinuation of Therapy in Each Treatment Arm0 Participants
PlaceboDiscontinuation of Therapy in Each Treatment Arm0 Participants
Secondary

Mean % Reduction of Bowel Frequency in Percent of the Mean 7-day Bowel Frequency After 6 Weeks of Therapy on Liraglutide vs Placebo Compared to Baseline.

Mean percentage reduction of 7-day bowel frequency after 6 weeks of therapy on Liraglutide vs placebo compared to baseline (baseline is defined as the mean 7-day bowel frequency in a 7-day period during the screening period before week 0). Due to the cross-over design, the outcome is reported depending on randomization in treatment period 1 at week 6 or treatment period 2 at week 12 vs baseline.

Time frame: Baseline, week 6 (treatment period 1) and week 12 (treatment period 2)

Population: Analyses were performed according to treatment with Liraglutide vs Placebo (not according to arm/sequence).

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
LiraglutideMean % Reduction of Bowel Frequency in Percent of the Mean 7-day Bowel Frequency After 6 Weeks of Therapy on Liraglutide vs Placebo Compared to Baseline.36.8 Percent reduction of bowel frequencyStandard Deviation 18.7
PlaceboMean % Reduction of Bowel Frequency in Percent of the Mean 7-day Bowel Frequency After 6 Weeks of Therapy on Liraglutide vs Placebo Compared to Baseline.15.7 Percent reduction of bowel frequencyStandard Deviation 5.3
Comparison: The 2 treatment modalities, Liraglutide and Placebo, were compared. A repeated-measures mixed model was fitted to the data, with treatment (liraglutide or placebo), period, and treatment sequence as fixed effects and the repeated measures within the subject as a random effect.p-value: 0.01Mixed Models Analysis

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026