Skip to content

The Use of iNPWT for Management of ALT Flap Donor Site Wound

The Use of Incisional Negative Pressure Wound Therapy for Management of Anterolateral Thigh Flap Donor Site Wound: A Prospective, Randomized Controlled Study

Status
Active, not recruiting
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT04762732
Enrollment
138
Registered
2021-02-21
Start date
2021-04-08
Completion date
2026-06-30
Last updated
2025-11-19

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Incisional Negative Pressure Wound Therapy

Keywords

free flap, head and neck cancer, wound care

Brief summary

Primary closure or skin grafting of the donor site after harvest of a anterolateral thigh flap (ALT) is associated with significant morbidity. Incisional negative pressure wound therapy (NPWT) may decrease complications in high-risk incisions. Successful use of NPWT has been reported in the treatment of ALT flap donor site wounds in a retrospective observational study, but no prospective study of NPWT application in the ALT flap donor site has been reported. This study aims to assess the incidence of complications at ALT flap donor site with an incisional NPWT device, PREVENA™. A prospective, controlled, pair-matched study has been designed to compare the effectiveness, complication rate, and scar quality of ALT flap donor site between using incisional NPWT and conventional bolster dressing.

Detailed description

Primary closure or skin grafting of the donor site after harvest of a anterolateral thigh flap (ALT) is associated with significant morbidity. Incisional negative pressure wound therapy (NPWT) may decrease complications in high-risk incisions. Successful use of NPWT has been reported in the treatment of ALT flap donor site wounds in a retrospective observational study, but no prospective study of NPWT application in the ALT flap donor site has been reported. This study aims to assessed the incidence of complications at ALT flap donor site with an incisional NPWT device, PREVENA™. A prospective, controlled, pair-matched study has been designed to compare the effectiveness, complication rate, and scar quality of ALT flap donor site between using incisional NPWT and conventional bolster dressing.

Interventions

DEVICENPWT

Wound of ALT donor site will be cared under PREVENA™ Incision Management System for 5 days post-operatively.

DEVICETraditional wound care

Wound of ALT donor site will be covered by vaseline gauze coated with tetracycline ointment (Genuine Chemical Pharmaceutical, Tao-Yuan, Taiwan), and layers of gauze.

Sponsors

National Taiwan University Hospital
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
20 Years to 80 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

The study is designed as a prospective randomized clinical trial. This study aims to enroll patients who require a free ALT flap for head and neck reconstruction. Inclusion criteria are as follows: 1. The donor site of ALT flap can be closed primarily. 2. Age≥20 years and \<80 years 3. ALT flap size measuring more than 6 cm in width 4. Patients will be required to understand and be willing to participate in the trial and be able to comply with the follow-up visits

Exclusion criteria

are as follows: 1. he donor site of ALT flap can not be closed primarily. 2. Uncontrolled diabetes mellitus, as measured by HbA1c≥10% 3. Under renal replacement therapy for more than 1 year. 4. Pregnant woman

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Development of wound dehiscence or other wound complications in the ALT flap donor site area30 daysDevelopment of wound dehiscence or other wound complications in the ALT flap donor site area during the first 6 weeks postoperatively. Wound dehiscence is defined as the splitting apart or rupturing of the margins of a previously closed wound along some or all of its length. Surgical site infection (SSI) was reported according to the revised criteria outlined by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), USA. To achieve a higher degree of objectivity, we will also adopt the modified ASEPSIS score criteria and definitions. The primary outcomes are assessed at the standardized follow-up visits by nurses and physicians in the hospital or in the outpatient clinic, who are not connected to the study and blinded to dressing allocation. The presence of dehiscence/infection at the ALT flap donor site, total or partial skin graft loss, and the need for another surgical procedure to the donor site are recorded.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
donor site scar quality6 monthsirst, we will use the Vancouver Scar Scale (VSS) for evaluation at post-operative 6 months. The VSS assesses four variables: vascularity, height/thickness, pliability and pigmentation. Each variable includes ranked subscales that are summed to obtain a total score ranging from 0 to 13, with 0 representing normal skin and 13 representing maximum alterations of the skin. The Patient and Observer Scar Assessment Scale (POSAS), which is a reliable and consistent tool used to assess scar quality, will also be employed.

Countries

Taiwan

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026