Body Weight Changes, Dietary Supplement, Exercise, Healthy Lifestyle, Overweight and Obesity
Conditions
Keywords
Fucoxanthin, Weight management, Microalgae, Exercise, Overweight
Brief summary
PhaoeSOL (Microphyt, Baillargues, France) is a microalgae-based nutritional ingredient developed with a patented production process that has New Dietary Ingredient (NDI) status from the FDA (#1120). It is an extract of the microalgae Phaeodactylum tricornutum standardized to 2.0% Fucoxanthin (FX) content by adding a food grade medium-chain triglyceride (MCT)-oil and a tocopherol-rich (Vitamin E) extract (0.5 % w:w). PhaeoSOL is intended for use as a source of the naturally occurring carotenoid, fucoxanthin, in food supplement products for the general population at levels not to exceed 437 mg/person/day for a maximal duration of 30 days of PhaeoSOL (equivalent to 10 mg fucoxanthin/person/day). Prior studies suggest that marine algae and Fucoxanthinol may have anti-obesity, lipid lowering, and glucose management enhancing properties. The purpose of this proof of concept pilot study is to examine whether dietary supplementation of PhaoeSOL enhances the benefits of women participating in an exercise and weight management program.
Detailed description
All participants will participate in a supervised exercise training 3 days per week at the HCRF consisting of a 5-min warm-up, light stretching, resistance training (3 sets of 10 repetitions @ 60%-80% 1RM on the bench press, seated row, shoulder press, lat pulldown, biceps curl, triceps extension, leg press, leg extension, leg curl, abdominal crunch/curl, back extension), and cardiovascular training (walking or cycling for 20 to 30 min training at 60% to 80% heart rate reserve \[HRR\]). Additionally, participants will be asked to accumulate 10,000 steps per day of brisk walking on non-training days (goal \> 100 min./wk. of moderate to vigorous exercise). Training will be recorded on training logs and by using an iPhone, Fitbit or pedometer. Participants will be given 1,400, 1,500 kcal/day or 1,600 kcal/day diets based on resting energy expenditure determination designed to promote a 400-500 kcal/d energy intake deficit following the American Heart Association (AHA) macronutrient distribution recommendations (55% CHO, 30% FAT, 15% PRO). A goal energy intake, weekly diet plan, examples, and a food substitution list will be provided. A phone app (e.g., MyFoodDiary) will be used to help participants monitor and adhere to energy intake goals. In our prior studies, this exercise and diet intervention has been shown to promote a 3-5 kg fat loss, 3-5% decrease in percent body fat, a maintenance in fat free mass and REE, and improved health outcomes. Primary Endpoints: Differences in body weight, body fat mass (kg and %), and waist and hip circumference at weeks 6 and 12 compared to baseline. Secondary Endpoints: Differences in resting energy expenditure, aerobic capacity, estimated 1RM, muscular endurance total work, training volume, energy and macronutrient intake, blood lipids, and HbA1c, IL6, CRPhs, TNFa, INF, Leptin, HbA1C, Insulin, Glucose, Comprehensive Clinical Panel (HDL, LDL, TG, BUN, CREAT, etc.), side effects, SF-36 quality of life at weeks 6 and 12 compared to baseline.
Interventions
In a double blind, randomized manner, 40 pre-menopausal females will ingest one of the following for 12 weeks: Treatment 1 -Placebo (218 mg/d of 100% sunflower Oil) Treatment 2 - PhaeoSOL (218 mg/d) Supplements will be prepared in softgel capsules for double blind administration by the sponsor.
In a double blind, randomized manner, 40 pre-menopausal females will ingest one of the following for 12 weeks: Treatment 1 -Placebo (218 mg/d of 100% sunflower Oil) Treatment 2 - PhaeoSOL (218 mg/d) Supplements will be prepared in softgel capsules for double blind administration by the sponsor.
Sponsors
Study design
Intervention model description
Randomized, placebo controlled, double-blind, parallel arm intervention trial.
Eligibility
Inclusion criteria
1. Has given voluntary, written, informed consent to participate in the study; 2. Healthy pre-menopausal females age 18 - 50 years; 3. Body mass index (BMI) between 25 - 35 kg/m2 and/or body fat \>30%; preferred BMI between 25-32 kg/m2; mean BMI in each group has to be in the range of 25-29.9. 4. Free-living (living in a private home, alone or with family, and able to maintain their health and hygiene without assistance); 5. In generally good health; and, 6. Willing to maintain consistent sleep duration the evening before study visits. Mean average BMI will be controlled during phone screening. Anyone with a BMI from 25-29.9 (assuming other inclusion criteria are met with no
Exclusion criteria
) will be enrolled and a list of alternatives for borderline subjects will be kept (e.g. up to 32). A log of active participants will be kept so subjects above 30 will not be added unless the mean is within 25-29.9 range
Design outcomes
Primary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Body fat mass (in Kg) | 6 and 12 weeks | Difference in body fat mass (kg) evaluated by DEXA between weeks 6 and 12 compared to baseline. |
| Body fat mass (in % of total body weight) | 6 and 12 weeks | Difference in body fat mass (% of total body weight) evaluated by DEXA between weeks 6 and 12 compared to baseline |
Secondary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Hip circumference (cm) | 6 and 12 weeks | Difference in hip circumference between weeks 6 and 12 weeks compared to baseline |
| Resting energy expenditure (Kcal/day) | 6 and 12 weeks | Difference in resting energy expenditure between weeks 6 and 12 weeks compared to baseline |
| Maximum oxygen uptake (ml/kg/min) | 6 and 12 weeks | Difference in aerobic capacity between weeks 6 and 12 weeks compared to baseline |
| Muscle strenght - 1 Repetition Maximum (Kg) | 6 and 12 weeks | Difference in estimated 1RM between weeks 6 and 12 weeks compared to baseline |
| Muscle strenght - 1 Repetition Maximum (% of estimated) | 6 and 12 weeks | Difference in estimated 1RM between weeks 6 and 12 weeks compared to baseline |
| Muscular endurance total work (Kg) | 6 and 12 weeks | Difference in muscular endurance total work between weeks 6 and 12 weeks compared to baseline |
| Energy daily intake (Kcal/day) | 6 and 12 weeks | Difference in energy and macronutrient intake between weeks 6 and 12 weeks compared to baseline |
| Blood HDL-cholesterol level (g/l) | 6 and 12 weeks | Difference in blood HDL-cholesterol level between weeks 6 and 12 weeks compared to baseline |
| Blood LDL-cholesterol level (g/l) | 6 and 12 weeks | Difference in blood LDL-cholesterol level between weeks 6 and 12 weeks compared to baseline |
| Blood total cholesterol level (g/l) | 6 and 12 weeks | Difference in blood total cholesterol level between weeks 6 and 12 weeks compared to baseline |
| Blood TGL level (g/l) | 6 and 12 weeks | Difference in blood TGL level between weeks 6 and 12 weeks compared to baseline |
| blood TNFa level (pg/ml) | 6 and 12 weeks | Difference in blood TNFa level weeks 6 and 12 weeks compared to baseline |
| blood INF level (pg/ml) | 6 and 12 weeks | Difference in blood INF level weeks 6 and 12 weeks compared to baseline |
| Total body weight (Kg) | 6 and 12 weeks | Difference in total body weight between weeks 6 and 12 weeks compared to baseline |
| blood CRPhs level (pg/ml) | 6 and 12 weeks | Difference in blood CRPhs level weeks 6 and 12 weeks compared to baseline |
| Blood insulin level (mUI/l) | 6 and 12 weeks | Difference in blood insulin level between weeks 6 and 12 weeks compared to baseline |
| Blood glucose level (mmol/l) | 6 and 12 weeks | Difference in blood glucose level between weeks 6 and 12 weeks compared to baseline |
| Blood leptin level (ng/ml) | 6 and 12 weeks | Difference in blood leptin level between weeks 6 and 12 weeks compared to baseline |
| Blood HbA1C level (%) | 6 and 12 weeks | Difference in blood HbA1C level between weeks 6 and 12 weeks compared to baseline |
| Blood Creatinine level (umol/l) | 6 and 12 weeks | Difference in blood Creatinine level between weeks 6 and 12 weeks compared to baseline |
| Blood total protein level (mmol/l) | 6 and 12 weeks | Difference in blood total protein level between weeks 6 and 12 weeks compared to baseline |
| Blood Urea/BUN ratio (mmol/l) | 6 and 12 weeks | Difference in blood Urea/BUN ratio between weeks 6 and 12 weeks compared to baseline |
| Blood Uric acid level (umol/l) | 6 and 12 weeks | Difference in blood uric acid level between weeks 6 and 12 weeks compared to baseline |
| Blood AST level (U/l) | 6 and 12 weeks | Difference in blood AST level between weeks 6 and 12 weeks compared to baseline |
| Blood ALT level (U/l) | 6 and 12 weeks | Difference in blood ALT level between weeks 6 and 12 weeks compared to baseline |
| Quality of life score (SF-36) | 6 and 12 weeks | Difference in quality of life score between weeks 6 and 12 weeks compared to baseline |
| blood IL6 level (pg/ml) | 6 and 12 weeks | Difference in blood IL6 level weeks 6 and 12 weeks compared to baseline |
| Waist circumference (cm) | 6 and 12 weeks | Difference in waist circumference between weeks 6 and 12 weeks compared to baseline |
Countries
United States