Skip to content

Kegel Exercise Pregnant Training mHealth App

Parallel-Group, Randomised Single-centred, Single-blind, Pilot and Feasibility Study for KEPT-app Trial: Study Protocol

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT04762433
Enrollment
26
Registered
2021-02-21
Start date
2021-05-17
Completion date
2021-11-17
Last updated
2022-04-04

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Pregnancy Related, Urinary Incontinence

Keywords

Pilot study, Feasibility study, Acceptability, mHealth app, Pelvic Floor Muscle Training

Brief summary

This pilot feasibility study protocol is to assess the feasibility in the future definitive trial that is the Kegel Exercise Pregnancy Training app (KEPT-app) trial. The aim of this study as follows: (1) to evaluate the recruitment capability of the pregnant women, (2) to evaluate the acceptability of the KEPT-app, (3) to determine the implementation feasibility of using KEPT-app, and (4) to determine the preliminary effectiveness of KEPT-app to improve PFMT skills of pregnant women.

Detailed description

The aim of this pilot feasibility study as follows: (1) to evaluate the recruitment capability of the pregnant women, (2) to evaluate the acceptability of the KEPT-app, (3) to determine the implementation feasibility of using KEPT-app, and (4) to determine the preliminary effectiveness of KEPT-app to improve PFMT skills of pregnant women.

Interventions

DEVICEKegel Exercise Pregnancy Training - app

KEPT-app is designed to educate pregnant women on PFMT via the step-by-step training with the capability element to improve their confidence and skills (beginner, intermediate and advance skills). Pregnant women are encouraged to continue adopt the PFMT throughout pregnancy until postpartum period. The details of the mHealth app content was developed based on the need assessment gathered from the cross-sectional study (Jaffar et al., 2020). It was conducted to identify the need of PFMT by looking at the prevalence of the UI among pregnant women and to understand their knowledge, attitude, and practices towards PFMT.

Sponsors

Universiti Putra Malaysia
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
DOUBLE (Investigator, Outcomes Assessor)

Masking description

The investigator and the assessor will be blinded as to the recruitment and allocation via the electronic consent format and the intervention via the mobile application.

Intervention model description

This study will use a single-blind, single-centre, parallel, randomized controlled trial (RCT) design which will incorporate individualised treatment flexibility, as in a real-world setting, and provide a realistic estimation in future KEPT-app RCT study (Sidik et al., 2021).

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
FEMALE
Age
18 Years to 55 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Pregnant women at 26-27 weeks of gestation, any parity with either stress UI or mixed UI will be included. * Participants are Malaysian citizens who consist of Malay, Chinese, Indian, and native ethnicities.

Exclusion criteria

* pregnant women with a chronic medical problem(s) before pregnancy, complicated pregnancies or conditions which are not advisable to practise PFMT will be excluded.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Acceptability of the mHealth app intervention.2 monthsInteractive Malay-mHealth App Usability Questionnaire Standardized outcome measure with additional Qualitative data collection 1. How many stars would you recommend this app to your friends? 2. How many stars would you rate the content of this app? 3. How many stars would you rate the comfort of using this app? 4. How many stars would you rate simplicity using this app? 5. How many stars would you rate the recruitment process using this app? 6. How many stars would you rate the quality of the app? 7. Factors influenced/hindered using this app? 8. What motivates you to continue the PFMT? (Further information will be collected via qualitative data feedback)

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Kegel's exercise adherence1 month and 2 monthsExercise Adherence Rating Scale Standardized outcome measure where the increasing PFMT adherence from lowest score (0) to maximum score (24) of Exercise Adherence Rating Scale (EARS) Increasing Exercise adherence from lowest score (0) to maximum score (24).
Self-efficacy towards Kegel's Exercise1 month and 2 monthsSelf-Efficacy Scale For Practicing Pelvic Floor Exercise Questionnaire Standardized outcome measure The final scores were obtained by calculating the mean of the items, ranging between 0 and 100, in which the higher values were equivalent to higher self-efficacy in practising PFME.
Validation of educational video1 monthPatient Educational Material Assessment Tool (PEMAT) Standardized outcome measure
Knowledge, Attitude and Practice Pelvic Floor Muscle Training1 month and 2 monthsThe overall knowledge scores ranged between 0 and 14, and a higher score suggested a higher level of knowledge. The total scores for attitude ranged between 8 and 40, with higher scores suggesting a positive attitude. The total scores for the practice domain ranged between 4 and 16, and the higher score suggested higher levels of its practice.
Quality of Life of pregnant women1 month and 2 monthsThe minimum mark was 19 and the maximum mark was 76 indicating severely affecting QOL using the Incontinence Impact Questionnaire Quality of Life (ICIQ-LUTSqol).
Urinary incontinence1 month and 2 monthsInternational Consultation on Incontinence Questionnaire-Urinary Incontinence Short Form (ICIQ-UI SF) The overall score is between 0 and 21 whereby greater values of the overall scores indicated increased severity of UI.

Countries

Malaysia

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 15, 2026